scholarly journals Association between postoperative haemoglobin concentrations and composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in noncardiac surgical patients: post hoc analysis of the POISE-2 trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alparslan Turan ◽  
Eva Rivas ◽  
Philip J. Devereaux ◽  
Mauro Bravo ◽  
Guangmei Mao ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien F. Lee ◽  
Morton G. Burt ◽  
Leonie K. Heilbronn ◽  
Arduino A. Mangoni ◽  
Vincent W. Wong ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Genovesi Ebert ◽  
Furio Colivicchi ◽  
Marco Malvezzi Caracciolo ◽  
Carmine Riccio

The prevention of symptomatic heart failure represents the treatment of patients in the A and B stages of AHA/ACC heart failure classification. Stage A refers to patients without structural heart disease but at risk to develop chronic heart failure. The major risk factors in stage A are hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis, family history of coronary artery disease and history of cardiotoxic drug use. In this stage, blockers hypertension is the primary area in which beta blockers may be useful. Beta blockers seem not to be superior to other medication in reducing the development of heart failure due to hypertension. Stage B heart failure refers to structural heart disease but without symptoms of heart failure. This includes patients with asymptomatic valvular disease, asymptomatic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, previous myocardial infarction with or without LV dysfunction. In asymptomatic valvular disease no data are available on the efficacy of beta blockers to prevent heart failure. In asymptomatic LV dysfunction only few asymptomatic patients have been enrolled in the trials which tested beta blockers. NYHA I patients were barely 228 in the MDC, MERIT and ANZ trials altogether. The REVERT trial was the only trial focusing on NYHA I patients with LV ejection fraction less than 40%. Metoprolol extended release on top of ACE inhibitors ameliorated LV systolic volume and ejection fraction. A post hoc analysis of the SOLVD Prevention trial demonstrated that beta blockers reduced death and development of heart failure. Similar results were reported in post MI patients in a post hoc analysis of the SAVE trial (Asymptomatic LV failure post myocardial infarction). In the CAPRICORN trial about 65% of the patients were not taking diuretics and then could be considered asymptomatic. The study revealed a reduction in mortality and a non-significant trend toward reduction of death and hospital admission for heart failure. Conclusions: beta blockers are not specifically indicated in stage A heart failure. On the contrary, in most of the stage B patients, and particularly after MI, beta blockers are indicated to reduce mortality and, probably, also the progression toward symptomatic heart failure.


2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Matzelle ◽  
N. M. Gibbs ◽  
W. Weightman ◽  
M. Sheminant ◽  
R. Rowe ◽  
...  

In an observational study using heparinase-modified thrombelastography, we investigated the percentage of elective cardiothoracic surgical patients receiving low-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU 12 hourly subcutaneously) who had a demonstrable systemic heparin effect. Blood samples were obtained at induction from 40 adult elective cardiothoracic surgical patients who had received 5000 IU unfractionated heparin subcutaneously within six hours. Simultaneous kaolin and heparinase-modified thrombelastographies were run on all samples. Fourteen patients (35%; 95% CI: 20 to 50%) had a demonstrable heparin effect(defined as a kaolin thrombelastography R time >25% longer than the heparinase-modified control). Their mean±SD kaolin thrombelastography R time was 13.6±5.9 minutes (normal range 4 to 8 minutes) vs. 7.1±2.0 minutes for the heparinase-modified controls. In 10 patients the thrombelastography R times were >50% longer and in four patients >100% longer, than their respective heparinase-modified controls. In a post hoc analysis, there was little correlation between the extent of the prolongation and patient age (r=0.02), weight (r=-0.31), preoperative creatinine (r=-0.17), or time since administration of heparin (r=0.14). These results indicate that about one third of patients who have received low-dose unfractionated heparin subcutaneously within six hours have a demonstrable heparin effect. The potential for this effect should be considered if central neural blockade is planned.


2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin J. Petrie ◽  
Adriaan A. Voors ◽  
Michele Robertson ◽  
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen ◽  
Henry J. Dargie

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kalra ◽  

Two major trials, LEADER and SUSTAIN 6, published in 2016, reported the cardiovascular and microvascular benefits of liraglutide and semaglutide respectively. This communication describes the results of these trials, and analyses the subtle differences in their outcomes. While semaglutide significantly reduces the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction (primary prevention), liraglutide reduces the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (secondary prevention). Both drugs significantly improve renal outcomes, but semaglutide increased the risk of retinal events. The time taken to achieve benefit was much less (4-6 months) with semaglutide than with liraglutide (12–18 months). LEADER and SUSTAIN 6 have made 2016 a landmark year in the history of diabetes care. Their positive results will help promote better, comprehensive diabetes care, using minimal drugs (therapeutic parsimony), encourage use of rational combinations to improve outcomes, and stimulate exaptation of these drugs for non-glycemic purposes.


Diabetologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon R. Heller ◽  
Milan S. Geybels ◽  
Ahmed Iqbal ◽  
Lei Liu ◽  
Lily Wagner ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims/hypothesis Hypoglycaemia is a common side effect of insulin and some other antihyperglycaemic agents used to treat diabetes. Severe hypoglycaemia has been associated with adverse cardiovascular events in trials of intensive glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. The relationship between non-severe hypoglycaemic episodes (NSHEs) and severe hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes has been documented. However, an association between more frequent NSHEs and cardiovascular events has not been verified. This post hoc analysis of the LEADER (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results) trial aimed to confirm whether there is an association between NSHEs and severe hypoglycaemic episodes in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In addition, the possible association between NSHEs and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality was investigated. Methods LEADER was a double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial that found that liraglutide significantly reduced the risk of MACE compared with the placebo. In this post hoc analysis, we explored, in all LEADER participants, whether the annual rate of NSHEs (defined as self-measured plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/l [56 mg/dl]) was associated with time to first severe hypoglycaemic episode (defined as an episode requiring the assistance of another person), time to first MACE, time to cardiovascular death and time to all-cause mortality. Participants with <2 NSHEs per year were used as reference for HR estimates. Cox regression with a time-varying covariate was used. Results We demonstrate that there is an association between NSHEs (2–11 NSHEs per year and ≥12 NSHEs per year) and severe hypoglycaemic episodes (unadjusted HRs 1.98 [95% CI 1.43, 2.75] and 5.01 [95% CI 2.84, 8.84], respectively), which was consistent when baseline characteristics were accounted for. Additionally, while no association was found between participants with 2–11 NSHEs per year and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, higher rates of NSHEs (≥12 episodes per year) were associated with higher risk of MACE (HR 1.50 [95% CI 1.01, 2.23]), cardiovascular death (HR 2.08 [95% CI 1.17, 3.70]) and overall death (HR 1.80 [95% CI 1.11, 2.92]). Conclusions/interpretation The analysis of data from the LEADER trial demonstrated that higher rates of NSHEs were associated with both a higher risk of severe hypoglycaemia and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, irrespective of the cause of this association, it is important that individuals with high rates of hypoglycaemia are identified so that the potentially increased risk of cardiovascular events can be managed and steps can be taken to reduce NSHEs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01179048). Graphical abstract


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Desouza ◽  
S C Bain ◽  
T Gondolf ◽  
T Hansen ◽  
I Holst ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In SUSTAIN 6, subcutaneous semaglutide once weekly added to standard of care significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or death) vs placebo over 2 years in T2D subjects. Purpose Assess the effect of semaglutide vs placebo on MACE and blood pressure (BP) by race and ethnicity in a post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN 6. Methods Subjects were randomised to semaglutide 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or volume-matched placebo. Data for the two semaglutide-dose groups were pooled and compared to the pooled placebo groups. Time-to-event data were analysed with a Cox proportional hazards model. Changes from baseline to week 104 were analysed using analysis of covariance. The interaction between treatment and subgroup was added to the models. Results Overall, 3,297 patients received treatment. Subgroups included Caucasian, Asian, Black/African American, Other (race), and Hispanic, non-Hispanic (ethnicity). Mean baseline characteristics were similar across subgroups (age 64.7 years, HbA1c 8.7%, diabetes duration 14.2 years). Time to composite MACE and individual components were improved with semaglutide across all subgroups. Semaglutide affected BP similarly across race and ethnicity, except for systolic BP in Black/African American subjects (Table). Race Ethnicity Caucasian Asian Black/African American Other Interaction p-value Hispanic Non-Hispanic Interaction p-value Semaglutide (n) 1,384 121 108 35 256 1,392 Placebo (n) 1,352 152 113 32 254 1,395 MACE and individual outcomes   MACE HR [95% CI] 0.76 [0.58; 1.00] 0.58 [0.25; 1.34] 0.72 [0.23; 2.28] 0.46 [0.08; 2.50] 0.8793 0.67 [0.33; 1.36] 0.74 [0.57; 0.96] 0.7978   CV death HR [95% CI] 0.98 [0.63; 1.50] 0.32 [0.04; 2.85] 1.01 [0.06; 16.20] n/a† 0.8089 0.79 [0.31; 2.00] 1.00 [0.63; 1.59] 0.6521   Non-fatal MI HR [95% CI] 0.69 [0.45; 1.07] 0.97 [0.36; 2.60] 1.37 [0.31; 6.12] 0.31 [0.03; 3.00] 0.6637 0.65 [0.18; 2.31] 0.74 [0.50; 1.10] 0.8562   Non-fatal stroke HR [95% CI] 0.70 [0.42; 1.16] 0.31 [0.04; 2.77] n/a‡ n/a‡ 0.9176 0.73 [0.16; 3.27] 0.60 [0.36; 0.99] 0.7995 Blood pressure at week 104   Systolic BP* ETD (mmHg) [95% CI] −1.92 [−3.09; −0.74] −4.98 [−8.61; 1.35] 4.47 [0.15; 8.79] −11.02 [−18.45; −3.60] 0.0008 −3.22 [−5.93; −0.51] −1.81 [−2.98; −0.64] 0.3489   Diastolic BP* ETD (mmHg) [95% CI] 0.36 [−0.32; 1.04] −1.31 [−3.43; 0.80] −0.07 [−2.56; 2.43] −3.41 [−7.73; 0.92] 0.1871 −0.18 [−1.75; 1.39] 0.16 [−0.52; 0.83] 0.6981 *Treatment difference between semaglutide and placebo (pooled 0.5 and 1.0 mg values for each treatment group) at week 104. †No events in the placebo group; ‡No events in the semaglutide group. BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; ETD, estimated treatment difference; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction. Conclusion Overall there was no evidence of a differential effect of semaglutide on risk reduction in MACE and its components and on BP across race and ethnicity subgroups in this post hoc analysis. Acknowledgement/Funding Novo Nordisk A/S


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document