scholarly journals Effect of dose reductions on clinical outcomes, or of outcomes on dose reductions?

The Breast ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith M. Regan
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18518-e18518
Author(s):  
Yihebali Chi ◽  
Ming Gao ◽  
Pingzhang Tang ◽  
Xiangqian Zheng ◽  
Zhengang Xu ◽  
...  

e18518 Background: Anlotinib demonstrated favorable efficacy in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial (ALTER01031, NCT02586350) for MTC which was published in 2019 ASCO annual meeting. Similar with other anti-angiogenesis drugs, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), hypertension and proteinuria were the major adverse drug reactions (ADRs) observed in this trial. We explored the association between common ADRs and the clinical outcomes with anlotinib in this subanalysis. Methods: Patients in the anlotinib group of ALTER01031 were divided into different groups according to the development of ADRs including HFS, hypertension or proteinuria. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median PFS (mPFS) for patients in different groups. The mPFS for patients with or without dose reduction were also evaluated. Results: A total of 62 patients received anlotinib in ALTER 01031. HFS of any grade was observed in 39 patients with a mPFS of 28.5 months, which was longer than in those without HFS (14.0 months, P = 0.079). The hazard ratio for progression was 0.540 (95% CI 0.252, 1.158) although statistical difference was not reached. Similarly, more survival benefit was also observed in 29 and 38 patients who experienced hypertension and proteinuria, with mPFS of 28.5 months and 22.4 months respectively. While the mPFS for patients without corresponding ADRs were only 17.0 months (HR = 0.648 [95% CI 0.320, 1.314], P = 0.237) and 14.0 months (HR = 0.738 [95% CI 0.331, 1.65], P = 0.421). Median PFS had not been reached in 20 patients with dose reduction while was recorded as 17.0 months in those without (HR = 0.707 [95% CI 0.335, 1.496], P = 0.392). Conclusions: This analysis indicated a trend of greater PFS benefit for MTC patients treated with anlotinib who experienced HFS, hypertension or proteinuria although no statistical differences were observed. A possible positive association was also observed between dose reductions and better clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT02586350.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Kelly L. Schoenbeck ◽  
Sirisha Tummala ◽  
Rebecca L. Olin ◽  
Neha G. Goyal ◽  
Anand Dhruva ◽  
...  

Introduction:Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) intolerance is commonly encountered in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Clinical trials define non-hematologic TKI intolerance as grade 3-4 toxicities, but lower grade toxicities may also impair patients' quality of life and lead to changes in medical management. We sought to compare TKI-intolerant and -tolerant CML-CP patients and their clinical outcomes, including molecular responses, rates of progression, survival, and utilization of allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Methods:We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of active CML-CP patients in our Hematology clinic between January 2017 and December 2019. We defined TKI intolerance as any grade non-hematologic toxicity that led to a change in TKI management, such as dose reduction or change of TKI. We also reviewed CML-CP patients who underwent alloSCT in the TKI era (2002-2019). AlloSCT patients were identified for chart review by ICD-10 codes and query of the institution's transplant database. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square tests, and two-tailed t-tests were used to summarize the data. Results:We identified 216 CML-CP patients (Table 1), and 161 (74.5%) met criteria for non-hematologic TKI intolerance. The median age was 59 years-old in TKI-intolerant patients and 49 in tolerant patients (P=0.011). Most patients experienced TKI-intolerance from symptoms (93.2%, n=150); symptoms included fatigue (n=77, 59.2%), arthralgias (n=36, 27.7%), nausea (n=29, 22.3%), headache (n=16, 12.3%), and edema (n=15, 11.5%). The remaining patients were TKI-intolerant based on abnormal laboratory findings such as transaminitis or hyperglycemia (6.8%, n=11/161). Of the 161 TKI-intolerant patients at last follow-up, 130 (80.7%) remained on TKI, 19 (11.8%) were on prescribed discontinuation, 6 (3.72%) were non-adherent, 5 (3.1%) were off TKI for non-CML medical problems, and 1 (0.6%) was on omacetaxine. Dose reductions occurred in the majority who remained on TKIs (n=103/130, 79.2%) and prior to TKI discontinuation (n=13/19, 68.4%). Most TKI-intolerant patients (n=122/161, 75.8%) switched TKIs, with a median of 2 agents used (range 1-5). Of 55 TKI-tolerant patients, 46 (83.6%) were on TKI, 8 (14.5%) were on discontinuation, and 1 (1.8%) was non-adherent. Only 19.6% (n=9/46) patients were dose-reduced, and they rarely changed TKIs (median of 1 agent used). MR4.5 was achieved in 49% (n=79/161) of TKI-intolerant and 41.8% (n=23/55) of TKI-tolerant patients. Only 1 patient in each group progressed to accelerated phase. TKI-intolerant and -tolerant patients had similar times since diagnosis (with a median follow up of 81.7 months and 79.7 months, respectively). Five of 161 (3.1%) TKI-intolerant patients died, all from causes unrelated to CML and TKI therapy. None of the TKI-tolerant patients died during the abstraction period. Twenty CML-CP patients underwent alloSCT from year 2002-2019; 10 (50%) were transplanted for TKI intolerance without other transplant indications (Tables 2 and 3). Three of those 10 patients also had hematologic intolerance. Four (40%) TKI-intolerant patients resumed TKI post-transplant: 3 for disease relapse, 1 for sclerotic GVHD. Seven (70%) developed GVHD, with most cases being chronic (n=6), extensive (n=6), and severe/moderate (n=6). While 80% of patients achieved MR4.5 post-transplant (n=8/10), 30% (n=3/10) experienced transplant-related mortality (TRM) with a mean post-transplant survival of 38.5 months; the remaining 7 patients were alive at a median follow-up of 37.1 months. Conclusion: CML-CP patients with non-hematologic TKI-intolerance achieved similar clinical outcomes as TKI-tolerant patients despite dose reductions and/or switching TKIs. The use of alloSCT was rare in our practice, and CML-CP patients transplanted for TKI intolerance commonly resumed TKI post-alloSCT and frequently developed extensive GVHD. In light of the high survival rate achieved with medical management in CML-CP patients with non-hematologic TKI-intolerance, including no disease- or treatment-related deaths, this analysis does not support the use of alloSCT for patients with non-hematologic TKI-intolerance. Disclosures Schoenbeck: American Society of Hematology:Research Funding.Olin:Astellas:Other: Site PI;Genentech:Consultancy;Daiichi Sankyo:Other: Site PI;Amgen:Consultancy;Genentech:Other: Site PI;Pfizer:Other: Site PI.Logan:Amphivena:Research Funding;Autolus:Research Funding;Jazz:Research Funding;Kadmon:Research Funding;Kite:Research Funding;Pharmacyclics:Research Funding;Abbvie:Consultancy;Amgen:Consultancy;Novartis:Consultancy.Smith:Revolution Medicines:Other: Research Support, Research Funding;Abbvie:Other: Research Support, Research Funding;FujiFilm:Other: Research support, Research Funding;Daiichi Sanyko:Consultancy, Honoraria;Astellas Pharma:Honoraria, Other: Research Support, Research Funding;Sanofi:Honoraria.Shah:Bristol-Myers Squibb:Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
George P Kim ◽  
Andy Surinach ◽  
Frank A Corvino ◽  
Paul Cockrum ◽  
Bruce Belanger ◽  
...  

Aim: This study sought to understand the association between liposomal irinotecan dose reductions (DRs) and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Materials & methods: A retrospective study of adult patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with liposomal irinotecan in the Flatiron Health database was conducted to assess treatment and clinical outcomes. Results: DRs occurred in 28.4% of the 320 patients in the study. Patients with DRs had longer overall survival (7.7 [95% CI: 6.2–10.2]) vs 3.6 [3.2–4.1] months) and time to discontinuation (4.2 [3.0–4.9] vs 1.4 [1.0–1.5] months) than patients without DRs. Results were consistent in a validation analysis requiring three cycles of treatment. Conclusion: Liposomal irinotecan DRs were associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with patients without DRs.


The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.K. Ismail ◽  
J. van Breeschoten ◽  
M.W.J.M. Wouters ◽  
M. van Dartel ◽  
S. van der Flier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 665-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Cockrum ◽  
Andy Surinach ◽  
George P. Kim ◽  
Daniel Mercer ◽  
Jim M. Koeller ◽  
...  

665 Background: The recommended starting dose for nal-IRI is 70mg/m2 (free base, equivalent to 80 mg/m2 salt-based dosing). This study evaluates the impact of nal-IRI dose reductions on clinical outcomes. Methods: Using the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database, de-identified data were extracted and analyzed for adult mPC pts treated with nal-IRI Jan 2014-Jan 2019 and who initiated treatment at approximately the recommended dose (RD), 70mg/m2 +/- 5mg. Initial dose was derived from structured medication records, prioritizing administrations. The cumulative dose (CD) of nal-IRI over the first six weeks of treatment, the presence of dose reductions (DR) – (a decrease ≥ 7mg/m2), overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation, and duration of treatment (DoT) were assessed. Results: 257 mPC pts treated with nal-IRI (median age: 68y, IQR: 61 - 73) were identified initiating therapy at approximately the RD. 26.5% (N = 68) of pts experienced a DR during treatment. Mean 6-week CD was 175.8 mg/m2 (SD: 77.9) among pts with no DR. For pts with DR, mean CD was 191.8 mg/m2 (53.2). Median DoT was 6.1 wks (IQR: 2.1 – 15.3). Pts that experienced a DR had a longer median DoT: 15.1 wks (7.1 – 23.0) vs 4.3. wks (2.1 – 12.1) for pts with no DR. Overall Median OS (mOS) was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.7 – 5.4). mOS for DR pts was 7.2 mos (95% CI: 5.5 – 9.7) and 3.7 mos (3.0 – 4.1) for pts who did not experience a DR. Conclusions: This real-world analysis suggests that reducing the dose of subsequent administrations of nal-IRI during treatment is associated with pts remaining on therapy longer, experiencing a larger CD, and a with longer OS. Additional real-world prospective studies are necessary to characterize the impact of nal-IRI dosing on clinical outcomes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Binger ◽  
Jennifer Kent-Walsh

Abstract Clinicians and researchers long have recognized that teaching communication partners how to provide AAC supports is essential to AAC success. One way to improve clinical outcomes is to select appropriate skills to teach communication partners. Although this sometimes seems like it should be a straightforward component of any intervention program, deciding which skills to teach partners can present multiple challenges. In this article, we will troubleshoot common issues and discuss how to select skills systematically, resulting in the desired effects for both communication partners and clients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Lynn E. Fox

Abstract Linguistic interaction models suggest that interrelationships arise between structural language components and between structural and pragmatic components when language is used in social contexts. The linguist, David Crystal (1986, 1987), has proposed that these relationships are central, not peripheral, to achieving desired clinical outcomes. For individuals with severe communication challenges, erratic or unpredictable relationships between structural and pragmatic components can result in atypical patterns of interaction between them and members of their social communities, which may create a perception of disablement. This paper presents a case study of a woman with fluent, Wernicke's aphasia that illustrates how attention to patterns of linguistic interaction may enhance AAC intervention for adults with aphasia.


Author(s):  
Charles Ellis ◽  
Molly Jacobs

Health disparities have once again moved to the forefront of America's consciousness with the recent significant observation of dramatically higher death rates among African Americans with COVID-19 when compared to White Americans. Health disparities have a long history in the United States, yet little consideration has been given to their impact on the clinical outcomes in the rehabilitative health professions such as speech-language pathology/audiology (SLP/A). Consequently, it is unclear how the absence of a careful examination of health disparities in fields like SLP/A impacts the clinical outcomes desired or achieved. The purpose of this tutorial is to examine the issue of health disparities in relationship to SLP/A. This tutorial includes operational definitions related to health disparities and a review of the social determinants of health that are the underlying cause of such disparities. The tutorial concludes with a discussion of potential directions for the study of health disparities in SLP/A to identify strategies to close the disparity gap in health-related outcomes that currently exists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document