Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects

Aquaculture ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 285 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 146-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert G.J. Tacon ◽  
Marc Metian
Keyword(s):  
Fish Oil ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 633-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bente E. Torstensen ◽  
Marit Espe ◽  
Ingunn Stubhaug ◽  
Øyvind Lie

In order to study whether lipid metabolism may be affected by maximum replacement of dietary fish oil and fish meal with vegetable oils (VO) and plant proteins (PP), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salarL.) smolts were fed a control diet containing fish oil and fish meal or one of three plant-based diets through the seawater production phase for 12 months. Diets were formulated to meet all known nutrient requirements. The whole-body lipid storage pattern was measured after 12 months, as well as post-absorptive plasma, VLDL and liver TAG. To further understand the effects on lipid metabolism, expression of genes encoding for proteins involved in VLDL assembly (apoB100), fatty acid uptake (FATP1, cd36, LPL and FABP3, FABP10 and FABP11) were measured in liver and visceral adipose tissue. Maximum dietary VO and PP increased visceral lipid stores, liver TAG, and plasma VLDL and TAG concentrations. Increased plasma TAG correlated with an increased expression of apoB100, indicating increased VLDL assembly in the liver of fish fed the high-plant protein- and VO-based diet. Atlantic salmon fed intermediate replacement levels of VO or PP did not have increased body fat or visceral mass. Overall, the present results demonstrate an interaction between dietary lipids and protein on lipid metabolism, increasing overall adiposity and TAG in the body when fish meal and fish oil are replaced concomitantly at maximised levels of VO and PP.


1945 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Vestal ◽  
C. L. Shrewsbury ◽  
Ruth Jordan ◽  
Opal Milligan
Keyword(s):  
Fish Oil ◽  

Nutrition ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samia S. Al-Ghannami ◽  
Eva Sedlak ◽  
Izzeldin S. Hussein ◽  
Yoeju Min ◽  
Saleh M. Al-Shmmkhi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taekyoung Seong ◽  
Jumpei Matsuyoshi ◽  
Yutaka Haga ◽  
Naoki Kabeya ◽  
Renato Kitagima ◽  
...  

BMC Genomics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Caballero-Solares ◽  
Xi Xue ◽  
Christopher C. Parrish ◽  
Maryam Beheshti Foroutani ◽  
Richard G. Taylor ◽  
...  

Aquaculture ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 498 ◽  
pp. 503-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Gil-Solsona ◽  
Josep Alvar Calduch-Giner ◽  
Jaime Nácher-Mestre ◽  
Leticia Lacalle-Bergeron ◽  
Juan Vicente Sancho ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 3345
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ido ◽  
Mika Kaneta

Finding an alternative feed source for the replacement of fish oil (FO) and fish meal (FM) produced from whole fish has been an important issue for realizing sustainable aquaculture. In this study, fishery by-products generated in the distribution phase, known as urban fisheries biomass (UFB), were focused on. The quality parameter and nutrient components of FO and FM from UFB were analyzed. Although crude FO produced from UFB showed relatively poor quality properties, the refinement process made an improvement of the quality to make it comparable to commercially available FO. There is no big variation in several samples in fatty acid profiles of FO and amino acid profiles of FM, and they seem to be able to replace FO and FM from whole fish in the diet for cultured fish. The utilization of UFB should be promoted in economic and ecologic aspects; however, in use of the FM, there remains a risk of intra-species recycling that might lead to transmissible spongiform encephalopathy. Furthermore, we must take into consideration the possibility of contamination of fishery products from at-risk species and illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fisheries due to the lack of regulations in Japan.


1980 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. H. Pike ◽  
I. N. Tatterson

Most of the by-products from fish go into the production of fish meal and fish oil, the latter going directly to the human food chain, and therefore do not really come under the heading of industrial by-products and waste per se. Broadly speaking, fish meal made from fish offal is a by-product which otherwise would have been wasted. This paper discusses the quantities involved and the nutritional properties offish meal, and in addition, the contribution to fish meal and fish oil made from species which are not suitable for human consumption (e.g. sandeels) or where the quantities caught exceed the demand for human consumption (e.g. sprats).Any method of utilizing fish by-products for animal feeding should minimize chemical changes in the product to avoid reduction in the nutrients which are present at the time of catching. In some respects chemical changes in fish by-products are brought about in a similar way to those in grass, cut for preservation. The fish material has a high water content, around 75%, and from the time of catching is subject to chemical changes by enzymes in the fish and also by bacterial action. Fish, however, differs from grass in that it contains oil and virtually no carbohydrates. The demersal, or lean fish, for example, cod, haddock, plaice, saithe, etc., contain high levels of oil in the liver which are removed for separate processing, but little in the flesh and in the offal produced. The ‘industrial’ fish caught are mainly pelagic species with high levels of oil in the flesh.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document