Articulating FPIC through transnational sustainability standards: A comparative analysis of Forest Stewardship Council’s standard development processes in Canada, Russia and Sweden

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 105631
Author(s):  
Sara Teitelbaum ◽  
Maria Tysiachniouk ◽  
Constance McDermott ◽  
Marine Elbakidze
Author(s):  
Austin Michael ◽  
Sarah Carnochan

Practice Research in the Human Services: A University-Agency Partnership Model describes the array of research methods employed in practice research as a foundation for distinguishing this approach from other applied research frameworks. Chapter 9 builds upon the preceding chapters and provides a comparative analysis of the differences and similarities between practice research and the basic elements of participatory action research and program evaluation and intervention research. It describes and compares approaches to research question formulation, sources of literature and practice wisdom, data collection tools, data analysis and interpretation processes, research dissemination processes, and knowledge development processes. With these common components in mind, the analysis also addresses the key concepts of principles, process challenges, methodological challenges, and success factors that are associated with each of the frameworks.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodora N. Ngosi ◽  
John O. Jenkins

This paper discusses research findings on information requirements for developing international Information Technology (IT) standards. Using the software standard development domain as a case study, the objective is to examine the standard development processes and the problems associated with IT standardization, and based upon the findings, an information requirement framework is provided.


Author(s):  
Youssef Tabsh ◽  
Vida Davidavičienė

Sustainability and innovation are strongly connected in terms of productivity and finding innovative solutions for the short and the long terms. The purpose of this article is to analyze ICT models for in-novation and sustainable development processes in the energy management sector and to identify possible solutions (Lebanese case). Using the comparative analysis method, the article will illustrate the difference between using ICT models in innovation and sustainability in energy management and the previous models used for energy production and management focusing on the results after im-plementation.


Equilibrium ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiza Piersiala

Research background: In this article the characteristics of the terms of an entrepreneurship of a region and a local development were presented. Likewise, it demonstrates the results of research about using the development model method to classify special economic zones (SEZ) in terms of the most important indicators referring to the economic activity of zones in Poland, as well as showing the potential of zones — by noting their advantage or distance in relation to another zone in terms of criteria for functioning of privileged areas forming together a group. Purpose of the article: The aim of the article is to show the possibility to use a multidimensional comparative analysis method to recognize the level of a region’s development in a time-space system on the example of SEZ operating in Poland. Methods: The essential data source about the article’s description were reports published by the Ministry of Economy and then the Ministry of Enterprise and Technology: Information on the implementation of the Act on Special Economic Zones. The empirical analysis used the method of multidimensional comparative analysis used to recognize the diversification of the functioning of fourteen SEZ operating in Poland in a time-space system. The examination procedure covered the years 2009–2017. A constant development pattern was adopted for all the years of the study. Findings & Value added: The results of conducted analysis show that in SEZ there were real development processes. However, these processes were accompanied by persistent disproportions in the level of development of individual zones.


Author(s):  
W. C. de Souza Carvalho ◽  
P. F. Rosa ◽  
Michel dos Santos Soares ◽  
Marco Antonio Teixeira da Cunha Junior ◽  
L. C. Buiatte

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 469-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
THOMAS A. HEMPHILL

The focus of this article is on exploring the business competitive consequences of firm patent strategies in the United States de jure technology standard development processes. An analytic framework ("Firm Patent Strategies Matrix") is created which formally identifies a set of firm patent strategies applicable in the de jure technology standard development process. This Firm Patent Strategies Matrix is predicated on two key variables relevant to the standard development process: first, firms are either active participants in standard-setting committees, or they are non-participants, and second, firms are either disclosing appropriate information on potentially relevant patented technology (or patent pending applications on such technology), or they are not disclosing such potentially relevant patented information on technology (or patent pending applications on such technology), in the standard development process. The Firm Patent Strategies Matrix identifies the following four generic strategic choices for a technology-driven firm to choose among concerning the disposition of its patents: (1) Disclosure/Participation, (2) Disclosure/Non-Participation, (3) Non-Disclosure/Participation, and (4) Non-Disclosure/Non-Participation. Public policy issues, relevant to these Firm Patent Strategies, are identified (e.g., RAND licencing terms, patent ambush and submarine patents) and recommended policy solutions are offered (e.g., instituting Ex Ante royalty discussions, vigorous federal antitrust enforcement against patent ambush and the wider use of firm patent liability insurance, respectively).


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Rawhouser ◽  
Michael E. Cummings ◽  
Alfred Marcus

Stakeholders play an increasingly active role in private governance, including development of standards for measuring sustainability. Building on prior studies focused on standards and stakeholder engagement, we use an innovation management theoretical lens to compare stakeholder engagement and standards developed in two carbon markets: the Climate Action Reserve and the U.N.’s Clean Development Mechanism. We develop and test hypotheses regarding how different processes of stakeholder engagement in standard development affect the number, identity, and age of stakeholders involved, as well as the variation and quality of the resulting standards. In doing so, we contribute to the growing literature on stakeholder engagement in developing sustainability standards.


Author(s):  
José Ernesto Rodríguez Morán ◽  
Douglas Ernesto Rodas García

ResumenLa investigación consistió en el análisis comparativo de los procesos de desarrollo de cinco proyectos con diferentes líneas de acción social realizados por los ilustradores salvadoreños Gabriel Granadino, Carlos Violante, Sonia Lazo, Edmundo Landaverde (MUNDO) y Gabriela Novoa, quienes fueron seleccionados con base en los patrones metodológicosabordados particularmente en cada uno de los casos estudiados.El objetivo principal de esta investigación es analizar la relación que existe entre las características de cada caso de estudio. Para ello, se seleccionaron cinco proyectos con diferentes líneas de acción social: identidad cultural, educación, feminismo, política y educación sexual. De estos proyectos se determinaron las metodologías y los contextos quefueron parte de los mismos, con el fin de comprender la manera en la que estos componentes influyeron en el desarrollo y el alcance de los objetivos contemplados para cada caso en específico. La investigación se realizó utilizando diversas fuentes de información recopiladas a través de: referencias bibliográficas, entrevistas, documentación fotográfica y la sistematización de los procesos por medio de matrices comparativas.AbstractThe investigation consisted in the comparative analysis of the development processes of five projects with different lines of social action carried out by the Salvadoran illustrators Gabriel Granadino, Carlos Violante, Sonia Lazo, Edmundo Landaverde (MUNDO) and Gabriela Novoa, who were selected based on the methodological patterns addressedparticularly in each of the cases studied.The main objective of this research is to analyze the relationship that exists between the characteristics of each case study. For this, five projects with different lines of social action were selected: cultural identity, education, feminism, politics and sexual education.From these projects, the methodologies and contexts that were part of them were determined, in order to understand the way in which these components influenced the development and scope of the objectives contemplated for each specific case. The research was conducted using various sources of information collected through: bibliographic references,interviews, photographic documentation and the systematization of processes through comparative matrices. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document