scholarly journals Is the Risk of Bleeding Among Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation Lower With Antiplatelet Compared With Oral Anticoagulants?

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 547-549
Author(s):  
Cameron Gettel ◽  
Elizabeth M. Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

scholarly journals Changes in Antithrombotic Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation in the Hospital in 2011-2012 and 2016-2017 (Pharmacoepidemiological Analysis)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-692
Author(s):  
O. V. Reshetko ◽  
A. V. Sokolov ◽  
N. V. Furman ◽  
V. V. Agapov
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Prosthetic Heart Valve ◽  
Saratov Region ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Aim. To study the changes that have occurred in the pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Saratov Region for 5 years by analyzing the antithrombotic therapy of patients who were admitted in a specialized department of the multidisciplinary hospital in Saratov in 2011-2012 and in 2016-2017.Material and methods. A pharmacoepidemiological retrospective study was conducted. The object of the study was the medical records of inpatients (Form 003/y) with the diagnosis “Atrial fibrillation” (ICD-X code I48), that consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of the multidisciplinary hospital in Saratov from January 1, 2011 to December, 31, 2012 (n=211) and from January 1, 2016 to December, 31, 2017 (n=227). Criteria for inclusion in the study: patients over 18 years of age, established diagnosis of non-valvular AF of ischemic genesis. Exclusion criteria from the study: non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, thyrotoxicosis, congenital heart defects, rheumatic heart damage, acute coronary syndrome, endocarditis, myocarditis, pericarditis, pulmonary thromboembolism, the presence of prosthetic heart valve. Pharmacoepidemiological analysis was carried out for the drugs prescribed during hospitalization and given by doctors at discharge of patients from the hospital. The risk of ischemic stroke was assessed using the CHA2DS2-VASc score, and the risk of bleeding – according to the HAS-BLED score.Results. When analyzing the risk of ischemic stroke, it was found that 100% of patients in 2011-2012 years and 98.2% in 2016-2017 years had indications for the prescription of oral anticoagulants (OAСs). In 2011-2012 there were no patients with a low risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc=0). High risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED≥3) occurred in 4.7% of patients in 2011-2012 and in 10.6% in 2016-2017, however, due to the high risk of stroke, the refusal to prescribe OAC in these patients was inappropriate in accordance with the recommendations for the treatment of AF. In the group of patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=0 in 2016-2017 antiplatelet therapy was prescribed in 100% at the hospital stage and at discharge, which contradicts the guidelines, according to which antithrombotic therapy is not recommended to patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=0. In patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=1, a low percentage of anticoagulants prescription was noted. In 2016-2017 OACs were prescribed only in 12.5% of patients at all stages of observation. In 2011-2012 OAC alone was prescribed only to 1 person (20%) at the hospital stage, which does not comply with modern guidelines for the treatment of patients with AF, according to which patients with a risk score CHA2DS2-VASc=1 are recommended to receive OACs in the absence of contraindications. OACs prescription in group CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 occurred only in 15% of patients in 2011-2012 and in a third of patients in 2016-2017 (p<0.05). The frequency of isolated use of OACs significantly increased in 2016-2017 compared to 2011-2012 mainly due to the increase in the spectrum of direct OACs (DOACs) (p<0.05).Conclusion. For 5 years there have been significant changes in the antithrombotic therapy of AF in the Saratov Region. The frequency of prescribing OACs according to indications has increased mainly due to the introduction of the DOACs into clinical practice. However, prevention of stroke remains insufficient.

Abstract 15396: Atrial Fibrillation Bleeding Risk and Prediction While Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Warfarin Naïve and Experienced Patients

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C Perino ◽  
Krishna Pundi ◽  
Jun Fan ◽  
Susan K Schmitt ◽  
Mitra Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Warfarin Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Warfarin Treatment ◽  
Treatment Analysis ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Favorable Safety

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are guideline-recommended over warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, patients who are DOAC eligible are commonly maintained on warfarin. We sought to evaluate bleeding risk and prediction while on DOAC treatment (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) as compared to warfarin. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Veteran Affairs health care system. We included patients with a prescription for warfarin and/or DOAC from 10/1/2010 to 9/30/2017 with an AF encounter in the 90 days prior to 30 days after prescription. We categorized DOAC treated patients as warfarin-naïve or -experienced and performed an on-treatment analysis to determine bleeding incidence and HAS-BLED score discrimination. In adjusted analyses, we compared risk of bleeding while treated with DOAC (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) to warfarin. Results: The analysis cohort included 99,143 patients treated with warfarin (71±10 years, HAS-BLED 2.6±1.2) and 73,732 and 26,760 patients treated with DOAC who were warfarin-naïve (74±10 years, HAS-BLED 2.4±1.0) and -experienced (71±9 years, HAS-BLED 2.8±1.1), respectively. DOAC patients with warfarin experience had more prior bleeds (DOAC, warfarin-experienced: 11.9%; DOAC, warfarin-naïve: 4.5%; warfarin: 6.2%; p<0.001 for both). Risk of intracranial bleeding was substantially lower while on DOAC treatment (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) as compared to warfarin ( Table ). HAS-BLED discrimination for bleeding outcomes, intracranial or any bleeding, was modest ( Table ). Conclusion: DOAC treatment had a favorable safety profile compared to warfarin treatment, even for DOAC treated patients with warfarin-experience who had more prior bleeds. These data argue against maintaining DOAC eligible patients on warfarin therapy regardless of HAS-BLED score.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and heart failure

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e0213614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alpesh Amin ◽  
Alessandra B. Garcia Reeves ◽  
Xiaoyan Li ◽  
Amol Dhamane ◽  
Xuemei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants

scholarly journals The risk of bleeding minimization with direct oral anticoagulants

2021 ◽  
pp. 106-126
Author(s):  
Т. N. Novikova
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Blood Analysis ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Wide Range

This review is devoted to the safety issues of anticoagulant therapy prescribed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are considered worldwide in accordance with the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation as the preferred anticoagulant choice for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Direct oral anticoagulants in comparison with vitamin K antagonists generally have similar efficacy, but different safety profiles, primarily, this concerns the risk of large extracranial and, primarily, gastrointestinal hemorrhages. To minimize the risk of bleeding during therapy with direct oral anticoagulants, an individual approach to the choice of the drug for each individual patient is required after assessing the risk of bleeding, searching for a potential bleeding substrate, correcting existing risk factors and eliminating, if possible, the substrate. When choosing an anticoagulant therapy, special attention should be paid to the most vulnerable categories of patients, such as patients of older age groups and patients with concomitant chronic kidney disease. Among the direct oral anticoagulants registered in the Russian Federation, according to meta-analyzes of key randomized clinical trials and real clinical trials, apixaban has the most optimal benefit: risk ratio in a wide range of patients, including vulnerable populations. Dynamic observation, including regular assessment of renal function, control of clinical blood analysis, erythrocyte and platelet levels, after prescribing an individually selected anticoagulant to the patient, ensures the maximum safety of therapy. Small, so-called, annoying bleeding is not a reason for canceling the anticoagulant, but requires a careful search for the causes of bleeding and their correction.

scholarly journals Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease: A Long-Term Perspective on the Need for Combined Antithrombotic Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C. Fanaroff ◽  
Shuang Li ◽  
Guillaume Marquis-Gravel ◽  
Jay Giri ◽  
Renato D. Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Data Registry ◽  
Artery Disease

Background: Older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) are often treated with the shortest possible duration of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to concern for bleeding. However, the risk of recurrent MI or PCI prompting antiplatelet therapy extension is unknown in this population. Methods: Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry linked to Medicare claims, we described the cumulative incidence of recurrent MI or PCI over a median of 7-year follow-up for patients ≥65 years old with AF discharged alive after acute MI between 2008 and 2017. We used pharmacy fill data to describe the proportion of patients filling prescriptions for both oral anticoagulants and P2Y 12 inhibitors for ≥50% of the indicated duration after MI or PCI. Results: Of 187 622 older patients discharged alive after MI, 50 539 (26.9%) had AF. Over a median of 7-year follow-up in patients with AF, the cumulative incidence was 14.5% for recurrent MI, 12.1% for PCI, 7.9% for stroke, and 9.5% for bleeding hospitalization. Among 7998 patients with AF and recurrent MI or PCI, 1668 (20.9%) had >1 MI or PCI during follow-up. Assuming each MI or PCI should be followed by 6 months of P2Y 12 inhibitor therapy, patients with AF who had a recurrent MI/PCI had a median estimated indication for antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment of 287 days (194, 358), but filled both P2Y 12 inhibitor and oral anticoagulant for a median of 0 days (0, 21). In this cohort, 12.2% of patients filled prescriptions for both a P2Y 12 inhibitor and oral anticoagulant for ≥50% of the indicated duration. Conclusions: Older adults with AF and MI have high incidences of downstream recurrent MI or PCI requiring extended antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy durations, yet many appear to be under-treated. These results highlight the need for better thrombosis prevention strategies in this group of patients.

scholarly journals Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Taking Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Oral Anticoagulants in the ARISTOTLE Trial

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik Dalgaard ◽  
Hillary Mulder ◽  
Daniel M. Wojdyla ◽  
Renato D. Lopes ◽  
Claes Held ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Background: The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with oral anticoagulants has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding. We investigated the risk of bleeding and major cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation taking NSAIDs and apixaban or warfarin. Methods: The ARISTOTLE trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation; n=18 201) compared apixaban with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation at an increased risk of stroke. Patients in ARISTOTLE without severe renal (creatine clearance ≤30 mL/min) or liver disease were included in this analysis (n=17 423). NSAID use at baseline, NSAID use during the trial (incident NSAID use), and never users were described. The primary outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, heart failure hospitalization, stroke or systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. NSAID use during the trial, and the interaction between randomized treatment, was analyzed using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Those with baseline NSAID use (n=832 [4.8%]), incident NSAID use (n=2185 [13.2%]), and never users were similar in median age (age [25th, 75th]; 70 [64, 77] versus 70 [63, 75] versus 70 [62, 76]). Those with NSAID use at baseline and incident NSAID use were more likely to have a history of bleeding than never users (24.5% versus 21.0% versus 15.6%, respectively). During a median follow-up (25th, 75th) of 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) years and when excluding those taking NSAID at baseline, we found that incident NSAID use was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61 [95% CI, 1.11–2.33]) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.16–2.48]), but not gastrointestinal bleeding. No significant interaction was observed between NSAID use and randomized treatment for any outcome. Conclusions: A substantial number of patients in the ARISTOTLE trial took NSAIDs. Incident NSAID use was associated with major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, but not with gastrointestinal bleeding. The safety and efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin appeared not significantly to be altered by NSAID use. This study warrants more investigation of the effect of NSAIDs on the outcomes of patients treated with apixaban. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00412984.

Abstract 17252: Rates and Predictors of Co-Prescribing Common Interacting Cardiovascular Medications in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Shurrab ◽  
Maria Koh ◽  
Cynthia JACKEVICIUS ◽  
Feng Qiu ◽  
Karen Tu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Cardiovascular Medications

Introduction: Amiodarone and diltiazem are commonly prescribed cardiovascular medications in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who take direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). They are known to have drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with DOACs, increasing serum levels of DOACs by 40-60%, and potentially increasing risk of bleeding. Objective: To evaluate frequency of use of amiodarone or diltiazem among continuous users of DOACs in AF patients and assess factors associated with their use. Methods: The study population included all AF patients with continuous DOAC use in Ontario, Canada, ≥66 years, from April 1 2017 to March 31 2018. We used linked databases housed at ICES, Ontario. DOAC fill dates and days supplied per prescription were used to determine treatment durations. A maximum gap of 30 days between prescriptions was allowed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of prescribing amiodarone or diltiazem among AF patients on DOACs. Results: In total, 5390 AF patients, ≥66 years, with continuous DOAC use were identified. Amiodarone was co-prescribed in 343 (6.4%) patients and diltiazem was co-prescribed in 604 (11.2%) patients. The presence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) significantly increased the odds of co-prescribing amiodarone among AF DOAC patients (OR 2.52 [95% CI 1.55, 4.10], p=0.0002 and OR 5.19 [95% CI 3.46, 7.80], p= <0.0001, respectively). The presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with significantly increased diltiazem co-prescription among AF DOAC patients (OR 1.55 [95% CI 1.28, 1.87], p=<0.0001) when adjusted for important patient-level factors (Tables 1&2). Conclusions: Among AF patients with continuous DOAC use, the presence of PCI or CABG was associated with increased amiodarone co-prescription. Future efforts should focus on examining the risk of bleeding in these vulnerable populations exposed to major DOAC DDIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document