Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of low-dose and high-dose baclofen in the treatment of alcohol dependence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 795-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimi Pierce ◽  
Arjen Sutterland ◽  
Esther M. Beraha ◽  
Kirsten Morley ◽  
Wim van den Brink
2020 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2019-318245
Author(s):  
Ming-Hsiu Chiang ◽  
Hsingjin Eugene Liu ◽  
Jinn-Li Wang

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of low-dose or no aspirin with conventional high-dose aspirin for the initial treatment in the acute-phase of Kawasaki disease (KD).DesignA meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised control trials and cohort studies.MethodsAll available articles that compared different dosage of aspirin in the acute-phase of KD published until 20 September 2019 were included from the databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Central without language restrictions. Extracted data from eligible studies were reviewed by two authors independently and analysed by using RStudio software.ResultsNine cohorts with a total of 12 182 children were enrolled. We found that low-dose (3–5 mg/kg/day) or no aspirin in the acute-phase KD was associated with reducing the risk of coronary artery lesions (CALs, OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.95). No differences were observed in intravenous immunoglobulin resistance, length of hospital stay and fever days after admission (OR=1.35, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.98; standard mean difference (SMD)=0.17, 95% CI −1.07 to 1.4; SMD=0.3, 95% CI −1.51 to 2.11) in the low-dose/no aspirin subgroup compared with the high-dose (≥30 mg/kg/day) aspirin subgroup. We did not identify any potential factors affecting the homogeneity of CAL risk as well as clinical important effects in all included studies.ConclusionsPrescribing low-dose or no aspirin in the acute-phase of KD might be associated with a decreased incidence of CAL. However, additional well-designed prospective trials are required to support the theory.


BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e014171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Li ◽  
Li-ping Qu ◽  
Dong Qi ◽  
Bo Shen ◽  
Yi-mei Wang ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of high-dose versus low-dose haemofiltration on the survival of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). We hypothesised that high-dose treatments are not associated with a higher risk of mortality.DesignMeta-analysis.SettingRandomised controlled trials and two-arm prospective and retrospective studies were included.ParticipantsCritically ill patients with AKI.InterventionsContinuous renal replacement therapy.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary outcomes: 90-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, hospital mortality; secondary outcomes: length of ICU and hospital stay.ResultEight studies including 2970 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled results showed no significant difference in the 90-mortality rate between patients treated with high-dose or low-dose haemofiltration (pooled OR=0.90, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.11, p=0.32). Findings were similar for ICU (pooled OR=1.12, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.34, p=0.21) and hospital mortality (pooled OR=1.03, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.30, p=0.84). Length of ICU and hospital stay were similar between high-dose and low-dose groups. Pooled results are not overly influenced by any one study, different cut-off points of prescribed dose or different cut-off points of delivered dose. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the results were not affected by the percentage of patients with sepsis or septic shock.ConclusionHigh-dose and low-dose haemofiltration produce similar outcomes with respect to mortality and length of ICU and hospital stay in critically ill patients with AKI.This study was not registered at the time the data were collected and analysed. It has since been registered on 17 February 2017 athttp://www.researchregistry.com/, registration number: reviewregistry211.


2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 6741-6753
Author(s):  
Sergiu Şuşman ◽  
Daniel-Corneliu Leucuţa ◽  
Gabriel Kacso ◽  
Ştefan loan Florian

Author(s):  
Mandar K. Shah ◽  
Mihika A. Shah ◽  
Sharan D. Shah

Bevacizumab, a humanized antibody against VEGF, is effective in the treatment of patients with many cancers. However, as with many therapeutic agents, significant side effects are associated with bevacizumab, Hypertension is one of the predominant toxicity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials of bevacizumab to quantify the risk of hypertension. 15 studies following PRISMA guidelines and matching inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected in which a group of patients were either treated with Bevacizumab and a concurrent chemotherapy and another group treated with Placebo and the same chemotherapy. Relative risk (RR) was calculated. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the analysis. A total of 13,070 patients were included. Bevacizumab was associated with a significant increased risk of overall hypertension (RR=3.509; 95% C.I:2.451 to 5.023). 11 trials are included for determining the risk of Grade 3 hypertension including 8799 patients with a significant increased risk (RR=3.909; 95%C.I:1.983 to 7.707). 7 trials are included for determining the risk of hypertension at low dose (2.5 mg/kg/cycle) including 3691 patients associated with a significant increased (RR=2.640; 95%C.I: 1.408 to 4.950). 10 trials are included for determining the risk of hypertension at high dose (5 mg/kg/cycle) including 9379 patients associated with a significant (RR=4.036; 95%C.I: 2.948 to 5.525). Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that bevacizumab may be associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension in patient with a variety of metastatic solid tumors irrespective of dosing.


Brachytherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Kyoo Lee ◽  
Jong Young Lee ◽  
Jung Mo Nam ◽  
Chun Bae Kim ◽  
Kyung Ran Park

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Ahmad M. Yakasai ◽  
Hamza Muhammad ◽  
Garba Iliyasu ◽  
Aisha M. Nalado ◽  
Mahmood M. Dalhat ◽  
...  

Background: Catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) contributes to morbidity and mortality among patients on haemodialysis (HD). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial lock solutions (ALS) in preventing CRBSI.Method: Electronic search of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ALS with other agents was performed up to January 2013. DerSimonian and Laird meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled relative risk (RR) from which efficacy of ALS and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. In a restricted analysis, pooled RRs where compared using a test of interaction to calculate ratio of relative risks (RRR). Meta-regression analysis was employed to explore sources of heterogeneity.Results: Sixteen RCTs involving 2016 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The efficacy of ALS in preventing CRBSI was 80% with NNT of 3 patients to prevent one CRBSI. The RR of CRBSI was significantly lower with ALS compared with heparin-only lock solution [RR {95% confidence interval (CI)} = 0.20 (0.13-0.31)]. With low dose (≤ 5 mg/ml) and high dose (40 mg/ ml) gentamicin-containing ALS, the RR (95% CI) of developing CRBSI was 0.03 (0.01-0.13) and 0.18 (0.03-0.98), respectively, with no significant difference [RRR (95% CI) = 0.2 (0.02-1.61), p = 0.126]. Heterogeneity was explained by a statistically significant association between rate of CRBSI and catheter days (p = 0.037). Conclusion: ALS are effective in preventing CRBSI. Low dose gentamicin should be preferred over high dose gentamicin as an ALS because it offers similar benefit in preventing CRBSI with lesser risk of toxicity from systemic leakage and subsequent development of drug resistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document