An experimental study on roundness error in wire EDM for ferro materials

Author(s):  
Tirupathi Kadam ◽  
Raheem Mohd. Abdul ◽  
Balram Yelamasetti
2012 ◽  
Vol 184-185 ◽  
pp. 981-987
Author(s):  
Setayesh Hakak Zargar ◽  
Vahid Tahmasbi ◽  
K. Besharati ◽  
Mohammad Farzami

In the present work, an experimental study has been made to optimize the drilling process parameters. Response surface methodology based on central composite design (CCD) has been used to study and analyze the experiments. Twist drill diameter, cutting speed and feed of drilling were chosen as variables to study the process performance for the responses of the hole surface quality (Ra) and the roundness error on aluminum 7075. Experiments were performed on a newly designed experimental setup developed in the laboratory. The results identified the most important parameters to maximize the hole surface quality and minimize roundness error. Finally, regression equations were obtained to predict the responses for different values of variables.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2567-2576 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.V.S. Ram Prasad ◽  
Koona. Ramji ◽  
G.L. Datta
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-115
Author(s):  
Amrullah Amrullah ◽  
Rahman Hakim

This research investigates the measurement error on Wire EDM cutting products to find the pulse current's problem-solving. One of the machining parameters that affect the precision of Wire EDM is the magnitude of the current. The experimental study carried out by using the pulse current started from 4-Ampere up to 8-Ampere as the research parameters. A chamfer dimension on 6061 Aluminum alloy was investigated with the gd&t method with ISO 5459 and ISO 1101 standard. Statistic method applied and processed on Minitab with Shapiro-Wilk parameter for normal distribution. These experimental studies have a normal distribution that finds the phenomena of 8-Ampere of pulse current generate a large measurement error. Furthermore, in these experimental studies, the usage of a Profile Projector generates a massive measurement error, up to 64.5% compared with CMM. A strong commitment to calibrate the Profile Projector up to date to maintain the machining quality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document