Complete response upon salvage chemotherapy after anti-PD1 failure: Watch and wait

2021 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 155-157
Author(s):  
Khalil Saleh ◽  
Christophe Bellanger ◽  
Gabriel Garcia ◽  
Marion Classe ◽  
Caroline Even
1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Levi ◽  
D Thomson ◽  
V Harvey ◽  
G Gill ◽  
D Raghavan ◽  
...  

Fifty-one patients with advanced germ cell malignancy who had either failed to achieve complete remission with initial cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin chemotherapy or who had relapsed after complete response (CR) to this therapy and then proven refractory on retreatment, were treated with etoposide (75 mg/m2 for 3 days), dactinomycin (1 mg/m2 day 1), and methotrexate (30 mg/m2 day 1) (EAM) every 3 weeks. Courses were continued until maximum response without empirical limit, and if complete remission was achieved, two courses of consolidation therapy were given before cessation of treatment. Thirteen patients (25%) were complete responders with residual masses containing fibrosis or benign teratoma being subsequently resected in seven patients. Two patients had persisting viable carcinoma within residual masses that were completely resected, leaving no evidence of disease (NED); the combined CR plus NED rate was 29%. The only pretreatment factor significantly influencing this response rate was tumor volume. Toxicities were moderate, with leukopenia being observed in 28% of patients, but it was severe in only 2%. There was one death from septicemia. Severe nausea and vomiting occurred in only 9% of patients and treatment-related stomatitis was observed in 42%. All patients achieving CR plus NED have been followed for a minimum of 5 years and no relapses have occurred, suggesting that these patients are cured. Unlike other regimens of salvage chemotherapy, this treatment program did not contain cisplatin and it is contended that a completely noncrossresistant drug regimen based on etoposide provides the opportunity to further improve the curability of patients with advanced germ cell cancer.


2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00158
Author(s):  
Ashray Gunjur ◽  
Grace Chazan ◽  
Genni Newnham ◽  
Sue-Anne McLachlan

PURPOSE: In patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, it may be reasonable to adopt a watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy rather than proceed to immediate resection of the rectum. Patient preferences for this strategy are unknown. The primary aim of the current study was to determine the feasibility of assessing hypothetical recurrence and survival differences that relevant patients would tolerate to avoid immediate resection of the rectum. A secondary aim included estimating patients’ tolerance thresholds and the factors that might predict them. METHODS: We developed a study-specific written questionnaire based on a previously validated instrument. Hypothetical time tradeoff tasks were used to determine the recurrence rate patients would accept to adopt a W&W strategy and the survival benefit that would be needed to justify choosing immediate resection over W&W. Feasibility was measured on the basis of response rate, the stated ease of completion and the satisfaction of task, and time used. RESULTS: Twenty of 31 potentially eligible patients completed the study-specific questionnaire. The majority of respondents felt that questions were clear (70%) and not hard to understand (65%). The median acceptable recurrence risk to adopt a W&W strategy was 20% (interquartile range [IQR], 10%-35%). Patients required a median of 2.0 extra years of survival (IQR, 1.0-3.0 years) over a baseline 7.0 years, and they required a median extra 10% (IQR, 4%-19%) over baseline 70% survival rates to justify immediate resection. CONCLUSION: Measuring the preferences of patients with rectal cancer using time tradeoff methods seemed to be feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm how acceptable a W&W strategy would be for relevant patients.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1954-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
John N. Allan ◽  
Angelique Boyer ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Roger N Pearse ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pomalidomide and Carfilzomib (Cfz) are two recently approved agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) that has relapsed after prior therapy including an IMiD and bortezomib. The sequencing of these agents to achieve maximum tumor reduction is thus far not known. We have previously reported response data from the combination clarithromycin, pomalidomide, dexamethasone (ClaPD) for relapsed or refractory MM. (Mark et al, ASH 2012). We examined the subset of these patients that had received a Cfz-based regimen prior to ClaPD as well as the subset of patients that received a Cfz-based regimen after ClaPD to determine whether the sequence of agents had any impact on response. Methods One hundred nineteen patients with heavily pretreated RRMM were enrolled into a single-institution study to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of ClaPD. Eligible subjects had at least 3 prior lines of therapy, one line of which must have included lenalidomide. ClaPD is clarithromycin 500mg twice daily; pomalidomide 4mg for days 1-21, and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1,8,15,22 of a 28-day cycle. Two subsets of patients were compared: 1) Subjects that had received treatment with a Cfz-based prior to ClaPD (CP) and 2) Subjects that had received a Cfz-based therapy after progression on ClaPD (PC). Disease response evaluation was performed monthly with immunoelectrophoresis and free light chain analysis; bone marrow biopsy with skeletal imaging was used to confirm MM progression or complete response (CR). Results Fourteen patients comprised CP and 20 in PC. Patients in the CP group were more heavily pre-treated with a median of 6 (range 3-15) lines of therapy, as compared to 5 lines (range 3-10) for PC. Responses are shown in Table 1. Median cycles of ClaPD and Cfz received in PC was 6.5 (range 2-16) and 5 (1-14), respectively. Median cycles of Cfz and ClaPD in the CP group was 8 (1-19) and 5 (1-23), respectively. CR complete response; VGPR: very good partial response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease; ORR: overall response rate Conclusions ClaPD and a Cfz-based regimen appear to have equally effective response regardless of sequence in salvage chemotherapy. Somewhat deeper responses are seen with ClaPD after Cfz as compared to Cfz after ClaPD, which is intriguing given that the CP group had more prior lines of treatment than PC. Longer follow-up to analyze duration of the response is needed prior to concluding which sequence (PC vs CP) is more effective. This data supports the use of pomalidomide after carfilzomib failure and vice-versa as potent salvage therapeutic options. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Zafar:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15028-e15028
Author(s):  
Jozef Mardiak ◽  
Michal Mego ◽  
Viera Miskovska ◽  
Zuzana Sycova-Mila ◽  
Jana Obertova ◽  
...  

e15028 Background: Currently, TIP with higher dose of paclitaxel (250mg/m2) is considered standard salvage chemotherapy in GCTs with good prognostic features. However, until 2007, we utilized regimen with standard dose of paclitaxel (175mg/m2). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of TIP with the standard versus higher dose of paclitaxel as first salvage therapy for patients with relapsed GCTs. Methods: This retrospective study included 64 patients with relapsed GCTs treated with TIP as first salvage therapy between 1998 and 2010 in two major cancer centers in Slovakia. Forty five patients (70%) patients had favorable prognostic features for response (testis primary tumor site and prior complete response to induction chemotherapy regimen). Four cycles of standard dose (175mg/m2, 37 patients) or higher dose (250 mg/m2, 27 patients) of paclitaxel (day 1) with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2 (day 1-5) and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 (day 1-5) were given 21 days apart with G-CSF support, followed by resection of resectable radiographic residua. Results: Nineteen of 37 (51%) patients treated with standard dose of paclitaxel achieved favourable response (complete remission or partial remission with negative serum tumor markers) compared to 20 of 27 (74%) patients treated with higher dose of paclitaxel (p = 0.07). In median follow-up of 23.9 months 37 patients (58%) experienced disease relapse and 33 (52%) patients died. Patients treated with higher dose of paclitaxel had better progression-free survival (median: not reached vs. 7 months, HR = 0.54, 0.28 - 1.04; p = 0.06) and overall survival (median: not reached vs. 33 months, HR = 0.69, 0.34-1.39; p = 0.31) compared to patients treated with standard dose of paclitaxel. Conclusions: Our data support the hypothesis that higher dose of paclitaxel with ifosfamide and cisplatin is associated with better outcome compared to standard dose of paclitaxel in patients with relapsed GCTs treated in first relapse.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22019-e22019
Author(s):  
Payal Shah ◽  
Patrick Boland ◽  
Anna C. Pavlick

e22019 Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have dramatically altered the prognosis of metastatic melanoma (MM); however, fifty percent of patients will not respond to ICI. For these patients, the next choice of treatment includes targeted therapy or a clinical trial if eligible. If these treatment choices have already been utilized or are not available to the patient, there may be value in attempting a course of salvage chemotherapy (CTX). Limited clinical trial evidence has demonstrated unexpected efficacy of CTX after prior progression on ipilimumab, offering higher disease control rates than expected from what is seen in first-line chemotherapy. The phenomenon of a “priming” effect of ICI on CTX efficacy has been shown in patients of various solid tumors after progression on anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of salvage CTX after prior ICI therapy for patients with MM. Patients with ocular melanoma were excluded, as this tumor subtype is known to have reduced response to immunotherapy. Methods: By retrospective analysis, patients were included under an IRB approved waiver of consent. We identified patients with MM treated with ICI therapy between Jan, 2011 and July, 2019 who were subsequently treated with salvage CTX as a result of progression of disease (POD). Salvage CTX included dacarbazine, carboplatin, temozolomide, paclitaxel, or a combination. We assessed response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP) from the onset of salvage CTX. Results: A total of 22 patients who satisfied the above criteria were identified. The majority of this population had a course of single agent ICI as well as a course of combination ICI prior to salvage CTX (72.7%, n = 16/22). 13 (59.1%) patients had POD on salvage CTX with a median TTP of 10.9 weeks. 9 (40.9%) patients responded to salvage CTX. 3 (13.6%) patients achieved a complete response, 4 (18.2%) patients achieved a partial response and 2 (9.1%) patients achieved stable disease. Mean durability of response was 53.6 weeks, ranging from 7-194 weeks. Conclusions: ICI “priming” prior to salvage CTX efficacy may improve disease responsiveness to CTX. This sequence of therapy may offer patients another reasonable treatment option. Despite the small sample size of this study, a prospective clinical trial in MM exploring CTX following ICI progression should be considered.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (28) ◽  
pp. 6999-7004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen A. Ronnen ◽  
G. Varuni Kondagunta ◽  
Jennifer Bacik ◽  
Stephanie Marion ◽  
Dean F. Bajorin ◽  
...  

Purpose To define the incidence, clinical features, and outcome to salvage chemotherapy in patients with late-relapse germ cell tumor (GCT) after a complete response to first-line chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Two patient populations were examined. First, retrospective analysis of 246 patients treated on a clinical trial with salvage chemotherapy was performed; 29 patients with late-relapse GCT were identified and evaluated for treatment outcome and survival. Salvage regimens included paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, single agents, or a high-dose chemotherapy program. Second, the incidence of late relapse was assessed by retrospective analysis of 551 patients after a complete response (CR) to first-line chemotherapy. Results Twenty-nine patients received salvage chemotherapy on a clinical trial for late relapse GCT. The median survival was 23.9 months. At a median follow-up of 50.6 months, there were nine survivors. The chemotherapy regimens varied, but the only CRs were observed in patients treated with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin. Seven (50%) of 14 patients treated with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin achieved a continuous CR. Among the second population of 551 patients who had previously achieved a CR to a first-line chemotherapy trial, 17 were identified as having a late relapse (3%). The median time to relapse for these 17 patients was 7.8 years. Conclusion Late-relapse GCT is uncommon and is associated with a poor prognosis resulting from a high degree of resistance to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin followed by surgery may be effective in patients with late-relapse GCT who are not considered candidates for primary surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v204
Author(s):  
J. Souza ◽  
R. Guimarães ◽  
M.B. Siqueira ◽  
R. Gil ◽  
R. Araujo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document