Non-melancholic depressive symptoms increase risk for incident cardiovascular disease: A prospective study in a primary care population at risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 109887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ansa Talvikki Rantanen ◽  
Jyrki Jaakko Antero Korkeila ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Päivi Elina Korhonen
2020 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 110107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ansa Talvikki Rantanen ◽  
Mika Martin Kallio ◽  
Jyrki Jaakko Antero Korkeila ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Päivi Elina Korhonen

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1655-P
Author(s):  
SOO HEON KWAK ◽  
JOSEP M. MERCADER ◽  
AARON LEONG ◽  
BIANCA PORNEALA ◽  
PEITAO WU ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shi Ying Tan ◽  
Heather Cronin ◽  
Stephen Byrne ◽  
Adrian O’Donovan ◽  
Antoinette Tuthill

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. Use of aspirin has been shown to be of benefit for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes; benefits in primary prevention have not been clearly proven. Aims This study aims to (a) determine if aspirin is prescribed appropriately in type 2 diabetes for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and (b) evaluate whether there are differences in aspirin prescribing according to where people receive their care. Design Cross-sectional study Methods The medical records of individuals with type 2 diabetes aged over 18 years and attending Elmwood Primary Care Centre and Cork University Hospital Diabetes outpatient clinics (n = 400) between February and August 2017 were reviewed. Results There were 90 individuals exclusively attending primary care and 310 persons attending shared care. Overall, 49.0% (n = 196) of those were prescribed aspirin, of whom 42.3% were using it for secondary prevention. Aspirin was used significantly more in people attending shared care (p < 0.001). About 10.8% of individuals with diabetes and CVD attending shared care met guidelines for, but were not prescribed aspirin. Conclusion A significant number of people with type 2 diabetes who should have been prescribed aspirin for secondary prevention were not receiving it at the time of study assessment. In contrast, a substantial proportion who did not meet criteria for aspirin use was prescribed it for primary prevention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document