The impact of educational materials on compliance and persistence rates with adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment: First-year results from the Compliance of ARomatase Inhibitors AssessmenT In Daily practice through Educational approach (CARIATIDE) study

Background: In this paper, our aim was to systematically evaluate published evidence of bone fracture risk associated with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in women aged 65 and under, and diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Methods: We comprehensively searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases from January 1997 through May 2015, and reference lists of the selected articles to identify English-language randomized controlled trials and cohort studies of fracture risk. Two independent reviewers screened articles and assessed methodological quality using Risk of Bias assessment for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Fracture risk was estimated as pooled risk ratios using a random-effects model and inverse variance method. Results: Of 1926 identified articles, 21 independent studies fulfilled our selection criteria. Similar fracture risk was observed in women treated and not treated with tamoxifen [pooled risk ratio (RR) 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84–1.07]. A 35% (95% CI 1.21–1.51) higher fracture risk was observed in the aromatase inhibitor group compared with the tamoxifen group. A 17% (95% CI 1.07–1.28) higher fracture risk was observed in the aromatase inhibitor group than the no aromatase inhibitor group. Compared with the tamoxifen group, aromatase inhibitor-associated fracture risk increased by 33% (pooled RR 1.33; 95% CI 1.21–1.47) during the tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitor treatment period, but did not increase (pooled RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.72–1.37) during the post-tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitor treatment period. Conclusions: Fracture risk is significantly higher in women treated with aromatase inhibitors, especially during the treatment period. Tamoxifen is not associated with lower fracture risk while tamoxifen could potentially preserve bone mass. Better osteoporosis management programs, especially during the treatment period, are needed for this group of women.

Download Full-text

Challenges in Preventing Bone Loss Induced by Aromatase Inhibitors

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism ◽

10.1210/clinem/dgaa463 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 105 (10) ◽

pp. 3122-3133

Author(s):

Tilman D Rachner ◽

Andy Göbel ◽

Nikolai P Jaschke ◽

Lorenz C Hofbauer

Keyword(s):

Bone Loss ◽

Aromatase Inhibitor ◽

Aromatase Inhibitors ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Hormone Receptor Positive ◽

Treatment Thresholds ◽

Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment ◽

Long Term Prognosis ◽

Inhibitor Treatment

Abstract Context: Aromatase inhibitors have become a mainstay in the adjuvant treatment regimen in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. While many of these patients have an excellent long-term prognosis, adverse effects on bone represent an emerging complication of aromatase inhibitor treatment, resulting in substantial bone loss and fragility fractures. Treatment approaches to prevent aromatase inhibitor–induced bone loss typically consist of an antiresorptive approach with bisphosphonates or the RANKL antibody denosumab. However, different guidelines vary with respect to treatment thresholds, duration, and dosing. The choice of antiresorptive regime is further complicated by comorbidities and potential disease-modifying effects of individual agents. Objective: This review summarizes the evidence of how aromatase inhibitors affect bone health and provides an update of clinical approaches to preserve bone strength in affected women. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab XX: 0–0, 2020)

Download Full-text