Validity of the central sensitization inventory through rasch analysis in patients with knee OA

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S16-S17
Author(s):  
L.C. Carlesso ◽  
N. Roby ◽  
T. Packham
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242912
Author(s):  
Man Soo Kim ◽  
In Jun Koh ◽  
Chul Kyu Kim ◽  
Keun Young Choi ◽  
Chang Yeon Kim ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to establish a Korean version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-K) for Korean-speaking patients facing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the CSI-K. We recruited a total of 269 patients with knee OA who were scheduled to undergo TKA for the study. CSI-K and pain-related outcomes, including the pain visual analog scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) pain sub-scores, were measured. Since central sensitization (CS) is closely related to the quality of life (QOL) and limited functionality as well as pain, the patient’s function was measured using the WOMAC function sub-scores, and QOL was measured using the EuroQol five-dimension test (EQ-5D). Reliability and validity were evaluated. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to begin the data reduction to validate the existing questionnaire translation. The internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.941. The test-retest reliability was acceptable-to-excellent with an ICC of 0.888. As expected, the CSI scores correlated strongly with the WOMAC pain scores (r = 0.524, p < 0.001) and moderately with the pain VAS (r = 0.496, p < 0.001), the WOMAC function (r = 0.408, p < 0.001), and the EQ-5D scores (r = 0.437, p < 0.001). EFA resulted in a six-factor model. The findings demonstrate that the CSI was successfully trans-culturally adapted into a simplified Korean version (CSI-K) that was reliable and valid for Korean-speaking patients who awaiting TKA for knee OA.


Pain ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha L. Orr ◽  
Kate J. Wahl ◽  
Michelle Lisonek ◽  
Angela Joannou ◽  
Heather Noga ◽  
...  

Pain Practice ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 724-736
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Knezevic ◽  
Randy Neblett ◽  
Petar Colovic ◽  
Milica Jeremic‐Knezevic ◽  
Vojislava Bugarski‐Ignjatovic ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2430-2440
Author(s):  
Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas ◽  
Randy Neblett ◽  
Jo Nijs ◽  
Alessandro Chiarotto ◽  
Jeroen Kregel ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The goal of this study was to identify central sensitization–related symptom severity subgroups in a large multicountry sample composed of patients with chronic pain and pain-free individuals using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Methods A large, pooled international (N = 8 countries) sample of chronic pain patients plus healthy subjects (total N = 2,620) was randomly divided into two subsamples for cross-validation purposes. First, a hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed using CSI item-level data as clustering variables (test sample; N = 1,312). Second, a latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to confirm the optimal number of CSI clusters (validation sample; N = 1,308). Finally, to promote implementation in real-world clinical practice, we built a free online Central Sensitization Inventory Symptom Severity Calculator. Results In both HCA (N = 1,219 valid cases) and LPA (N = 1,245 valid cases) analyses, a three-cluster and three-profile solution, respectively, emerged as the most statistically optimal and clinically meaningful. Clusters were labeled as follows: (i) Low Level of CS-Related Symptom Severity, (ii) Medium Level of CS-Related Symptom Severity, and (iii) High Level of CS-Related Symptom Severity. Conclusions Our results indicated that a three-cluster solution clearly captured the heterogeneity of the CSI data. The calculator might provide an efficient way of classifying subjects into the cluster groups. Future studies should analyze the extent to which the CSI cluster classification correlates with other patient-reported and objective signs and symptoms of CS in patients with chronic pain, their associations with clinical outcomes, health-related costs, biomarkers, (etc.), and responsiveness to treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-770
Author(s):  
Natasha L. Orr ◽  
Kate J. Wahl ◽  
Heather Noga ◽  
Catherine Allaire ◽  
Christina Williams ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
M.A. Bakhtadze ◽  
M.V. Churyukanov ◽  
M.L. Kukushkin ◽  
O.S. Davydov ◽  
K.V. Proskuryakov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document