scholarly journals Melt pool monitoring for laser beam melting of metals: assistance for material qualification for the stainless steel 1.4057

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Kolb ◽  
Philipp Gebhardt ◽  
Oliver Schmidt ◽  
Jan Tremel ◽  
Michael Schmidt
2015 ◽  
Vol 651-653 ◽  
pp. 713-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Merklein ◽  
Raoul Plettke ◽  
Daniel Junker ◽  
Adam Schaub ◽  
Bhrigu Ahuja

The quality of additive manufactured parts however depends pretty much on the workers experience to control porosity, layer linkage and surface roughness. To analyze the robustness of the Laser Beam Melting (LBM) process a Round Robin test was made in which specimens from four institutes from different countries were tested and compared. For the tests each institute built a set of specimens out of stainless steel 1.4540. The aim of this work is to analyze the influence of the process parameters on the mechanical properties. The results show that there is a high potential for additive manufacturing but also a lot of further research is necessary to optimize this technology.


2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 818-823
Author(s):  
N. Eschner ◽  
J. Lingenhöhl ◽  
S. Öppling ◽  
G. Prof. Lanza

Gegenwärtig ist bei der additiven Fertigung eine prozessbegleitende Überwachung des Bauteils auf das Schmelzbad und oberflächennahe Bereiche limitiert. Mithilfe akustischer Signale lassen sich typische Defekte, die im Rahmen des LBM (laser beam melting – Laserstrahlschmelzen)-Verfahrens auftreten, detektieren. Dies umfasst neben Porosität und Rissen auch Eigenspannungen. In diesem Fachbeitrag werden die Möglichkeit eines in den LBM-Prozess integrierten akustischen Prüfsystems sowie alternative Sensorkonzepte diskutiert und evaluiert.   Current process monitoring techniques for additive manufacturing are limited to the melt pool and near-surface areas. Typical defects that occur within the LBM-process, such as porosity and cracks, as well as residual stress, can be detected by using acoustic waves. In this article, the possibility of an integrated ultrasonic inspection system, as well as various sensor concepts are discussed and evaluated.


Procedia CIRP ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Kolb ◽  
Lars Müller ◽  
Jan Tremel ◽  
Michael Schmidt

2020 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 108594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Barroux ◽  
Nadège Ducommun ◽  
Eric Nivet ◽  
Lydia Laffont ◽  
Christine Blanc

Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1569
Author(s):  
Asif Ur Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Arif Mahmood ◽  
Fatih Pitir ◽  
Metin Uymaz Salamci ◽  
Andrei C. Popescu ◽  
...  

For laser-melting deposition (LMD), a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed using the volume of fluid and discrete element modeling techniques. A method was developed to track the flow behavior, flow pattern, and driving forces of liquid flow. The developed model was compared with experimental results in the case of AISI 304 stainless steel single-track depositions on AISI 304 stainless steel substrate. A close correlation was found between experiments and modeling, with a deviation of 1–3%. It was found that the LMD involves the simultaneous addition of powder particles that absorb a significant amount of laser energy to transform their phase from solid to liquid, resulting in conduction-mode melt flow. The bubbles within the melt pool float at a specific velocity and escape from the melt pool throughout the deposition process. The pores are generated if the solid front hits the bubble before escaping the melt pool. Based on the simulations, it was discovered that the deposited layer’s counters took the longest time to solidify compared to the overall deposition. The bubbles strived to leave through the contours in an excess quantity, but became stuck during solidification, resulting in a large degree of porosity near the contours. The stream traces showed that the melt flow adopted a clockwise vortex in front of the laser beam and an anti-clockwise vortex behind the laser beam. The difference in the surface tension between the two ends of the melt pool induces “thermocapillary or Benard–Marangoni convection” force, which is insignificant compared to the selective laser melting process. After layer deposition, the melt region, mushy zone, and solidified region were identified. When the laser beam irradiates the substrate and powder particles are added simultaneously, the melt adopts a backwards flow due to the recoil pressure and thermocapillary or Benard–Marangoni convection effect, resulting in a negative mass flow rate. This study provides an in-depth understanding of melt pool dynamics and flow pattern in the case of LMD additive manufacturing technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document