Robotic-assisted Gait Training as Part of the Rehabilitation Program in Persons with Traumatic and Anoxic Brain Injury

2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. e117
Author(s):  
Anne O'Brien ◽  
Catherine Adans-Dester ◽  
Alessandra Scarton ◽  
Jean O'Brien Murby ◽  
Lori Laliberte ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (07) ◽  
pp. 1079-1087
Author(s):  
Amjad Annethattil ◽  
◽  
Joseph Prabahar Pushparaj ◽  
Ayman Sabbagh ◽  
Mohammad Farraj ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in improving the functional outcomes among stroke survivors Design: Retrospective matched control study. Setting: Inpatients stroke unit, Qatar Rehabilitation Institute. Outcome Measures: The Functional Ambulation classification (FAC), The Functional independence measure (FIM), The Berg Balance Scale (BBS), The Dynamic Gait index (DGI), The Ten-meter walk test (10MWT), The timed up and Go test (TUG) and the Five times sit to stand (5XSTS) Data Analysis: A retrospective comparison of stroke patients who received robotic assisted gait training performed statistically using the 20th version of SPSS statistical package (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) Study Procedures: The investigators reviewed the medical records, the physiotherapy treatment sessions records and data from the Clinical Management System of Qatar rehabilitation institute of the patients during the period from 1stJanuary 2018 to 31 December 2019. RAGT group was created to assign the patients who received more than four RAGT sessions. The other group was created from the patients who completed the stroke rehabilitation program without RAGT to cross match Conclusion: All the outcome measures were compared between admission and discharge regardless of their group and found that there was a good improvement in the outcome and statistically significant (p value 0.0001) While comparing the lokomat and non lokomat group in functional outcome measurements lokomat group (RAGT) had significant improvement in discharge scores.


Author(s):  
Pierre Langevin ◽  
Philippe Fait ◽  
Pierre Frémont ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Roy

Abstract Background Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is an acknowledged public health problem. Up to 25% of adult with mTBI present persistent symptoms. Headache, dizziness, nausea and neck pain are the most commonly reported symptoms and are frequently associated with cervical spine and vestibular impairments. The most recent international consensus statement (2017 Berlin consensus) recommends the addition of an individualized rehabilitation approach for mTBI with persistent symptoms. The addition of an individualized rehabilitation approach including the evaluation and treatment of cervical and vestibular impairments leading to symptoms such as neck pain, headache and dizziness is, however, recommended based only on limited scientific evidence. The benefit of such intervention should therefore be further investigated. Objective To compare the addition of a 6-week individualized cervicovestibular rehabilitation program to a conventional approach of gradual sub-threshold physical activation (SPA) alone in adults with persistent headache, neck pain and/or dizziness-related following a mTBI on the severity of symptoms and on other indicators of clinical recovery. We hypothesize that such a program will improve all outcomes faster than a conventional approach (between-group differences at 6-week and 12-week). Methods In this single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 46 adults with subacute (3 to12 weeks post-injury) persistent mTBI symptoms will be randomly assigned to: 1) a 6-week SPA program or 2) SPA combined with a cervicovestibular rehabilitation program. The cervicovestibular rehabilitation program will include education, cervical spine manual therapy and exercises, vestibular rehabilitation and home exercises. All participants will take part in 4 evaluation sessions (baseline, week 6, 12 and 26) performed by a blinded evaluator. The primary outcome will be the Post-Concussion Symptoms Scale. The secondary outcomes will be time to clearance to return to function, number of recurrent episodes, Global Rating of Change, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, Headache Disability Inventory and Dizziness Handicap Inventory. A 2-way ANOVA and an intention-to-treat analysis will be used. Discussion Controlled trials are needed to determine the best rehabilitation approach for mTBI with persistent symptoms such as neck pain, headache and dizziness. This RCT will be crucial to guide future clinical management recommendations. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier - NCT03677661, Registered on September, 15th 2018.


Author(s):  
Lorenzo Peluso ◽  
Benjamin Legros ◽  
Sarah Caroyer ◽  
Fabio Silvio Taccone ◽  
Nicolas Gaspard

Author(s):  
Heidi Nedergård ◽  
Ashokan Arumugam ◽  
Marlene Sandlund ◽  
Anna Bråndal ◽  
Charlotte K. Häger

Abstract Background Robotic-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) may enable high-intensive and task-specific gait training post-stroke. The effect of RAGT on gait movement patterns has however not been comprehensively reviewed. The purpose of this review was to summarize the evidence for potentially superior effects of RAGT on biomechanical measures of gait post-stroke when compared with non-robotic gait training alone. Methods Nine databases were searched using database-specific search terms from their inception until January 2021. We included randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of RAGT (e.g., using exoskeletons or end-effectors) on spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic parameters among adults suffering from any stage of stroke. Screening, data extraction and judgement of risk of bias (using the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool) were performed by 2–3 independent reviewers. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were used to evaluate the certainty of evidence for the biomechanical gait measures of interest. Results Thirteen studies including a total of 412 individuals (mean age: 52–69 years; 264 males) met eligibility criteria and were included. RAGT was employed either as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in a subacute or chronic phase post-stroke. The included studies showed a high risk of bias (n = 6), some concerns (n = 6) or a low risk of bias (n = 1). Meta-analyses using a random-effects model for gait speed, cadence, step length (non-affected side) and spatial asymmetry revealed no significant differences between the RAGT and comparator groups, while stride length (mean difference [MD] 2.86 cm), step length (affected side; MD 2.67 cm) and temporal asymmetry calculated in ratio-values (MD 0.09) improved slightly more in the RAGT groups. There were serious weaknesses with almost all GRADE domains (risk of bias, consistency, directness, or precision of the findings) for the included outcome measures (spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters). Kinetic parameters were not reported at all. Conclusion There were few relevant studies and the review synthesis revealed a very low certainty in current evidence for employing RAGT to improve gait biomechanics post-stroke. Further high-quality, robust clinical trials on RAGT that complement clinical data with biomechanical data are thus warranted to disentangle the potential effects of such interventions on gait biomechanics post-stroke.


PM&R ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. S243-S243
Author(s):  
Nicholas F. Love ◽  
Lindsay C. Smith ◽  
Sara Salim ◽  
Nicole A. Strong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document