Clean/Contaminated Appendectomy: Misclassification of Wound Class for Acute Appendicitis

2016 ◽  
Vol 223 (4) ◽  
pp. e115
Author(s):  
John V. Gahagan ◽  
Matthew D. Whealon ◽  
Michael J. Phelan ◽  
Ravi Moonka ◽  
Steven D. Mills ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clement L. K. Chia ◽  
Vishal G. Shelat ◽  
Wilson Low ◽  
Sheena George ◽  
Jaideepraj Rao

Abstract We conducted a retrospective study to examine the role of Collatamp G in reducing postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with different wound classes. Ninety-two patients (62 men and 30 women; mean age, 58 years; range, 29–88 years) who had undergone surgery between December 2009 and November 2011 in Tan Tock Seng Hospital and who had application of Collatamp G in their wound before closure were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the development of any superficial wound infection within 1 month postoperatively. Of 92 patients studied, 9 (10%) developed a superficial wound infection. Two of 43 patients with clean-contaminated wounds (5%), 2 of 19 with contaminated wounds (11%), and 5 of 30 with dirty-infected wounds (16%) developed infection. Use of the larger size Collatamp G (10 × 10 cm) also appears to have a lower incidence of SSI compared with the smaller Collatamp G (5 × 5 cm); 4% and 12%, respectively. Our data suggest that postoperative SSI was reduced in the group of patients with dirty-infected wound class. SSI appears to be decreased with use of the larger size Collatamp G.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S60-S61
Author(s):  
Kelley M Boston ◽  
Misti Ellsworth ◽  
Jocelyn Thomas ◽  
Tawanna A McInnis-Cole ◽  
Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner

Abstract Background Colon surgery (COLO) is one of the focus areas for the the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program. Standardized criteria from the National Healthcare Surveillance Network (NSHN) are used to define surgical site infections (SSI) and to assess and weight standardized risk variables, so that all organizations can be judged to the same standard. Performance is compared though use of a standardized infection ratio (SIR), which is the observed number of infections, divided by the “predicted” number of infections, given the number and type of surgeries performed. Methods A retrospective review of medical records and NHSN documentation was conducted for 778 COLO procedures that were performed at a large academic and level 1 trauma center between January 2019 and December 2020. Initial review of the data showed that the increases in SIR were primarily concentrated in trauma patients with intestinal injury and fecal spillage. SIR for adult procedures were calculated using the NHSN Complex 30-Day SSI Data for IQR Report model, which the metric used by the CMS IQR. The CDC NHSN Statistics Calculator was used to compare SIR for procedures coded as trauma and non-trauma. As a proxy for patients with penetrating trauma, SIR for patients coded as trauma who had a surgical wound class noted as dirty was compared to SIR for patients coded as trauma with surgical wound class coded as contaminated or clean-contaminated. Results For the CMS model, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0003) between SIR for trauma (SIR = 3.451) and non-trauma (SIR = 1.071) procedures. There was also a statistically significant difference (p=0.0014) between trauma procedures with dirty surgical wound class (SIR = 6.608), compared to those with wounds categorized as contaminated or clean-contaminated (SIR = 2.235). NHSN Adult Complex 30 Days SIR comparison for COLO SSI with and without trauma NHSN Adult Complex 30 Days SIR comparison for trauma COLO procedures with dirty wound class description, against COLO procedures with wound class described as clean or clean-contaminated Conclusion Risk factors currently included in the model for COLO SSI may not adequately account for the increased risk from penetrating trauma with fecal spillage. Trauma and wound class should be added to the CMS IQR risk model for SIR. Disclosures Kelley M. Boston, MPH, CIC, CPHQ, FAPIC, Infection Prevention & Management Associates (Employee, Shareholder) Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, MD, Amplyx (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant)F2G (Consultant)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Speaker's Bureau)Pfizer (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Viracor (Consultant)


1999 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huh ◽  
S-M Hong ◽  
Kim ◽  
B-S Kim ◽  
K-H Lee ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
MARY ANN MOON
Keyword(s):  

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halkic ◽  
Abdelmoumene ◽  
Gintzburger ◽  
Mosimann

Acute appendicitis is the most common acute surgical infection during pregnancy. Although usually pyogenic in origin, parasitic infections account for a small percentage of cases. Despite the relatively high prevalence of acute appendicitis in our environment, it is not commonly associated with schistosomiasis. We report here the association of pregnancy and appendicitis caused by Schistosoma haematobium. Schistosomiasis is very common complication of pregnancy in hyperendemic areas. Schistosome egg masses can lodge throughout the body and cause acute inflammation of the appendix, liver and spleen. Congestion of pelvic vessels during pregnancy facilitates passage of eggs into the villi and intervillous spaces, causing an inflammatory reaction. Tourism and immigration make this disease a potential challenge for practitioners everywhere.


2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Shung-Shung ◽  
S. Yu-Chien ◽  
Y. Mei-Due ◽  
W. Hwei-Chung ◽  
A. Kao

Summary Aim: Even with careful observation, the overall false-positive rate of laparotomy remains 10-15% when acute appendicitis was suspected. Therefore, the clinical efficacy of Tc-99m HMPAO labeled leukocyte (TC-WBC) scan for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients presenting with atypical clinical findings is assessed. Patients and Methods: Eighty patients presenting with acute abdominal pain and possible acute appendicitis but atypical findings were included in this study. After intravenous injection of TC-WBC, serial anterior abdominal/pelvic images at 30, 60, 120 and 240 min with 800k counts were obtained with a gamma camera. Any abnormal localization of radioactivity in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen, equal to or greater than bone marrow activity, was considered as a positive scan. Results: 36 out of 49 patients showing positive TC-WBC scans received appendectomy. They all proved to have positive pathological findings. Five positive TC-WBC were not related to acute appendicitis, because of other pathological lesions. Eight patients were not operated and clinical follow-up after one month revealed no acute abdominal condition. Three of 31 patients with negative TC-WBC scans received appendectomy. They also presented positive pathological findings. The remaining 28 patients did not receive operations and revealed no evidence of appendicitis after at least one month of follow-up. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values for TC-WBC scan to diagnose acute appendicitis were 92, 78, 86, 82, and 90%, respectively. Conclusion: TC-WBC scan provides a rapid and highly accurate method for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical examination. It proved useful in reducing the false-positive rate of laparotomy and shortens the time necessary for clinical observation.


Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Bhupen Songra ◽  
Richa Jain ◽  
Deeksha Mehta

Background: the present study was under taken to determine the role of CA-125 in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), to prevent its complications and also in preventing negative appendicectomies in tertiary care hospital. Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care and research center between 01/03/2018 to 30/06/2019. Patients admitted to the surgery department with diagnosis of AA were considered for the study. After informed consent, a, standardized history was obtained as a case Performa. Serum samples from all the cases with clinical diagnosis of AA were obtained and stored. Only the cases with histopathologically approved AA were included in the study. Cases operated for clinical diagnosis of AA, but not histopathologically proven AA was not included in the study. CA125 levels in cases with definitive diagnosis of AA were measured. Results: In present study, ROC curve analysis revealed the sensitivity of 87.27 % and specificity of 90.91 % when the CA 125 cut-off value of > 16.8 was taken to diagnose acute appendicitis. AUC was 0.911 with a standard error of 0.0292. Conclusion: In this study we have observed that CA125 showed a positive correlation with acute appendicitis, that was statistically not significant (P>0.05). We didn’t evaluate the correlation with the disease severity. We consider that CA125 can be used as a marker in acute appendicitis cases although further research is still needed. Keywords: CA125, Acute Appendicitis, Surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document