scholarly journals The Longitudinal Impact of Parent Distress and Behavior on Functional Outcomes Among Youth With Chronic Pain

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 729-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika T. Chow ◽  
John D. Otis ◽  
Laura E. Simons
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob A. B. Oostendorp ◽  
Hans Elvers ◽  
Emilia Mikołajewska ◽  
Marjan Laekeman ◽  
Emiel van Trijffel ◽  
...  

Objective.To develop and evaluate process indicators relevant to biopsychosocial history taking in patients with chronic back and neck pain.Methods.The SCEBS method, covering the Somatic, Psychological (Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior), and Social dimensions of chronic pain, was used to evaluate biopsychosocial history taking by manual physical therapists (MPTs). In Phase I, process indicators were developed while in Phase II indicators were tested in practice.Results.Literature-based recommendations were transformed into 51 process indicators. Twenty MTPs contributed 108 patient audio recordings. History taking was excellent (98.3%) for the Somatic dimension, very inadequate for Cognition (43.1%) and Behavior (38.3%), weak (27.8%) for Emotion, and low (18.2%) for the Social dimension. MTPs estimated their coverage of the Somatic dimension as excellent (100%), as adequate for Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior (60.1%), and as very inadequate for the Social dimension (39.8%).Conclusion.MTPs perform screening for musculoskeletal pain mainly through the use of somatic dimension of (chronic) pain. Psychological and social dimensions of chronic pain were inadequately covered by MPTs. Furthermore, a substantial discrepancy between actual and self-estimated use of biopsychosocial history taking was noted. We strongly recommend full implementation of the SCEBS method in educational programs in manual physical therapy.


Author(s):  
Richard Gowan ◽  
Isabelle Iff
Keyword(s):  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 491-491
Author(s):  
Soumitri Sil ◽  
Alison Manikowski ◽  
Mallory Schneider ◽  
Lindsey L Cohen ◽  
Carlton D. Dampier

Abstract Introduction: Youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) and chronic pain are a heterogeneous group with variability in their daily pain experience and physical and psychosocial functioning. We aimed to 1) empirically derive chronic pain subgroups based on sensory pain characteristics using cluster analysis within a sample of youth with chronic SCD pain, and 2) investigate derived subgroups for differences in sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and psychosocial and functional outcomes. We hypothesized that chronic SCD pain subgroups with higher sensory pain experiences would be associated with poorer functional and psychosocial outcomes. Methods: Children and adolescents receiving care at comprehensive SCD clinics at three tertiary care locations within a southeast children's hospital were included if they were aged 10-18 years, any SCD genotype, reported chronic pain (i.e., pain on most days per month for a duration of at least 3 months), and had English fluency. Youth were excluded if they had comorbid medical conditions typically associated with pain but unrelated to SCD or had significant cognitive or developmental limitations that would interfere with study procedures. Patients completed a battery of patient-reported outcomes including pain characteristics (i.e., intensity, frequency, and the Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool to assess number of pain locations and pain quality descriptors), PROMIS Pediatric Short Forms for pain interference, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, the Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale for sleep quality, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization outcomes were abstracted from electronic medical records including number of inpatient admissions for pain and emergency department visits for pain in the prior 12 months. Chronic SCD pain subgroups were based on sensory pain characteristics including pain intensity ratings, pain frequency, number of body sites affected by pain, and pain quality descriptors. Hierarchical cluster analysis informed the number of clusters at the patient level. K-means cluster analysis was used to assign patients to clusters once the number of clusters was established. Clusters were compared on sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization, and child psychosocial and functional outcomes. Results: Youth (n=62) were on average (M) 13.9 years old (SD=2.5), 56% female, 95% Black or African American, and 85% Non-Hispanic/Latinx. Most (75%) had HbSS or HbSβ 0 and 67% were prescribed hydroxyurea. Hierarchical cluster analysis and k-means clustering supported a 2-cluster solution (see Figure 1). Cluster 1 (n=35; Frequent, Moderate Pain) was distinguished by significantly lower scores on worst pain intensity (M=6.4, SD=0.4), lower number of pain days per month (M=12.1, SD=2.8), fewer number of body sites affected by pain (M=8.9, SD=0.9), and lower pain quality ratings (M=15.9, SD=1.3). Cluster 2 (n=27; Almost Daily, High Pain) represented patients who reported high ratings of worst pain intensity (M=8.2, SD=0.3), daily to almost daily pain (M=20.3, SD=1.7), higher number of body sties affected by pain (M=12.5, SD=1.5), and higher ratings of pain quality (M=40.8, SD=1.9) (all p's <.05). There were no differences between chronic SCD pain subgroups by sociodemographics (e.g., age, sex, family income), clinical characteristics (e.g., genotype, history of avascular necrosis, disease-modifying treatments, prescribed long-acting opioids, neuropathic medications, or antidepressants), or healthcare utilization. Patients in the Almost Daily High Pain subgroup reported significantly higher pain interference, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing compared to patients in the Frequent, Moderate Pain subgroup (see Table 1). There were no differences between subgroups on anxiety or sleep quality. Conclusions: Two subgroups of chronic SCD pain were identified based on pain, psychosocial, and functional outcomes. Beyond sensory pain characteristics, pain interference, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing were the only variables that best differentiated the chronic SCD pain subgroups. These empirically derived subgroups are comparable to other non-SCD chronic pain subgroups in pediatrics and adults. Identifying homogenous chronic SCD pain subtypes can inform tailored assessment and management of chronic pain. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 744-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan T. Tran ◽  
Kristen E. Jastrowski Mano ◽  
Keri R. Hainsworth ◽  
Gustavo R. Medrano ◽  
Kimberly Anderson Khan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 1605-1609
Author(s):  
Valeriy М. Pashkovskyy ◽  
Оlha S. Yurtsenyuk

The aim: to determine occurrence and structure of non-psychotic mental disorders associated with chronic pain among young people. Materials and methods: The results of examination of 1235 students were analyzed. The following methods were applied: clinical, clinical-psychopathological, clinicalepidemiological, clinical-anamnestic, experimental-psychological and statistical. Results: Students with neurotic disorders associated with stress and somatoform disorders were found to prevail in the main group (F40-48.1) 187 (58,99%), affective mood disorders were on the second position (F30-34.1) - 79 (24,92%) individuals, followed by disorders of a mature personality and behavior of adults (F60-60.7) diagnosed in 31 (9,78%) students, and at last, behavioral syndromes associated with physiological disorders and physical factors (F50-51.4) - 20 (6,30%) respectively. Chronic pain syndrome was diagnosed in 113 (35,65%) students with NMD including 43 (38,05%) men and 70 (61,95%) women. The majority of young people (86 individuals – 76,11%) observed severe pain, and 27 (23,89%) of them – moderate pain. A clear correlation was found between a depressive episode and CPS (γ<0,02). Conclusions: The findings obtained should be considered in development of screening systems concerning diagnostics, prevention of nonpsychotic mental disorders associated with chronic pain syndrome.


2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-3, 10-12
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth

Abstract This article is part three of a four-part series that examines the rating of pain complaints and mental illness using the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, (AMA Guides). Chapter 18 provides physicians with a method for evaluating impairment associated with “chronic pain states” for which there may be “no demonstrable active disease or unhealed injury,” and Chapter 14 should be considered when symptoms are out of proportion to physical findings. This article focuses on the directions from Chapter 18 and other pain resources. The authors note that Chapter 18 specifically addresses the issue of distinguishing between uses of Chapters 18 and 14, but the directions are contradictory with respect to the key question, Do “psychological factors” play a “major role” in the presentation of pain? Resources such as Bonica's Management of Pain point out that “[t]issue damage and nociception are neither necessary nor sufficient for pain,” suggesting that psychological factors are nearly always present and obviating the use of Chapter 18. A potential solution would be to ask, “Is the presentation of pain consistent with any mental illness as defined in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual?” The decision rule then would be if the presentation of pain is consistent with any mental illness, then the mental and behavior chapter should be used.


Pain ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (12) ◽  
pp. 2471-2475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Pereira ◽  
Yeates Conwell ◽  
Michael J. Gitlin ◽  
Robert H. Dworkin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document