Core surgical training: training or service provision? Assessing compliance against JCST quality indicators for London core surgical trainees

Since the introduction of the European Working Time Regulations (EWTR) and Modernising Medical Careers (MMC), concerns have been raised regarding the quality of early surgical training. Recurring issues include the lack of time spent in the operating theatre and outpatient clinic with increased time spent on service provision. As a means of restoring the quality of early surgical training, the Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST) has devised a set of SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-framed) standards to be met by core surgical trainees (CSTs). These include the following scheduled weekly activities: four half-day sessions (18 hours) supervised in the operating theatre, one half-day session (4.5 hours) in supervised outpatient clinics and two hours of structured teaching.

Download Full-text

An analysis of the cost of postgraduate training in surgery in Ireland compared to other specialties

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) ◽

10.1007/s11845-021-02641-z ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Earley H. ◽

Mealy K.

Keyword(s):

Surgical Training ◽

Financial Support ◽

Postgraduate Training ◽

Medical Training ◽

Medical Council ◽

List Type ◽

Training Costs ◽

Considerable Cost ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

The Cost

Abstract Introduction Postgraduate specialty training in Ireland is associated with considerable cost. Some of these are mandatory costs such as medical council fees, while others are necessary to ensure career progression, such as attendance at courses and conferences. In particular, surgical specialities are believed to be associated with high training costs. It is unknown how these costs compare to those borne by counterparts in other specialities. Aims The aims of this study were to Quantify the amount that trainees in Ireland spend on postgraduate training Determine whether a difference exists between surgery and other non-skill-based specialties in terms of expenditure on training Methods A standardised non-mandatory questionnaire was circulated to trainees across two training centres in Ireland. Trainees at all levels were invited to participate. Results Sixty responses were obtained. Fifty-seven questionnaires were fully completed and included for analysis. The median expenditure on training was higher for surgical than non-surgical specialities. Subgroup analysis revealed surgical training was associated with higher expenditure on higher degrees and courses compared to medical training (p = 0.035). > 95% of trainees surveyed felt that greater financial support should be available for trainees during the course of their training. Conclusions This study demonstrated that a career in surgery is associated with higher ongoing costs for higher degrees and courses than counterparts in non-surgical training. All surgical trainees surveyed felt that better financial support should be available. Increasing financial support for may be a tangible way to mitigate against attrition during training.

Download Full-text

Riding the waves: the ongoing impact of COVID-19 on a national surgical training cohort

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) ◽

10.1007/s11845-021-02739-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Orla Hennessy ◽

Amy Lee Fowler ◽

Conor Hennessy ◽

David Brinkman ◽

Aisling Hogan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surgical Training ◽

World Health Organisation ◽

World Health ◽

Training Methods ◽

Viral Spread ◽

Surgical Services ◽

Global Pandemic ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

Secondary Survey ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background The World Health Organisation declared a global pandemic on the 11 March 2020 resulting in implementation of methods to contain viral spread, including curtailment of all elective and non-emergent interventions. Many institutions have experienced changes in rostering practices and redeployment of trainees to non-surgical services. Examinations, study days, courses, and conferences have been cancelled. These changes have the potential to significantly impact the education and training of surgical trainees. Aim To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training, educational, and operative experiences of Irish surgical trainees. Methods Surgical trainees were surveyed anonymously regarding changes in working and educational practices since the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic on 11 March 2020. The survey was circulated in May 2020 to both core and higher RCSI surgical trainees, when restrictions were at level five. Questions included previous and current access to operative sessions as well as operative cases, previous and current educational activities, access to senior-led training, and access to simulation-/practical-based training methods. A repeat survey was carried out in October 2020 when restrictions were at level two. Results Overall, primary and secondary survey response rates were 29% (n = 98/340) and 19.1% (n = 65/340), respectively. At the time of circulation of the second survey, the number of operative sessions attended and cases performed had significantly improved to numbers experienced pre-pandemic (p < 0.0001). Exposure to formal teaching and education sessions returned to pre-COVID levels (p < 0.0001). Initially, 23% of trainees had an examination cancelled; 53% of these trainees have subsequently sat these examinations. Of note 27.7% had courses cancelled, and 97% of these had not been rescheduled. Conclusion Surgical training and education have been significantly impacted in light of COVID-19. This is likely to continue to fluctuate in line with subsequent waves. Significant efforts have to be made to enable trainees to meet educational and operative targets.

Download Full-text

P38 COVID-19 impact on Surgical Training And Recovery Planning (COVID-STAR) Survey

BJS Open ◽

10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.037 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

◽

Joshua Clements

Keyword(s):

Surgical Training ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Healthcare Delivery ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Surgical Trainee ◽

Surgical Specialty ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Training Time ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

And Training

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in dynamic changes to healthcare delivery. Surgery as a specialty has been significantly affected and with that the delivery of surgical training. Method This national, collaborative, cross sectional study comprising 13 surgical trainee associations distributed a pan surgical specialty survey on the COVID-19 impact on surgical training over a 4-week period (11th May - 8th June 2020). The survey was voluntary and open to medical students and surgical trainees of all specialties and training grades. All aspects of training were qualitatively assessed. This study was reported according to STROBE guidelines. Results 810 completed responses were analysed. (M401: F 390) with representation from all deaneries and training grades. 41% of respondents (n = 301) were redeployed with 74% (n = 223) redeployed > 4 weeks. Complete loss of training was reported in elective operating (69.5% n = 474), outpatient activity (67.3%, n = 457), Elective endoscopy (69.5% n = 246) with > 50% reduction in training time reported in emergency operating (48%, n = 326) and completion of work-based assessments (WBA) (46%, n = 309). 81% (n = 551) reported course cancellations and departmental and regional teaching programmes were cancelled without rescheduling in 58% and 60% of cases respectively. A perceived lack of Elective operative exposure and completions of WBA’s were the primary reported factor affecting potential training progression. Overall, > 50% of trainees (n = 377) felt they would not meet the competencies required for that training period. Conclusion This study has demonstrated a perceived negative impact on numerous aspects of surgical training affecting all training specialties and grades.

Download Full-text

354 Differential Attainment in Surgical Training

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab134.131 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

Z Vinnicombe ◽

M Little ◽

J Super

Keyword(s):

Academic Performance ◽

Surgical Training ◽

General Medical Council ◽

Career Progression ◽

Medical Council ◽

Multiple Deprivation ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

Economic Background ◽

The Relationship ◽

Index Of Multiple Deprivation

Abstract Introduction Differential attainment (DA), according to the General Medical Council (GMC), is the gap between attainment levels in different groups. Attainment measures should cover aspects that include academic performance and career progression. Two such areas in surgical training are the MRCS examinations and ARCPs, both of which are required for progression in a career in surgery. Our aim was to investigation whether socio-economic background was a significant factor for progression in surgical training. Method Data from the GMC for Core Surgical Trainees (CSTs) taking the MRCS examination between 2016 and 2019 and CST ARCP outcomes between 2017 and 2019 were obtained. Socio-economic background was assessed using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). ARCP and MRCS outcomes were assessed against IMD. Results Trainees from IMD Q1&2 (most deprived) had a significantly higher (p < 0.01) mean number of attempts (1.86) to pass MRCS examinations than trainees from IMD Q4&5 (least deprived) (1.54). IMD Q1&2 were significantly more likely to obtain unsatisfactory outcomes (24.4%) than trainees from IMD Q4&5 (14.2%) (p < 0.05). Conclusions There is clear evidence that differential attainment exists within Core Surgical Training. The reasons for this are likely to be complex and more work is needed to further investigate the relationship.

Download Full-text

Outcomes following a dedicated period of research during surgical training

Scottish Medical Journal ◽

10.1258/smj.2011.011159 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 56 (4) ◽

pp. 206-209 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

B M Stutchfield ◽

E M Harrison ◽

S J Wigmore ◽

R W Parks ◽

O J Garden

Keyword(s):

Surgical Training ◽

Academic Outcomes ◽

Online Survey ◽

Career Progression ◽

Working Time ◽

Research Interest ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

Surgical Career ◽

Training Structure ◽

Research Period

With recent ‘working-time'-related changes to surgical training structure, the value of dedicated research during surgical training has been questioned. Online survey examining career and academic outcomes following a period of surgically related dedicated research at a Scottish University between 1972 and 2007. Of 58 individuals identified, contact details were available for 49 and 43 (88%) responded. Ninety-five percent ( n = 41) of respondents continue to pursue a career in surgery and 41% ( n = 17) are currently in academic positions. Ninety-one percent ( n = 39) had published one or more first-author peer-reviewed articles directly related to their research, with 53% ( n = 23) publishing three or more. Respondents with a clinical component to their research published significantly more papers than those with purely laboratory-based research ( P = 0.04). Eighty-one percent ( n = 35) thought that research was necessary for career progression, but only 42% ( n = 18) felt research should be integral to training. In conclusion, the majority of surgical trainees completing a dedicated research period, published papers and continued to pursue a surgical career with a research interest. A period of dedicated research was thought necessary for career progression, but few thought dedicated research should be integral to surgical training.

Download Full-text

Establishing a surgical skills laboratory and dissection curriculum for neurosurgical residency training

Journal of Neurosurgery ◽

10.3171/2014.11.jns14902 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 123 (5) ◽

pp. 1331-1338 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

James K. C. Liu ◽

Varun R. Kshettry ◽

Pablo F. Recinos ◽

Kambiz Kamian ◽

Richard P. Schlenk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surgical Training ◽

Training Programs ◽

Core Competencies ◽

Technical Skills ◽

Surgical Skills ◽

Training Experience ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

Modern Health Care ◽

External Pressures ◽

Skills Laboratory

Surgical education has been forced to evolve from the principles of its initial inception, in part due to external pressures brought about through changes in modern health care. Despite these pressures that can limit the surgical training experience, training programs are being held to higher standards of education to demonstrate and document trainee competency through core competencies and milestones. One of the methods used to augment the surgical training experience and to demonstrate trainee proficiency in technical skills is through a surgical skills laboratory. The authors have established a surgical skills laboratory by acquiring equipment and funding from nondepartmental resources, through institutional and private educational grants, along with product donations from industry. A separate educational curriculum for junior- and senior-level residents was devised and incorporated into the neurosurgical residency curriculum. The initial dissection curriculum focused on cranial approaches, with spine and peripheral nerve approaches added in subsequent years. The dissections were scheduled to maximize the use of cadaveric specimens, experimenting with techniques to best preserve the tissue for repeated uses. A survey of residents who participated in at least 1 year of the curriculum indicated that participation in the surgical skills laboratory translated into improved understanding of anatomical relationships and the development of technical skills that can be applied in the operating room. In addition to supplementing the technical training of surgical residents, a surgical skills laboratory with a dissection curriculum may be able to help provide uniformity of education across different neurosurgical training programs, as well as provide a tool to assess the progression of skills in surgical trainees.

Download Full-text

The Lost Generation: Impact of the 56-hour EWTD on Current Surgical Training

Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England ◽

10.1308/147363510x491105 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 92 (3) ◽

pp. 102-106 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

CR Chalmers ◽

S Joshi ◽

PG Bentley ◽

NH Boyle

Keyword(s):

Shift Work ◽

Surgical Training ◽

New Deal ◽

Working Hours ◽

Lost Generation ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

European Working ◽

Working Time Directive ◽

Training Opportunities ◽

The New Deal

The reform of specialist surgical training – the New Deal (1991), the Calman report (1993) and the implementation of the European Working Time Directive (EWTD, 1998) – has resulted in shorter training periods with reduced working hours. The Calman reform aimed to improve and structure training with regular assessment and supervision whereas the New Deal and the EWTD have concentrated predominantly on a reduction in hours. The adoption of full or partial shift work to provide surgical cover at night compliant to a 56-hour working week, as stipulated by phase one of the EWTD, has resulted in daytime hospital attendance for surgical trainees of an average three days per week despite almost universal acknowledgement of the limited training opportunities available at night.

Download Full-text

Autonomy in the Operating Room: A Multicenter Study of Gender Disparities During Surgical Training

Journal of Graduate Medical Education ◽

10.4300/jgme-d-21-00217.1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (5) ◽

pp. 666-672

Author(s):

Jenny X. Chen ◽

Edward H. Chang ◽

Francis Deng ◽

Shari Meyerson ◽

Brian George ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surgical Training ◽

Gender Disparities ◽

Training Level ◽

Surgical Performance ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Multivariable Regression ◽

Operative Performance ◽

And Performance ◽

Multivariable Regression Models

ABSTRACT Background Gender disparities are prevalent in medicine, but their impact on surgical training is not well studied. Objective To quantify gender disparities in trainee intraoperative experiences and explore the variables associated with ratings of surgical autonomy and performance. Methods From September 2015 to May 2019, attending surgeons and trainees from 71 programs assessed trainee autonomy on a 4-level Zwisch scale and performance on a 5-level modified Dreyfus scale after surgical procedures. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association of trainee gender with autonomy and performance evaluations. Results A total of 3255 trainees and attending surgeons completed 94 619 evaluations. Attendings gave lower ratings of operative autonomy to female trainees than male trainees when controlling for training level, attending, and surgical procedure (effect size B = −0.0199, P = .008). There was no difference in ratings of autonomy at the beginning of training (P = .32); the gap emerged as trainees advanced in years (B = −0.0163, P = .020). The gender difference in autonomy was largest for the most complex cases (B = −0.0502, P = .002). However, there was no difference in attending ratings of surgical performance for female trainees compared to male trainees (B = −0.0124, P = .066). Female trainees rated themselves as having less autonomy and worse performance than males when controlling for training level, attending, procedure, case complexity, and attending ratings (autonomy B = −0.0669, P < .001; performance B = −0.0704, P < .001). Conclusions While there was no significant difference in ratings of operative performance, a small difference between ratings of operative autonomy for female and male surgical trainees was identified.

Download Full-text

982 Higher General Surgical Trainee preferences for Annual Review of Competency Progression during COVID-19 Pandemic

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab259.884 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽

Author(s):

K Khan ◽

G Torpiano ◽

N Galbraith ◽

M McLellan ◽

A Lannigan

Keyword(s):

Surgical Training ◽

Annual Review ◽

Surgical Trainee ◽

Training Groups ◽

Surgical Trainees ◽

The Impact

Abstract Aim The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption in surgical training. We aim to explore the preferences of higher general surgical trainees for Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP) also compare the responses across different training grades. Method All higher general surgical trainee in a single deanery were invited to participate in an online voluntary anonymous survey. The respondents were divided in two groups: junior (ST3-ST5) and senior higher surgical trainees (ST6-ST8) and responses compared. Results Sixty-four of 88 trainees responded. Thirty-three (51.6%) were ST3–ST5, 24 (37.5%) were ST6–ST8 and 7 (10.9%) were out-of-training. More trainees in ST3–ST5 group preferred to defer the next rotation for 12 months (18.2% vs 0%, p = 0.034), repeat current sub-specialty (33.3% vs 4.2%, p = 0.009), or add 12 months to training and delay predicted CCT date by 12 months (18.2% vs 0%, p = 0.034). Most trainees in both groups preferred the option of prolonging training should be offered to all trainees with an option to decline extension if ARCP competencies met (66.7% vs 50.0%, p = 0.276). Conclusions The preference for ARCP and length of training was different between two training groups, hence the need of trainees should be considered by training committees when addressing the impact of COVID-19.

Download Full-text