scholarly journals Developments in Diabetology in 2016

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kalra ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Renal Outcomes ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Fatal Myocardial Infarction

Two major trials, LEADER and SUSTAIN 6, published in 2016, reported the cardiovascular and microvascular benefits of liraglutide and semaglutide respectively. This communication describes the results of these trials, and analyses the subtle differences in their outcomes. While semaglutide significantly reduces the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction (primary prevention), liraglutide reduces the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (secondary prevention). Both drugs significantly improve renal outcomes, but semaglutide increased the risk of retinal events. The time taken to achieve benefit was much less (4-6 months) with semaglutide than with liraglutide (12–18 months). LEADER and SUSTAIN 6 have made 2016 a landmark year in the history of diabetes care. Their positive results will help promote better, comprehensive diabetes care, using minimal drugs (therapeutic parsimony), encourage use of rational combinations to improve outcomes, and stimulate exaptation of these drugs for non-glycemic purposes.

scholarly journals Aspirin for primary prevention of stroke in individuals without cardiovascular disease—A meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17
Author(s):  
Conor Judge ◽  
Sarah Ruttledge ◽  
Robert Murphy ◽  
Elaine Loughlin ◽  
Sarah Gorey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Fatal Myocardial Infarction

Background The benefits of aspirin for primary prevention of stroke are uncertain. Methods We performed a cumulative meta-analysis of trials investigating aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a focus on stroke. We assessed the effects of aspirin on non-fatal stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major gastrointestinal bleeding, and an analysis of net clinical effect, in populations without a history of clinical or subclinical cardiovascular disease. Summary of review results Among 11 trials (157,054 participants), aspirin was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in non-fatal stroke (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.04) but was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.56). Aspirin was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.03) or cardiovascular mortality (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.03). Aspirin was associated with a reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.94) and an increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.35). Using equal weighting for non-fatal events and major bleeding, we observed no net clinical benefit with aspirin use for primary prevention. Conclusion Our meta-analysis reports no benefit of aspirin for primary stroke prevention.

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Aspirin in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 174-174
Author(s):  
Nina C Raju ◽  
Magda Sobieraj-Teague ◽  
John W Eikelboom
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Abstract 174 Primary prevention with aspirin reduces the risk of non-fatal cardiovascular events but has not been demonstrated to reduce mortality. We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of aspirin in primary prevention to obtain best estimates of the benefits and harm of aspirin compared with no aspirin with a focus on mortality. Eligible articles were identified by computerized search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and CINAHL databases, review of bibliographies of relevant publications and a related article search using PubMed. The outcomes of interest included all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke or death, and bleeding. 2 reviewers independently extracted study information and data. Data were pooled from individual trials using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model and results are presented as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). 8 studies comprising a total of 96,726 subjects were included. Aspirin reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.94; 95%CI 0.88–1.00), the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death (RR 0.87; 95%CI 0.82–0.93), and myocardial infarction (RR 0.8; 95%CI 0.66–0.98) but did not significantly reduce cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.94; 95%CI 0.82–1.08) or stroke (RR 0.93; 95%CI 0.81–1.07). Aspirin increased the risk of major bleeding (RR; 1.69 95%CI 1.38–2.08), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.38; 95%CI 1.16–1.65) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.36; 95%CI 1.01–1.84). There was no interaction between subjects with or without diabetes for the outcomes of all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke or death. Aspirin therapy in subjects with no prior history of cardiovascular disease reduces the risk of cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction and overall mortality. These benefits are achieved at the expense of increased bleeding. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Green Tea and Coffee Consumption and All-Cause Mortality Among Persons With and Without Stroke or Myocardial Infarction

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Teramoto ◽  
Isao Muraki ◽  
Kazumasa Yamagishi ◽  
Akiko Tamakoshi ◽  
Hiroyasu Iso
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Coffee Consumption ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Tea Consumption ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Background and Purpose: The effect of green tea and coffee consumption on mortality among cardiovascular diseases survivors is unknown. We examined the association between green tea and coffee consumption and mortality among persons with and without stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: In the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study, 46 213 participants (478 stroke survivors, 1214 MI survivors, and 44 521 persons without a history of stroke or MI), aged 40 to 79 years at baseline (1988–1990), completed a lifestyle, diet, and medical history questionnaire and were followed up regarding mortality until 2009. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate the multivariable hazard ratios with 95% CIs of all-cause mortality after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Results: During the 18.5-year median follow-up period, 9253 cases were documented. Green tea consumption was inversely associated with all-cause mortality among stroke or MI survivors; the multivariable hazard ratios (95% CIs) for stroke survivors were 0.73 (0.42–1.27) for 1 to 6 cups/wk, 0.65 (0.36–1.15) for 1 to 2 cups/d, 0.56 (0.34–0.92) for 3 to 4 cups/d, 0.52 (0.31–0.86) for 5 to 6 cups/d, and 0.38 (0.20–0.71) for ≥7 cups/d, compared with nondrinkers. A similar inverse association was observed for MI survivors, but not evident for those without a history of stroke or MI. Coffee consumption was inversely associated with all-cause mortality in persons without a history of stroke or MI; the multivariable hazard ratios (95% CIs) were 0.86 (0.82–0.91) for 1 to 6 cups/wk, 0.86 (0.80–0.92) for 1 cup/d, and 0.82 (0.77–0.89) for ≥2 cups/d, compared with nondrinkers. The corresponding hazard ratios (95% CIs) for MI survivors were 0.69 (0.53–0.91), 0.78 (0.55–1.10), and 0.61 (0.41–0.90). No such association was observed for stroke survivors. Conclusions: Green tea consumption can be beneficial in improving the prognosis for stroke or MI survivors, whereas coffee consumption can also be so for persons without a history of stroke or MI as well as MI survivors.

Abstract WP226: The Association of Green Tea and Coffee Consumption With Mortality From Cardiovascular Disease and All Causes Among Persons With and Without History of Stroke or Myocardial Infarction: The JACC Study

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Teramoto ◽  
Isao Muraki ◽  
Kokoro Shirai ◽  
Akiko Tamakoshi ◽  
Hiroyasu Iso
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
General Population ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Coffee Consumption ◽  
Tea Consumption ◽  
Food Frequency ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Background: Both green tea and coffee consumption have been associated with lower risks of mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all causes in general population, but little is known about those impact on persons with history of CVD. We examined the association of those consumption with these mortalities among persons with and without history of stroke or myocardial infarction in general population. Methods: The study subjects were 60,664 participants (896 stroke and 1751 myocardial infarction survivors and 58,017 persons with no history of stroke or myocardial infarction), aged 40-79 years at the baseline (1988-1990), who completed a lifestyle and medical history questionnaire including self-administered food frequency under the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risk (JACC Study). Results: During the median follow-up of 18.5 years, a total of 12,745 (7,458 men and 5,287 women) deaths including 3,737 CVD deaths were documented. Green tea and coffee consumption were inversely associated with CVD and all-cause mortality among myocardial infarction survivors as well as persons without history of stroke or myocardial infarction. After adjustment for known cardiovascular risk factors, the lower risks of mortality from CVD and all-causes associated with frequent green tea consumption (5-6 and ≥7 cups/day) or coffee consumption (≥2 cups/day) remained statistical. Conclusions: Both green tea and coffee consumption were inversely associated with risks of CVD and all-cause mortality among myocardial infarction survivors and persons without history of stroke or myocardial infarction.

Rates and Predictors of Physician-Recommended and Self-Reported Aspirin Use in 2015

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 556-565
Author(s):  
Taylor Naberhaus ◽  
Nicole K. Early ◽  
Kathleen A. Fairman ◽  
Kelsey Buckley
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Behavioral Risk ◽  
Medication History ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
History Of

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the rate of providerrecommended aspirin use through the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) database versus self-reported aspirin use through the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database and identifies factors that predict initiation of aspirin. This study provides insight into the rate of providerrecommended aspirin use versus self-reported aspirin use prior to the 2016 United States Preventive Service Task Force primary prevention recommendation update.<br/> DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of US population data obtained from medical records (NAMCS) and community-dwelling residents in four states (BRFSS) in 2015.<br/> SETTING: Physician offices (NAMCS) and households or telephone (BRFSS).<br/> PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: NAMCS: visits made by patients 40 years of age or older to physicians who permitted federal employees to abstract officevisit data. BRFSS: household or telephone interview respondents 40 years of age or older.<br/> INTERVENTIONS: Comparisons of persons with (secondary prevention) versus without (primary prevention) cardiovascular disease.<br/> MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: Recommended (NAMCS) or self-reported (BRFSS) use of aspirin.<br/> RESULTS: The sample included 19 170 patients (NAMCS), with 2 205 having a history of cardiovascular disease and 14 872 respondents (BRFSS) with 2 024 having a history of cardiovascular disease. For both primary and secondary prevention, respondents from BRFSS reported higher rates of aspirin use (27.7% primary, 65.6% secondary prevention) compared with prescribed rates from NAMCS (11.7% primary, 45.6% secondary prevention).<br/> CONCLUSIONS: Study results highlight the value of obtaining a complete medication history, including aspirin use, from all patients.

scholarly journals Creatine kinase is associated with bleeding after myocardial infarction

Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lizzy Maritza Brewster ◽  
Jim Fernand
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Creatine Kinase ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Peak Plasma ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Type Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Fatal Bleeding ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

BackgroundThe ADP-scavenging enzyme creatine kinase (CK) is reported to reduce ADP-dependent platelet activation. Therefore, we studied whether highly elevated CK after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with bleeding.MethodsData of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group phase II trial on the efficacy of angioplasty, following intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), are used to assess whether peak plasma CK (CKmax) is independently associated with adjudicated fatal or non-fatal bleeding (primary) and combined bleeding/all-cause mortality (secondary) in multivariable binomial logistic regression analysis, adjusting for baseline and treatment allocation covariates.ResultsThe included patients (n=3339, 82% men, 88% white, mean age 57 years, SE 0.2) had a history of angina pectoris (55%), hypertension (38%) and/or diabetes mellitus (13%). CKmax ranged from 16 to 55 890 IU/L (mean 2389 IU/L, SE 41), reached within 8 hours in 51% of the patients (93% within 24 hours). Adjudicated fatal/non-fatal bleeding occurred in 30% of the patients (respectively 26% in the low vs 34% in the high CK tertile), and bleeding/all-cause mortality in 35% (29% in the low vs 40% in the high CK tertile). In multivariable regression analysis, the adjusted OR for fatal/non-fatal bleeding (vs not bleeding and survival) was 2.6 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.7)/log CKmax increase, and 3.1 (2.2 to 4.4) for bleeding/all-cause mortality.ConclusionHighly elevated plasma CK after myocardial infarction might be an independent predictor of bleeding and haemorrhagic death. This biologically plausible association warrants further prospective study of the potential role of extracellular CK in ADP-dependent platelet activation and bleeding.

Pioglitazone for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients with or at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 1670-1681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Zhou ◽  
Yajing Huang ◽  
Xiaoyun Ji ◽  
Xiang Wang ◽  
Liyan Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Primary And Secondary Prevention ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Abstract Context The goal of the meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and renal adverse events in patients with or at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Design Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pioglitazone with any control were identified through PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Cardiovascular outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, defined as the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death), hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Renal outcomes included change in urinary albumin to creatinine ratio and 24-hour urinary protein excretion. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Results A total of 26 studies with 19 645 participants were enrolled. Pioglitazone reduced the risk of MACE (RR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7–0.9]), with benefit only seen in patients with a history of established CVDs (0.8 [0.7–0.9]) and not in those without (1.0 [0.7–1.3]). Regarding the individual components, pioglitazone reduced the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction (0.8 [0.6–1.0]) and nonfatal stroke (0.8 [0.7–0.9]), which was confined to patients with a history of established CVDs, whereas no treatment effect was found on cardiovascular death (1.0 [0.7–1.2]) regardless of the presence of established CVDs. Pioglitazone increased the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (1.3 [1.1–1.6]) and had no treatment effect on all-cause mortality (1.0 [0.8–1.1]). Pioglitazone reduced albuminuria by 18.5% (WMD 18.5% [95% CI, 21.1-16.0]), with a similar benefit in patients with different renal function categories. Conclusions Pioglitazone should be considered in patients with or at high risk of T2DM for the prevention of cardiovascular endpoints, especially in those with a history of established CVD who might benefit the most. Robust reductions in progression of renal disease are seen regardless of baseline renal function degree.

scholarly journals Efficacy of statin treatment based on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients: a standard meta-analysis and Bayesian network analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052092634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuannan Zhai ◽  
Kai Hou ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
YueCheng Hu ◽  
JingXia Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Statin Treatment ◽  
Comparative Effect ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Central Database

Objective Statins have been shown to be beneficial for the prevention of cardiovascular events. In elderly individuals, the efficacy of statins remains controversial and the comparative effect of statins has not been assessed. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central database were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed statins in older patients. Results Seventeen trials were analyzed. When used for secondary prevention, statins were associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, revascularization, and stroke. When used for primary prevention, statins reduced the risk of myocardial infarction and revascularization, but did not significantly affect other outcomes. A modest difference between pharmaceutical statin products was found, and high-quality evidence indicated that intensive atorvastatin had the greatest benefits for secondary prevention. Conclusions In secondary prevention, evidence strongly suggests that statins are associated with a reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and revascularization. However, differences in the effects of various statins do not appear to have significant effects on therapy in secondary prevention for the elderly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document