The use of biomass to reduce power derating in combined cycle power plants retrofitted with post-combustion CO2 capture

2016 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Carapellucci ◽  
Lorena Giordano ◽  
Maura Vaccarelli
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle

scholarly journals Preliminary Performance and Cost Evaluation of Four Alternative Technologies for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture in Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuele Gatti ◽  
Emanuele Martelli ◽  
Daniele Di Bona ◽  
Marco Gabba ◽  
Roberto Scaccabarozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supersonic Flow ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Cost Evaluation ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Co2 Absorption ◽  
Molten Carbonate ◽  
Energy Penalty

The objective of this study is to assess the technical and economic potential of four alternative processes suitable for post-combustion CO2 capture from natural gas-fired power plants. These include: CO2 permeable membranes; molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs); pressurized CO2 absorption integrated with a multi-shaft gas turbine and heat recovery steam cycle; and supersonic flow-driven CO2 anti-sublimation and inertial separation. A common technical and economic framework is defined, and the performance and costs of the systems are evaluated based on process simulations and preliminary sizing. A state-of-the-art natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) without CO2 capture is taken as the reference case, whereas the same NGCC designed with CO2 capture (using chemical absorption with aqueous monoethanolamine solvent) is used as a base case. In an additional benchmarking case, the same NGCC is equipped with aqueous piperazine (PZ) CO2 absorption, to assess the techno-economic perspective of an advanced amine solvent. The comparison highlights that a combined cycle integrated with MCFCs looks the most attractive technology, both in terms of energy penalty and economics, i.e., CO2 avoided cost of 49 $/tCO2 avoided, and the specific primary energy consumption per unit of CO2 avoided (SPECCA) equal to 0.31 MJLHV/kgCO2 avoided. The second-best capture technology is PZ scrubbing (SPECCA = 2.73 MJLHV/kgCO2 avoided and cost of CO2 avoided = 68 $/tCO2 avoided), followed by the monoethanolamine (MEA) base case (SPECCA = 3.34 MJLHV/kgCO2 avoided and cost of CO2 avoided = 75 $/tCO2 avoided), and the supersonic flow driven CO2 anti-sublimation and inertial separation system and CO2 permeable membranes. The analysis shows that the integrated MCFC–NGCC systems allow the capture of CO2 with considerable reductions in energy penalty and costs.

System Integration and Techno-Economy Analysis of the IGCC Plant With CO2 Capture: Results of the EU H2-IGCC Project

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mansouri Majoumerd ◽  
Mohsen Assadi ◽  
Peter Breuhaus ◽  
Øystein Arild
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Capital Costs ◽  
Cost Of Electricity ◽  
Plant Components

The overall goal of the European co-financed H2-IGCC project was to provide and demonstrate technical solutions for highly efficient and reliable gas turbine technology in the next generation of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants with CO2 capture suitable for combusting undiluted H2-rich syngas. This paper aims at providing an overview of the main activities performed in the system analysis working group of the H2-IGCC project. These activities included the modeling and integration of different plant components to establish a baseline IGCC configuration, adjustments and modifications of the baseline configuration to reach the selected IGCC configuration, performance analysis of the selected plant, performing techno-economic assessments and finally benchmarking with competing fossil-based power technologies. In this regard, an extensive literature survey was performed, validated models (components and sub-systems) were used, and inputs from industrial partners were incorporated into the models. Accordingly, different plant components have been integrated considering the practical operation of the plant. Moreover, realistic assumptions have been made to reach realistic techno-economic evaluations. The presented results show that the efficiency of the IGCC plant with CO2 capture is 35.7% (lower heating value basis). The results also confirm that the efficiency is reduced by 11.3 percentage points due to the deployment of CO2 capture in the IGCC plant. The specific capital costs for the IGCC plant with capture are estimated to be 2,901 €/(kW net) and the cost of electricity for such a plant is 90 €/MWh. It is also shown that the natural gas combined cycle without CO2 capture requires the lowest capital investment, while the lowest cost of electricity is related to IGCC plant without CO2 capture.

scholarly journals Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2161-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Siegelman ◽  
Phillip J. Milner ◽  
Eugene J. Kim ◽  
Simon C. Weston ◽  
Jeffrey R. Long
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Primary Energy ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
New Research

As natural gas supplies a growing share of global primary energy, new research efforts are needed to develop adsorbents for carbon capture from gas-fired power plants alongside efforts targeting emissions from coal-fired plants.

scholarly journals Optimization of the design, operating conditions, and coupling configuration of combined cycle power plants and CO2 capture processes by minimizing the mitigation cost

2018 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. 870-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia L. Mores ◽  
Juan I. Manassaldi ◽  
Nicolás J. Scenna ◽  
José A. Caballero ◽  
Miguel C. Mussati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Mitigation Cost

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells for Retrofitting Postcombustion CO2 Capture in Coal and Natural Gas Power Plants

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Spinelli ◽  
Stefano Campanari ◽  
Stefano Consonni ◽  
Matteo C. Romano ◽  
Thomas Kreutz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Cells ◽  
Fuel Cell ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Co2 Separation ◽  
Molten Carbonate ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells

The state-of-the-art conventional technology for postcombustion capture of CO2 from fossil-fueled power plants is based on chemical solvents, which requires substantial energy consumption for regeneration. A promising alternative, available in the near future, is the application of molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFC) for CO2 separation from postcombustion flue gases. Previous studies related to this technology showed both high efficiency and high carbon capture rates, especially when the fuel cell is thermally integrated in the flue gas path of a natural gas-fired combined cycle or an integrated gasification combined cycle plant. This work compares the application of MCFC-based CO2 separation process to pulverized coal fired steam cycles (PCC) and natural gas combined cycles (NGCC) as a “retrofit” to the original power plant. Mass and energy balances are calculated through detailed models for both power plants, with fuel cell behavior simulated using a 0D model calibrated against manufacturers' specifications and based on experimental measurements, specifically carried out to support this study. The resulting analysis includes a comparison of the energy efficiency and CO2 separation efficiency as well as an economic comparison of the cost of CO2 avoided (CCA) under several economic scenarios. The proposed configurations reveal promising performance, exhibiting very competitive efficiency and economic metrics in comparison with conventional CO2 capture technologies. Application as a MCFC retrofit yields a very limited (<3%) decrease in efficiency for both power plants (PCC and NGCC), a strong reduction (>80%) in CO2 emission and a competitive cost for CO2 avoided (25–40 €/ton).

scholarly journals Energy and Economic Analysis of the CO2 Capture from Flue Gas of Combined Cycle Power Plants

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 1165-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maura Vaccarelli ◽  
Roberto Carapellucci ◽  
Lorena Giordano
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle

Flue Gas Recirculation in a Gas Turbine: Impact on Performance and Operational Behavior

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Sander ◽  
Richard Carroni ◽  
Stefan Rofka ◽  
Eribert Benz
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combustion Process ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Flue Gas Recirculation ◽  
Overall Performance ◽  
Gas Recirculation ◽  
The Impact

The rigorous reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the upcoming decades is only achievable with contribution from the following strategies: production efficiency, demand reduction of energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) capture from fossil fueled power plants. Since fossil fueled power plants contribute largely to the overall global greenhouse gas emissions (> 25% [1]), it is worthwhile to capture and store the produced CO2 from those power generation processes. For natural-gas-fired power plants, post-combustion CO2 capture is the most mature technology for low emissions power plants. The capture of CO2 is achieved by chemical absorption of CO2 from the exhaust gas of the power plant. Compared to coal fired power plants, an advantage of applying CO2 capture to a natural-gas-fired combined cycle power plant (CCPP) is that the reference cycle (without CO2 capture) achieves a high net efficiency. This far outweighs the drawback of the lower CO2 concentration in the exhaust. Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR) means that flue gas after the HRSG is partially cooled down and then fed back to the GT intake. In this context FGR is beneficial because the concentration of CO2 can be significantly increased, the volumetric flow to the CO2 capture unit will be reduced, and the overall performance of the CCPP with CO2 capture is increased. In this work the impact of FGR on both the Gas Turbine (GT) and the Combined Cycle Power Plant (CCPP) is investigated and analyzed. In addition, the impact of FGR for a CCPP with and without CO2 capture is investigated. The fraction of flue gas that is recirculated back to the GT, need further to be cooled, before it is mixed with ambient air. Sensitivity studies on flue gas recirculation ratio and temperature are conducted. Both parameters affect the GT with respect to change in composition of working fluid, the relative humidity at the compressor inlet, and the impact on overall performance on both GT and CCPP. The conditions at the inlet of the compressor also determine how the GT and water/steam cycle are impacted separately due to FGR. For the combustion system the air/fuel-ratio (AFR) is an important parameter to show the impact of FGR on the combustion process. The AFR indicates how close the combustion process operates to stoichiometric (or technical) limit for complete combustion. The lower the AFR, the closer operates the combustion process to the stoichiometric limit. Furthermore, the impact on existing operational limitations and the operational behavior in general are investigated and discussed in context of an operation concept for a GT with FGR.

Process Analysis of Selective Exhaust Gas Recirculation for CO2 Capture in Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants Using Amines

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elena Diego ◽  
Jean-Michel Bellas ◽  
Mohamed Pourkashanian
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Exhaust Gas Recirculation ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Exhaust Gas ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Gas Recirculation

Post-combustion CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants is challenging due to the large flow of flue gas with low CO2 content (∼3–4%vol.) that needs to be processed in the capture stage. A number of alternatives have been proposed to solve this issue and reduce the costs of the associated CO2 capture plant. This work focuses on the selective exhaust gas recirculation (S-EGR) configuration, which uses a membrane to selectively recirculate CO2 back to the inlet of the compressor of the turbine, thereby greatly increasing the CO2 content of the flue gas sent to the capture system. For this purpose, a parallel S-EGR NGCC system (53% S-EGR ratio) coupled to an amine capture plant using MEA 30%wt. was simulated using gCCS (gPROMS). It was benchmarked against an unabated NGCC system, a conventional NGCC coupled with an amine capture plant (NGCC+CCS), and an EGR NGCC power plant (39% EGR ratio) using amine scrubbing as the downstream capture technology. The results obtained indicate that the net power efficiency of the parallel S-EGR system can be up to 49.3% depending on the specific consumption of the auxiliary S-EGR systems, compared to the 49.0% and 49.8% values obtained for the NGCC+CCS and EGR systems, respectively. A preliminary economic study was also carried out to quantify the potential of the parallel S-EGR configuration. This high-level analysis shows that the cost of electricity for the parallel S-EGR system varies from 82.1–90.0 $/MWhe for the scenarios considered, with the cost of CO2 avoided being in the range of 79.7–105.1 $/tonne CO2. The results obtained indicate that there are potential advantages of the parallel S-EGR system in comparison to the NGCC+CCS configuration in some scenarios. However, further benefits with respect to the EGR configuration will depend on future advancements and cost reductions achieved on membrane-based systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document