The impact of tumor and gut microbiotas on cancer therapy: Beneficial or detrimental?

Life Sciences ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 116680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yalda Hekmatshoar ◽  
Yalda Rahbar Saadat ◽  
Seyed Mahdi Hosseiniyan Khatibi ◽  
Tulin Ozkan ◽  
Fatemeh Zununi Vahed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 117955492110434
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Buti ◽  
Fabiana Perrone ◽  
Teresa Zielli ◽  
Giulia Mazzaschi ◽  
Chiara Casartelli ◽  
...  

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), an acute respiratory syndrome caused by a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), has rapidly spread worldwide, significantly affecting the outcome of a highly vulnerable group such as cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of COVID-19 infection on outcome and oncologic treatment of cancer patients. Patient and methods: We retrospectively enrolled cancer patients with laboratory and/or radiologic confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, admitted to our center from February to April 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the clinical data and univariate analyses were performed to investigate the impact of anticancer treatment modifications due to COVID-19 outbreak on the short-term overall survival (OS). Results: Among 61 patients enrolled, 49 (80%) were undergoing anticancer treatment and 41 (67%) had metastatic disease. Most patients were men; median age was 68 years. Median OS was 46.6 days (40% of deaths occurred within 20 days from COVID-19 diagnosis). Among 59 patients with available data on therapeutic course, 46 experienced consequences on their anticancer treatment schedule. Interruption or a starting failure of the oncologic therapy correlated with significant shorter OS. Anticancer treatment delays did not negatively affect the OS. Lymphocytopenia development after COVID was significantly associated with worst outcome. Conclusions: COVID-19 diagnosis in cancer patients may affect their short-term OS, especially in case of interruption/starting failure of cancer therapy. Maintaining/delaying cancer therapy seems not to influence the outcome in selected patients with recent COVID-19 diagnosis.


1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-81
Author(s):  
Fatma M. El Sharkawi ◽  
Mahmoud F. Sakr ◽  
Hoda Y. Atta ◽  
Hafez M. Ghanem

The impact of breast cancer therapy on the quality of life [QL] of Egyptian women was studied. Patients were divided into four groups:1:mastectomy alone;2:surgery plus radiotherapy;3:surgery plus chemotherapy;and 4:triple modality. The results revealed that all the four domains of QL of women having adjuvant therapy [groups 2, 3, or 4] were significantly altered compared to those who underwent mastectomy alone. Triple modality adversely affected global QL the most compared to radiotherapy or chemotherapy;radiotherapy had significantly less effect on QL compared to chemotherapy. Triple modality predicted the worst QL. QL measures should be incorporated with the traditional end points for evaluation of treatment and patients given health education on the effects of each therapy


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1255-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
S B Yellen ◽  
D F Cella

PURPOSE Little is known about the influence of social factors on treatment preferences and desire for aggressive cancer therapy. The present study assessed subjective and objective social indicators in patient preferences for treatment. METHODS Cancer patients (N = 296) with diverse diagnoses and stages read sets of hypothetical vignettes describing patients with early-stage and advanced disease. In the first set, patients made decisions about treatment acceptance given varying levels of either increasing cure or extending survival. In the second set, the point at which patients shifted preferences from mild to severe treatment to improve likelihood of 1-year survival (switch point) was the dependent measure. We assessed the impact of quality-of-life (QL) domains measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), having children, marital status, and living arrangements on treatment preferences and switch points. RESULTS The Social Well-Being (SWB) subscale of the FACT-G predicted both treatment acceptance (P = .007) and switch point (P = .043) in the advanced-disease vignettes, with lower SWB associated with less aggressive preferences. Children living at home was likewise associated with more aggressive intent both in treatment preferences (P = .003, advanced-disease vignette) and switch point (P < .001 and P = .001 for early- and advanced-disease vignettes, respectively). Living with others predicted more aggressive intent in the advanced-disease vignette (P = .03). Marital status did not predict either treatment acceptance or switch point. CONCLUSION Positive social well-being, as well as having children living at home, predicted patient willingness to accept aggressive treatment. Willingness to receive aggressive treatment may explain or mediate previously reported salutory effects of social support on cancer outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 135 (12) ◽  
pp. 1487-1503
Author(s):  
Crizza Ching ◽  
Dakota Gustafson ◽  
Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan ◽  
Jason E. Fish

Abstract Significant improvements in cancer survival have brought to light unintended long-term adverse cardiovascular effects associated with cancer treatment. Although capable of manifesting a broad range of cardiovascular complications, cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) remains particularly common among the mainstay anthracycline-based and human epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapies. Unfortunately, the early asymptomatic stages of CTRCD are difficult to detect by cardiac imaging alone, and the initiating mechanisms remain incompletely understood. More recently, circulating inflammatory markers, cardiac biomarkers, microRNAs, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been considered as early markers of cardiovascular injury. Concomitantly, the role of the endothelium in regulating cardiac function in the context of CTRCD is starting to be understood. In this review, we highlight the impact of breast cancer therapies on the cardiovascular system with a focus on the endothelium, and examine the status of circulating biomarkers, including inflammatory markers, cardiac biomarkers, microRNAs, and endothelial cell-derived EVs. Investigation of these emerging biomarkers may uncover mechanisms of injury, detect early stages of cardiovascular damage, and elucidate novel therapeutic approaches.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Bergaggio ◽  
Roberto Piva

Isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDHs) are enzymes that catalyze the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate, producing α-ketoglutarate (αKG) and CO2. The discovery of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in several malignancies has brought to the approval of drugs targeting IDH1/2 mutants in cancers. Here, we summarized findings addressing the impact of IDH mutants in rare pathologies and focused on the relevance of non-mutated IDH enzymes in tumors. Several pieces of evidence suggest that the enzymatic inhibition of IDHs may have therapeutic potentials also in wild-type IDH cancers. Moreover, IDHs inhibition could enhance the efficacy of canonical cancer therapies, such as chemotherapy, target therapy, and radiotherapy. However, further studies are required to elucidate whether IDH proteins are diagnostic/prognostic markers, instrumental for tumor initiation and maintenance, and could be exploited as targets for anticancer therapy. The development of wild-type IDH inhibitors is expected to improve our understanding of a potential non-oncogenic addition to IDH1/2 activities and to fully address their applicability in combination with other therapies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Steen ◽  
M Montenbruck ◽  
P Wuelfing ◽  
S Esch ◽  
A K Schwarz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The incidence of cardiotoxicity during cancer therapy is underestimated due to limitations of current diagnostic tests. Current biomarkers (BNP, NT-pro-BNP, hs-Troponin, etc.) and imaging calculations (e.g. echocardiography) such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are currently included in the guidelines to designate cardiotoxicity during cancer therapy. Unfortunately, these diagnostics identify systemic damage in symptomatic patients after the heart is unable to compensate for regional dysfunction. Fast-SENC segmental intramyocardial strain (fSENC) is a unique cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) test that regionally detects subclinical intramyocardial dysfunction in 1 heartbeat. Methods This single center, prospective Prefect Study was used to evaluate cardiotoxicity and the impact of cardioprotective therapy in Breast Cancer and Lymphoma patients (NCT03543228). fSENC was acquired with a 1.5T MRI and processed with the software to quantify intramyocardial strain. Segmental strain was measured in three short axis scans (basal, midventricular, apical) with 16 LV/6 RV longitudinal segments & three long axis scans (2-, 3-, 4-chamber) with 21 LV/5 RV circumferential segments. fSENC CMR was performed before chemotherapy, during and after anthracycline/taxane therapy, at 1 year follow-up, and as needed in between designated follow-up periods. Cardioprotective therapy was offered to patients meeting the definition of cardiotoxicity by the ESC Guidelines on Cardiotoxicity and/or ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines or those observing a substantial decline in cardiac function. Results Two hundred eight (208) CMRs were performed in fifty-two (52) patients (44 female). Patients had an average (± stdev) age of 53 (15) yrs, BMI of 26 (5) kg/m2; 77% had breast cancer, 23% had Lymphoma. fSENC CMRs required 11 (2) min total exam time. The % of normal fSENC (segmental stain <−17%) with a threshold of 65% showed a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 89% in detecting cardiotoxicity while echocardiography GLS with a threshold of −17% observed a sensitivity of 20% and specificity of 88%. Figure 1 shows receiver operating characteristic curves for fSENC based on the percent of normal myocardium, and echocardiography global longitudinal strain (GLS) respectively. Global fSENC had substantially lower sensitivity than segmental fSENC despite having higher accuracy than the other global metrics. Figure 1 Conclusion Segmental fSENC intramyocardial strain detects subclinical dysfunction due to cardiotoxic response of chemotherapy before other biomarkers and imaging modalities. The ability to detect the subclinical cardiotoxicity of chemotherapy agents, or other pharmacological agents that cause or worsen heart failure, enables proactive prescription of cardioprotective medications to avoid tissue remodeling that precedes systemic cardiac dysfunction and worsening of global measures such as LVEF and current biomarkers.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack A. Tuszynski ◽  
Iara Santelices ◽  
Douglas E. Friesen ◽  
Clayton Bell ◽  
Jack Xiao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingjun Sun ◽  
Cong Luo ◽  
Xuanbo Zhang ◽  
Mengran Guo ◽  
Mengchi Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milad Ashrafizadeh ◽  
Hui Li Ang ◽  
Ebrahim Rahmani Moghadam ◽  
Shima Mohammadi ◽  
Vahideh Zarrin ◽  
...  

Molecular signaling pathways involved in cancer have been intensively studied due to their crucial role in cancer cell growth and dissemination. Among them, zinc finger E-box binding homeobox-1 (ZEB1) and -2 (ZEB2) are molecules that play vital roles in signaling pathways to ensure the survival of tumor cells, particularly through enhancing cell proliferation, promoting cell migration and invasion, and triggering drug resistance. Importantly, ZEB proteins are regulated by microRNAs (miRs). In this review, we demonstrate the impact that miRs have on cancer therapy, through their targeting of ZEB proteins. MiRs are able to act as onco-suppressor factors and inhibit the malignancy of tumor cells through ZEB1/2 down-regulation. This can lead to an inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) mechanism, therefore reducing metastasis. Additionally, miRs are able to inhibit ZEB1/2-mediated drug resistance and immunosuppression. Additionally, we explore the upstream modulators of miRs such as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs), as these regulators can influence the inhibitory effect of miRs on ZEB proteins and cancer progression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document