scholarly journals Teaching Anatomy to Neuroscientific Health-Care Professionals: Are They Receiving the Best Anatomical Education?

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Francesco Latini ◽  
Mats Ryttlefors

Abstract University neuroanatomical courses seldom teach the anatomical-functional connectivity of the brain. White matter dissection improves understanding of brain connectivity, but until now has been restricted to neurosurgeons and in some cases to medical students, never to health-care non-medical professionals. Our aim was to teach white matter anatomy to medical and non-medical students to evaluate this technique in groups with different education. A standardized lab demonstration of white matter anatomy was performed with high appreciation rate in both groups, suggesting a suboptimal neuroanatomical education provided by basic course. We encourage to include this technique of teaching brain anatomy into basic neuroanatomical courses to improve the level of comprehension and competence in all health-care staff within the field of neuroscience.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S379-S379
Author(s):  
Mary F Wyman ◽  
Verena R Cimarolli ◽  
Robyn Stone

Abstract It is well-established that there is a critical shortage of trained health care staff who can deliver high-quality behavioral health services to persons with dementia. The development of innovative professional training curricula, and effectively implementing and sustaining such programs, is a key element in addressing this workforce crisis. This symposium highlights cutting-edge efforts being conducted across the continuum of care, to train health care professionals to support optimal behavioral health for persons with dementia. In the outpatient setting, Wyman et al. present data from a survey of mental health clinicians on their perspectives about working with persons with dementia and caregivers, revealing critical gaps in knowledge and skills to target in continuing education programming. Wray and colleagues focus on integrated behavioral health in primary care, discussing how geriatric experts can most effectively contribute to improved assessment and treatment within this setting. Koepp presents an innovative program to transform outpatient mental health care for persons with dementia through provider training and consultation. In the residential care setting, Reinhardt and colleagues report on the implementation of a comprehensive approach to the alleviation of behavioral health problems through training direct care staff in person-directed care in nursing homes. Finally, Karel et al share how VA interprofessional nursing home teams learn and sustain an evidence-based program to address behavioral concerns among residents with dementia. The discussant will lend a deep expertise in research and policy related to the geriatric workforce to her remarks on the presentations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Goetz ◽  
Michael Marx ◽  
Irmgard Marx ◽  
Marc Brodowski ◽  
Maureen Nafula ◽  
...  

Background. Job satisfaction and working atmosphere are important for optimal health care delivery. The study aimed to document working atmosphere and job satisfaction of health care professionals in Kenya and to explore associations between job satisfaction, staff characteristics, and working atmosphere.Methods. Data from the integrated quality management system (IQMS) for the health sector in Kenya were used. Job satisfaction was measured with 10 items and with additional 5 items adapted to job situation in Kenya. Working atmosphere was measured with 13 item questionnaire. A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed with overall job satisfaction and working atmosphere, aspects of job satisfaction, and individual characteristics.Results. Out of 832 questionnaires handed out, 435 questionnaires were completed (response rate: 52.3%). Health care staff indicated high commitment to provide quality services and low levels regarding the adequacy and functionality of equipment at their work station. The aspect “support of the ministry of health” (β= 0.577) showed the highest score of explained variance (32.9%) regarding overall job satisfaction.Conclusions. IQMS which also evaluates job satisfaction and working atmosphere of health care staff provides a good opportunity for strengthening the recruitment and retention of health care staff as well as improving the provision of good quality of care.


10.2196/15380 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e15380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micheal O'Cathail ◽  
M Ananth Sivanandan ◽  
Claire Diver ◽  
Poulam Patel ◽  
Judith Christian

Background The National Health Service (NHS) Long-Term Plan has set out a vision of enabling patients to access digital interactions with health care professionals within 5 years, including by video link. Objective This review aimed to examine the extent and nature of the use of patient-facing teleconsultations within a health care setting in the United Kingdom and what outcome measures have been assessed. Methods We conducted a systematic scoping review of teleconsultation studies following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched up to the end of December 2018 for publications that reported on the use of patient-facing teleconsultations in a UK health care setting. Results The search retrieved 3132 publications, of which 101 were included for a full review. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous in design, in the specialty assessed, and reported outcome measures. The technology used for teleconsultations changed over time with earlier studies employing bespoke, often expensive, solutions. Two-thirds of the studies, conducted between 1995 and 2005, used this method. Later studies transitioned to Web-based commercial solutions such as Skype. There were five outcome measures that were assessed: (1) technical feasibility, (2) user satisfaction, (3) clinical effectiveness, (4) cost, (5) logistical and operational considerations. Due to the changing nature of technology over time, there were differing technical issues across the studies. Generally, teleconsultations were acceptable to patients, but this was less consistent among health care professionals. However, among both groups, face-to-face consultations were still seen as the gold standard. A wide range of clinical scenarios found teleconsultations to be clinically useful but potentially limited to more straightforward clinical interactions. Due to the wide array of study types and changes in technology over time, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the cost involved. However, cost savings for health care providers have been demonstrated by the goal-directed implementation of teleconsultations. The integration of technology into routine practice represents a complex problem with barriers identified in funding and hospital reimbursement, information technologies infrastructure, and integration into clinicians’ workflow. Conclusions Teleconsultations appear to be safe and effective in the correct clinical situations. Where offered, it is likely that patients will be keen to engage, although teleconsultations should only be offered as an option to support traditional care models rather than replace them outright. Health care staff should be encouraged and supported in using teleconsultations to diversify their practice. Health care organizations need to consider developing a digital technology strategy and implementation groups to assist health care staff to integrate digitally enabled care into routine practice. The introduction of new technologies should be assessed after a set period with service evaluations, including feedback from key stakeholders.


The Lancet ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 395 (10234) ◽  
pp. e79-e80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sten Rasmussen ◽  
Phillip Sperling ◽  
Mathias Såby Poulsen ◽  
Jeppe Emmersen ◽  
Stig Andersen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Müller ◽  
Markus Heymanns ◽  
Laura Harder ◽  
Julia Winter ◽  
Stephan Gehring ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, many authors have suggested a commitment of medical students to support overworked health care staff. However, whether the students are prepared for such an occupation remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate medical students’ preparedness for a commitment in the pandemic and to assess the impact on their skills and attitudes.Methods: In April 2020, the CoronaPreventMainz (CPM) study was initiated to test 3300 employees with direct patient contact at the University Medical Center Mainz. To accomplish the huge logistic effort, medical students were recruited as support staff.Using a web-based questionnaire, the participating students were asked 27 questions covering six different topics.Results: Of the 75 recruited students, 63 (84.0%) participated in this survey. The median age was 24 years, and 66.6% (n = 42) were female. The vast majority agreed that students should be used as voluntary helpers during this crisis (87.3%) and had the feeling of contributing in the fight against the pandemic (90.5%). Most of the students (80.6%) even reported an improvement in their practical skills. Fear of self-infection was low (7.9%), and overextending situations occurred for just 3.2%. However, less than one-fifth (19.4%) of the students felt prepared for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by medical school, and two-thirds (67.7%) demanded special preparation. Conclusion: Through their commitment, the medical students felt that they were taking part in the fight against the pandemic. However, only a few felt well-prepared by medical school and the students’ need for special preparation courses is huge. Therefore, single-center initiatives can only be the beginning. Dedicated courses on how to support health care staff in natural disasters should be integrated into the medical curriculum to better prepare medical students for the next crisis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 387-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julianne Harrison ◽  
Elana Evan ◽  
Amy Hughes ◽  
Shahram Yazdani ◽  
Myke Federman ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:Effective communication regarding death and dying in pediatrics is a vital component of any quality palliative care service. The goal of the current study is to understand communication among health care professionals regarding death and dying in children. The three hypotheses tested were: (1) hospital staff (physicians of all disciplines, nurses, and psychosocial clinicians) that utilize consultation services are more comfortable communicating about death and dying than those who do not use such services, (2) different disciplines of health care providers demonstrate varying levels of comfort communicating about a range of areas pertaining to death and dying, and (3) health care staff that have had some type of formal training in death and dying are more comfortable communicating about these issues.Methods:A primary analysis of a survey conducted in a tertiary care teaching children's hospital.Results:Health care professionals who felt comfortable discussing options for end of life care with colleagues also felt more comfortable: initiating a discussion regarding a child's impending death with his/her family (r = 0.42), discussing options for terminal care with a family (r = 0.58), discussing death with families from a variety of ethnic/cultural backgrounds (r = 0.51), guiding parents in developmentally age-appropriate discussions of death with their children (r = 0.43), identifying and seeking advice from a professional role model regarding management concerns (r = 0.40), or interacting with a family following the death of a child (r = 0.51). Among all three disciplines, physicians were more likely to initiate discussions with regards to a child's impending death (F = 13.07; p = 0.007). Health care professionals that received formal grief and bereavement training were more comfortable discussing death.Significance of the results:The results demonstrated that consultation practices are associated with a higher level of comfort in discussing death and dying in pediatrics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1300.2-1300
Author(s):  
M. Beermann ◽  
K. Nilke Nordlund

Background:The project “Lead Patients – a new resource for health”, led by researcher Sara Riggare at Karolinska Institutet and financed by Vinnova, the Swedish innovation authority, launched in 2017 and the Swedish National Organization for Young Rheumatics was one out of 14 partners. One of our tasks was to develop training courses for health care staff, and to try out what happens when lead patients are giving the opportunity to educate. We developed and produced nine different courses, and during the Autumn of 2019, we had the chance to try out two of them within the project.Objectives:The aim was to switch the perspective and see what would happen when patients’ expertise and knowledge is used to educate health care professionals and challenge the norm about health care professionals being superior. The objective with first training course, “Teams that enable self-realization”, was to create conditions and find new methods for the health care professionals to better support patients with what actually matters to them. The objective with the second training course, “Anti-oppressive pedagogy and language impact”, was to create new knowledge as a group and find methods for inclusion and anti-discrimination.Methods:“Teams that enable self-realization” was conducted as an interactive lecture with a concluding workshop. The lecture was based on results from the Swedish Young Rheumatics Report, teamwork and the Swedish Patient Act. The workshop consisted of a case, where the participants were supposed to come up with a plan for a first meeting and treatment of a patient. “Anti-oppressive pedagogy and language impact” was conducted in two parts, with one week in between the two occasions. The first one was mainly a lecture with background and theory about anti-oppressive pedagogy, norms and power structures, followed by a workshop where the participants analyzed the organizations’ own value principals. The second occasion was a deepened discussion with the purpose of identifying new methods for work and strategies to move forward.Results:The main goal with the training was to highlight positive examples and create creative conditions to be able to identify these new methods and tools. And during the training, there was a great will from the staff to work in a more patient-centered way and let what is most important fort the patient to be what is directing the meeting. Some suggested that the patient should be considered a part of the health care team, but that methods are missing for making it work today. There was also a great will to reflect over what consequences the current health care system might have, and to discuss possible changes. It was exciting to see the traditional hierarchy, where patients are seen as passive receivers of care, being challenged for real and letting patients not only talk about “what it’s like to live with a chronic disease” but actually be seen as capable and qualified educators.Conclusion:If lead patient-led training becomes an obvious and vital part in building and develop the health care system, it will lead to new opportunities and possibilities to better form the health care based on patients’ needs, both strategically and operational. Because converting to a patient focused care isn’t just about changing old attitudes and organizational culture, it’s also about building new adapted structures and methods for governing the health care system.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Devlin ◽  
Roy Harper ◽  
Phyl Reynolds ◽  
Paul Mccullagh

A Web portal was developed to assist in diabetes education and self-management. Access to reliable information is an essential component of effective self-care in diabetes. Education was provided as a series of learning objects, aimed at patients with either Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes. Where appropriate, material was also provided via multimedia learning tools, such as tutorials and interactive quizzes. Throughout the development of the Web portal, periodic assessment was carried out by an expert patient group. This comprised 10 individuals, four of whom had Type 1 diabetes and two with Type 2. The expert group provided feedback to the health-care professionals involved with content development. There were also regular discussion forums with both patients and health-care staff. The portal was designed to facilitate effective self-management, by providing ongoing support with regular feedback on progress.


Author(s):  
Amirah Al-Rossais ◽  
Shibli Sayeed ◽  
Mohammad Shibly Khan ◽  
Malak Ayedh Al-Qahtani ◽  
Aedh Bin Fardan

Background: The knowledge of and attitude towards medical research among health care staff is an important factor in delivering health care services. We aimed to assess the knowledge of basic research methods and the attitude towards medical research among health care professionals.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among the health care professionals working in primary care (including physicians, nursing staff, public health professionals and other paramedical staff). A pre designed, structured, closed ended, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data.Results: A great majority (80%) showed interest in participating in a research if offered opportunity. Most of the attitude items had the highest proportion (>80%) of positive response whereas the knowledge items ranged from as low as 14% (awareness of reference management) to as high as 56% (correct knowledge of consent). Although the proportion of correct responses among the physicians was higher in almost all the knowledge items, as compared to nursing and other heath staff but this difference was not observed to be statistically significant (p>0.05).Conclusions: While majority of the participants had good attitude towards medical research, their knowledge was found to be low in basic research methodology.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob A Andrews ◽  
Michael P Craven ◽  
Jennifer Jamnadas-Khoda ◽  
Alexandra R Lang ◽  
Richard Morriss ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Remote measurement technologies (RMT) can be used to collect data on a variety of bio-behavioral variables, which may improve the care of patients with central nervous system disorders. Although various studies have explored their potential, prior work has highlighted a knowledge gap in health care professionals’ (HCPs) perceptions of the value of RMT in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE This study aims to understand HCPs’ perspectives on using RMT in health care practice for the care of patients with depression, epilepsy, or multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 26 multidisciplinary primary and secondary care HCPs who care for patients with epilepsy, depression, or MS. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 8 main themes emerged from the analysis: (1) potential clinical value of RMT data; (2) when to use RMT in care pathways; (3) roles of health care staff who may use RMT data; (4) presentation and accessibility of data; (5) obstacles to successful use of RMT; (6) limits to the role of RMT; (7) empowering patients; and (8) considerations around alert-based systems. CONCLUSIONS RMT could add value to the system of care for patients with central nervous system disorders by providing clinicians with graphic summaries of data in the patient record. Barriers of both technical and human nature should be considered when using these technologies, as should the limits to the benefits they can offer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document