scholarly journals Audit of empirical antibiotic therapy for sepsis and the impact of early multidisciplinary consultation on patient outcomes

Author(s):  
Valentino D'Onofrio ◽  
Agnes Meersman ◽  
Koen Magerma ◽  
Luc Waumans ◽  
Karlijn van Halem ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 1242-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan J. Zasowski ◽  
Kimberly C. Claeys ◽  
Abdalhamid M. Lagnf ◽  
Susan L. Davis ◽  
Michael J. Rybak

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlota Gudiol ◽  
Adaia Albasanz-Puig ◽  
Guillermo Cuervo ◽  
Jordi Carratalà

Sepsis is a frequent complication in immunosuppressed cancer patients and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients that is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The worldwide emergence of antimicrobial resistance is of special concern in this population because any delay in starting adequate empirical antibiotic therapy can lead to poor outcomes. In this review, we aim to address: (1) the mechanisms involved in the development of sepsis and septic shock in these patients; (2) the risk factors associated with a worse prognosis; (3) the impact of adequate initial empirical antibiotic therapy given the current era of widespread antimicrobial resistance; and (4) the optimal management of sepsis, including adequate and early source control of infection, optimized antibiotic use based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics changes in these patients, and the role of the new available antibiotics.


Author(s):  
PARTH VACHHANI ◽  
ANIL SINGH

Objective: Antibiotics are frequently prescribed because of clinical suspicion of infection, while the results of the microbiological analysis are still awaited. This study was undertaken to assess the impact of microbiological culture results on the antibiotic prescribing pattern. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 400 patients of either sex and any age with positive microbiological culture results. Empirical antibiotic therapy details were recorded and change in empirical antibiotic therapy after positive culture results was also recorded. Assessment of sensitivity resistance pattern of microorganisms was also performed. Results: In the study, male: female ratio was 1.01:1. The majority of patients i.e. 94 (24.50%) were in the 46 y to 60 y of age group. Definitive antibiotic therapy was initiated in 103 patients (25.75%) out of 400 patients. The highest number of changes in antibiotic therapy was done in urinary tract infections (63.95%) and septicemia (32.61%) cases. Klebsiella (34.25%), E. coli (32%) and Staphylococcus aureus (14.75%) were commonly isolated microorganisms. Cephalosporins (77.75%) and aminoglycosides (47%) were commonly used in empirical antibiotic therapy, while nitrofurantoin (47.57%) and penicillins (22.33%) were commonly used in definitive antibiotic therapy. Definitive antibiotic therapy was associated with a reduced duration of hospital stay as compared to empirical antibiotic therapy (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Antibiotic prescribing is infrequently influenced by microbiological culture results. Adjustment of the antimicrobial therapy according to microbiological culture results can decrease the duration of hospital stay as well as can decrease the spread of antimicrobial resistance.


Author(s):  
Rahul R. Damor ◽  
Amita R. Kubavat

Background: Antimicrobials are the greatest discovery of the twentieth century. To limit the emergence and spread of resistance, antibiotic therapy should be adjusted according to the results of microbiological culture. Klebsiella isolates causes various types of infections and the incidence of antibiotic resistance is also high in Klebsiella infections. So, Authors plan this study to analyze how the results of microbiological cultures influence the antibiotic use in the treatment of Klebsiella infections.Methods: It is a record based observational prospective study which assessed the impact of Klebsiella positive culture results on antibiotic prescribing pattern and its impact on clinical outcome. Patients with empirical antibiotic therapy and Klebsiella positive were included and patients with inadequate data were excluded in this study and the data were recorded. Recorded data were entered and analyzed in Microsoft Office Excel-2013. Unpaired student t-test was used to compare the mean duration of hospital stay using Past software (version 3.20).Results: There were total 400 patients in our study. Amikacin was the most common drug (n=202) used as empirical therapy. Empirical antibiotic therapy was changed in 161(40.25%) patients. Meropenem was the most commonly used definitive drug. Mean duration of hospital stay is less in empirical sensitive antibiotic therapy as compared to empirical resistance antibiotic therapy having p value <0.0001 which shows significant difference between two groups showing better clinical outcome.Conclusion: Initial empirical therapy with broad-spectrum antimicrobials is a treatment strategy for severe Klebsiella infections.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 172-172
Author(s):  
Chee Kwan Ng ◽  
Gerald Y. Tan ◽  
Khai Lee Toh ◽  
Sing Joo Chia ◽  
James K. Tan

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin L. Black ◽  
Courtney Duval

Background: Diabetes is a growing problem in the United States. Increasing hospital admissions for diabetes patients demonstrate the need for evidence-based care of diabetes patients by inpatient providers, as well as the importance of continuity of care when transitioning patients from inpatient to outpatient providers. Methods: A focused literature review of discharge planning and transitions of care in diabetes, conducted in PubMed is presented. Studies were selected for inclusion based on content focusing on transitions of care in diabetes, risk factors for readmission, the impact of inpatient diabetes education on patient outcomes, and optimal medication management of diabetes during care transitions. American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines for care of patients during the discharge process are presented, as well as considerations for designing treatment regimens for a hospitalized patient transitioning to various care settings. Results: Multiple factors may make transitions of care difficult, including poor communication, poor patient education, inappropriate follow-up, and clinically complex patients. ADA recommendations provide guidance, but an individualized approach for medication management is needed. Use of scoring systems may help identify patients at higher risk for readmission. Good communication with patients and outpatient providers is needed to prevent patient harm. A team-based approach is needed, utilizing the skills of inpatient and outpatient providers, diabetes educators, nurses, and pharmacists. Conclusion: Structured discharge planning per guideline recommendations can help improve transitions in care for patients with diabetes. A team based, patient-centered approach can help improve patient outcomes by reducing medication errors, delay of care, and hospital readmissions.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e047051
Author(s):  
Gemma F Spiers ◽  
Tafadzwa Patience Kunonga ◽  
Alex Hall ◽  
Fiona Beyer ◽  
Elisabeth Boulton ◽  
...  

ObjectivesFrailty is typically assessed in older populations. Identifying frailty in adults aged under 60 years may also have value, if it supports the delivery of timely care. We sought to identify how frailty is measured in younger populations, including evidence of the impact on patient outcomes and care.DesignA rapid review of primary studies was conducted.Data sourcesFour databases, three sources of grey literature and reference lists of systematic reviews were searched in March 2020.Eligibility criteriaEligible studies measured frailty in populations aged under 60 years using experimental or observational designs, published after 2000 in English.Data extraction and synthesisRecords were screened against review criteria. Study data were extracted with 20% of records checked for accuracy by a second researcher. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach.ResultsWe identified 268 studies that measured frailty in samples that included people aged under 60 years. Of these, 85 studies reported evidence about measure validity. No measures were identified that were designed and validated to identify frailty exclusively in younger groups. However, in populations that included people aged over and under 60 years, cumulative deficit frailty indices, phenotype measures, the FRAIL Scale, the Liver Frailty Index and the Short Physical Performance Battery all demonstrated predictive validity for mortality and/or hospital admission. Evidence of criterion validity was rare. The extent to which measures possess validity across the younger adult age (18–59 years) spectrum was unclear. There was no evidence about the impact of measuring frailty in younger populations on patient outcomes and care.ConclusionsLimited evidence suggests that frailty measures have predictive validity in younger populations. Further research is needed to clarify the validity of measures across the adult age spectrum, and explore the utility of measuring frailty in younger groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document