Inorganic adhesive system introduced for specialized die attachment

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 186
2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioana Hodisan ◽  
Cristina Prejmerean ◽  
Tinca Buruiana ◽  
Doina Prodan ◽  
Loredana Colceriu ◽  
...  

The aim of this work was to reduce microleakage in giomer restorations by using innovative materials in both adhesive systems and light-cured dental giomer. Two adhesive systems with different primers were investigated. The innovative compounds in the primers were acrylic acid (AA)/itaconic acid (IA) copolymer modified with methacrylic groups and AA/IA/N-acryloyl-L-leucine copolymer grafted with methacrylic groups. In addition, the investigated new giomer G contains a pre-reacted glass based on the latter copolymer. The commercial Beautifil II giomer and the FL-Bond II adhesive system were used for comparison. Microleakage was evaluated by determining the scores and percentages of dye penetration lengths after thermocycling of a series of light-cured dental giomer restorations performed on 42 premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons. A lower microleakage value was recorded for the adhesive system containing the AA/IA/N-acryloyl-L-leucine copolymer grafted with methacrylic groups than for the commercial adhesive, which was in substantial agreement with SEM and AFM investigations. In this case, remarkable dentin sealing and a strong adhesion at the giomer restoration�tooth interface was observed, and the innovative adhesive was proven to be promising for dental applications.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
GC Oliveira ◽  
AP Boteon ◽  
FQ Ionta ◽  
MJ Moretto ◽  
HM Honório ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Resin-based materials that show promising effects for preventing the progression of erosion have been studied. This in vitro study evaluated the effects of applying resin-based materials, including resin infiltration, on previously eroded enamel subjected to erosive challenges. The influence of enamel surface etching prior to application of the material was also studied. Bovine enamel blocks were immersed in hydrochloric acid (HCl), 0.01 M (pH 2.3), for 30 seconds in order to form a softened erosion lesion. The blocks were then randomly divided into nine groups (n=12) and treated as follows: C = control without treatment; Hel = pit & fissure resin sealant (Helioseal Clear); Adh = two-step self-etching adhesive system (AdheSe); Tet = two-step conventional adhesive system (Tetric N-bond); and Inf = infiltrant (Icon). The Helno, Adhno, Tetno, and Infno groups received the same materials without (or with no) surface conditioning. The depth of the material's penetration into softened erosion lesions was qualitatively analyzed using reflection and fluorescence confocal microscopy. After application of the materials, the blocks were immersed in HCl for two minutes; this step was followed by immersion in artificial saliva for 120 minutes four times a day for five days (erosive cycling). Both the enamel alteration and material thickness were analyzed using profilometry, and the results were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p>0.05). Images from the confocal microscopy showed minimal penetration of Adh/Adhno and deep penetration of Inf/Infno into the erosive lesions. The groups Hel, Adh, Inf, Tetno, and Infno resulted in the formation of a layer of material over the enamel, which was effective in inhibiting the progression of erosion. In conclusion, the infiltrant, with or without etching, was able to penetrate and protect the enamel against dental erosion. The other resin-based materials, except for the two-step conventional adhesive, were able to penetrate and inhibit the progression of erosive lesions only when they were applied after enamel etching.


2021 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 102790
Author(s):  
Priscila Raquel Schiroky ◽  
Isadora Martini Garcia ◽  
Fernanda Coradini Noal ◽  
Vicente Castelo Branco Leitune ◽  
Fernando Borba de Araújo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphne Camara Barcellos ◽  
Priscila Holleben ◽  
Beatriz Maria Fonseca ◽  
Bruna de Cássia Sabino ◽  
Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva Gonçalves

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 390-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICARDO WALTER ◽  
EDWARD J. SWIFT JR. ◽  
LEE W. BOUSHELL ◽  
KRISTA BRASWELL

2006 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Mamiński ◽  
J. Pawlicki ◽  
A. Zado ◽  
P. Parzuchowski

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 604-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Franke ◽  
A. W. Taylor ◽  
A. Lago ◽  
M. C. Fredel

Clinical Relevance Statistical analysis of the results obtained in this study shows that Nd:YAG laser irradiation on the adhesive system has a significant influence on bond strength to dentin. Bond strength is improved by better adhesive penetration when low energy is applied; whereas, high energy densities have a deleterious effect on the procedure.


2006 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1028-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neslihan Arhun ◽  
Ayca Arman ◽  
Sevi Burçak Çehreli ◽  
Serdar Arıkan ◽  
Erdem Karabulut ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To assess microleakage of a tooth-adhesive-bracket complex when metal or ceramic brackets were bonded with a conventional and an antibacterial self-etching adhesive. Materials and Methods: Forty freshly extracted human premolars were randomly assigned to four equal groups and received the following treatments: group 1 = Transbond XT + metal bracket, group 2 = Transbond XT + ceramic bracket, group 3 = Clearfil Protect Bond + ceramic bracket, and group 4 = Clearfil Protect Bond + metal bracket. After photopolymerization, the teeth were kept in distilled water for 1 month and thereafter subjected to thermal cycling (500 cycles). Specimens were further sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 hours, sectioned and examined under a stereomicroscope, and scored for marginal microleakage for the adhesive-tooth and bracket-adhesive interfaces from incisal and gingival margins. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. Results: All groups demonstrated microleakage between the adhesive-enamel and bracket-adhesive interfaces. A significant difference was observed among all groups (P < .05) for the microleakage between the bracket-adhesive interface. Metal brackets exhibited significantly more microleakage than did ceramic brackets between the bracket-adhesive interface with either of the adhesives. Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited results similar to Transbond XT. Clearfil Protect Bond may be a choice of adhesive in bracket bonding because of its antibacterial activity and similar microleakage results with the orthodontic adhesive. Conclusions: Metal brackets cause more leakage between an adhesive-bracket interface, which may lead to lower clinical shear bond strength and white-spot lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document