scholarly journals Design for Additive Manufacturing Method for a Mechanical System Downsizing

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Orquéra ◽  
Sébastien Campocasso ◽  
Dominique Millet
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Mechanical System ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Manufacturing Method

A Design for Additive Manufacturing Method of Direct Metal Parts for Aerospace Applications

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcio Fernando Cruz ◽  
Anderson Vicente Borille ◽  
Luis Gonzaga Trabasso ◽  
Carlos Roberto Pansani de Haro ◽  
Felipe Brandão
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Manufacturing Method ◽  
Metal Parts ◽  
Aerospace Applications

A Study of Design Fixation Related to Additive Manufacturing

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esraa S. Abdelall ◽  
Matthew C. Frank ◽  
Richard T. Stone
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Design Constraints ◽  
Basic Product ◽  
Manufacturing Method ◽  
Design Fixation ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Short Run ◽  
Manufacturing Features

This study aims to understand the effect of additive manufacturing (AM) on design fixation. Whereas previous research illustrates the positive aspects of AM, the overarching hypothesis of this work is that it might also have negative effects with respect to conventional manufacturability. In this work, participants from two groups, a design for conventional manufacturing (DfCM) group, and a design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) group, were asked to design a basic product. Then, a second iteration of the design asked both groups to design for conventional processes, and to include subtractive and formative methods like machining and casting, respectively. Findings showed that the DfAM fixated on nonproducible manufacturing features and produced harder to conventionally manufacture designs, even when told specifically to DfCM. There was also evidence that the complex designs of the DfAM group limited their modeling success and seemed to encourage them to violate more design constraints. This study draws attention to the negative effect of AM knowledge on designers and provides motivation for treatment methods. This is important if AM is used in prototyping or short run production of parts that are slated for conventional manufacturing later. The issue of design fixation is not a problem if AM is the final manufacturing method—a more common practice nowadays. This work suggests that one should consider the possibility of fixation in design environments where AM precedes larger volume conventional manufacturing.

Design for Additive Manufacturing in Extended DFMA Process

2018 ◽  
Vol 786 ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari Mäntyjärvi ◽  
Terho Iso-Junno ◽  
Henri Niemi ◽  
Jarmo Mäkikangas
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Manufacturing Industry ◽  
Design Guidelines ◽  
Design For Manufacturing ◽  
Manufacturing Technology ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Technology Design ◽  
Manufacturing Method ◽  
New Variant ◽  
Manufacturing Methods

As a new manufacturing method, Additive Manufacturing has begun to get a foothold in the manufacturing industry. The effective exploitation of the technology requires many times a re-design of the product or re-considering the manufacturing technology. Design for additive manufacturing differs considerably from design to other manufacturing methods, therefore design guidelines for additive manufacturing has been developed. The purpose of this paper is to present a new variant of the Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) method which supports additive manufacturing.

scholarly journals GEOMETRICAL BENCHMARKING OF LASER POWDER BED FUSION SYSTEMS BASED ON DESIGNER NEEDS

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1657-1666
Author(s):  
Joaquin Montero ◽  
Sebastian Weber ◽  
Christoph Petroll ◽  
Stefan Brenner ◽  
Matthias Bleckmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Use Case ◽  
Powder Bed Fusion ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Laser Powder Bed Fusion ◽  
Measuring Systems ◽  
Powder Bed ◽  
Geometric Dimensioning And Tolerancing ◽  
Uncertainty Map ◽  
New System

AbstractCommercially available metal Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) systems are steadily evolving. Thus, design limitations narrow and the diversity of achievable geometries widens. This progress leads researchers to create innovative benchmarks to understand the new system capabilities. Thereby, designers can update their knowledge base in design for additive manufacturing (DfAM). To date, there are plenty of geometrical benchmarks that seek to develop generic test artefacts. Still, they are often complex to measure, and the information they deliver may not be relevant to some designers. This article proposes a geometrical benchmarking approach for metal L-PBF systems based on the designer needs. Furthermore, Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) characteristics enhance the approach. A practical use-case is presented, consisting of developing, manufacturing, and measuring a meaningful and straightforward geometric test artefact. Moreover, optical measuring systems are used to create a tailored uncertainty map for benchmarking two different L-PBF systems.

scholarly journals REVIEW OF DESIGN HEURISTICS AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2571-2580
Author(s):  
Filip Valjak ◽  
Angelica Lindwall
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Heuristics ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Support Methods

AbstractThe advent of additive manufacturing (AM) in recent years have had a significant impact on the design process. Because of new manufacturing technology, a new area of research emerged – Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) with newly developed design support methods and tools. This paper looks into the current status of the field regarding the conceptual design of AM products, with the focus on how literature sources treat design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM. To answer the research question, a systematic literature review was conducted. The results are analysed, compared and discussed on three main points: the definition of the design heuristics and the design principles, level of support they provide, as well as where and how they are used inside the design process. The paper highlights the similarities and differences between design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM.

A review of additive manufacturing applications in ophthalmology

2021 ◽  
pp. 095441192110280
Author(s):  
Arivazhagan Pugalendhi ◽  
Rajesh Ranganathan
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Physical Object ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Manufacturing Method ◽  
3D Cad ◽  
Stl File ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Manufacturing Applications

Additive Manufacturing (AM) capabilities in terms of product customization, manufacture of complex shape, minimal time, and low volume production those are very well suited for medical implants and biological models. AM technology permits the fabrication of physical object based on the 3D CAD model through layer by layer manufacturing method. AM use Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), and 3D scanning images and these data are converted into surface tessellation language (STL) file for fabrication. The applications of AM in ophthalmology includes diagnosis and treatment planning, customized prosthesis, implants, surgical practice/simulation, pre-operative surgical planning, fabrication of assistive tools, surgical tools, and instruments. In this article, development of AM technology in ophthalmology and its potential applications is reviewed. The aim of this study is nurturing an awareness of the engineers and ophthalmologists to enhance the ophthalmic devices and instruments. Here some of the 3D printed case examples of functional prototype and concept prototypes are carried out to understand the capabilities of this technology. This research paper explores the possibility of AM technology that can be successfully executed in the ophthalmology field for developing innovative products. This novel technique is used toward improving the quality of treatment and surgical skills by customization and pre-operative treatment planning which are more promising factors.

scholarly journals Smooth Design of 3D Self-Supporting Topologies Using Additive Manufacturing Filter and SEMDOT

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Yun-Fei Fu ◽  
Kazem Ghabraie ◽  
Bernard Rolfe ◽  
Yanan Wang ◽  
Louis N. S. Chiu
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Compliant Mechanism ◽  
Optimization Method ◽  
Light Weight ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Compliance Minimization ◽  
Performance Requirements ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
Smooth Design ◽  
Compliant Mechanism Design

The smooth design of self-supporting topologies has attracted great attention in the design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) field as it cannot only enhance the manufacturability of optimized designs but can obtain light-weight designs that satisfy specific performance requirements. This paper integrates Langelaar’s AM filter into the Smooth-Edged Material Distribution for Optimizing Topology (SEMDOT) algorithm—a new element-based topology optimization method capable of forming smooth boundaries—to obtain print-ready designs without introducing post-processing methods for smoothing boundaries before fabrication and adding extra support structures during fabrication. The effects of different build orientations and critical overhang angles on self-supporting topologies are demonstrated by solving several compliance minimization (stiffness maximization) problems. In addition, a typical compliant mechanism design problem—the force inverter design—is solved to further demonstrate the effectiveness of the combination between SEMDOT and Langelaar’s AM filter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document