Achieving Near-Zero and Zero: Who Said Interventions and Controls Don't Matter?

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Matocha
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Product Selection ◽  
Process Improvements ◽  
Crucial Part ◽  
Simple Average ◽  
Central Line Bundle

AbstractBackground: Implementation of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Central Line Bundle in 2005 did not result in attainment of 0 central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs).Purpose: To establish process improvements to eliminate CLABSIs.Methods: Infection Prevention and Intravenous Therapy Departments at our institution formed a collaborative partnership in 2008 to eliminate CLABSIs. Staff education, daily surveillance, and implementing evidence-based practice into policies, protocols, and product selection were utilized. A study designed to capture and track multiple interventions from the beginning versus time was implemented.Results: There were a total of 7 CLABSIs over 5 years, which trended down by year from 3 to 2 to 1 to 1 to 0. The average annual CLABSI rate of infections per 1,000 catheter line days declined from 1.068 to 0.849 to 0.508 to 0.449 to 0.000. The full 3-year simple average from 2009 to 2011, after all of the key interventions were phased-in, was 0.3048.Conclusions: Collaboration and commitment played a role in implementing changes. Empowering staff through education that increases knowledge, understanding, and skills improves patient safety and patient outcomes. Process changes and practice protocols supported by evidence-based practice along with efficacious products played a crucial part in getting to 0 CLABSIs. Layered kits with products placed in the correct order of use can increase aseptic technique compliance. Prompt identification of individual CLABSI episodes with prompt intervention to the specific individuals involved has been shown to be cost-effective and can be implemented in most hospitals.

scholarly journals Results of the CHlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing implementation intervention to improve evidence-based nursing practices for prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections Study (CHanGing BathS): a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Staci S. Reynolds ◽  
Patricia Woltz ◽  
Edward Keating ◽  
Janice Neff ◽  
Jennifer Elliott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Educational Outreach ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Intervention Effect ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Outreach Visits ◽  
Educational Outreach Visits

Abstract Background Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) result in approximately 28,000 deaths and approximately $2.3 billion in added costs to the U.S. healthcare system each year, and yet, many of these infections are preventable. At two large health systems in the southeast United States, CLABSIs continue to be an area of opportunity. Despite strong evidence for interventions to prevent CLABSI and reduce associated patient harm, such as use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing, the adoption of these interventions in practice is poor. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of a tailored, multifaceted implementation program on nursing staff’s compliance with the CHG bathing process and electronic health record (EHR) documentation in critically ill patients. The secondary objectives were to examine the (1) moderating effect of unit characteristics and cultural context, (2) intervention effect on nursing staff’s knowledge and perceptions of CHG bathing, and (3) intervention effect on CLABSI rates. Methods A stepped wedged cluster-randomized design was used with units clustered into 4 sequences; each sequence consecutively began the intervention over the course of 4 months. The Grol and Wensing Model of Implementation helped guide selection of the implementation strategies, which included educational outreach visits and audit and feedback. Compliance with the appropriate CHG bathing process and daily CHG bathing documentation were assessed. Outcomes were assessed 12 months after the intervention to assess for sustainability. Results Among the 14 clinical units participating, 8 were in a university hospital setting and 6 were in community hospital settings. CHG bathing process compliance and nursing staff’s knowledge and perceptions of CHG bathing significantly improved after the intervention (p = .009, p = .002, and p = .01, respectively). CHG bathing documentation compliance and CLABSI rates did not significantly improve; however, there was a clinically significant 27.4% decrease in CLABSI rates. Conclusions Using educational outreach visits and audit and feedback implementation strategies can improve adoption of evidence-based CHG bathing practices. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03898115, Registered 28 March 2019.

Neonatal Cholestasis: Updates on Diagnostics, Therapeutics, and Prevention

NeoReviews ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. e819-e836
Author(s):  
Amy G. Feldman ◽  
Ronald J. Sokol
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Biliary Atresia ◽  
Young Infant ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Primary Indication ◽  
Effective Diagnosis ◽  
Made In

Cholestatic jaundice is a common presenting feature of hepatobiliary and/or metabolic dysfunction in the newborn and young infant. Timely detection of cholestasis, followed by rapid step-wise evaluation to determine the etiology, is crucial to identify those causes that are amenable to medical or surgical intervention and to optimize outcomes for all infants. In the past 2 decades, genetic etiologies have been elucidated for many cholestatic diseases, and next-generation sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing now allow for relatively rapid and cost-effective diagnosis of conditions not previously identifiable via standard blood tests and/or liver biopsy. Advances have also been made in our understanding of risk factors for parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis/liver disease. New lipid emulsion formulations, coupled with preventive measures to decrease central line–associated bloodstream infections, have resulted in lower rates of cholestasis and liver disease in infants and children receiving long-term parental nutrition. Unfortunately, little progress has been made in determining the exact cause of biliary atresia. The median age at the time of the hepatoportoenterostomy procedure is still greater than 60 days; consequently, biliary atresia remains the primary indication for pediatric liver transplantation. Several emerging therapies may reduce the bile acid load to the liver and improve outcomes in some neonatal cholestatic disorders. The goal of this article is to review the etiologies, diagnostic algorithms, and current and future management strategies for infants with cholestasis.

scholarly journals Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections: a survey of ICU nurses’ knowledge and practice in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuwen Chi ◽  
Juan Guo ◽  
Xiaofeng Niu ◽  
Ru He ◽  
Lijuan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Insertion Site ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Guangdong Province ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Knowledge And Practice ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Abstract Background Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are largely preventable when evidence-based guidelines are followed. However, it is not clear how well these guidelines are followed in intensive care units (ICUs) in China. This study aimed to evaluate Chinese ICU nurses’ knowledge and practice of evidence-based guidelines for prevention of CLABSIs issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US and the Department of Health UK. Method Nurses completed online questionnaires regarding their knowledge and practice of evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of CLABSIs from June to July 2019. The questionnaire consisted of 11 questions, and a score of 1 was given for a correct answer (total score = 0–11). Results A total of 835 ICU nurses from at least 104 hospitals completed the questionnaires, and 777 were from hospitals in Guangdong Province. The mean score of 11 questions related to evidence-based guidelines for preventing CLABSIs was 4.02. Individual total scores were significantly associated with sex, length of time as an ICU nurse, educational level, professional title, establishment, hospital grade, and incidence of CLABSIs at the participant’s ICU. Importantly, only 43% of nurses reported always using maximum barrier precautions, 14% of nurses reported never using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate for antisepsis at the insertion site, only 40% reported prompt removal of the catheter when it was no longer necessary, and 33% reported frequently and routinely changing catheters even if there was no suspicion of a CLABSI. Conclusion Chinese ICU nurses in Guangdong Province lack of knowledge and practice of evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of CLABSIs. National health administrations should adopt policies to train ICU nurses to prevent CLABSIs.

scholarly journals 584. Use of Multi-Disciplinary Prevention Rounds to Reduce Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S275-S276
Author(s):  
Matthew Linam ◽  
Jessica Wright ◽  
Kum Kim ◽  
Cara Van Treek ◽  
Patrick Spafford
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous Line ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clabsi Rate

Abstract Background Despite successful implementation of evidence-based prevention bundles, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) continue to occur in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We hypothesized that multi-disciplinary prevention rounds may be able to further reduce CLABSIs. Methods We implemented bedside rounds in a 39-bed tertiary NICU in November 2018 with the focus of reducing CLABSIs. Standardized rounds for all patients with a central venous line (CVL) occurred 2–3 times/week on weekdays during either the day or evening shifts. Rounds included NICU nursing leadership, the Hospital Epidemiologist and the patient’s nurse. Questions focused on the CVL maintenance bundle, reducing line access, and patient-specific CLABSI risk factors. Best practices were reinforced and solutions for identified risk factors were developed. Recommendations were communicated to the physician, as appropriate. Prevention rounds data were collected. Nurses and providers in the NICU were surveyed about their perceptions of the rounds. CLABSIs were identified by Infection Prevention using standard definitions. Results The average daily NICU census was 35.6, with an average of 14 patients with CVLs/day. The average duration of rounds was 45 minutes. Recommendations to physicians, such as changing medications from intravenous to oral or line removal, were accepted 85% of the time. 74.5% of nurses and 87.5% of providers thought that prevention rounds had at least some impact on CLABSI prevention. Nurse and provider responses to the perceived impact of CLABSI prevention rounds are in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. In the 12 months prior to starting prevention rounds, the CLABSI rate was 1.53 /1000 line days and the CLABSI rate for the 6 months after starting rounds was 0.99/1,000 line days, a 65% decrease. Conclusion CLABSI prevention rounds helped reinforce evidence-based prevention practices, identified patient-specific risk factors and improved physician-nurse communication. CLABSIs in NICU were reduced. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 582. Impact of Central Line Bundle for Prevention of Umbilical Vein Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S275-S275
Author(s):  
İlker devrim ◽  
Ferit Kulalı ◽  
İlknur Çağlar ◽  
Yeliz Oruc ◽  
Nevbahar Demiray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Umbilical Vein ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Units ◽  
Vein Catheter ◽  
Single Use ◽  
Umbilical Vein Catheter ◽  
Central Line Bundle

Abstract Background Umbilical vein catheters (UVC) are one of the most common types of vascular access device in the neonatal intensive care units. Central line-associated bloodstream infections were reported to be in the first place of healthcare-associated infections in preterm infants. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the bundle applications in the prevention of umbilical vein catheter-associated bloodstream infections in neonates including premature infants. Methods This 40 months cross-sectional study included two periods, including pre-bundle period (from August 1, 2015 to March 31, 2017) and bundle period (April 1, 2017 to November 30, 2018). The umbilical vein catheter-related bloodstream infections, catheter line days, number of the patients were recorded and compared between the prebundle and bundle periods. Bundle steps were defined as education-training-assignment, evaluation of daily catheter indications, hand hygiene and aseptic technique while insertion, maximal sterile barrier precautions, closure of the catheter area with transparent semi-permeable membrane, using needless connectors in stead of 3-way stop-cocks, and single-use prefilled saline syringes for flushing. Results During the whole study period total umbilical vein catheter days were 2,228 days. During the prebundle period there was 10 and in the bundle period there was 2 umbilical vein catheter-related bloodstream infections (Table 1). While umbilical vein-associated bloodstream infection rate was 8.9 per 1,000 catheter days in the pre-bundle period, and significantly decreased to 1.79 in the bundle period (P < 0.05). After the introduction of bundle applications, it was observed that the rate of infection decreased by 68% (P < 0.05) Conclusion Our study showed that implementation of central line bundle including needless connectors and single-use prefilled syringes for umbilical vein-related bloodstream infections was effective for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care units. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Central line bundle including split-septum device and single use prefilled flushing syringes for prevention of port associated bloodstream infections: A cost and resource utilization analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilker Devrim ◽  
Mustafa T Ozkul ◽  
İlknur Çağlar ◽  
Yeliz Oruç ◽  
Nevbahar Demiray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Line Bundle ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients ◽  
Central Line Bundle

Abstract Background: Central line bundle programs were found to be effective in decreasing central line–associated bloodstream infection rates in pediatric cancer patients with ports. However cost-effectiveness studies of central line bundle programs in pediatric cancer patients are limited and most available data are from intensive care unit or adult studies. Methods: In this 6 years cross-sectional study, comprehensive assessment of total health care costs attributable to CLABSI’s associated with ports between two periods including 3 years of pre-bundle period and bundle period. Results: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the pediatric hematology-oncology ward of Dr. Behçet Uz Children’s Hospital from 1 August November 2011 to 31 July 2017. The CLABSI rates decreased significantly from 8,31 CLABSIs to 3.04 per 1000 central line days ( p <0.0001). In the prebundle period, total attributable costs spent for of patients with CLABSI were $130661,68 and in the bundle period, total attributable costs spent for patients with CLABSI were $116579,05.Within bundle implantation, 71 potential CLABSI were prevented which saved an additional $208977,81. In other words, for one dollar spent for bundle program, $ 6,54 was saved by decreasing the expected CLABSI. Conclusion: our study shows that central line bundles decreases not only the CLABSI rate, but also decreases attributable costs due to CLABSI. Expenses spent for bundle elements, were covered by savings by preventing CLABSI with higher costs

Using Evidence and Process Improvement Strategies to Enhance Healthcare Outcomes for the Critically Ill: A Pilot Project

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 549-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol W. Hatler ◽  
Deanna Mast ◽  
Jeannie Corderella ◽  
Gina Mitchell ◽  
Kathleen Howard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Healthcare Outcomes ◽  
Tertiary Referral Hospital ◽  
Adult Intensive Care Unit

• Background Although the value of evidence-based practice may seem obvious, the process needed to produce more effective delivery of evidence-based healthcare is not obvious. Furthermore, the continuing escalation of healthcare costs fuels the desire of providers and consumers to undertake only those treatments that have benefit. One way to effect necessary changes in healthcare organizations is through focused, interdisciplinary, collaborative projects related to evidence-based practice. • Objectives To reduce rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients in the medical intensive care unit of a large, urban tertiary referral hospital in the Southwest. • Methods The theory of planned behavior served as the basis for providing staff members with research-based, easily controllable strategies that “fit” with the usual methods of care delivery. Implementation of the strategies and data collection were accomplished through routine rounds on patients and regular reporting of objective information. • Results During a 15-month period, use of the selected strategies resulted in a 54% reduction in ventilator-associated pneumonia, a 78% reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections, and a 18% reduction in mean length of stay in the unit. Use of a multidisciplinary, environmentally tailored approach to concerns about patients’ care resulted in estimated cost savings of $1.0 million to $2.3 million. • Conclusions Early, consistent communication about the project’s rationale, expected behavior, and outcomes enhanced the manageability and effectiveness of this change in an adult intensive care unit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document