P3-164: Profile of neuropsychological test results of mild cognitive impairment associated with presence of depression

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. T568-T568
Author(s):  
Ja-Young Oh ◽  
Chan-Seung Chung ◽  
Jae-Hong Lee ◽  
Duk-Lyul Na ◽  
Doh Kwan Kim ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
Clara Zancada-Menéndez ◽  
Patricia Sampedro-Piquero ◽  
Azucena Begega ◽  
Laudino López ◽  
Jorge Luis Arias

Mild cognitive impairment is understood as a cognitive deficit of insufficient severity to fulfil the criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. Many studies have attempted to identify which cognitive functions are most affected by this type of impairment and which is the most sensitive neuropsychological test for early detection. This study investigated sustained and selective attention, processing speed, and the inhibition process using a sample of people divided into three groups mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer disease and cognitively healthy controls selected and grouped based on their scores in the Mini Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination-revised. Three tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (Motor Screening Task, Stop Signal Task and Reaction time) were used as well as the d2 attention test. The results show that that participants with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease showed lower levels of concentration compared with the cognitively healthy controls group in the d2 test and longer reaction times in the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, although the differences were not marked in the latter test. The impairments in basic cognitive processes, such as reaction time and sustained attention, indicate the need to take these functions into account in the test protocols when discriminating between normal aging and early and preclinical dementia processes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 405-412
Author(s):  
Stelios Zygouris ◽  
Paraskevi Iliadou ◽  
Eftychia Lazarou ◽  
Dimitrios Giakoumis ◽  
Konstantinos Votis ◽  
...  

Background: Literature supports the use of serious games and virtual environments to assess cognitive functions and detect cognitive decline. This promising assessment method, however, has not yet been translated into self-administered screening instruments for pre-clinical dementia. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the performance of a novel self-administered serious game-based test, namely the Virtual Supermarket Test (VST), in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a sample of older adults with subjective memory complaints (SMC), in comparison with two well-established screening instruments, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Methods: Two groups, one of healthy older adults with SMC (N = 48) and one of MCI patients (N = 47) were recruited from day centers for cognitive disorders and administered the VST, the MoCA, the MMSE, and an extended pencil and paper neuropsychological test battery. Results: The VST displayed a correct classification rate (CCR) of 81.91% when differentiating between MCI patients and older adults with SMC, while the MoCA displayed of CCR of 72.04% and the MMSE displayed a CCR of 64.89%. Conclusion: The three instruments assessed in this study displayed significantly different performances in differentiating between healthy older adults with SMC and MCI patients. The VST displayed a good CCR, while the MoCA displayed an average CCR and the MMSE displayed a poor CCR. The VST appears to be a robust tool for detecting MCI in a population of older adults with SMC.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1239-1239
Author(s):  
E Briceño ◽  
R Mehdipanah ◽  
X Gonzales ◽  
K Langa ◽  
D Levine ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Hispanics are a rapidly growing and aging segment of the US population. There is a critical need to accurately and efficiently detect those at risk for dementia, particularly those with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). MCI diagnosis typically relies on neuropsychological tests, although cultural and linguistic factors impact neuropsychological test scores. The current study reviews neuropsychological studies on MCI in Hispanics to evaluate the factors in testing for MCI diagnosis. Participants and Method Studies were identified from a literature search utilizing Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus, using search terms “Hispanic OR Mexican American” and “Mild Cognitive Impairment,” and from the reference sections of studies identified through this search. Studies utilizing neuropsychological tests in the diagnosis of MCI for Hispanics living in the US were identified and reviewed. Approaches for sample characterization (e.g., country of origin and of education, literacy, language preference and proficiency), neuropsychological test methods (e.g., test selection and translation, normative data source), and method of MCI diagnosis were reviewed. Results Considerable variability was found across studies with regard to the incorporation – and the method of incorporation – of cultural factors and their consideration in the MCI diagnosis process for Hispanics. For example, several studies did not report their sample’s country of education, source of normative data used for determination of cognitive impairment, or method of test adaptation/translation. Conclusions Diagnosis of MCI in Hispanics has been complicated by a dearth of culturally appropriate neuropsychological assessment tools and normative data, which likely contributes to inconsistency across studies. Future studies are needed to further develop culturally appropriate neuropsychological methods to evaluate MCI in Hispanics in the US and to improve diagnostic accuracy in this population.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1499-1506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A Morrow ◽  
Sherrilene Classen ◽  
Miriam Monahan ◽  
Tim Danter ◽  
Robert Taylor ◽  
...  

Background: Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS). In other populations, cognitive impairment is known to affect fitness-to-drive. Few studies have focused on fitness-to-drive in MS and no studies have solely focused on the influence of cognitive impairment. Objective: To assess fitness-to-drive in persons with MS with cognitive impairment and low physical disability. Methods: Persons with MS, aged 18–59 years with EDSS ⩽ 4.0, impaired processing speed, and impairment on at least one measure of memory or executive function, were recruited. Cognition was assessed using the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function battery. A formal on-road driving assessment was conducted. Chi-square analysis examined the association between the fitness-to-drive (pass/fail) and the neuropsychological test results (normal/impaired). Bayesian statistics predicting failure of the on-road assessment were calculated. Results: Of 36 subjects, eight (22.2%) were unfit to drive. Only the BVMTR-IR, measuring visual-spatial memory, predicted on-road driving assessment failure ( X2 ( df = 1, N = 36) = 3.956; p = 0.047) with a sensitivity of 100%, but low specificity (35.7%) due to false positives (18/25). Conclusion: In persons with MS and impaired processing speed, impairment on the BVMTR-IR should lead clinicians to address fitness-to-drive.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stina Saunders ◽  
Craig W. Ritchie ◽  
Tom C. Russ ◽  
Graciela Muniz-Terrera ◽  
Richard Milne

Abstract Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a condition that exists between normal healthy ageing and dementia with an uncertain aetiology and prognosis. This uncertainty creates a complex dynamic between the clinicians’ conception of MCI, what is communicated to the individual about their condition, and how the individual responds to the information conveyed to them. The aim of this study was to explore clinicians’ views around the assessment and communication of MCI in memory clinics. Method As part of a larger longitudinal study looking at patients’ adjustment to MCI disclosure, we interviewed Old Age Psychiatrists at the five participating sites across Scotland. The study obtained ethics approvals and the interviews (carried out between Nov 2020–Jan 2021) followed a semi-structured schedule focusing on [1] how likely clinicians are to use the term MCI with patients; [2] what tests clinicians rely on and how much utility they see in them; and [3] how clinicians communicate risk of progression to dementia. The interviews were voice recorded and were analysed using reflective thematic analysis. Results Initial results show that most clinicians interviewed (Total N = 19) considered MCI to have significant limitations as a diagnostic term. Nevertheless, most clinicians reported using the term MCI (n = 15/19). Clinical history was commonly described as the primary aid in the diagnostic process and also to rule out functional impairment (which was sometimes corroborated by Occupational Therapy assessment). All clinicians reported using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III as a primary assessment tool. Neuroimaging was frequently found to have minimal usefulness due to the neuroradiological reports being non-specific. Conclusion Our study revealed a mixture of approaches to assessing and disclosing test results for MCI. Some clinicians consider the condition as a separate entity among neurodegenerative disorders whereas others find the term unhelpful due to its uncertain prognosis. Clinicians report a lack of specific and sensitive assessment methods for identifying the aetiology of MCI in clinical practice. Our study demonstrates a broad range of views and therefore variability in MCI risk disclosure in memory assessment services which may impact the management of individuals with MCI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document