scholarly journals Petrophysical interpretation in shaly sand formation of a gas field in Tanzania

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1201-1213
Author(s):  
Oras Joseph Mkinga ◽  
Erik Skogen ◽  
Jon Kleppe

AbstractAn onshore gas field (hereafter called the R field—real name not revealed) is in the southeast coast of Tanzania which includes a Tertiary aged shaly sand formation (sand–shale sequences). The formation was penetrated by an exploration well R–X wherein no core was acquired, and there is no layer-wise published data of the petrophysical properties of the R field in the existing literature, which are essential to reserves estimation and production forecast. In this paper, the layer-wise interpretation of petrophysical properties was undertaken by using wireline logs to obtain parameters to build a reservoir simulation model. The properties extracted include shale volume, total and effective porosities, sand fractions and sand porosity, and water saturation. Shale volume was computed using Clavier equation from gamma ray. Density method was used to calculate total and effective porosities. Thomas–Stieber method was used to determine sand porosity and sand fraction, and water saturation was computed using Poupon–Leveaux model. The statistics of the parameters extracted are presented, where shale volume obtained that varies with zones is between 6 and 54% volume fraction, with both shale laminations and dispersed shale were identified. Total porosity obtained is in a range from 12 to 22%. Sand porosity varies between 15 and 25%, and sand fraction varies between 33 and 93% height fraction. Average water saturation obtained is between 32 and 49% volume fraction.

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 18-34
Author(s):  
Yousif Najeeb Abdul-majeed ◽  
Ahmad Abdullah Ramadhan ◽  
Ahmed Jubiar Mahmood

The aim of this study is interpretation well logs to determine Petrophysical properties of tertiary reservoir in Khabaz oil field using IP software (V.3.5). The study consisted of seven wells which distributed in Khabaz oilfield. Tertiary reservoir composed from mainly several reservoir units. These units are : Jeribe, Unit (A), Unit (A'), Unit (B), Unit (BE), Unit (E),the Unit (B) considers best reservoir unit because it has good Petrophysical properties (low water saturation and high porous media ) with high existence of hydrocarbon in this unit. Several well logging tools such as Neutron, Density, and Sonic log were used to identify total porosity, secondary porosity, and effective porosity in tertiary reservoir. For Lithological identification for tertiary reservoir units using (NPHI-RHOB) cross plot composed of dolomitic-limestone and mineralogical identification using (M/N) cross plot consist of calcite and dolomite. Shale content was estimated less than (8%) for all wells in Khabaz field. CPI results were applied for all wells in Khabaz field which be clarified movable oil concentration in specific units are: Unit (B), Unit (A') , small interval of Jeribe formation , and upper part of Unit (EB).


2021 ◽  

The understanding of low resistivity reservoir zone is one of the most challenging cases for further development in order to optimize the remaining oil and gas field productions. In the Intra-Gumai Formation “B” Field where marine clastic reservoirs are deposited, a low resistivity reservoir is being developed as a new perforation and workover target. This study discusses how to identify the cause of low resistivity case and evaluate the proper petrophysical parameters to unlock the potential reservoir pay zones. The data set consists of petrographic, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), routine core, Drill Stem Test ((DST) and wireline logs data. Petrographic, XRD, CEC and routine analysis were performed to recognize the low resistivity causes characterized by the presence of framework grain (quartz, K-feldspar and glaucony, calcite and kaolinite) observed in intergranular pore and also quartz overgrowth developed prior to kaolinite precipitation. Petrophysical analysis defines the reservoir property parameters by comparing some equations also validated with routine core and DST result. Based on the quantitative analysis carried out, namely the evaluation of the distribution of shale volume, calculation of porosity, and determination of water saturation, it is recommended to use the Stieber method for the distribution of shale volume in the reservoir and its properties, the neutron density porosity method to calculate porosity model, and the Waxman Smits method to determine the final fluid saturation model. Finally, by using the hydrocarbon saturation results in the current study, this interval was improved as pay zone. This method will be applied to other wells and other structures that have a similar depositional environment to increase hydrocarbon reserves in the same field.


2021 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 149-157
Author(s):  
Nur Farhana Salleh ◽  
◽  
Maman Hermana ◽  
Deva Prasad Ghosh

A subsurface resistivity model is important in hydrocarbon exploration primarily in the controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method. CSEM forward modelling workflow uses resistivity model as the main input in feasibility studies and inversion process. The task of building a shaly sand resistivity model becomes more complex than clean sand due to the presence of a shale matrix. In this paper, a new approach is introduced to model a robust resistivity property of shaly sand reservoirs. A volume of seismic data and three wells located in the K-field of offshore Sarawak is provided for this study. Two new seismic attributes derived from seismic attenuation property called SQp and SQs are used as main inputs to predict the volume of shale, effective porosity, and water saturation before resistivity estimation. SQp attribute has a similar response to gamma-ray indicating the lithological variation and SQs attribute is identical to resistivity as an indicator to reservoir fluids. The petrophysical predictions are performed by solving the mathematical step-wise regression between the seismic multi-attributes and predicted petrophysical properties at the well locations. Subsequently, resistivity values are estimated using the Poupon-Leveaux (Indonesia) equation, an improvised model from Archie’s to derive the mathematical relationship of shaly sand’s resistivity to the volume and resistivity of clay matrix in shaly sand reservoirs. The resistivity modeled from the predicted petrophysical properties distributed consistently with sand distribution delineated from SQp attribute mainly in southeast, northeast, and west regions. The gas distribution of the net sand modeled by 5% and 90% of gas saturation scenarios also changed correspondingly to SQs attribute anomaly indicating the consistent fluid distribution between the modeled resistivity and SQs attribute.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
Raja Asim Zeb ◽  
Muhammad Haziq Khan ◽  
Intikhab Alam ◽  
Ahtisham Khalid ◽  
Muhammad Faisal Younas

The lower Indus basin is leading hydrocarbon carriage sedimentary basin in Pakistan. Evaluation of two sorts out wells namely Sawan-2 and Sawan-3 has been assumed in this work for estimation and dispensation of petro physical framework using well log data. The systematic formation assessment by using petro physical studies and neutron density cross plots reveal that lithofacies mainly composed of sandstone. The hydrocarbon capability of the formation zone have been mark through several isometric maps such as water saturation, picket plots, cross plots, log analysis Phie vs depth and composite log analysis. The estimated petro physical properties shows that reservoir have volume of shale 6.1% and 14.0%, total porosity is observed between 14.6% and 18.2%, effective porosity ranges 12.5-16.5%, water saturation exhibits between 14.05% and 31.58%, hydrocarbon saturation ranges 68.42% -86.9%, The lithology of lower goru formation is dominated by very fine to fine and silty sandstone. The study method can be use within the vicinity of central Indus basin and similar basin elsewhere in the globe to quantify petro physical properties of oil and gas wells and comprehend the reservoir potential.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1941-1947
Author(s):  
C Eze ◽  
G Emujakporue ◽  
DC Okujagu

Petrophysical-Modelling is indispensable in upstream Projects, considering the high cost, risks and uncertainties associated with this sector. Petrophysical qualities for Queen Field was modeled using Information obtained and analyzed from well-logs and 3-D Seismic data. Coarse-grain, Medium- grain and fine-grain Sands as well as Shale were all delineated by GR log. Results of petrophysical evaluation conducted on seven reservoir intervals correlated across the field showed that; Shale volume was below 35%, Total Porosity are > 20% Effective Porosity are >15% Permeability is > 380.00mD all of this conforms to excellent reservoir quantity. Seismic interpretation showed the presence of synthetic and antithetic faults. Two horizons were mapped on seismic data and utilized for modeling. These models were the framework for facies and petrophysical properties distribution. Facies models were generated using sequential indicator simulation while petrophysical properties were generated using sequential gaussian simulation algorithm. A comparison was further done between facies constrained and non-facies constrained models. It was found that for Porosity, Permeability, Water of Saturation and Shale Volume Models not constrained to facies all showed overestimated Models, in addition Stochastic STOIIP not constrained to facies gave an Over Estimated P50 value for Surface I and O Reservoir Interval as 624.028M, 76.28MM, when compared to Stochastic Hydrocarbon STOIIP when constrained to facies that showed Stochastic P50 value of 513,247 and 67.04MM for surface I and O and Deterministic STOIIP of 742.90M and 87.88MM. This study validates the practice of constraining Petrophysical model to facies available on the field as the best practice. Keywords: Queen Field, Onshore, Niger Delta, 3D Petrophysical.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-116
Author(s):  
Hasan Saleh Azeez ◽  
Dr. Abdul Aali Al-Dabaj ◽  
Dr.Samaher Lazim

Mansuriya Gas field is an elongated anticlinal structure aligned from NW to SE, about 25 km long and 5-6 km wide. Jeribe formation is considered the main reservoir where it contains condensate fluid and has a uniform thickness of about 60 m. The reservoir is significantly over-pressured, (TPOC, 2014). This research is about well logs analysis, which involves the determination of Archie petrophysical parameters, water saturation, porosity, permeability and lithology. The interpretations and cross plots are done using Interactive Petrophysics (IP) V3.5 software. The rock parameters (a, m and n) values are important in determining the water saturation where (m) can be calculated by plotting the porosity from core and the formation factor from core on logarithmic scale for both and the slope which represent (m) then Pickett plot method is used to determine the other parameters after calculating Rw from water analysis . The Matrix Identification (MID), M-N and Density-Neutron crossplots indicates that the lithology of Jeribe Formation consists of dolomite, limestone with some anhydrite also gas-trend is clear in the Jeribe Formation. The main reservoir, Jeribe Formation carbonate, is subdivided into 8 zones namely  J1 to J8, based mainly on porosity log (RHOB and NPHI) trend, DT trend and saturation trend.  Jeribe formation was considered to be clean in terms of shale content .The higher gamma ray because of the uranium component which is often associated with dolomitisationl and when it is removed and only comprises the thorium and potassium-40 contributions, showed the gamma response to be low compared to the total gamma ray response that also contains the uranium   contribution.While the Jeribe formation is considered to be clean in terms of shale content so the total porosity is equal to the effective porosity.No porosity cut off is found if cutoff permeability 0.01 md is applied while the porosity cut off approximately equal to 0.1 only for unit J6 & J8 if cutoff permeability 0.1 md is applied . It can be concluded that no saturation cutoff for the units of Jeribe formation is found after a cross plot between water saturation and log porosity for the reservoir units of Jeribe formation and applied the calculated cut off porosity. The permeability has been predicted using two methods: FZI and Classical, the two methods yield approximately the same results for all wells.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Taheri K

Determination of petrophysical parameters is necessary for modeling hydrocarbon reservoir rock. The petrophysical properties of rocks influenced mainly by the presence of clay in sedimentary environments. Accurate determination of reservoir quality and other petrophysical parameters such as porosity, type, and distribution of reservoir fluid, and lithology are based on evaluation and determination of shale volume. If the effect of shale volume in the formation not calculated and considered, it will have an apparent impact on the results of calculating the porosity and saturation of the reservoir water. This study performed due to the importance of shale in petrophysical calculations of this gas reservoir. The shale volume and its effect on determining the petrophysical properties and ignoring it studied in gas well P19. This evaluation was performed in Formations A and B at depths of 3363.77 to 3738.98 m with a thickness of 375 m using a probabilistic calculation method. The results of evaluations of this well without considering shale showed that the total porosity was 0.1 percent, the complete water saturation was 31 percent, and the active water saturation was 29 percent, which led to a 1 percent increase in effective porosity. The difference between water saturation values in Archie and Indonesia methods and 3.3 percent shale volume in the zones show that despite the low shale volume in Formations A and B, its effect on petrophysical parameters has been significant. The results showed that if the shale effect not seen in the evaluation of this gas reservoir, it can lead to significant errors in calculations and correct determination of petrophysical parameters.


Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 1457-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam P. Koesoemadinata ◽  
George A. McMechan

Viscoelastic seismic parameters are expressions of underlying petrophysical properties. Theoretical and empirically derived petrophysical/seismic relations exist, but each is limited in the number and the range of values of the variables used. To provide a more comprehensive empirical model, we combined lab measurements from 18 published data sets and well log data for sandstone samples, and determined least‐squares coefficients across them all. The dependent variables are the seismic parameters of bulk density (ρ), compressional and shear wave velocities ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]), and compressional and shear wave quality factors ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]). The independent variables are effective pressure, porosity, clay content, water saturation, permeability, and frequency. As the derived expressions are empirical correlations, no causal relations should be inferred. Prediction of ρ is based on volumetric mixing of the constituents. For [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] predictions, separate sets of coefficients are fitted for three water saturation conditions: dry, partially saturated, and fully saturated. Predictions of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are fitted as functions of porosity, clay content, effective pressure, saturation, and frequency. Predictions of [Formula: see text] are fitted as a function of porosity, clay content, permeability, saturation, frequency, and pressure. Interactions between effective pressure, saturation, and frequency are included. Predictions of [Formula: see text] are obtained from [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The result is a composite model that is more comprehensive than previous models and that predicts seismic properties from the petrophysical properties. Empirically estimated values of ρ, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] for the composite data over all saturations predict the measurements with correlation coefficients [Formula: see text] that range from a low of 0.65 (for [Formula: see text],) to a high of 0.90 (for [Formula: see text]). As the fitted relations have been derived from data with limited parameter ranges, extrapolation is not advised, and they are not intended to substitute for locally derived relations based on site‐specific data. Nevertheless, the derived expressions produce representative values that will be useful when approximate, internally consistent predictions are sufficient. Potential future applications include building of seismic reservoir models from petrophysical data and analysis of the sensitivity of seismic data to changes in reservoir properties.


Author(s):  
S. M. Talha Qadri ◽  
Md Aminul Islam ◽  
Mohamed Ragab Shalaby ◽  
Ahmed K. Abd El-Aal

AbstractThe study used the sedimentological and well log-based petrophysical analysis to evaluate the Farewell sandstone, the reservoir formation within the Kupe South Field. The sedimentological analysis was based on the data sets from Kupe South-1 to 5 wells, comprising the grain size, permeability, porosity, the total cement concentrations, and imprints of diagenetic processes on the reservoir formation. Moreover, well log analysis was carried on the four wells namely Kupe South 1, 2, 5 and 7 wells for evaluating the parameters e.g., shale volume, total and effective porosity, water wetness and hydrocarbon saturation, which influence the reservoir quality. The results from the sedimentological analysis demonstrated that the Farewell sandstone is compositionally varying from feldspathic arenite to lithic arenite. The analysis also showed the presence of significant total porosity and permeability fluctuating between 10.2 and 26.2% and 0.43–1376 mD, respectively. The diagenetic processes revealed the presence of authigenic clay and carbonate obstructing the pore spaces along with the occurrence of well-connected secondary and hybrid pores which eventually improved the reservoir quality of the Farewell sandstone. The well log analysis showed the presence of low shale volume between 10.9 and 29%, very good total and effective porosity values ranging from 19 to 32.3% as well as from 17 to 27%, respectively. The water saturation ranged from 22.3 to 44.9% and a significant hydrocarbon saturation fluctuating from 55.1 to 77.7% was also observed. The well log analysis also indicated the existence of nine hydrocarbon-bearing zones. The integrated findings from sedimentological and well log analyses verified the Farewell sandstone as a good reservoir formation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. SAE9-SAE18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Alvarez ◽  
Francisco Bolívar ◽  
Mario Di Luca ◽  
Trino Salinas

The multiattribute rotation scheme (MARS) is a methodology that uses a numerical solution to estimate a transform to predict petrophysical properties from elastic attributes. This is achieved by estimating a new attribute in the direction of maximum change of a target property in an [Formula: see text]-dimensional Euclidean space formed by an [Formula: see text] number of attributes and subsequent scaling of this attribute to the target unit properties. We have computed the transform from well-log-derived elastic attributes and petrophysical properties, and we have posteriorly applied it to seismically derived elastic attributes. Such transforms can be used to estimate reservoir property volumes for reservoir characterization and delineation in exploration and production settings and to estimate secondary variables in geostatistical workflows for static model generation and reserve estimation. To illustrate the methodology, we applied MARS to estimate a transform to predict the water saturation and total porosity from elastic attributes in a well located in the Barents Sea as well as to estimate a water-saturation volume in a mud-rich turbidite gas reservoir located onshore Colombia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document