In vitro production of an anti-DNA idiotype by lymphocytes of normal subjects and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

1986 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syamal K. Datta ◽  
Yaakov Naparstek ◽  
Robert S. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
In Vitro Production ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Vitro Production

Differential effects of epratuzumab on peripheral blood B cells of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus versus normal controls

2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Jacobi ◽  
D M Goldenberg ◽  
F Hiepe ◽  
A Radbruch ◽  
G R Burmester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Systemic Lupus

Objective:B lymphocytes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of lupus and other autoimmune diseases, resulting in the introduction of B cell-directed therapies. Epratuzumab, a humanised anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, is currently in clinical trials, although its effects on patients’ B cells are not completely understood.Methods:This study analysed the in vivo effect of epratuzumab on peripheral B cell subsets in 12 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and also addressed the in vitro effects of the drug by analysing anti-immunoglobulin-induced proliferation of isolated B cells obtained from the peripheral blood of 11 additional patients with lupus and seven normal subjects.Results:Upon treatment, a pronounced reduction of CD27– B cells and CD22 surface expression on CD27– B cells was observed, suggesting that these cells, which mainly comprise naïve and transitional B cells, are preferentially targeted by epratuzumab in vivo. The results of in vitro studies indicate additional regulatory effects of the drug by reducing the enhanced activation and proliferation of anti-immunoglobulin-stimulated lupus B cells after co-incubation with CD40L or CpG. Epratuzumab inhibited the proliferation of B cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus but not normal B cells under all culture conditions.Conclusions:Epratuzumab preferentially modulates the exaggerated activation and proliferation of B cells from patients with lupus in contrast to normal subjects, thus suggesting that epratuzumab might offer a new therapeutic option for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, as enhanced B cell activation is a hallmark of this disease.

scholarly journals THU0035 OX40L EXPRESSING NEUTROPHILS INDUCE CD4 T FOLLICULAR AND PERIPHERAL HELPER CELL DIFFERENTIATION IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 230.2-231
Author(s):  
A. Pappalardo ◽  
E. Wojciechowski ◽  
I. Odriozola ◽  
I. Douchet ◽  
N. Merillon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
T Cells ◽  
B Cells ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Memory B Cells ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Research Support

Background:Neutrophils have been described as potent antigen-presenting cells able to activate T cells by MHC/TCR interaction and costimulatory molecules in tumor immunity. However, little is known about the direct interaction between neutrophils and CD4 T cells with respect to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We have previously shown that OX40L expressed by monocytes from SLE patients promote the differentiation of naïve and memory cells into IL21 secreting T cells that are able to help B cells1,2.Objectives:In this study, we investigate OX40L expression on neutrophils from SLE patients and contribution of these OX40L+neutrophils in SLE pathogenesis to modulation of the B cell helper role of CD4 T cells.Methods:Surface expression of co-stimulatory molecules (OX40L, ICOSL, GITRL, 4-1BBL) on neutrophils from SLE patients and healthy donors (HD) was measured by flow cytometry (FC). Neutrophils from HD were stimulated with TLR7 or TLR8 agonists and IFNα after 5 hours of culture, OX40L expression was measured by FC and Western Blotting. CD4 T cells were cultured with the stimulated neutrophils for 3 days. At the end of the co-culture, percentages of IL21-expressing T follicular (Tfh) and peripheral helper (Tph) cells measured by FC. These generated T cells were also cultured in the presence of memory B cells. After 5 days of co-culture, plasmablast generation and Ig levels were assessed by FC and ELISA, respectively. Inhibition of OX40-OX40L interaction in vitro was achieved using ISB 830, a novel anti-OX40 mAb currently used in clinical trials.Results:Among the co-stimulatory molecules tested, percentages of OX40L+neutrophils in SLE (n=54) were increased compared to HD (n=25)(mean + SD: HD = 1,34%±1.62 vs SLE = 4,53%±8.1; p=0.29). OX40L expression positively correlated with SLE disease activity score (SLEDAI) (p = 0,04; r = 0,31) and with anti-DNA antibodies (p= 0,04, r = 0,33). Of note, the percentage of OX40L+neutrophils was higher in anti-sm-RNP+patients (n=16, mean= 9%±9.8), compared to anti-sm-RNP-patients (n=27, mean = 1,4%±2.5; p = 0,02). The percentage of OX40L+neutrophils was higher in patients with class III or IV lupus nephritis, and inflammatory infiltrate within the kidney biopsy disclosed OX40L+neutrophils, in close contact with T cells. Neutrophils from HD express OX40L with TLR8 agonist, or IFNα priming followed by TLR7 agonist. When memory CD4 T cells were cultured in the presence of TLR8-stimulated neutrophils, the proportion of IL21-expressing Tfh (CXCR5+PD1+) and Tph (CXCR5-PD1hi) were increased, compared to culture with unstimulated neutrophils. This process was dependent on OX40-OX40L interactions, since in vitro treatment with the anti-OX40 blocking antibody ISB 830, inhibited the differentiation of memory T cells into Tfh and Tph. Both generated Tfh and Tph were able to promote the differentiation of memory B cells into Ig-secreting plasmablasts.Conclusion:Our results disclose an unprecedented phenomenon where cross-talk between TLR7/8-activated neutrophils and CD4 lymphocytes operates through OX40L-OX40 costimulation, and neutrophils promote the differentiation of pro-inflammatory Tfh and Tph, as well as IL21 production. Therefore, OX40L/OX40 should be considered as a potentially therapeutic axis in SLE patients.References:[1]Jacquemin et al. Immunity 2015;[2]Jacquemin et al. JCI Insight 2018Disclosure of Interests:Angela Pappalardo Grant/research support from: Ichnos Sciences, Elodie Wojciechowski: None declared, Itsaso Odriozola: None declared, Isabelle Douchet: None declared, Nathalie Merillon: None declared, Andrea Boizard-Moracchini: None declared, Pierre Duffau: None declared, Estibaliz Lazaro: None declared, Marie-Agnes Doucey Employee of: Ichnos Sciences, Lamine Mbow Employee of: Ichnos Sciences, Christophe Richez Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB., Patrick Blanco Grant/research support from: Ichnos Sciences

scholarly journals OP0039 ALPN-303, AN ENHANCED, POTENT DUAL BAFF/APRIL ANTAGONIST ENGINEERED BY DIRECTED EVOLUTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE) AND OTHER B CELL-RELATED AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 21.2-21
Author(s):  
S. R. Dillon ◽  
L. S. Evans ◽  
K. E. Lewis ◽  
J. Yang ◽  
M. W. Rixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Autoimmune Diseases ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Directed Evolution ◽  
Human Lymphocyte ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Cynomolgus Monkeys

Background:BAFF and APRIL are TNF superfamily members that form homo- and heteromultimers that bind TACI and BCMA on B cells; BAFF also binds BAFF-R. BAFF and APRIL support B cell development, differentiation, and survival, particularly for plasmablasts and plasma cells, and play critical roles in the pathogenesis of B cell-related autoimmune diseases. In nonclinical models, inhibition of either BAFF or APRIL alone mediates relatively modest effects, whereas their co-neutralization dramatically reduces B cell function, including antibody production. Fc fusions of wild-type (WT) TACI (e.g. atacicept and telitacicept) target both BAFF and APRIL and have demonstrated promising clinical potential in e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and IgA nephropathy but have not yet clearly exhibited long-term and/or complete disease remissions.Objectives:To generate a dual BAFF/APRIL antagonist with inhibitory activity superior to WT TACI and BCMA and with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in B cell-mediated diseases.Methods:Our directed evolution platform was used to identify a potent variant TNFR domain (vTD) of TACI that exhibits significantly enhanced affinity for BAFF and APRIL as compared to WT TACI; this TACI vTD domain was fused to a human IgG Fc to generate the therapeutic candidate ALPN-303. ALPN-303 was evaluated for functional activity in: 1) human lymphocyte assays, 2) the NOD.Aec1Aec2 spontaneous model of Sjogren’s syndrome (SjS), 3) the bm12-induced mouse model of lupus, 4) the (NZB/NZW)F1 spontaneous model of lupus, and 5) preclinical rodent and cynomolgus monkey pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies.Results:ALPN-303 inhibited BAFF- and APRIL-mediated signaling in vitro in human lymphocyte assays, with significantly lower IC50 values than WT TACI-Fc and belimumab comparators. In all mouse models evaluated, administration of ALPN-303 rapidly and significantly reduced key lymphocyte subsets including plasma cells, germinal center B cells, and follicular T helper cells. ALPN-303 significantly reduced autoantibodies and sialadenitis in the spontaneous SjS model, inhibited glomerular IgG deposition in the bm12-induced model of lupus, and potently suppressed anti-dsDNA autoAbs, blood urea nitrogen levels, proteinuria, sialadenitis, kidney lesions, and renal immune complex deposition in the NZB/W lupus model. As compared to WT TACI-Fc, ALPN-303 exhibited higher serum exposure and significantly and persistently decreased titers of serum IgM, IgG, and IgA antibodies in mice and cynomolgus monkeys (Figure 1).Figure 1.ALPN-303 induces more potent suppression, as compared to WT TACI-Fc, of serum immunoglobulins following a single 9 mg/kg IV infusion (on Day 0; arrows) in female cynomolgus monkeys.Conclusion:ALPN-303 is a potent BAFF/APRIL antagonist derived from our directed evolution platform that consistently demonstrates encouraging immunomodulatory activity and efficacy in vitro and in vivo, superior in preclinical studies to anti-BAFF antibody and WT TACI-Fc. This novel Fc fusion molecule demonstrates favorable preliminary developability characteristics, including higher serum exposures and more potent immunosuppressive activities, which may enable lower clinical doses and/or longer dosing intervals than WT TACI-Fc therapeutics. ALPN-303 may thus be an attractive development candidate for the treatment of multiple autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, particularly B cell-related diseases such as SLE, SjS, and other connective tissue diseases. Preclinical development is underway to enable the initiation of clinical trials later this year.Disclosure of Interests:Stacey R. Dillon Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrence S. Evans Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Katherine E. Lewis Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Jing Yang Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Mark W. Rixon Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Joe Kuijper Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Dan Demonte Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Janhavi Bhandari Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Steve Levin Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Kayla Kleist Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Sherri Mudri Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Susan Bort Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Daniel Ardourel Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Michelle A. Seaberg Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Rachel Wang Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Chelsea Gudgeon Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Russell Sanderson Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Martin F. Wolfson Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Jan Hillson Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Stanford L. Peng Shareholder of: Alpine Immune Sciences, Employee of: Alpine Immune Sciences

scholarly journals Diet in Rheumatoid Arthritis versus Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Any Differences?

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 772
Author(s):  
Alessia Alunno ◽  
Francesco Carubbi ◽  
Elena Bartoloni ◽  
Davide Grassi ◽  
Claudio Ferri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Musculoskeletal Diseases ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
History Of ◽  
Indirect Action

In recent years, an increasing interest in the influence of diet in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) led to the publication of several articles exploring the role of food/nutrients in both the risk of developing these conditions in normal subjects and the natural history of the disease in patients with established RMDs. Diet may be a possible facilitator of RMDs due to both the direct pro-inflammatory properties of some nutrients and the indirect action on insulin resistance, obesity and associated co-morbidities. A consistent body of research has been conducted in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), while studies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are scarce and have been conducted mainly on experimental models of the disease. This review article aims to outline similarities and differences between RA and SLE based on the existing literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document