scholarly journals Early detection of deep vein thrombosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: who to screen and who not to with Doppler ultrasound?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Ierardi ◽  
Andrea Coppola ◽  
Stefano Fusco ◽  
Elvira Stellato ◽  
Stefano Aliberti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Is Colour Doppler Ultrasound a Sensitive Screening Method in Diagnosing Deep Vein Thrombosis after Hip Surgery ?

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (02) ◽  
pp. 242-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Magnusson ◽  
Bengt I Eriksson ◽  
Peter Kãlebo ◽  
Ramon Sivertsson
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Colour Doppler ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Colour Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryPatients undergoing orthopedic surgery are at high risk of developing deep vein thrombosis. One hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients undergoing total hip replacement or hip fracture surgery were included in this study. They were surveilled with colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and bilateral ascending contrast phlebography. The prevalence of proximal and distal DVT in this study was 5.8% and 20.3% respectively.CDU has a satisfactory sensitivity in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, especially in the proximal region. These results could not be confirmed in the present study of asymptomatic patients. The sensitivity was 62.5% (95% confidence interval: C.I. 24-91%) and the specificity 99.6% (C.I. 98-100%) for proximal DVT; 53.6% (C.I. 34-73%) and 98% (C.I. 96-99%) respectively for distal thrombi. The overall sensitivity was 58.1% (C.I. 39-75%) and the specificity 98% (C.I. 96-99%). The positive predictive value was 83.3% (C.I. 36-99%) and 75% (C.I. 51-91%) for proximal and distal DVT respectively. The negative predictive value was 98.9% (C.I. 98-100%) and 94.9% (C.I. 92-98%) for proximal and distal DVT respectively. The results of this study showed that even with a highly specialised and experienced investigator the sensitivity of CDU was too low to make it suitable for screening purposes in a high risk surgical population.

Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis by Combination of Doppler Ultrasound Flow Examination and Strain Gauge Plethysmography

1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (02) ◽  
pp. 141-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Bounameaux ◽  
B Krähenbühl ◽  
S Vukanovic
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Strain Gauge ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Strain Gauge Plethysmography ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryDoppler ultrasound flow examination, strain gauge plethysmography and contrast venography were performed in 160 lower limbs of 80 in-patients. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was suspected in 87 limbs. Using measurement of venous stop-flow pressure, the Doppler method had an overall sensitivity of 83%. By combined use of Doppler and Plethysmography, sensitivity was increased to 96%. Specificity was 62% and 51%, respectively. With a positive and a negative predictive value of 80% and 73%, respectively, the combination of both non-invasive methods cannot reliably replace venography in the diagnosis of DTV, although all (40/40) thromboses proximal to or involving the popliteal segment were detected by either Doppler and Plethysmography or both.After exclusion of 14 patients (18%) suffering from conditions known to alter the results of these non-invasive methods, the positive predictive value of abnormal findings in both Doppler and Plethysmography was increased to 94% for suspected limbs, whilst negative predictive value of both negative Doppler and Plethysmography was 90%, allowing the avoidance of venography in these patients.

Post-thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis: The role of follow-up Doppler ultrasound

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (5) ◽  
pp. 251-252
Author(s):  
Francisco Galeano-Valle ◽  
Jorge del-Toro-Cervera ◽  
Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Deep Vein

Comparative Study of Deep Vein Thrombosis Recanalization Using Doppler Ultrasound in Different Post-Treatment Intervals in Traumatic Patients

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazanin Farshchian ◽  
Negin Farshchian ◽  
Parisa Bahrami Kamangar
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Sonographic Diagnosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Comparative Examination

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent vascular disease characterized by pelvic and limb deep vein thrombophlebitis, and it has a high incidence in traumatic patients. Contrary to older studies, recent research has reported that recanalization in DVT is not a slow process. The present study aimed at the comparative examination of DVT recanalization with Doppler ultrasound in different intervals following treatment with heparin or enoxaparin. This prospective study was conducted on all traumatic patients hospitalized in Imam Reza Hospital of Kermanshah, Iran, with the clinical and sonographic diagnosis of DVT in limb veins. Doppler ultrasound was performed two weeks, one month, and three months following treatment in order to examine recanalization. Data were analyzed using statistical tests in SPSS16 at the significance level of <0.05. Based on Doppler ultrasound, a significant difference was found between the degree of recanalization in patients aged <45 years and those aged >45 years, between male and female patients, and between different DVT locations (P<0.05). After three months of treatment with heparin and enoxaparin, the degree of recanalization was increased in DVT. Moreover, it was found that Doppler ultrasound is a useful tool for the diagnosis of recanalization in patients with DVT.

scholarly journals Value of Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.

BMJ ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (5996) ◽  
pp. 552-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Meadway ◽  
A N Nicolaides ◽  
C J Walker ◽  
J D O'Connell
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

The Clinical Diagnosis Of Deep Venous Thrombosis

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Briët ◽  
M J Boekhout-Mussert ◽  
L H van Hulsteijn ◽  
C W Koch ◽  
H W C Loose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Diagnostic Strategies ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Fifty-three patients were examined because of suspected deep venous thrombosis, by means of clinical examination, Doppler ultrasound and venography. Eighty-two legs were examined with all three methods. Venography was positive in 40 and normal in 42. The clinical examination was false positive in 4 legs and false negative in 6. The Doppler ultrasound studies gave false positive results in 3 legs and false negative results in 6. These results are better than those reported in the literature probably because the thrombosis extended to the popliteal vein or the more proximal veins in 38 of the 40 legs with deep vein thrombosis. This high percentage of upper leg vein thrombosis can be explained by the fact that 47 of the 53 patients were ambulant when they developed the signs and symptoms of thrombosis. It is concluded, that the clinical examination and Doppler ultrasonography can be used to diagnose deep vein thrombosis in ambulant patients in our clinic. We presume that the findings reported in the literature cannot be used indiscriminately as a basis for diagnostic strategies in other hospitals because of widely varying categories of patients, referral patterns and diagnostic criteria that are virtually impossible to standardize.

Comparison of Wells Scores with Doppler Ultrasound in Deep Vein Thrombosis

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
Ali Haydar BAYKAN ◽  
Ali Ümit YENER ◽  
Kemal KORKMAZ ◽  
Bülent Çağlar BİLGİN ◽  
Umut Hasan KANTARCI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Residual Vein Thrombosis Improves Screening for Occult Cancer: Results On 537 Patients with Idiopathic Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3999-3999
Author(s):  
Sergio Siragusa ◽  
Alessandra Malato ◽  
Fabio Fulfaro ◽  
Giorgia Saccullo ◽  
Domenica Caramazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Occult Cancer ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Related Mortality

Abstract Abstract 3999 Poster Board III-935 Background Clinical advantage of extensive screening for occult cancer in patients with idiopathic Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is unknown. We have demonstrated that the Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT)-based screening for occult cancer improves early detection as well as cancer-related mortality (Siragusa S et al. Blood 2007;110(699):OC). Here we report on final analysis of 537 patients over a period of 8 years. Objective of the study We conducted a prospective study evaluating whether a RVT-based screening for cancer is sensitive and influences cancer-related mortality. Study design Prospective with two cohorts of DVT patients: the first cohort was monitored for clinical overt cancer only (Group A), while the second (Group B) received complete screening for occult neoplasm and subsequent surveillance. Materials and methods Consecutive patients with a first episode of DVT who presented RVT after 3 month of anticoagulation and without signs and/or symptoms for overt cancer. Screening for occult cancer was based on: ultrasound and/or CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis, gastroscopy, colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, hemoccult, sputum cytology and tumor markers. These tests were extended with mammography and Pap smear for women and ultrasound of the prostate and total specific prostatic antigen (PSA) for men. All investigations had to be completed within four-weeks from the assessment of RVT. All patients were followed-up for at least 2 years. Incidence and cancer-related mortality was compared between the two groups by survival curves (Kaplan-Mayer) and related Breslow test for statistics. Results Over a period of 8 years, 537 patients were included in the analysis: first cohort included 346 patients (Group A), second cohort 191 (Group B). Clinical characteristics between groups were homogenous. During the follow-up, 8.3% of patients developed overt cancer in group A; in group B, 7.8% of patients had diagnosed cancer at the moment of extensive screening while 2 new cases (0.7%) occurred during the follow-up (Table). The sensitivity of this approach was 92.1% (95% confidence intervals 75.2-104.2). Cancer-related mortality was 7.5% in group A and 3.6% in group B (p< 0.001). Conclusions The RVT-based screening for occult cancer is highly effective for improving early detection as well as cancer-related mortality in a cohort of 537 patient with DVT of the lower limbs. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Hydroxyurea use in myelofibrosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document