HEISQUAL: A modern approach to measure service quality in higher education institutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 100933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jawad Abbas
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Modern Approach ◽  
Quality In Higher Education

scholarly journals Service quality in higher education: Study of Turkish students in Malaysian universities

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amran Md Rasli ◽  
Mansoor Ahmed Bhatti ◽  
Nadhirah Norhalim ◽  
Tan Owee Kowang
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Quality Measurement ◽  
Gap Model ◽  
Perceived Service Quality ◽  
Education Study ◽  
Stratified Sample ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Quality In Higher Education

The Article attempts to analyze service quality in higher education institutions of Malaysia. The study used the Gap Model presented by Parasuraman et al. (1985, 1988) to identify the difference between expected quality and perceived quality in higher education institutions of Malaysia. The study focused to identify gaps of Turkish students in Malaysian universities Five basic dimensions of service quality measured through SERVQUAL (Instrument for service quality measurement). These dimensions are tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. A stratified sample of 41 Turkish students has been selected from top five public universities in Malaysia. Results showed a negative service quality gap in higher education institutions of Malaysia from Turkish students’ perception which indicated perceived service quality is below than expectations of Turkish students in Malaysian universities.

Service quality in higher education institutions: qualitative evidence from the students’ perspectives using Maslow hierarchy of needs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jawad Abbas
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Deductive Reasoning ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Teaching Quality ◽  
Hierarchy Of Needs ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Quality In Higher Education

Purpose Higher education institutions (HEIs) are responsible for training and transforming the students into valuable resources. Although students are believed to be the principal stakeholders in HEIs, limited research studies are available on service quality (SQ) in HEIs from students’ perspectives. This study aims to bridge this gap by investigating the factors, which constitute SQ in HEIs, specifically from students’ perspective, as existing literature on this topic is either from management and general perspective or is time dated. Design/methodology/approach The current study contributes by reviewing qualitative responses received through interviews and focus groups session with 43 students from 3 Turkey-based private HEIs. Data was collected from 43 students through 26 individual interviews and 3 focus group sessions and was analyzed through deductive reasoning using narrative and framework analysis with open coding. Findings The analysis of data indicated six main themes, specifically: teaching quality, facilities, support staff quality, employability links, safety and security and extra-curricular activities as indicators of SQ from students’ perspective. The findings of the study strongly comply with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and take steps by identifying employability and safety and security as new emerging indicators of the existing literature of SQ in HEIs. Originality/value The existing literature lacks to provide qualitative data on SQ in HEIs from students’ perspectives in Asian countries, particularly, in Turkey, the place of current research. The findings of the present research provide valuable insights to HEIs’ management to understand students’ perceptions of SQ, their expectations and experiences.

scholarly journals Intensifying Focus on Service Quality in Higher Education Institutions: Emotional and Spiritual Intelligence

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (15) ◽  
pp. 85-92
Author(s):  
Mazni Saad ◽  
Norliana Ahmadshah ◽  
Kamisah Supian ◽  
Anita Abdul Rani
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Publishing House ◽  
Spiritual Intelligence ◽  
International Publishing ◽  
Quality In Higher Education ◽  
The University ◽  
Quality Learning

The influence of Emotional and Spiritual Intelligence was investigated on the lecturers’ Service Quality. Based on stratified sampling method, the results confirmed that both types of intelligence have a positive and significant influence on the lecturers’ teaching progression. In conclusion, if the average level of each intelligence was good, then the level of Service Quality would also excel accordingly. The study highlights the need to have both EQ and SQ as it will encourage and motivate them into giving their best service to the university as well as their highest commitment towards giving students the best quality learning experience.   Keywords: Emotional Intelligence; Higher Education Institutions; Service Quality; Spiritual Intelligence eISSN: 2398-4287© 2020. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5i15.2340.

scholarly journals Development of Service Quality Scale in Higher Education: A Validity and Reliability Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-173
Author(s):  
Şakir Çınkır ◽  
Sevgi Yıldız ◽  
Gül Kurum
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Education Institution ◽  
Quality Of Services ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Quality In Higher Education

Students have become highly critical and analytical in selecting the higher education institution they would like to study at. It has become important for higher education institutions to be preferred by such prospective students as well as ensuring the commitment and retention of their current students. Universities, as the most important representatives of higher education institutions, are evaluated directly and indirectly by their stakeholders regarding the quality of the services they provide. Service quality and satisfaction surveys based on these evaluations can have a wide variety of implications on institutional rankings, preferability, financial policies, etc. This study aims to develop a scale specific to Turkish Higher Education Institutions to determine the quality of services offered in higher education according to the satisfaction perceptions of undergraduate students. Accordingly, the first draft of a 53-item seven-dimensional five-point Likert type scale was created. The piloting version of the scale was applied to a total of 500 undergraduate students, of whom 346 were female and 149 male, who were continuing their studies in 15 faculties of a public university in Turkey. Further, particular care was taken to include students who were in their second year or higher seniority at the university so that they would have had sufficient time to benefit from the services offered. A 29-item structure with three sub-dimensions was revealed as a result of the exploratory factor analysis performed. The sub-dimensions were named as "Academic services", "Administrative services", and "Campus facilities". The findings of the confirmatory factor analysis conducted on 1782 participants support the structure validity of the scale. Based on the findings, the Service Quality in Higher Education Scale has been determined to be a highly reliable and valid scale that can be used to specifically measure the quality of services offered in higher education.

scholarly journals Service Quality in Higher Education Institutions an Overview of Models Assessing It

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suela Hajdari
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Education Sector ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Quality Of Higher Education ◽  
Comprehensive Literature Review ◽  
Quality In Higher Education

This paper aims to give an overview of the existing literature of the models which asses the quality of higher education institutions. The higher education sector is dynamic and competitive. The increasing number of universities leads to the necessity for them to maximize the efforts and improve the quality of their services. A lot of studies from different researchers and different countries are developed through time. It is important to emphasize that higher education is a service, and as other services offered to the customers we have to measure its quality. So this study consists on qualitative research methods and a comprehensive literature review, which allows choosing which model to use for assessing the quality of higher education. Analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each model the researchers would be able to use the model which is more reliable and valid for their study. The results of this paper are consistent with earlier research that had compared these models, the Servqual remains the most pointed model used to assess service quality in the higher education sector.

scholarly journals Students’ Perception on Core Service Quality in Higher Education Institutions in UAE

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
T K Sameena
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Basic Service ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Service ◽  
Quality In Higher Education

The service quality in educational institutions has been focused on two dimensions, namely core and value-added service quality. The core service quality is the various basic service quality variables established by the pioneer in the field. These are reliability, responsiveness, empathy, assurance, and tangibles. The paper focuses on the core service quality as viewed by the students of selected Higher Education Institutions in the UAE.

Measurement of perceived service quality in higher education institutions

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Soares Silva ◽  
Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes ◽  
Ieda Kanashiro Makiya ◽  
Francisco Ignácio Giocondo Cesar
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Perceived Service Quality ◽  
Quality In Higher Education ◽  
Online Library ◽  
Single Instrument ◽  
Selection Of

Purpose This study aims to find evidence of the HEdPERF scale use for measuring the perceived service quality from the perspective of students in higher education institutions (HEIs) worldwide. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of the literature was conducted to find evidence of the scale use in articles published between January 2005 and May 2017, according to databases Emerald, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library. The articles were searched on the databases on Jun 17, 2017 and at the end of the selection of articles, were kept 12 distinct documents. Findings The articles found pointed towards classic SERVQUAL and SERVPERF scales as being well substantiated for measuring perceived service quality. The HEdPERF scale was applied in articles about perceived service quality in HEI in studies in Brazil, China, Croatia, India, Malaysia, Portugal, Sri Lanka and Turkey. Originality/value The paper attempts to gather some articles on the measurement of service quality in higher education institutions, by the HEdPERF scale use. This study indicates that SERVPERF scale can also be an appropriate model to measure service quality in HEI context, that is, it is not yet possible to defend a single instrument as a standard for this purpose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document