Molecular determinants in tRNA D-arm required for inhibition of HIV-1 Gag membrane binding

2021 ◽  
pp. 167390
Author(s):  
Christopher Sumner ◽  
Osamu Kotani ◽  
Shuohui Liu ◽  
Karin Musier-Forsyth ◽  
Hironori Sato ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 428 (8) ◽  
pp. 1637-1655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Y. Mercredi ◽  
Nadine Bucca ◽  
Burk Loeliger ◽  
Christy R. Gaines ◽  
Mansi Mehta ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (16) ◽  
pp. 7939-7951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Joshi ◽  
Kunio Nagashima ◽  
Eric O. Freed

ABSTRACT The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag precursor protein Pr55Gag drives the assembly and release of virus-like particles in the infected cell. The capsid (CA) domain of Gag plays an important role in these processes by promoting Gag-Gag interactions during assembly. The C-terminal domain (CTD) of CA contains two dileucine-like motifs (L189/L190 and I201/L202) implicated in regulating the localization of Gag to multivesicular bodies (MVBs). These dileucine-like motifs are located in the vicinity of the CTD dimer interface, a region of CA critical for Gag-Gag interactions during virus assembly and CA-CA interactions during core formation. To study the importance of the CA dileucine-like motifs in various aspects of HIV-1 replication, we introduced a series of mutations into these motifs in the context of a full-length, infectious HIV-1 molecular clone. CA mutants LL189,190AA and IL201,202AA were both severely impaired in virus particle production because of a variety of defects in the binding of Gag to membrane, Gag multimerization, and CA folding. In contrast to the model suggesting that the CA dileucine-like motifs regulate MVB targeting, the IL201,202AA mutation did not alter Gag localization to the MVB in either HeLa cells or macrophages. Revertants of single-amino-acid substitution mutants were obtained that no longer contained dileucine-like motifs but were nevertheless fully replication competent. The varied phenotypes of the mutants reported here provide novel insights into the interplay among Gag multimerization, membrane binding, virus assembly, CA dimerization, particle maturation, and virion infectivity.


Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 548 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Elliot Murphy ◽  
Jamil S. Saad

Advancement in drug therapies and patient care have drastically improved the mortality rates of HIV-1 infected individuals. Many of these therapies were developed or improved upon by using structure-based techniques, which underscore the importance of understanding essential mechanisms in the replication cycle of HIV-1 at the structural level. One such process which remains poorly understood is the incorporation of the envelope glycoprotein (Env) into budding virus particles. Assembly of HIV particles is initiated by targeting of the Gag polyproteins to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (PM), a process mediated by the N-terminally myristoylated matrix (MA) domain and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2). There is strong evidence that formation of the Gag lattice on the PM is a prerequisite for the incorporation of Env into budding particles. It is also suggested that Env incorporation is mediated by an interaction between its cytoplasmic tail (gp41CT) and the MA domain of Gag. In this review, we highlight the latest developments and current efforts to understand the interplay between gp41CT, MA, and the membrane during assembly. Elucidation of the molecular determinants of Gag–Env–membrane interactions may help in the development of new antiviral therapeutic agents that inhibit particle assembly, Env incorporation and ultimately virus production.


2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (23) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dishari Thornhill ◽  
Balaji Olety ◽  
Akira Ono

ABSTRACT The HIV-1 Gag matrix (MA) domain mediates the localization of Gag to the plasma membrane (PM), the site for infectious virion assembly. The MA highly basic region (MA-HBR) interacts with phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2], a PM-specific acidic lipid. The MA-HBR also binds RNAs. To test whether acidic lipids alone determine PM-specific localization of Gag or whether MA-RNA binding also plays a role, we compared a panel of MA-HBR mutants that contain two types of substitutions at MA residues 25 and 26 or residues 29 and 31: Lys→Arg (KR) (25/26KR and 29/31KR) and Lys→Thr (KT) (25/26KT and 29/31KT). Consistent with the importance of the HBR charge in RNA binding, both KT mutants failed to bind RNA via MA efficiently, unlike the corresponding KR mutants. Both 25/26KT Gag-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and 29/31KT Gag-YFP bound nonspecifically to the PM and intracellular membranes, presumably via the myristoyl moiety and remaining MA basic residues. In contrast, 25/26KR Gag-YFP bound specifically to the PM, suggesting a role for the total positive charge and/or MA-bound RNA in navigating Gag to the PM. Unlike 29/31KT Gag-YFP, 29/31KR Gag-YFP was predominantly cytosolic and showed little intracellular membrane binding despite having a higher HBR charge. Therefore, it is likely that MA-RNA binding blocks promiscuous Gag membrane binding in cells. Notably, the introduction of a heterologous multimerization domain restored PI(4,5)P2-dependent PM-specific localization for 29/31KR Gag-YFP, suggesting that the blocking of PM binding is more readily reversed than that of intracellular membrane binding. Altogether, these cell-based data support a model in which MA-RNA binding ensures PM-specific localization of Gag via suppression of nonspecific membrane binding. IMPORTANCE The PM-specific localization of HIV-1 Gag is a crucial early step in infectious progeny production. The interaction between the MA highly basic region (MA-HBR) of Gag and the PM-specific lipid PI(4,5)P2 is critical for Gag localization to the PM. Additionally, in vitro evidence has indicated that MA-RNA binding prevents nonspecific binding of Gag to non-PI(4,5)P2-containing membranes. However, cell-based evidence supporting a role for HIV-1 MA-RNA binding in PM-specific subcellular localization has been scarce; thus, it remained possible that in cells, just the high basic charge or the PI(4,5)P2 binding ability is sufficient for MA to direct Gag specifically to the PM. The present study reveals for the first time an excellent correlation between RNA binding of the MA-HBR and inhibition of promiscuous Gag localization, both within the cells, and thereby provides cell-based evidence supporting a mechanism in which HIV-1 MA binding to RNA ensures the specific localization of Gag to the PM.


mBio ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingga Inlora ◽  
David R. Collins ◽  
Marc E. Trubin ◽  
Ji Yeon J. Chung ◽  
Akira Ono

ABSTRACTThe matrix (MA) domain of HIV-1 mediates proper Gag localization and membrane binding via interaction with a plasma-membrane (PM)-specific acidic phospholipid, phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2]. HIV-1 MA also interacts with RNA, which prevents Gag from binding to membranes containing phosphatidylserine, a prevalent cellular acidic phospholipid. These results suggest that the MA-bound RNA promotes PM-specific localization of HIV-1 Gag by blocking nonspecific interactions with cellular membranes that do not contain PI(4,5)P2. To examine whether PI(4,5)P2dependence and RNA-mediated inhibition collectively determine MA phenotypes across a broad range of retroviruses and elucidate the significance of their interrelationships, we compared a panel of Gag-leucine zipper constructs (GagLZ) containing MA of different retroviruses. We found thatin vitromembrane binding of GagLZ via HIV-1 MA and Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) MA is both PI(4,5)P2dependent and susceptible to RNA-mediated inhibition. The PM-specific localization and virus-like particle (VLP) release of these GagLZ proteins are severely impaired by overexpression of a PI(4,5)P2-depleting enzyme, polyphosphoinositide 5-phosphatase IV (5ptaseIV). In contrast, membrane binding of GagLZ constructs that contain human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) MA, murine leukemia virus (MLV) MA, and human endogenous retrovirus K (HERV-K) MA is PI(4,5)P2independent and not blocked by RNA. The PM localization and VLP release of these GagLZ chimeras were much less sensitive to 5ptaseIV expression. Notably, single amino acid substitutions that confer a large basic patch rendered HTLV-1 MA susceptible to the RNA-mediated block, suggesting that RNA readily blocks MA containing a large basic patch, such as HIV-1 and RSV MA. Further analyses of these MA mutants suggest a possibility that HIV-1 and RSV MA acquired PI(4,5)P2dependence to alleviate the membrane binding block imposed by RNA.IMPORTANCEMA basic residues in the HIV-1 structural protein Gag interact with phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2] and RNA. RNA inhibits HIV-1 MA binding to non-PI(4,5)P2acidic lipids. This inhibition may promote PM specificity of Gag membrane binding, an early essential step in virus assembly. However, whether and how relationships between these interactions have developed among retroviruses are poorly understood. In this study, by comparing diverse retroviral MA domains, we elucidated a strong correlation among PI(4,5)P2dependence, susceptibility to RNA-mediated inhibition, and cellular behaviors of Gag. Mutagenesis analyses suggest that a large basic patch on MA is sufficient to confer susceptibility to RNA-mediated inhibition but not for PI(4,5)P2-dependent membrane binding. Our findings highlight RNA’s role as a general blocker of large basic patches and suggest a possibility that some retroviruses, including HIV-1, have evolved to bind PI(4,5)P2, while others have adopted smaller basic patches on their MA domains, to overcome the RNA-mediated restriction of membrane binding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Distefano ◽  
Esteban Lanzarotti ◽  
María Florencia Fernández ◽  
Andrea Mangano ◽  
Marcelo Martí ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 193 ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balaji Olety ◽  
Akira Ono
Keyword(s):  
Hiv 1 ◽  

2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (23) ◽  
pp. 24569-24577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania Matamoros ◽  
Sandra Franco ◽  
Blanca M. Vázquez-Álvarez ◽  
Antonio Mas ◽  
Miguel Ángel Martínez ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (Spring) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Homann ◽  
Simone I. Giese ◽  
Ilka Woerz ◽  
Nadine Tibroni ◽  
Oliver T. Fackler
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document