scholarly journals Examining the validity and consistency of the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire-Español (AEBQ-Esp) and its relationship to BMI in a Mexican population

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Hunot-Alexander ◽  
Laura Patricia Arellano-Gómez ◽  
Andrea D. Smith ◽  
Martha Kaufer-Horwitz ◽  
Edgar M. Vásquez-Garibay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Eating Behaviour ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Spanish Speaking Population

Abstract Purpose Appetitive traits in adults and their associations with weight can be measured using the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (AEBQ). The aim of this study was to confirm the factor structure of the Spanish AEBQ (AEBQ-Esp) in a Mexican sample and explore associations between the eight traits with body mass index (BMI). Method A sample of 1023 adults, mean age of 36.8 ± 12.8 years, was recruited from Guadalajara, Mexico. Researchers weighed and measured participants, and they completed the AEBQ-Esp either online or in paper format and reported sociodemographic data. To test two alternative factor structures (eight factors including Hunger; seven factors excluding Hunger), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha; test–retest reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients. Multivariate linear regressions were used to test for associations between the AEBQ subscales and BMI, adjusted for age, sex, format of AEBQ responses, education, marital and employment status. Results A seven-factor structure was the best model fit using CFA, excluding the Hunger subscale but similar to the original AEBQ. Internal reliability was good for all subscales (Cronbach’s α = 0.70–0.86), and the intra-class correlation coefficient (0.70–0.91) reflected good test–retest reliability. In the fully adjusted models, Satiety Responsiveness [β = − 0.61; (− 1.01, − 0.21)] and Slowness in Eating [β = − 0.70; (− 1.01, − 0.39)] were negatively associated with BMI, and Emotional Over-Eating [β = 0.94; (0.62, 1.27)] was positively associated with BMI. Conclusions The AEBQ-Esp (excluding Hunger) appears to be a valid and reliable psychometric questionnaire for measuring appetitive traits in a Mexican Spanish-speaking population. Some traits appear to be associated with BMI in adulthood and warrant further exploration. Level of evidence Level III evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case–control analytic studies. Although this was just an observational study, it was well designed and provided new evidence.

scholarly journals Development, factor structure and application of the Dog Obesity Risk and Appetite (DORA) questionnaire

PeerJ ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. e1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Raffan ◽  
Stephen P. Smith ◽  
Stephen O’Rahilly ◽  
Jane Wardle
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Gastrointestinal Disease ◽  
Eating Behaviour ◽  
Food Motivation ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Final Questionnaire ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background.Dogs are compelling models in which to study obesity since the condition shares many characteristics between humans and dogs. Differences in eating behaviour are recognised to contribute to obesity susceptibility in other species but this has not been systematically studied in dogs.Aim.To develop and validate an owner-reported measure of canine eating behaviour and owner or dog related factors which can alter the development of obesity. Further, to then test variation in food-motivation in dogs and its association with obesity and owner management.Methods.Owner interviews, a literature review and existing human appetite scales were used to identify relevant topics and generate items for the questionnaire. Following a pilot phase, a 75 item online questionnaire was distributed via social media. Responses from 302 dog/owner dyads were analysed and factor structure and descriptive statistics calculated. Results were compared with descriptions of dog behaviour and management from a subset of respondents during semi-structured interviews. The optimum questions were disseminated as a 34 item final questionnaire completed by 213 owners, with a subset of respondents repeating the questionnaire 3 weeks later to assess test–retest reliability.Results.Analysis of responses to the final questionnaire relating to 213 dog/owner dyads showed a coherent factor structure and good test–retest reliability. There were three dog factors (food responsiveness and satiety, lack of selectivity, Interest in food), four owner factors (owner motivation to control dog weight, owner intervention to control dog weight, restriction of human food, exercise taken) and two dog health factors (signs of gastrointestinal disease, current poor health). Eating behaviour differed between individuals and between breed groups. High scores on dog factors (high food-motivation) and low scores on owner factors (less rigorous control of diet/exercise) were associated with obesity. Owners of more highly food-motivated dogs exerted more control over their dogs’ food intake than those of less food-motivated dogs.Conclusions.The DORA questionnaire is a reliable and informative owner-reported measure of canine eating behaviour and health and management factors which can be associated with obesity development. The tool will be applicable to study of the canine obesity model and to clinical veterinarians. Results revealed eating behaviour to be similarly associated with obesity as exercise and owners giving titbits.

Developing a measure to assess clinicians’ ability to reflect on key staff–patient dynamics in forensic settings

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Polnay ◽  
Helen Walker ◽  
Christopher Gallacher
Keyword(s):  
Reflective Practice ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Purpose Relational dynamics between patients and staff in forensic settings can be complicated and demanding for both sides. Reflective practice groups (RPGs) bring clinicians together to reflect on these dynamics. To date, evaluation of RPGs has lacked quantitative focus and a suitable quantitative tool. Therefore, a self-report tool was designed. This paper aims to pilot The Relational Aspects of CarE (TRACE) scale with clinicians in a high-secure hospital and investigate its psychometric properties. Design/methodology/approach A multi-professional sample of 80 clinicians were recruited, completing TRACE and attitudes to personality disorder questionnaire (APDQ). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) determined factor structure and internal consistency of TRACE. A subset was selected to measure test–retest reliability. TRACE was cross-validated against the APDQ. Findings EFA found five factors underlying the 20 TRACE items: “awareness of common responses,” “discussing and normalising feelings;” “utilising feelings,” “wish to care” and “awareness of complicated affects.” This factor structure is complex, but items clustered logically to key areas originally used to generate items. Internal consistency (α = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.55–0.76) demonstrated borderline acceptability. TRACE demonstrated good test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.78–0.98) and face validity. TRACE indicated a slight negative correlation with APDQ. A larger data set is needed to substantiate these preliminary findings. Practical implications Early indications suggested TRACE was valid and reliable, suitable to measure the effectiveness of reflective practice. Originality/value The TRACE was a distinctive measure that filled a methodological gap in the literature.

Attachment Avoidance and Anxiety in Adolescence: Turkish Adaptation of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 1372-1394
Author(s):  
Savaş Karataş ◽  
İlkay Demir
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Close Relationships ◽  
Attachment Avoidance ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Relationship Structures ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The aim of the present study is to test the factor structure and reliability of the Experience of Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Scale (ECR-RS) mother, father, romantic partner, close friend forms among Turkish adolescents. In order to test the structure validity of the ECR-RS, exploratory factor analysis is performed on a sample of 214 participants in Study 1, and to further investigate the structure validity, confirmatory factor analysis is performed on a second sample of 286 participants in Study 2. Within the scope of the reliability studies of the ECR-RS, internal reliability and test–retest reliability of the Turkish ECR-RS are also tested. The results of the explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, and test–retest reliability scores supported the original two-factor structure (attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety) for all forms of the ECR-RS among Turkish adolescents.

scholarly journals Test-retest reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF for the measurement of physical function in psoriatic arthritis

2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.210175
Author(s):  
Ying Ying Leung ◽  
William Tillett ◽  
Pil Hojgaard ◽  
Ana-Maria Orbai ◽  
Richard Holland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Reliability Performance ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objective Due to no existing data, we aimed to derive evidence to support test-retest reliability for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form-36 item physical functioning domain (SF-36 PF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods We identified datasets that collected relevant data for test-retest reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF; and evaluated them using OMERACT Filter 2.1 methodology. We calculated intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) as a measure of test-retest reliability. We then conducted a quality assessment and evaluated the adequacy of test-retest reliability performance. Results Two datasets were identified for HAQ-DI and one for SF-36 PF in PsA. The quality of the datasets was good. The ICCs for HAQ-DI were excellent in both datasets: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.97) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.97). The ICC of SF-36 PF was good (0.89, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.95). The performance of test-retest reliability for both instruments was judged to be adequate. Conclusion The new data derived support good and reasonable test-retest reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF in PsA.

The Mandarin Voice Handicap Index for Laryngectomees With Pneumatic Artificial Laryngeal and Esophageal Speech

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Chen-Chi Wang ◽  
Jia-Shiou Liao ◽  
Hsiu-Chin Lai ◽  
Yi-Hsuan Lo
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Voice Handicap Index ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Valid Instrument ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The Voice Handicap Index (VHI) questionnaire assesses the impact of total laryngectomy on voice-related quality of life. This study evaluates the Mandarin VHI, including its internal consistency, test–retest reliability, content validity, and differences in scores for Mandarin alaryngeal patients with pneumatic artificial laryngeal (PA) and esophageal (ES) speech. Method Translation and validation of the VHI questionnaire was performed through the forward–backward translation technique. This study used a sample of 78 PA and 23 ES participants from Taiwan who completed the Mandarin VHI. Forty-two of the alaryngeal participants completed the Mandarin VHI twice over a period of 7–63 days. Results The measurement of the internal consistency of the Mandarin VHI showed a high Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total score (.975) and the functional (.930), physical (.939), and emotional (.938) subscales. Based on the results of the intraclass correlation coefficients, good test–retest reliability for the total and domain scores was found (intraclass correlation coefficient = .827–.863). Conclusion The Mandarin VHI was validated as an instrument with proper internal consistency and reliability, which supports the Mandarin VHI as a valid instrument for the self-evaluation of handicaps related to voice problems in PA and ES speakers.

Reliability of Autism-Tics, AD/HD, and other Comorbidities (A–TAC) Inventory in a Test-Retest Design

2014 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Larson ◽  
Eva Norén Selinus ◽  
Clara Hellner Gumpert ◽  
Thomas Nilsson ◽  
Nóra Kerekes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Intraclass Correlations ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The Autism-Tics, AD/HD, and other Comorbidities (A–TAC) inventory is used in epidemiological research to assess neurodevelopmental problems and coexisting conditions. Although the A–TAC has been applied in various populations, data on retest reliability are limited. The objective of the present study was to present additional reliability data. The A–TAC was administered by lay assessors and was completed on two occasions by parents of 400 individual twins, with an average interval of 70 days between test sessions. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were analysed with intraclass correlations and Cohen's κ. A–TAC showed excellent test-retest intraclass correlations for both autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (each at .84). Most modules in the A–TAC had intra- and inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients of ≥ .60. Cohen's κ indicated acceptable reliability. The current study provides statistical evidence that the A–TAC yields good test-retest reliability in a population-based cohort of children.

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of the Hindi Version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand: A Pilot Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurabh P. Mehta ◽  
Ramesh Tiruttani ◽  
Manraj N. Kaur ◽  
Joy MacDermid ◽  
Rania Karim
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Longitudinal Design ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Convergent Construct Validity ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objectives. To culturally adapt and translate the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire into Hindi (DASH-H) and assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in adult patients with shoulder tendonitis.Study Design. Descriptive methodological research, using longitudinal design.Setting. Outpatient clinic.Participants. 30 adult patients aged 53.3 ± 6.9 y with shoulder tendonitis.Data Analyses. DASH-H, visual analogue scales for pain (VAS-P) and disability (VAS-D), and shoulder active range of motion (AROM) were assessed at baseline, 2-3 days later, and 4-5 weeks after baseline. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed test-retest reliability of these scales and responsiveness was examined by calculating effect sizes (ES) and standardized response means (SRM). Cronbach’s alpha (CA) was used to examine internal consistency of DASH-H. Convergent construct validity of DASH-H with VAS scales and shoulder AROM was determined using Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients (r).Results. DASH-H demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency (ICC and CA both > 0.75) and excellent responsiveness (ES = 2.2, SRM = 6.1). DASH-H showed high concordance (r=-0.71,p<0.01) with AROM-flexion and moderate concordance (r>-0.4,p<0.05) with VAS scales and AROM-external rotation.Conclusion. Analyses indicate that DASH-H demonstrates good test-retest reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with shoulder tendonitis.

Reliability and Validity of the Short Schema Mode Inventory (SMI)

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Lobbestael ◽  
Michiel van Vreeswijk ◽  
Philip Spinhoven ◽  
Erik Schouten ◽  
Arnoud Arntz
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Schema Modes ◽  
Adequate Test ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: This study presents a new questionnaire to assess schema modes: the Schema Mode Inventory (SMI). Method: First, the construction of the short SMI (118 items) was described. Second, the psychometric properties of this short SMI were assessed. More specifically, its factor structure, internal reliability, inter-correlations between the subscales, test-retest reliability and monotonically increase of the modes were tested. This was done in a sample of N = 863 non-patients, Axis I and Axis II patients. Results: Results indicated a 14-factor structure of the short SMI, acceptable internal consistencies of the 14 subscales (Cronbach α's from .79 to .96), adequate test-retest reliability and moderate construct validity. Certain modes were predicted by a combination of the severity of Axis I and II disorders, while other modes were mainly predicted by Axis II pathology. Conclusions: The psychometric results indicate that the short SMI is a valuable measure that can be of use for mode assessment in SFT.

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of three isometric back extensor strength assessments with different test postures

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006051988526
Author(s):  
Sen Yang ◽  
Wenjie Wu ◽  
Chengmin Zhang ◽  
Donggui Wang ◽  
Can Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prone Position ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Back Extensor Strength ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Back Extensor

Objective To compare the test-retest reliability and validity of three simple maximal isometric back extensor strength (BES) assessment protocols with different test postures, and to recommend an optimal clinical protocol to quantify BES. Methods Asymptomatic adults, aged over 45 years, were assessed for maximal isometric BES using external fixation of dynamometers, with the subject in standing, prone and sitting positions, respectively. Measurements were repeated at a one-week interval to examine test-retest reliability. Validation was performed by comparing with results obtained from isokinetic dynamometer assessments. Results Out of a total of 60 included participants, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0.92, 0.93 and 0.90 in standing, prone and sitting positions, respectively. Correlation analyses revealed acceptable convergent validity in the standing and prone position (r = 0.50 and 0.54, respectively), whereas tests conducted in the sitting position showed a relatively low validity (r = 0.32). Among the three protocols, measurement error was lowest in the prone position. Conclusions Maximal isometric BES assessment in the prone position was shown to be the most reliable and valid protocol, and may be considered the preferred option for assessing BES in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Development of a tool to assess beliefs about mythical causes of cancer: the Cancer Awareness Measure Mythical Causes Scale

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e022825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel G Smith ◽  
Emma Beard ◽  
Jennifer A McGowan ◽  
Emma Fox ◽  
Chloe Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
National Sample ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sensitivity To Change ◽  
Cancer Awareness ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Control Information ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Cancer Awareness Measure

ObjectivesWe aimed to develop a reliable and valid measure to assess public beliefs in mythical causes of cancer: the Cancer Awareness Measure–MYthical Causes Scale (CAM-MYCS).Design and settingCancer myth items were generated from a literature review, social media and interviews (n=16). The CAM-MYCS was prepared by reducing items using (a) an online sample (n=527) with exploratory factor analysis and (b) cancer experts with Delhpi methodology (n=13). To assess test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change, students (n=91) completed the CAM-MYCS at baseline and 1 week after exposure to information on lifestyle-related cancer causes or control information. Construct validity was tested by comparing CAM-MYCS scores between cancer experts (n=25) and students (n=91). Factor structure and internal reliability were investigated in a national sample (n=1993).ResultsOut of 42 items generated, 12 were retained based on factor loadings, prevalence of endorsement and expert consensus. CAM-MYCS scores improved (fewer myths endorsed) among students exposed to information on cancer causes compared with the control group (p<0.001) and showed high test–retest reliability (r=0.90, p<0.001). Cancer experts reported higher CAM-MYCS scores (fewer myths endorsed) than students (p<0.001). The factor structure of the CAM-MYCS was confirmed in the national sample and internal reliability was high (α=0.86). Inclusion of the CAM-MYCS alongside items assessing knowledge of actual cancer causes did not affect responses.ConclusionsThe CAM-MYCS tool is a reliable and valid tool assessing beliefs in mythical causes of cancer, and it can be used alongside items assessing known causes of cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document