The impact of in vitro human embryo fragmentation on blastocyst development and ploidy using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. e23
Author(s):  
J.H. Tan ◽  
J.J. Chen ◽  
L.J. Lim ◽  
P.S. Wong
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Hazan ◽  
Sheldon Jordan

Abstract Background: Reports have been surfacing surrounding CNS-associated symptoms in individuals affected by coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Tourette syndrome is a neuropsychiatric disorder with usual onset in childhood. Gut microbiota can affect central physiology and function via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The authors of this case report describe Tourette’s-like symptoms in a patient resulting from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection disrupting gut microbiota. Case Presentation: This case involves a 16-year-old female that developed acute onset Tourette’s-like symptoms along with neuropsychiatric symptoms after exposure to and infection from SARS-CoV-2. The patient had negative nasopharyngeal (NP) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2 on five occasions from August of 2020 through June of 2021. The patient’s symptoms continued to worsen over the next six months until next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed SARS-CoV-2 in her stool. Her treatment was adjusted as NGS revealed SARS-CoV-2 in her stool. Repair of the gastrointestinal microbiota, treatment with nutraceutical and pharmaceutical agents, as well as alterations in her surroundings resulted in dramatic improvement in the microbiome and a significant reduction of symptoms.Discussion: The use of (RT-PCR) testing to determine the presence or absence of SARS-CoV-2 may be inadequate and inaccurate for individuals that have been exposed to the virus. In addition, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection of the GI tract may cause significant havoc in the gut microbiota. Additional testing, eradication of infectious agents, as well as restoration of the gut microbiome are needed to effectively manage and treat this condition. The patient’s symptoms worsened over the next six months until next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed SARS-CoV-2 in her stool and her treatment was adjusted. Treatment with nutraceuticals and alterations in her surroundings was followed by a more normal microbiome and a dramatic reduction in symptoms.


2015 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
TONY SHEN ◽  
ARIEL LEE ◽  
CAROL SHEN ◽  
C.JIMMY LIN

SummaryThere are an estimated 6000–8000 rare Mendelian diseases that collectively affect 30 million individuals in the United States. The low incidence and prevalence of these diseases present significant challenges to improving diagnostics and treatments. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized research of rare diseases. This article will first comment on the effectiveness of NGS through the lens of long-tailed economics. We then provide an overview of recent developments and challenges of NGS-based research on rare diseases. As the quality of NGS studies improve and the cost of sequencing decreases, NGS will continue to make a significant impact on the study of rare diseases moving forward.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. vi14-vi15
Author(s):  
S. Coquerelle ◽  
M. Darlington ◽  
M. Michel ◽  
M. Durand ◽  
J. Gutton ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2928
Author(s):  
Katia Nones ◽  
Ann-Marie Patch

Next generation sequencing (NGS) describes the technical revolution that enabled massively parallel sequencing of fragmented nucleic acids, thus making possible our current genomic understanding of cancers [...]


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2341-2341
Author(s):  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Campbell L. Stewart ◽  
Jennifer JD Morrissette ◽  
David Lieberman ◽  
David J. Margolis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background:Leukemia cutis (LC) occurs in 10-30% of AML cases and may be a marker of poor prognosis. However, outside of monocytic AML (FAB M4/M5), no clinical or genetic predictors of LC are known. Recently, a number of somatic molecular mutations have been described in AML. Using amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a panel of recurrent, hematologic malignancy-associated mutations, we sought to determine potential molecular markers associated with the development of LC. Methods: A cohort of non-M3 AML patients treated at the University of Pennsylvania was identified in which NGS had been performed on either leukemic blasts obtained during clinical care or from the institutional tissue bank.Average read depth for 33 hematologic malignancy-associated genes was approximately 3000X, minimal depth was 250x, and reporting frequency cutoff for variants was 5%. Mutations were reported as pathogenic or variants of uncertain significance (VUS, further sub-classified internally as likely disease associated, VUS, or likely benign) based on the University’s Center for Personalized Diagnostics (CPD) review of publically available data; only pathogenic or likely disease-associated mutations were included in this analysis. A database maintained by dermatopathology was reviewed to identify cases of leukemia cutis at any time during the disease course. Independent dermatopathology review was obtained for indeterminate cases. Association between presence of each of the 3 most common molecular mutations (FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, and NPM1) and development of LC was assessed by logistic regression, with adjustment for FAB M4/M5, as appropriate. The association between presence of a molecular mutation in different functional classes (tumor suppressors, activated signaling, chromatin modifiers, transcription factors, splicing machinery) and the development of LC was also assessed. Results:279 adult patients with AML with known molecular genotype were identified. Molecular profile was determined from AML diagnosis in (243, 88%) with the remainder undergoing assessment after prior therapy (relapsed or refractory). 56% were male with median age of 60 years (range 18-87) and median WBC count at diagnosis of 22 K/uL (range 0.4 -388 K/uL; 17% ≥100K/uL). The majority of patients had intermediate cytogenetic risk (12% favorable, 59% intermediate, 23% unfavorable, 6% unknown) and 41% of patients had FAB M4/M5 AML (9% unknown). The three most common mutations were NPM1 (29%), DNMT3A (25%), and FLT3-ITD (23%). NPM1mutations were enriched in patients with FAB M4/M5 AML (41% vs 23%, p=0.003). Leukemia cutis was present in 26 (9%) of patients. NPM1 mutant status was present in 14 of 26 cases of leukemia cutis (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.40-7.20, p=0.006). No association was detected for LC and the presence of mutant FLT3-ITD (OR 1.27, p=0.613), mutant DNMT3A (OR 1.7, p=0.224), or a mutation in any functional class of AML mutations (all p-values NS). The impact of NPM1 mutant status remained significant after adjustment for association with M4/M5 AML (OR 3.91, p=0.005). As the histologic subtype of AML might modify the association between NPM1 mutations and leukemia cutis, we next examined the impact of NPM1 mutant status on patients with FAB M4/M5 AML and non-M4/M5 AML. Among patients with M4/M5 AML, 10/12 (80%) patients with LC were NPM1 mutant compared to 32/91 (35%) without LC suggesting that the presence of mutated NPM1 was significantly associated with the development of LC (OR 9.22, p=0.006). Among patients with non-M4/M5 AML, 3/9 (33%) of patients with leukemia cutis were NPM1 mutant compared to 32/142 (22.5%) without LC indicating no association in the non-M4/M5 subgroup (OR 1.72, p=0.461). Interestingly, M4/M5 AML was not associated with LC in the NPM1 WT cohort (OR 0.65, p=0.6). Conclusion: Using NGS, we identify a novel association between NPM1 mutation status and the presence of leukemia cutis, particularly within monocytic AML. Confirmation of these observations in a larger dataset is planned. Our data suggest potential cellular effects of NPM1 mutation affecting homing of leukemic blasts to skin and support the World Health Organization’s provisional classification of NPM1-mutated AML as a distinct biologic entity. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
Ramzi Hassouneh

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has ignited a revolution in genomic medicine by eliminating the inherent limitations of conventional sequencing methods. Due to its high throughput and low-cost, clinics can use NGS to perform targeted and genome sequencing to make diagnoses or pre-screen for risk to future disease. Despite its clinical uses, many challenges exist before NGS becomes a mainstay in the clinic. There is a lack of understanding of the impact of genetic variants on health and disease and how to best apply genetic information to patient care. Nevertheless, the translation of base pair reads to clinical applications has truly begun.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3375-3375
Author(s):  
Eri Kawata ◽  
Anargyros Xenocostas ◽  
Cyrus C. Hsia ◽  
Uday Deotare ◽  
Lalit Saini ◽  
...  

Background: A common referral to hematology is for patients with suspected myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or cytopenias of undetermined origin. We recently implemented a Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel which covers a wide spectrum of genes related to the major myeloid disorders, including DNA based gene sequencing and RNA based gene fusion analysis, as a tier one clinical diagnostic test (Levy et al. Eur. J. Haematol 2019). We compared the diagnostic and prognostic information derived from conventional cytogenetics and NGS testing as well as the clinical impact on management in this patient group. Methods: We identified all new cases with suspected MDS or cytopenias of undetermined origin referred between January 2018 to February 2019 that had both NGS and cytogenetic testing at London Health Sciences Centre, a tertiary care centre servicing a population of approximately 2.5 million in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. From the retrospective review of electronic medical record, patient demographics, diagnosis and management were ascertained. Diagnosis was based on the 2016 WHO classification and the ICD-10.Previously reported definitions for ICUS, IDUS, CHIP, and CCUSwere also adopted (Bejar et al. Leukemia 2017). Patients not meeting these criteria were defined as either cytopenia not yet determined (NYD) or secondary to other systemic disease. The impact of NGS and cytogenetics results on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of each disease were assessed by referring to the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Either a bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) sample from each patient was assessed by the Oncomine Myeloid NGS panel (Thermo-Fisher, MA, USA), which examines DNA sequence variants in 40 genes (17 full genes and 23 hotspot genes) along with an RNA-based panel of 29 fusion driver genes and their over 600 fusion partners. Patients' BM samples were also tested by the conventional cytogenetic G-banding method. Results: Of the 1100 samples assessed by NGS, 178 met the study inclusion criteria. Overall, 120 (67.4%) patients had both cytogenetics and NGS performed on their BM samples. Of those 120 patients, 41 (34.2%) had DNA mutations, 17 (14.2%) had cytogenetic abnormalities, 22 (18.3%) had both molecular and cytogenetic findings, and 40 (33.3%) had neither abnormality identified. NGS Information contributed in diagnosing 13 (10.8%) patients, while cytogenetics in 6 (5%) patients. In addition, of 38 patients who were diagnosed as MDS with good/intermediate risk cytogenetics, 24 (63.2%) harbored poor prognostic risk mutations as detected by NGS (Table), influencing the management of disease. Additionally, 22 (12.4%) of all patients had NGS testing using PB and cytogenetics using BM samples, and of these 13 (52.2%) patients had NGS abnormalities. Finally, 36 (20.2%) of all patients had only NGS testing by PB samples. Of those, 12 (33.3%) were found to harbor at least one gene mutation including ASXL1, TP53, ZRSR2, and STAG1 suggesting poor prognostic significance for diagnoses of MDS, or JAK2, SF3B1 which could support a disease specific diagnosis. Conclusion: NGS had enhanced diagnostic capabilities including classification of newly described entities such as ICUS or CCUS and more importantly yielded additional prognostic information compared to cytogenetics alone for this patient population. Cytogenetic findings were mainly aneuploidy or deletions, either clinically evident constitutional abnormalities such as Trisomy 21 and +X in Klinefelter syndrome, or loss of Y chromosome in a small proportion of cells and thus of questionable clinical significance. Based on this information consideration should be given to using the NGS panel as the primary molecular diagnostic and prognostic tool with karyotyping being reserved for subsets of patients being assessed for suspected MDS or cytopenias of undetermined origin. Disclosures Hsia: Amgen: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document