Machine-learning neuroimaging challenge for automated diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment: Lessons learnt

2018 ◽  
Vol 302 ◽  
pp. 10-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Castiglioni ◽  
Christian Salvatore ◽  
Javier Ramírez ◽  
Juan Manuel Górriz
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Automated Diagnosis ◽  
Lessons Learnt

Machine Learning for the Prediction of Amyloid Positivity in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Sung Hoon Kang ◽  
Bo Kyoung Cheon ◽  
Ji-Sun Kim ◽  
Hyemin Jang ◽  
Hee Jin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Apolipoprotein E ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Good Accuracy ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Temporal Region ◽  
Apolipoprotein E Genotype

Background: Amyloid (Aβ) evaluation in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients is important for predicting conversion to Alzheimer’s disease. However, Aβ evaluation through amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is limited due to high cost and safety issues. Objective: We therefore aimed to develop and validate prediction models of Aβ positivity for aMCI using optimal interpretable machine learning (ML) approaches utilizing multimodal markers. Methods: We recruited 529 aMCI patients from multiple centers who underwent Aβ PET. We trained ML algorithms using a training cohort (324 aMCI from Samsung medical center) with two-phase modelling: model 1 included age, gender, education, diabetes, hypertension, apolipoprotein E genotype, and neuropsychological test scores; model 2 included the same variables as model 1 with additional MRI features. We used four-fold cross-validation during the modelling and evaluated the models on an external validation cohort (187 aMCI from the other centers). Results: Model 1 showed good accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.837) in cross-validation, and fair accuracy (AUROC 0.765) in external validation. Model 2 led to improvement in the prediction performance with good accuracy (AUROC 0.892) in cross validation compared to model 1. Apolipoprotein E genotype, delayed recall task scores, and interaction between cortical thickness in the temporal region and hippocampal volume were the most important predictors of Aβ positivity. Conclusion: Our results suggest that ML models are effective in predicting Aβ positivity at the individual level and could help the biomarker-guided diagnosis of prodromal AD.

scholarly journals Mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and cognitive dysfunction screening using machine learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 030006052093688
Author(s):  
Daehyuk Yim ◽  
Tae Young Yeo ◽  
Moon Ho Park
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Learning Algorithm ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithm ◽  
Neuropsychological Screening ◽  
Dementia Screening

Objective To develop a machine learning algorithm to identify cognitive dysfunction based on neuropsychological screening test results. Methods This retrospective study included 955 participants: 341 participants with dementia (dementia), 333 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 341 participants who were cognitively healthy. All participants underwent evaluations including the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Each participant’s caregiver or informant was surveyed using the Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire at the same visit. Different machine learning algorithms were applied, and their overall accuracies, Cohen’s kappa, receiver operating characteristic curves, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. Results The overall screening accuracies for MCI, dementia, and cognitive dysfunction (MCI or dementia) using a machine learning algorithm were approximately 67.8% to 93.5%, 96.8% to 99.9%, and 75.8% to 99.9%, respectively. Their kappa statistics ranged from 0.351 to 1.000. The AUCs of the machine learning models were statistically superior to those of the competing screening model. Conclusion This study suggests that a machine learning algorithm can be used as a supportive tool in the screening of MCI, dementia, and cognitive dysfunction.

scholarly journals A machine learning-based linguistic battery for diagnosing mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e0229460
Author(s):  
Sylvester Olubolu Orimaye ◽  
Karl Goodkin ◽  
Ossama Abid Riaz ◽  
Jean-Maurice Miranda Salcedo ◽  
Thabit Al-Khateeb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment

scholarly journals Utility of MemTrax and Machine Learning Modeling in Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1545-1558
Author(s):  
Michael F. Bergeron ◽  
Sara Landset ◽  
Xianbo Zhou ◽  
Tao Ding ◽  
Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Classification Performance ◽  
Cognitive Screening ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Machine Learning Classification

Background: The widespread incidence and prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has prompted an urgent call for research to validate early detection cognitive screening and assessment. Objective: Our primary research aim was to determine if selected MemTrax performance metrics and relevant demographics and health profile characteristics can be effectively utilized in predictive models developed with machine learning to classify cognitive health (normal versus MCI), as would be indicated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 259 neurology, memory clinic, and internal medicine adult patients recruited from two hospitals in China. Each patient was given the Chinese-language MoCA and self-administered the continuous recognition MemTrax online episodic memory test on the same day. Predictive classification models were built using machine learning with 10-fold cross validation, and model performance was measured using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Models were built using two MemTrax performance metrics (percent correct, response time), along with the eight common demographic and personal history features. Results: Comparing the learners across selected combinations of MoCA scores and thresholds, Naïve Bayes was generally the top-performing learner with an overall classification performance of 0.9093. Further, among the top three learners, MemTrax-based classification performance overall was superior using just the top-ranked four features (0.9119) compared to using all 10 common features (0.8999). Conclusion: MemTrax performance can be effectively utilized in a machine learning classification predictive model screening application for detecting early stage cognitive impairment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document