Enhancing the capacity of oncology nurses to provide supportive care for parents with advanced cancer: Evaluation of an educational intervention

2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1798-1806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Turner ◽  
Alexandra Clavarino ◽  
Phyllis Butow ◽  
Patsy Yates ◽  
Maryanne Hargraves ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Turner ◽  
Alexandra Clavarino ◽  
Patsy Yates ◽  
Maryanne Hargraves ◽  
Veronica Connors ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 184
Author(s):  
Theocharis I. Konstantinidis ◽  
George Samonis ◽  
Pavlos Sarafis ◽  
Anastas Philalithis

BACKGROUND: Needs assessment of patients with advanced cancer (ACPs) is essential for optimal care. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ) and assessed the supportive care needs of hospitalized ACPs with solid tumors.METHODS: The validated Greek version of the NEQ along with demographic and clinical data of 95 consecutive breast, colon and lung ACPs hospitalized in the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece, were used to assess their supportive care needs. The NEQ score was subsequently rescaled to 0-100.RESULTS: NEQ displayed adequate psychometric properties in validity and reliability tests. The average number of needs reported was 8.4(4.1). Female and younger patients reported a higher score of unmet needs than their male (40.3 versus 30.0, p=0.005) and elder (40.1 versus 29.2, p=0.001) counterparts. Patients reported higher needs in receiving information about their future (73.7%), treatments (56.8%), examinations (51.6%) and for the need "to speak with people who had the same experience" (53.7%). In contrast, lower scores were observed in the assistance and treatments needs regarding intimacy (11.6%), "better attention from nurses" (15.8%), "more help with eating, dressing, and going to the bathroom" (18.9%). Lung ACPs reported more assistance and treatment needs than colon and breast ACPs (p<0.05).CONCLUSIONS: ACPs reported many unmet needs, mainly informational, that were related to gender, age, and type of cancer. NEQ is a useful tool in everyday clinical practice for obtaining information for supportive care needs. Health care personnel has to address these needs for implementing effective patient-centered care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirza Jacqueline Alcalde-Castro ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Alfredo Covarrubias-Gómez ◽  
Sofía Sánchez-Román ◽  
Paulina Quiróz-Friedman ◽  
...  

Background: Early specialized palliative care improves quality of life of patients with advanced cancer, and guidelines encourage its integration into standard oncology care. However, many patients fail to obtain timely palliative/supportive care evaluations, particularly in limited-resource settings. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients with advanced cancer who received an assessment of symptoms and were referred to supportive and palliative care services during the first year after diagnosis in a Mexican hospital. Methods: Individuals with newly diagnosed advanced solid tumors and 1 year of follow-up at the oncology clinics in the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran in Mexico City from October 2015 to April 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included. Forty-two (54.5%) were referred to the various supportive care services during the first year after diagnosis, and 23 (29.8%) were referred to the palliative care clinic. The most commonly assessed symptoms by oncologists were pain (77.9%), anorexia (74.0%), fatigue (68.8%), and nausea (55.8%), while depression/anxiety were evaluated in 10 (12.9%) patients. The oncologist offered to clarify treatment goals in 39 (50.6%) cases and evaluated the understanding of diagnosis/illness and prognosis in 22 (28.5%). Conclusion: Palliative and supportive care services were widely underutilized, which may be related to a lack of standardized symptom assessments and poor end-of-life communication. Novel strategies are needed to improve the implementation of tools for systematic symptom assessment and to optimize the integration of supportive care interventions into oncology care in developing countries.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6054-6054
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Cohen ◽  
Diana Urbauer ◽  
Michael Fisch ◽  
Bryan Fellman ◽  
Holly Hough ◽  
...  

6054 Background: The widespread use of CAM in academic oncology settings has been well documented. However, there is a lack of communication between patients and health care professionals on CAM that may have negative health consequences. No comprehensive study of CAM use in community oncology settings exists. We examined the benefits of a brief educational intervention on nurse discussions of CAM with patients. Methods: A multi-site, randomized trial of an educational intervention (brief video, resource list) designed to encourage oncology nurses to discuss CAM use with their patients was conducted within the MD Anderson CCOP network. Nurses (N=175) and patients (baseline N=699 and different set of patients after intervention N=650) completed questions about CAM use, communication, and knowledge. Results: Nurses were 97% female, 96% non-Hispanic white. Two months after the intervention, nurses in the intervention group reported that they were more likely to ask about CAM use than those in the control group (OR=4.2; p<.005) and asked more of their last 5 patients about CAM use (p=.003). No significant intervention effect was found for the proportion of patients in the clinic who indicated they were asked about CAM use after the intervention (OR=1.6, p>.10). Approximately 40% of patients reported using CAM following their cancer diagnosis yet the majority of nurses estimated less than 25% of their patients used CAM. Conclusions: CAM use in community-based oncology patients is high and there is an underestimation of use by the oncology nurses. This very brief intervention significantly improved how often nurses reported asking patients about their CAM use. However, the patients of the nurses did not reflect this change in communication. Additional types of interventions are needed to increase communication between patients and nurses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document