Focusing on the coach’s eye- towards a working model of coach decision-making in talent selection

2021 ◽  
pp. 102011
Author(s):  
Franziska Lath ◽  
Till Koopmann ◽  
Irene Faber ◽  
Joseph Baker ◽  
Jörg Schorer
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Working Model ◽  
Talent Selection

Commentary: A Consensus about “Consensus”?

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P. Aulisio ◽  
Robert M. Arnold
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Consensus Method ◽  
Clinical Bioethics ◽  
Working Model ◽  
Clinical Pragmatism ◽  
Ethical Consensus ◽  
The Ideal

In “Bioethics and the Whole: Pluralism, Consensus, and the Transmutation of Bioethical Methods into Gold,” Patricia Martin identifies themes common to three emerging approaches to clinical bioethics--clinical pragmatism, ethics facilitation, and mediation-in order to develop an “ethical consensus method” that can serve as a “practical, step-by-step guide” for decision making She is to be applauded both for her identification of themes common to these three approaches and for her contribution to what we hope will be a growing literature on practical methods for problem solving in clinical bioethics that take seriously the ideal of consensus. After a few preliminary remarks concerning Martin's working model, we focus the majority of our commentary on the notion of “consensus,” which is at the heart of her “ethical consensus method,” and the three approaches from which it is drawn.

Modelling the Relationship(s) Between Safety and Operational Performance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Wemakor ◽  
A. Jack ◽  
F. Schmid
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real World ◽  
Operational Performance ◽  
Performance Models ◽  
Model Framework ◽  
The Real ◽  
Working Model ◽  
Railway Safety ◽  
Rail Industry ◽  
The Relationship

Models have the ability to represent a specific viewpoint of situations or circumstances in the real world. This paper facilitates the understanding of the relationship between railway safety and operational performance by providing an overview of performance models and presenting a model framework that incorporates both elements of safety and operational performance in the rail industry. This framework, if further developed into a working model with complex equations will facilitate decision making by governments and stakeholders in the daily operations and investments of railways.

scholarly journals Talent Selection and the Present? The Way Sports Preconditions Are Determined in Slovakia

GYMNASIUM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol XIX (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Tomáš Perič ◽  
Pavel Ružbarský
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Physical Fitness ◽  
Slovak Republic ◽  
Contingency Tables ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Talent Selection ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Fitness Tests

Talent selection includes a variety of issues that may be classified into several domains following one another (talent determination, talent searching, talent selection, and so forth). One of the most important domains is the determination of sports preconditions – talent (particularly from the viewpoint of assessment and prognosis). The assessment of sports preconditions is based on four domains: somatic parameters, manipulative skills, decision making, and conditioning. The example of the Slovak Republic is presented to demonstrate how sports preconditions are assessed in 6-year-old children. In the pilot study data were collected from 1,669 children (boys: n = 880; girls: n = 789) who performed 12 physical fitness tests. The children attended three types of school: schools with large numbers of students, schools with medium numbers of students, and schools with small number of students, respectively. Data collected from children who were from eight Slovak regions were compared by gender and region in particular physical fitness tests using the contingency tables

scholarly journals Interval Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Model with Abnormal Information and Its Application in Talent Selection

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xueer Ji ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Huifeng Xue
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Correction Method ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Talent Selection ◽  
Decision Attributes ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy

In some complex decision-making problems such as talent selection, experts often hesitate between multiple evaluation values during their decision making and can only give a range of information due to the fuzziness and imprecision of qualitative decision-making attributes. Interval intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their decision-making methods provide a useful tool to describe the fuzziness of decision attributes and decision experts’ hesitation. However, the abnormal information in the expert decision information has not been considered in the previous works; that is, some interval intuitionistic fuzzy numbers exceed the defined interval range. This kind of abnormal decision information often makes it difficult to obtain accurate decision results using the decision model. To avoid the abnormal information influence on decision-making results, the hesitancy degree-based interval intuitionistic fuzzy sets are employed to propose an adaptive correction method of abnormal information, which can correct the abnormal decision information without changing the decision preference of experts. The abnormal information correction method is utilized to construct a new interval intuitionistic fuzzy entropy by combining hesitancy and fuzziness. This provides a multiattribute decision-making method, including abnormal decision information. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method and decision-making model are evaluated using an application case study of talent selection.

Discarding optimality: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Reward Rate ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Standard Observer ◽  
Rate Maximization ◽  
Reward Rate Maximization ◽  
Descriptive Standard ◽  
Observer Model

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.

LPCD framework: Analytical tool or psychological model?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Bayesian Decision ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Psychological Model ◽  
Psychological Reality ◽  
Psychological Theories ◽  
Target Article ◽  
Bayesian Decision Making

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document