Comparative evaluation of performance and energy consumption of hot air and superheated steam impinging stream dryers for high-moisture particulate materials

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (16) ◽  
pp. 3444-3452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwanchai Choicharoen ◽  
Sakamon Devahastin ◽  
Somchart Soponronnarit
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 717-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanit Swasdisevi ◽  
Sakamon Devahastin ◽  
Suchart Thanasookprasert ◽  
Somchart Soponronnarit

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 479-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarocha Charoenvai ◽  
Wanchana Yingyuen ◽  
Anuchit Jewyee ◽  
Phadungsak Rattanadecho ◽  
Somsak Vongpradubchai

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwanchai Choicharoen ◽  
Sakamon Devahastin ◽  
Somchart Soponronnarit

HortScience ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 249a-249
Author(s):  
Eric A. Lavoie ◽  
Damien de Halleux ◽  
André Gosselin ◽  
Jean-Claude Dufour

The main objective of this research was to produce a simulated model that permitted the evaluation of operating costs of commercial greenhouse tomato growers with respect to heating methods (hot air, hot water, radiant and heat pumps) and the use of artificial lighting for 1991 and 1992. This research showed that the main factors that negatively influence profitability were energy consumption during cold periods and the price of tomatoes during the summer season. The conventional hot water system consumed less energy than the heat pump system and produced marketable fruit yields similar to those from the heat pump system. The hot water system was generally more profitable in regards to energy consumption and productivity. Moreover, investment costs were less; therefore, this system gives best overall financial savings. As for radiant and hot air systems, their overall financial status falls between that of the hot water system and the heat pump. The radiant system proved to be more energy efficient that the hot air system, but the latter produced a higher marketable fruit yield over the 2-year study.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
pp. 3941
Author(s):  
Fangliang Zhong ◽  
Hassam Nasarullah Chaudhry ◽  
John Kaiser Calautit

To host the 2022 FIFA World Cup, Qatar is facing the greatest challenge in balancing the energy consumptions for cooling the stadiums and the thermal comfort for both players and spectators. Previous studies have not considered using a combined configuration of air curtain and roof cooling supply slot in stadiums to prevent the infiltration of outside hot air and reduce the cooling system’s energy consumption. This paper presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study of thermal and wind modeling around a baseline stadium and simulates the cooling scenarios of air curtains and roof cooling along with the energy consumption estimations for the World Cup matches using Building Energy Simulation (BES). Sensitivity analysis of different supply speeds and supply temperatures of air curtain gates and roof cooling was carried out, and the results showed that scenario six, which provides supply air of 25 m/s and 20 m/s at the roof and air curtain gates with a supply temperature of 10 °C, demonstrates optimal thermal performances on both the spectator tiers and the pitch. Compared with the baseline stadium performance, the average reductions in temperature on the pitch and spectator tiers under scenario six could reach 15 °C and 14.6 °C. The reductions in the Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied values for the upper and lower tiers as well as the pitch were 63%, 74%, and 78%. In terms of the estimated energy consumptions, scenario six would consume electric energy per match at a rate of 25.5 MWh compared with 22.8 MWh for one of the stadiums in the 2010 South Africa World Cup and 42.0 MWh for the 2006 Germany World Cup. Future research is recommended to explore the influence of supply angle on air curtain gates and roof cooling supply slots’ performances.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Iyota ◽  
Yotaro Konishi ◽  
Kaori Yoshida ◽  
Nobuya Nishimura ◽  
Tomohiro Nomura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document