scholarly journals Complete ablation of tumors using synchronous chemoradiation with bimetallic theranostic nanoparticles

Author(s):  
Hamed Nosrati ◽  
Elahe Attari ◽  
Fatemeh Abhari ◽  
Murat Barsbay ◽  
Mohammadreza Ghaffarlou ◽  
...  
Small ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Xie ◽  
Yixue Su ◽  
Gloria B. Kim ◽  
Erhan Selvi ◽  
Chuying Ma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 2100425
Author(s):  
Youngsik Lee ◽  
Taegyu Kang ◽  
Hye Rim Cho ◽  
Gil Ju Lee ◽  
Ok Kyu Park ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dominyka Dapkute ◽  
Marijus Pleckaitis ◽  
Danute Bulotiene ◽  
Dainius Daunoravicius ◽  
Ricardas Rotomskis ◽  
...  

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Lin Su ◽  
Shang-Hsiu Hu

Theranostic nanoparticles recently received great interest for uniting unique functions to amplify therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects. Despite the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, which amplifies the accumulation of nanoparticles at the site of a tumor, tumor heterogeneity caused by the dense extracellular matrix of growing cancer cells and the interstitial fluid pressure from abnormal angiogenesis in the tumor inhibit drug/particle penetration, leading to inhomogeneous and limited treatments. Therefore, nanoparticles for penetrated delivery should be designed with different strategies to enhance efficacy. Many strategies were developed to overcome the obstacles in cancer therapy, and they can be divided into three main parts: size changeability, ligand functionalization, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment. This review summarizes the results of ameliorated tumor penetration approaches and amplified therapeutic efficacy in nanomedicines. As the references reveal, further study needs to be conducted with comprehensive strategies with broad applicability and potential translational development.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1921-1929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahaveer Swaroop Bhojani ◽  
Marcian Van Dort ◽  
Alnawaz Rehemtulla ◽  
Brian D. Ross

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 6187-6196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Liu ◽  
Li Qun Xu ◽  
Gang Xu ◽  
Dicky Pranantyo ◽  
Koon-Gee Neoh ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e052992
Author(s):  
Elles M F van de Voort ◽  
Gerson M Struik ◽  
Linetta B Koppert ◽  
Adriaan Moelker ◽  
Reno Debets ◽  
...  

IntroductionBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide but almost half of the patients have an excellent prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 98%–99%. These patients could potentially be treated with thermal ablation to avoid surgical excision, reduce treatment-related morbidity and increase patients’ quality of life without jeopardising treatment effectiveness. Previous studies showed highest complete ablation rates for radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation. However, due to heterogeneity among studies, it is unknown which of these three techniques should be selected for a phase 3 comparative study.Methods and analysisThe aim of this phase 2 screening trial is to determine the efficacy rate of radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation with the intention to select one treatment for further testing in a phase 3 trial. Additionally, exploratory data are obtained for the phase 3 trial. The design is a multicentre open-label randomised phase 2 screening trial. Patients with unifocal, invasive breast cancer with a maximum diameter of 2 cm without lymph node or distant metastases are included. Triple negative, Bloom-Richardson grade 3 tumours and patients with an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be excluded. Included patients will be allocated to receive one of the three thermal ablation techniques. Three months later surgical excision will be performed to determine the efficacy of thermal ablation. Treatment efficacy in terms of complete ablation rate will be assessed with CK 8/18 and H&E staining. Secondary outcomes include feasibility of the techniques in an outpatient setting, accuracy of MRI for complete ablation, patient satisfaction, adverse events, side effects, cosmetic outcome, system usability and immune response.Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol was approved by Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNL9205 (www.trialregister.nl); Pre-results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document