Korean version of the G-8 geriatric screening tool: Translation and linguistic validation

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-474
Author(s):  
Hyeong Dong Yuk ◽  
Julia Jooyoung Kim ◽  
Ja Hyeon Ku ◽  
Cheol Kwak ◽  
Hyeon Hoe Kim ◽  
...  
Gerontology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Katharina Anic ◽  
Sophie Birkert ◽  
Mona Wanda Schmidt ◽  
Valerie Catherine Linz ◽  
Anne-Sophie Heimes ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> We evaluated the prognostic impact of various global health assessment tools in patients older than 60 years with ovarian cancer (OC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> G-8 geriatric screening tool (G-8 score), Lee Schonberg prognostic index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were determined retrospectively in a consecutive cohort of elderly patients with OC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier method were performed to analyze the impact of the preoperative global health status on survival. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 116 patients entered the study. In multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical-pathological factors, only the G-8 score retained significance as a prognostic parameter of progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.970; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.056–3.677]; <i>p</i> = 0.033). Fifty-six patients were classified as G-8-nonfrail with an increased PFS compared to 50 G-8-frail patients (53.4% vs. 16.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.010). A higher CCI was associated with decreased PFS (45.1% vs. 22.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), but it did not influence the risk of recurrences or death (<i>p</i> = 0.360; <i>p</i> = 0.111). The Lee Schonberg prognostic index, the ECOG, and age were not associated with survival. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The G-8 score independently predicted PFS in elderly OC patients regardless of maximal surgical effort. Thus, it could be useful to assess surgical treatment based on frailty rather than age alone.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise Deluche ◽  
Sophie Leobon ◽  
Francois Lamarche ◽  
Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24010-e24010
Author(s):  
Rocio Grajales ◽  
Alicia Gutierrez Mata ◽  
José Enrique Martínez Hernández ◽  
Alejandro Zavala-Calderon

e24010 Background: G8 is a geriatric screening tool designed to identify elderly cancer patients who benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Despite the increase in the incidence of cancer in the geriatric patients, there is absence of trials targeting this population. Decisions are often made based on their age and ECOG/Karnofsky scales, which does not reflect the actual role of an elderly patient. It is necessary to identify patients who require a CGA for an accurate evaluation and optimal oncological management. The routine implementation of the G8 geriatric screening tool in the oncology consultation consumes little time and is useful for timely referral of vulnerable patients to specialized care, in order to generate a positive impact on oncological therapy decision-making, improving their outcomes. Our main objective was to determine, using the geriatric screening tool G8, the percentage of patients aged >65 years with breast cancer, which require a CGA. Methods: The G8 questionnaire was applied to patients >65 yo with a diagnosis of breast cancer from December 2019 to May 2020. The baseline characteristics were prospectively collected and included clinical and demographic characteristics. The prognostic value of the functional status of the ECOG was evaluated and compared with that obtained from the G8. The difference between groups was assessed using Pearson's chi square with Yates correction. Additional scores were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log rank test. The hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards analysis, considering an abnormal G8 score as an exposure variable. Spearman correlation was made between age and the G8 score obtained. SPSS v22 software (IBM, USA) was used for all analyzes. Results: From December 2019 to May 2020, 357 patients were recruited. The mean age was 73.57 years (SD+7.02 y). The most frequent clinical stage was IIA (27.7%), followed by I (21.8%). 74.2% had an ECOG 1. Regarding treatment, 317 patients (88.8%) were on hormone therapy. The percentage of patients requiring a CGA was 44.3% (n = 158), of which only 55.1% (n = 87) were performed. We found no significant association between the requirement of CGA and clinical stage (p = 0.27) or treatment received (p = 0.345); but according to the ECOG, we obtained statistical significance p < 0.0001. Spearman correlation was performed between age and the G8 score, a correlation of 0.422 was obtained with p < 0.0001.The most affected domains of G8 were polypharmacy (51%) and ingestion (28.3%). Disease-free survival analysis was performed, without finding differences between vulnerable-frail and healthy patients. Conclusions: The G8 is a tool that allows to discern which patients require a CGA, in order to carry out interventions to improve comprehensive cancer treatment, so it should be implemented routinely in the oncology consultation.


CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 753-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Laguë ◽  
Philippe Voyer ◽  
Marie-Christine Ouellet ◽  
Valérie Boucher ◽  
Marianne Giroux ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesIn the fast pace of the Emergency Department (ED), clinicians are in need of tailored screening tools to detect seniors who are at risk of adverse outcomes. We aimed to explore the usefulness of the Bergman-Paris Question (BPQ) to expose potential undetected geriatric syndromes in community-living seniors presenting to the ED.MethodsThis is a planned sub-study of the INDEED multicentre prospective cohort study, including independent or semi-independent seniors (≥65 years old) admitted to hospital after an ED stay ≥8 hours and who were not delirious. Patients were assessed using validated screening tests for 3 geriatric syndromes: cognitive and functional impairment, and frailty. The BPQ was asked upon availability of a relative at enrolment. BPQ’s sensitivity and specificity analyses were used to ascertain outcomes.ResultsA response to the BPQ was available for 171 patients (47% of the main study’s cohort). Of this number, 75.4% were positive (suggesting impairment), and 24.6% were negative. To detect one of the three geriatric syndromes, the BPQ had a sensitivity of 85.4% (95% CI [76.3, 92.0]) and a specificity of 35.4% (95% CI [25.1, 46.7]). Similar results were obtained for each separate outcome. Odds ratio demonstrated a higher risk of presence of geriatric syndromes.ConclusionThe Bergman-Paris Question could be an ED screening tool for possible geriatric syndrome. A positive BPQ should prompt the need of further investigations and a negative BPQ possibly warrants no further action. More research is needed to validate the usefulness of the BPQ for day-to-day geriatric screening by ED professionals or geriatricians.


2009 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. S23-S24 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Fargeas ◽  
M.A. Picat ◽  
L. Dumazeau ◽  
S. Trarieux ◽  
B. Marin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-137
Author(s):  
Volkan Şen ◽  
Alperen Yıldız ◽  
Ozan Bozkurt ◽  
Hülya Ellidokuz ◽  
Uğur Mungan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document