scholarly journals Adherance To Medication Errors Repoting System At Public Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A466
Author(s):  
YA Alomi ◽  
NA Al-Shubbar
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Public Hospital

scholarly journals Analysis of Reported E-prescribing Medication Administration Errors at King Saud Medical City, Riyadh: A Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 34-45
Author(s):  
Dalal Salem Al- Dossari ◽  
Mohammed Ibrahim Alnami ◽  
Naseem Akhtar Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Medication Administration ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Common Error ◽  
Clinical Pharmacists ◽  
Medication Administration Errors

Background: Drug prescription error is a medication error that most frequently happens in healthcare organizations and adversely affects the healthcare consumers. Most medication errors (MEs) but not all are captured and corrected before reaching the patient by designed system controls. Medication administration errors (MAEs) mostly are made by nurses but frequently reported by clinical pharmacists in hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Objective: This study aimed to analyze exclusively the voluntarily reported drug administration errors in a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh city. Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective study evaluated consecutively collected medication administration report forms over a period of one year from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. Results: The number of MAEs occurring during stage of drug administration constituted 7.1% (n=971) of total medication errors (n=13677). The maximum number of MEs (n=6838, 50%) and MAEs (n=455, 46.9%) occurred during the 4th quarter of the year 2015. The most common MAE happened to be category C (n=888, 91.5%) which means error occurred, reached the patient but without causing any harm. Concerning MAE types, the most common error included wrong frequency (40%) followed by wrong drug (17%), wrong time of administration (16%) and wrong rate of infusion (10%). Nurses made the most of the errors (92.2%) while the clinical pharmacists reported the most MAEs (75.5%). High alert medications (HAM) errors constituted 32.3% (n=314) of MAEs (n=971) and most common HAM errors included the wrong route of administration of Lanus Insulin (15%) followed by Insulin Aspart (15%), Enoxaparin (13%) and Insulin Protamine-Nvomix (12%). Look-alike and sound-alike (LASA) errors constituted 55.2% of MAEs (971/536) and most common LASA drugs identified were Gentamycin (13%), Insulin Mixtard (11%), NPH Insulin (8%) Intralipid vial (8%) and Insulin regular (6%). Conclusion: This retrospective study provides some important tentative pharmacovigilance insights into MAEs, which are partially comparable with current international trends in drug administration errors. Further studies on MAEs are warranted not only in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but also other Gulf countries.

scholarly journals A study of medication errors during the prescription stage in the pediatric critical care services of a secondary-tertiary level public hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Michele Brennan-Bourdon ◽  
Alan O. Vázquez-Alvarez ◽  
Jahaira Gallegos-Llamas ◽  
Manuel Koninckx-Cañada ◽  
José Luis Marco-Garbayo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
Care Services

Abstract Background Medication Errors (MEs) are considered the most common type of error in pediatric critical care services. Moreover, the ME rate in pediatric patients is up to three times higher than the rate for adults. Nevertheless, information in pediatric population is still limited, particularly in emergency/critical care practice. The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze MEs in the pediatric critical care services during the prescription stage in a Mexican secondary-tertiary level public hospital. Methods A cross-sectional study to detect MEs was performed in all pediatric critical care services [pediatric emergency care (PEC), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and neonatal intermediate care unit (NIMCU)] of a public teaching hospital. A pharmacist identified MEs by direct observation as the error detection method and MEs were classified according to the updated classification for medication errors by the Ruíz-Jarabo 2000 working group. Thereafter, these were subclassified in clinically relevant MEs. Results In 2347 prescriptions from 301 patients from all critical care services, a total of 1252 potential MEs (72%) were identified, and of these 379 were considered as clinically relevant due to their potential harm. The area with the highest number of MEs was PICU (n = 867). The ME rate was > 50% in all pediatric critical care services and PICU had the highest ME/patient index (13.1). The most frequent MEs were use of abbreviations (50.9%) and wrong speed rate of administration (11.4%), and only 11.7% of the total drugs were considered as ideal medication orders. Conclusion Clinically relevant medication errors can range from mild skin reactions to severe conditions that place the patient’s life at risk. The role of pharmacists through the detection and timely intervention during the prescription and other stages of the medication use process can improve drug safety in pediatric critical care services.

A Retrospective Study of Pediatric Medication Errors in Saudi Arabia

2019 ◽  
pp. 001857871988231
Author(s):  
Oluwaseun Egunsola ◽  
Sheraz Ali ◽  
Dalal S. Al-Dossari ◽  
Rahsid Hamoud Alnajrani
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Pediatric Care ◽  
Common Drug ◽  
Transcription Error

Background: The peculiarities of medication errors (MEs) among the pediatric population in the Middle East have not been adequately explored. In this study, we describe the MEs reported at the largest tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of MEs reported by health care professionals at a large tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia between 2015 and 2016. Results: There were a total of 9123 MEs involving 84 different medications. In total, 109 382 drugs were ordered. Thus, 8.3 MEs per 100 prescriptions were reported during the study period. Thirty-nine errors (0.4%) reached the patient, but did not cause any harm. Transcribing errors accounted for more than half of the MEs (n = 4856, 53.2%). Physicians were the least likely to report an ME (n = 159, 1.7%), whereas pharmacists reported more MEs than any other health care professional (n = 4924, 54%). The most common drug causes of MEs were paracetamol, salbutamol, and amoxicillin, which accounted for 21.0%, 16.6%, and 12.4% of MEs, respectively, over the study period. Conclusions: Medication errors are common in pediatric care, especially for drugs such as paracetamol and amoxicillin that are frequently prescribed. Transcription error was common in this study and is more likely to be reported by pharmacists.

scholarly journals Risk factors for medication errors in the electronic and manual prescription

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cris Renata Grou Volpe ◽  
Eveline Maria Magalhães de Melo ◽  
Lucas Barbosa de Aguiar ◽  
Diana Lúcia Moura Pinho ◽  
Marina Morato Stival
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Electronic Records ◽  
Brand Name ◽  
Electronic Prescription ◽  
Medication Process

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare electronic and manual prescriptions of a public hospital of Brasilia, identifying risk factors for the occurrence of medication errors. Method: descriptive-exploratory, comparative and retrospective study. Data collection occurred from July 2012 to January 2013, using an instrument for the review of the information contained in medical records related to the medication process. A total of 190 manual and 199 electronic records composed the sample, with 2027 prescriptions each. Results: compared to the manual prescription, a significant reduction was observed in the risk factors after implantation of the electronic prescription, in items such as "lack of the form of dilution" (71.1% to 22.3%) and "prescription with brand name" (99.5% to 31.5%). Conversely, the risk factors "no check" and "lack of CRM of the prescriber" increased. The lack of the allergy registration and the occurrences related to medication were the same for both groups. Conclusion: generally, the use of the electronic prescription system was associated with a significant reduction in risk factors for medication errors, concerning the following aspects: illegibility, prescription with brand name and presence of essential items that provide a safe and effective prescription.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document