System Integration and Techno-Economy Analysis of the IGCC Plant With CO2 Capture: Results of the EU H2-IGCC Project

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mansouri Majoumerd ◽  
Mohsen Assadi ◽  
Peter Breuhaus ◽  
Øystein Arild
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Capital Costs ◽  
Cost Of Electricity ◽  
Plant Components

The overall goal of the European co-financed H2-IGCC project was to provide and demonstrate technical solutions for highly efficient and reliable gas turbine technology in the next generation of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants with CO2 capture suitable for combusting undiluted H2-rich syngas. This paper aims at providing an overview of the main activities performed in the system analysis working group of the H2-IGCC project. These activities included the modeling and integration of different plant components to establish a baseline IGCC configuration, adjustments and modifications of the baseline configuration to reach the selected IGCC configuration, performance analysis of the selected plant, performing techno-economic assessments and finally benchmarking with competing fossil-based power technologies. In this regard, an extensive literature survey was performed, validated models (components and sub-systems) were used, and inputs from industrial partners were incorporated into the models. Accordingly, different plant components have been integrated considering the practical operation of the plant. Moreover, realistic assumptions have been made to reach realistic techno-economic evaluations. The presented results show that the efficiency of the IGCC plant with CO2 capture is 35.7% (lower heating value basis). The results also confirm that the efficiency is reduced by 11.3 percentage points due to the deployment of CO2 capture in the IGCC plant. The specific capital costs for the IGCC plant with capture are estimated to be 2,901 €/(kW net) and the cost of electricity for such a plant is 90 €/MWh. It is also shown that the natural gas combined cycle without CO2 capture requires the lowest capital investment, while the lowest cost of electricity is related to IGCC plant without CO2 capture.

CO2 Emissions Reduction From Coal-Fired Power Generation: A Techno-Economic Comparison

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Tola ◽  
Giorgio Cau ◽  
Francesca Ferrara ◽  
Alberto Pettinau
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Coal Combustion ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Emissions ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Capital Costs

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) represents a key solution to control the global warming reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. This study reports a comparative performance assessment of different power generation technologies, including ultrasupercritical (USC) pulverized coal combustion plant with postcombustion CO2 capture, integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) with precombustion CO2 capture, and oxy-coal combustion (OCC) unit. These three power plants have been studied considering traditional configuration, without CCS, and a more complex configuration with CO2 capture. These technologies (with and without CCS systems) have been compared from both the technical and economic points of view, considering a reference thermal input of 1000 MW. As for CO2 storage, the sequestration in saline aquifers has been considered. Whereas a conventional (without CCS) coal-fired USC power plant results to be more suitable than IGCC for power generation, IGCC becomes more competitive for CO2-free plants, being the precombustion CO2 capture system less expensive (from the energetic point of view) than the postcombustion one. In this scenario, oxy-coal combustion plant is currently not competitive with USC and IGCC, due to the low industrial experience, which means higher capital and operating costs and a lower plant operating reliability. But in a short-term future, a progressive diffusion of commercial-scale OCC plants will allow a reduction of capital costs and an improvement of the technology, with higher efficiency and reliability. This means that OCC promises to become competitive with USC and also with IGCC.

scholarly journals Preliminary Performance and Cost Evaluation of Four Alternative Technologies for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture in Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuele Gatti ◽  
Emanuele Martelli ◽  
Daniele Di Bona ◽  
Marco Gabba ◽  
Roberto Scaccabarozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supersonic Flow ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Cost Evaluation ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Co2 Absorption ◽  
Molten Carbonate ◽  
Energy Penalty

The objective of this study is to assess the technical and economic potential of four alternative processes suitable for post-combustion CO2 capture from natural gas-fired power plants. These include: CO2 permeable membranes; molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs); pressurized CO2 absorption integrated with a multi-shaft gas turbine and heat recovery steam cycle; and supersonic flow-driven CO2 anti-sublimation and inertial separation. A common technical and economic framework is defined, and the performance and costs of the systems are evaluated based on process simulations and preliminary sizing. A state-of-the-art natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) without CO2 capture is taken as the reference case, whereas the same NGCC designed with CO2 capture (using chemical absorption with aqueous monoethanolamine solvent) is used as a base case. In an additional benchmarking case, the same NGCC is equipped with aqueous piperazine (PZ) CO2 absorption, to assess the techno-economic perspective of an advanced amine solvent. The comparison highlights that a combined cycle integrated with MCFCs looks the most attractive technology, both in terms of energy penalty and economics, i.e., CO2 avoided cost of 49 $/tCO2 avoided, and the specific primary energy consumption per unit of CO2 avoided (SPECCA) equal to 0.31 MJLHV/kgCO2 avoided. The second-best capture technology is PZ scrubbing (SPECCA = 2.73 MJLHV/kgCO2 avoided and cost of CO2 avoided = 68 $/tCO2 avoided), followed by the monoethanolamine (MEA) base case (SPECCA = 3.34 MJLHV/kgCO2 avoided and cost of CO2 avoided = 75 $/tCO2 avoided), and the supersonic flow driven CO2 anti-sublimation and inertial separation system and CO2 permeable membranes. The analysis shows that the integrated MCFC–NGCC systems allow the capture of CO2 with considerable reductions in energy penalty and costs.

Seven Years of Putnam Plant Operation: Part 1–2

1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. C. Tandon ◽  
D. A. Moss
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Heat Rate ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
High Availability ◽  
Fuel Utilization ◽  
Residual Oil ◽  
L System ◽  
Efficient Power ◽  
Plant Components

Florida Power and Light Company’s Putnam Station, one of the most efficient power plants in the FP&L system, is in a unique and enviable position from an operational viewpoint. Its operation, in the last seven years, has evolved through a triple phase fuel utilization from distillate to residual oil and finally to natural gas. This paper compares the availability/reliability of the Putnam combined cycle station and the starting reliability of the combustion turbines in each of the operating periods. A review of the data shows that high availability/reliability is not fuel selective when appropriate actions are developed and implemented to counteract the detractors. This paper also includes experience with heat rate and power degradation of various power plant components and programs implemented to restore performance.

scholarly journals Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2161-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Siegelman ◽  
Phillip J. Milner ◽  
Eugene J. Kim ◽  
Simon C. Weston ◽  
Jeffrey R. Long
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Primary Energy ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
New Research

As natural gas supplies a growing share of global primary energy, new research efforts are needed to develop adsorbents for carbon capture from gas-fired power plants alongside efforts targeting emissions from coal-fired plants.

scholarly journals The Optimization of Combined Cycle HRSGs as a Function of the Plant Load Duty

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Dechamps
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Steam Generator ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Load Factor ◽  
Heat Recovery Steam Generator ◽  
Economic Optimization ◽  
Cost Of Electricity ◽  
The Cost

Natural gas fired combined cycle power plants now take a substantial share of the power generation market, mainly because they can be delivering power with a remarkable efficiency shortly after the decision to install is taken, and because they are a relatively low capital cost option. The power generation markets becoming more and more competitive in terms of the cost of electricity, the trend is to go for high performance equipments, notably as far as the gas turbine and the heat recovery steam generator are concerned. The heat recovery steam generator is the essential link in the combined cycle plant, and should be optimized with respect to the cost of electricity. This asks for a techno-economic optimization with an objective function which comprises both the plant efficiency and the initial investment. This paper applies on an example the incremental cost method, which allows to optimize parameters like the pinch points and the superheat temperatures. The influence of the plant load duty on this optimization is emphasized. This is essential, because the load factor will not usually remain constant during the plant life-time. The example which is presented shows the influence of the load factor, which is important, as the plant goes down in merit order with time, following the introduction of more modern, more efficient power plants on the same grid.

Thermoeconomic Optimization of COOLCEP-S: A Novel Zero-CO2-Emission Power Cycle Using LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) Coldness

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Liu ◽  
Noam Lior ◽  
Na Zhang ◽  
Wei Han
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Payback Period ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Pinch Point ◽  
Cost Of Electricity ◽  
The Cost

This paper presents a thermoeconomic optimization of a novel zero-CO2 and other emissions and high efficiency power and refrigeration cogeneration system, COOLCEP-S† which uses the liquefied natural gas (LNG) coldness during its revaporization. It was predicted that at the turbine inlet temperature (TIT) of 900°C, the energy efficiency of the COOLCEP-S system reaches 59%. The thermoeconomic optimization determines the specific cost, the cost of electricity, and the system payback period. The optimization started by performing a thermodynamic sensitivity analysis, which has shown that for a fixed TIT and pressure ratio, the pinch point temperature difference in the recuperator, ΔTp1, and that in the condenser, ΔTp2, are the most significant unconstrained variables to have a significant effect on the thermal performance of this novel cycle. The thermoeconomic analysis of the cycle (with fixed net power output of 20 MW and plant life of 40 years) shows that the payback period with the revenue from electricity and CO2 mitigation was ∼5.9 years, and would be reduced to ∼3.1 years when there is a market for the refrigeration byproduct. The capital investment cost of the economically optimized plant is estimated to be about $1,000/kWe, and the cost of electricity is estimated to be 0.34–0.37 CNY/kWh (∼0.04 $/kWh). These values are much lower than those of conventional coal power plants being installed at this time in China, which, in contrast to COOLCEP-S, do produce CO2 emissions at that.

scholarly journals Technical Evaluation of Simplified IGCC Components

1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Horner ◽  
R. K. Alff ◽  
J. C. Corman
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Fixed Bed ◽  
Exhaust System ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Fuel Gas ◽  
Capital Costs ◽  
Coal Gas ◽  
Hot Gas

Simplified integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants offer attractive advantages for improving the performance of coal to electricity systems. This plant configuration, which utilizes a coal gasifier, hot gas cleanup system, and gas turbine combined cycle, has the potential to reduce both capital costs for equipment and fuel costs through improved efficiency. This paper reports the results of fuel supply and gas turbine testing on actual hot low-Btu coal gas. A pilot-scale advanced fixed-bed gasifier has been modified to supply hot coal gas to a particulate removal cyclone and then to a gas turbine simulator. The hot gas is combusted in a General Electric MS6000 combustor developed for low-Btu gas fuel. The combusted product flows through a MS6000 turbine first-stage nozzle sector. The exhaust gases from the nozzle sector pass over air-cooled cylindrical ash deposition pin specimens and then into a water quench exhaust system. Extensive instrumentation and sampling provisions are utilized to characterize the fuel gas, the combustion gases, and the ash deposits formed on turbine components. Two regimes of nozzle metal surface temperatures have been investigated by separate testing performed including 500–600 °F with water-cooled and 1500–1650 °F with air-cooled nozzle sectors. Results from the test program have provided key data related to fuel gas cleanup and the tolerance of gas turbine hot gas path parts to the products of combustion from coal-derived fuels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document