Biochar co-applied with organic amendments increased soil-plant potassium and root biomass but not crop yield

Author(s):  
Michael B. Farrar ◽  
Helen M. Wallace ◽  
Cheng-Yuan Xu ◽  
Stephen Joseph ◽  
Peter K. Dunn ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 103714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliano Bonanomi ◽  
Francesca De Filippis ◽  
Maurizio Zotti ◽  
Mohamed Idbella ◽  
Gaspare Cesarano ◽  
...  

Nematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Jose A. López-Pérez ◽  
Sara Sánchez-Moreno

Summary The increasing interest in agroecological practices and the current consideration of agrarian soils as a sustainable resource are driving the development of new strategies to manage soil parasites and diseases. The application of organic matter from different sources to reduce plant parasites contributes to circular economy by applying by-products as soil organic amendments that reduce wastes. Wine vinasse (WV) is a by-product generated to obtain alcohol from wine by physical methods in distilleries. The aim of this study was to determine the potential of WV and its combination with animal manure (WV+M) as soil biodisinfestation products. For this, it was compared with a plastic-covered control to distinguish the biodisinfestation from solarisation effect. The crops tested consisted of a tomato-Swiss chard rotation under glasshouse conditions. Their effects on Meloidogyne incognita, soil fertility, nematode community and crop yield were assessed. The results obtained after two seasons showed a reduction of M. incognita galling in the root system of both crops. The immediate effect after the treatment application was a reduction in the abundance of nematodes and changes in the nematode-based indices that affected all plots, including the control, most likely related to the tillage effect for the treatments application and the plastic cover. Soil fertility was improved by the application of WV (NO3−, Bioav. P) and WV+M (C, Ntotal, K), which reduced herbivore nematode metabolic footprints and enhanced bacterivore footprints. Our results indicate that the combination WV+M was effective reducing M. incognita infection, and improved crop yield. Use of by-products such as WV is a helpful tool for managing horticultural soils.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e0200646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junaidi Junaidi ◽  
Cynthia M. Kallenbach ◽  
Patrick F. Byrne ◽  
Steven J. Fonte

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serafín González Prieto ◽  
Tarsy Carballas ◽  
Arturo Castro

Organic amendments combined with the sowing of gramineous grasses are effective for the early protection of burnt soils (BS) but cannot restore soil N status to pre-fire level; this has led to interest in combining their use with N<sub>2</sub> fixer legumes. The effectiveness of applying poultry manure (PM; 2 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>) and sowing legumes (<em>Lotus corniculatus, Lupinus polyphyllus </em>and <em>Trifolium repens</em>) for the early protection of BS was compared with that of applying PM + <em>Lolium perenne</em> and growing these four species without PM in a 3-month pot experiment, which also included a control consisting of an unburnt soil (US). In US, the shoot and root biomass increased as follows: <em>Trifolium </em>~<em> Lotus </em>&lt;&lt; <em>Lolium </em>&lt; <em>Lupinus.</em> Compared with those grown in US, plants grown in BS were smaller and weaker in three species (<em>Lupinus, Lolium</em> and <em>Trifolium</em>). The reverse was true for the four species grown in BS+PM, which showed the benefits of PM addition. In all the treatments, plant N uptake, which prevents soil-N losses, increased as follows: <em>Trifolium </em>~ <em>Lotus</em> &lt; <em>Lupinus </em>&lt; <em>Lolium.</em> The lack of nodules observed suggested that none of the legumes fixed atmospheric-N<sub>2</sub>.


Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1455
Author(s):  
Tomasz Głąb ◽  
Krzysztof Gondek ◽  
Monika Mierzwa-Hersztek

The use of straw as a soil amendment is a well-known and recommended agronomy practice, but it can lead to negative effects on the soil and crop yield. It has been hypothesized that many problems related to the burying of straw can be overcome by pyrolyzing it. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of straw and its biochar on the biomass production of perennial ryegrass. A pot-based experiment was conducted with three factors: (i) the crop species used as feedstock, (ii) raw or pyrolyzed organic material, and (iii) the rate of organic amendments. The soil in the pots was amended with straw and biochar produced from Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus) or winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). After soil amendment application, perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) seeds were sown. During two years of the experiment, the perennial ryegrass above-ground biomass production and root biomass and morphology parameters were determined. Straw and biochar resulted in higher perennial ryegrass above-ground biomass compared with that of the non-fertilized control. However, straw amendment resulted in lower plant yields of above-ground biomass than those of the biochar treatments or the mineral fertilizer control treatment. The feedstock type (Miscanthus or wheat) significantly affected the perennial ryegrass yield. No difference was observed among wheat and Miscanthus biochar, while among straws, Miscanthus resulted in lower perennial ryegrass productivity (the higher rate of straw and biochar as soil amendments resulted in relatively high perennial ryegrass productivity). The organic amendments resulted in relatively high root biomass and length. The root:shoot ratio was lower in the treatments in which biochar was used, whereas feedstock species and amendment rate were not statistically significant for any of the root biomass and morphometric parameters. The results suggest that the use of pyrolyzed straw can be a reliable strategy instead of straw, increasing ryegrass growth and productivity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 186 ◽  
pp. 135-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne Celestina ◽  
James R. Hunt ◽  
Peter W.G. Sale ◽  
Ashley E. Franks

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1176-1179
Author(s):  
Shubham Chadha ◽  
Peeyush Sharma ◽  
Vikas Abrol ◽  
KR Sharma ◽  
Vikas Sharma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document