scholarly journals Peer review report 1 on Wound management with vacuum assisted closure in surgical site infection after ankle surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. S9-S10
Author(s):  
Daniel Dante Yeh
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Wound Management ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Vacuum Assisted Closure ◽  
Ankle Surgery

Surgical Site Infection Rate Drops to 0% Using a Vacuum-Assisted Closure in Contaminated/ Dirty Infected Laparotomy Wounds

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Lozano-Balderas ◽  
Alejandro Ruiz-Velasco-Santacruz ◽  
Jose Antonio Diaz-Elizondo ◽  
Juan Antonio Gomez-Navarro ◽  
Eduardo Flores-Villalba
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Vacuum Assisted Closure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Delayed Closure

Wound site infections increase costs, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Techniques used for wounds management after laparotomy are primary, delayed primary, and vacuum-assisted closures. The objective of this study is to compare infection rates between those techniques in contaminated and dirty/ infected wounds. Eighty-one laparotomized patients with Class III or IV surgical wounds were enrolled in a three-arm randomized prospective study. Patients were allocated to each group with the software Research Randomizer® (Urbaniak, G. C, & Plous, S., Version 4.0). Presence of infection was determined by a certified board physician according to Centers for Disease Control's Criteria for Defining a Surgical Site Infection. Twenty-seven patients received primary closure, 29 delayed primary closure, and 25 vacuum-assisted closure, with no exclusions for analysis. Surgical site infection was present in 10 (37%) patients treated with primary closure, 5 (17%) with primary delayed closure, and 0 (0%) patients receiving vacuum-assisted closure. Statistical significance was found between infection rates of the vacuum-assisted group and the other two groups. No significant difference was found between the primary and primary delayed closure groups. The infection rate in contaminated/dirty-infected laparotomy wounds decreases from 37 and 17 per cent with a primary and delayed primary closures, respectively, to 0 per cent with vacuum-assisted systems.

scholarly journals AN UPDATED GUIDELINES ON POST-OPERATIVE WOUND MANAGEMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangita Santosh Nimbalkar ◽  
Manish R. Malani
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Wound Management ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Postoperative Wound ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Operative Care ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: management and prevention of wounds after a surgical procedure, are important and debatable topics. Optimal adoption of guidelines for proper prevention and management of post-surgical wounds must be carried out by any surgeon or institute. Postoperative wound care is done by cleaning and dressing the wounds after the surgical procedure, preventing them from getting contaminated with the external surfaces or the microorganisms on the patient’s body. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is the infection associated with healthcare in which the infection occurs in the wound after an invasive surgical procedure. A minimum of 5% of the patients who undergo surgical procedures will develop surgical site infections. This study draws the attention of the clinicians to a proper set of guidelines for post-operative care to minimize post-operative complications. Materials and Methods: this study is a Retrospective Cohort design. The study was considered 92 patients who had various types of surgery from during the period of 10 months. The patients who had intra-abdominal surgery are only included. The study divided 92 patients into 2 groups. In each group, 46 patients were assigned based on following NICE guidelines on postoperative wound management. Patients, for whom the NICE guidelines were followed properly at every aspect, were assigned to the first group (Group 1). Otherwise, the patients were assigned to the second group (Group 2). The study adopted a list comprising of NICE guidelines which are applicable to this study. The study assessment was done by observing the appearance of Surgical Site Infection among the patients, 3 to 7 days post-surgery. Results: it as found that 91.30% of the Group 1 patients showed significant improvement in terms of resolution while only 13.04% of the patients in improved significant without any surgical site infection (SSI). Conclusion: the study results show that the patients who were given post-operative care according to NICE guidelines had much lesser Surgical Site Infection (SSI) as compared to those who were not given post-operative care according to NICE guidelines. Keywords: surgical site infection, postoperative care, nice guidelines, wound management

Does Revascularization Prior to Foot and Ankle Surgery Reduce the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI)?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15S-16S
Author(s):  
Nima Heidari ◽  
Alexander Charalambous ◽  
Iris Kwok ◽  
Alexandros Vris ◽  
Yueyang Li
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Beneficial Effect ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Peripheral Vascular ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infection ◽  
Ankle Surgery

Recommendation: Several studies support the effect of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) on wound healing and surgical site infection (SSI). Despite this, there have been no specific studies proving the beneficial effect of revascularization on SSI prior to operative intervention in the setting of traumatic or elective foot and ankle surgery. The majority of studies on revascularization are in the setting of diabetic foot infection or established ischemia. We recommend that in the presence of an inadequate vascularization in the foot and ankle, vascular optimization should be undertaken prior to elective surgery. Level of Evidence: Limited. Delegate Vote: Agree: 100%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 0% (Unanimous, Strongest Consensus)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document