Prognostic Importance of Progression Free Survival Interval in Patients with IVB Endometrial Cancer Treated with Platinum-Based Therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-211
Author(s):  
A Crim ◽  
J. Gillen ◽  
C. Liu ◽  
B. Roane ◽  
K. Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Importance ◽  
Survival Interval

A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Irosustat Versus Megestrol Acetate in Advanced Endometrial Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Pautier ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Florence Joly ◽  
Bohuslav Melichar ◽  
Elzbieta Kutarska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Megestrol Acetate ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

ObjectiveAdvanced/metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis. Malignant endometrial tissue has high steroid sulphatase (STS) activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate STS as a therapeutic target in patients with endometrial cancer.MethodsThis was a phase 2, multicenter, international, open-label, randomized (1:1), 2-arm study of the STS inhibitor oral irosustat 40 mg/d versus oral megestrol acetate 160 mg/d in women with advanced/metastatic or recurrent estrogen receptor–positive endometrial cancer. The primary end point was the proportion of patients without progression or death 6 months after start of treatment. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to progression, overall survival, and safety.ResultsSeventy-one patients were treated (36 with irosustat, 35 with megestrol acetate). The study was prematurely stopped after futility analysis. Overall, 36.1% and 54.1% of patients receiving irosustat or megestrol acetate had not progressed or died at 6 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between irosustat and megestrol acetate in response and overall survival rates. Irosustat patients had a median progression-free survival of 16 weeks (90% confidence interval, 9.0–31.4) versus 40 weeks (90% confidence interval, 16.3–64.0) in megestrol acetate patients. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20 (55.6%) and 13 (37.1%) patients receiving irosustat or megestrol, respectively. Most adverse events in both groups were grade 1 or 2.ConclusionsAlthough irosustat monotherapy did not attain a level of activity sufficient for further development in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, this study confirms the activity of hormonal treatment (megestrol acetate) for this indication.

Concurrent 5-Fluorouracil, Mitomycin C and Radiation, with or without Brachytherapy, in Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: A Scoring System to Predict Clinical Response and Outcome

2005 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Smaniotto ◽  
Giuseppe D'Agostino ◽  
Stefano Luzi ◽  
Vincenzo Valentini ◽  
Gabriella Macchia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

Aims and background This prospective, phase II study aimed to test the efficacy of concurrent 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and radiation, with or without brachytherapy, on the clinical outcome of a series of recurrent endometrial cancer patients and to determine the prognostic impact of a subset of factors. Methods Thirty patients with locally recurrent, nonmetastatic endometrial cancer received external beam radiation (4-week split course: 23.4 + 23.4 Gy) plus two courses of concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, 96-h continous infusion, days 1-4; 1 g/m2/day; mitomycin C, 10 mg/m2, bolus iv, day 1). Nineteen patients (63.3%) underwent endocavitary, low-dose brachytherapy boost (20-25 Gy); eight patients (26.7%) received external beam radiation boost (14-20 Gy). Results Eleven complete responses (36.7%), 11 partial responses (36.7%), 6 disease stabilizations (20.0%) and 2 progressions (6.6%) were observed. After a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 1-108), overall actuarial 3-year survival, progression-free survival and local progression-free survival were 46.8%, 35.2% and 41.2%, respectively. Two patients (6.7%) experienced hematological grade 3 toxicity. Two patients (6.7%) had grade 3 intestinal toxicity. Severe late toxicity was infrequent, only 3 patients showing severe vaginal stenosis (10.0%). A clinical score of 0 to 1 was assigned to each patient on the basis of the absence (score = 0) or presence (score = 1) of any of the following prognostic factors: time between surgery and recurrence shorter than 12 months, pelvic wall site of recurrence, positive lymph nodes, hemoglobin <11 g/dL. With this device, it was clear that patients with a low score had a significantly better outcome (clinical remission: 77.2% of patients with a score <2 vs 25.0% of patients with a score ≥2, P = 0.009), better local control of the disease (50.2% vs. 0 at 3 years, P = 0.014,) and better overall survival (65.8% vs 0 at 3 years, P = 0.003). Conclusions Our data suggest that this combined modality therapy was relatively well tolerated and resulted in reasonable local control and survival. The scoring system proved to be helpful in identifying patients with the best chance of benefiting from the treatment.

Treatment outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a multi-institutional analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Onal ◽  
Berna Akkus Yildirim ◽  
Sezin Yuce Sari ◽  
Guler Yavas ◽  
Melis Gultekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis

ObjectiveTo analyze the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis.MethodsData from four centers were collected retrospectively for 92 patients with endometrial cancer treated with combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy alone postoperatively, delivered by either the sandwich or sequential method. Prognostic factors affecting overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 35 % and 33 %, respectively, after a median follow-up time of 33 months. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy postoperatively compared with patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with adjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy via the sandwich method compared with patients treated with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the univariate analysis, in addition to treatment strategy, pathology, depth of myometrial invasion, and tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for both overall survival and progression-free survival. In the multivariate analysis, grade III disease, myometrial invasion greater than or equal to 50%, and adjuvant radiotherapy alone were negative predictors for both overall survival and progression-free survival.ConclusionWe demonstrated that adjuvant combined treatment including radiotherapyand chemotherapy significantly increases overall survival and progression-free survival rates compared with postoperative pelvic and paraaortic radiotherapy.

Surrogates of Progression-Free Survival in Endometrial Cancer Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 107S
Author(s):  
Emily Penick ◽  
Chunqiao Tian ◽  
Guisong Wang ◽  
George Maxwell ◽  
Chad Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Why Routine Clinical Follow-up for Patients With Early Stage Endometrial Cancer Is Not Always Necessary: A Study on Women in South Wales

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilly Aung ◽  
Robert E.J. Howells ◽  
Kenneth C.K. Lim ◽  
Emma Hudson ◽  
Peter W. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
South Wales

ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the existing methods of follow-up in women who have undergone treatment of early endometrial carcinoma in South Wales and to assess if they are appropriate.DesignThis study used a retrospective analysis of follow-up data.SettingThis study was performed in the Virtual Gynaecological Oncology Centre, South Wales, United Kingdom.SampleThis study sample is composed of 552 women.MethodsData regarding follow-up were collected retrospectively from patient case notes and computerized data systems. Data were analyzed using the Pearson χ2 test, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves.Main Outcome MeasuresThis study aimed to determine whether routine follow-up was beneficial in detecting disease recurrence and whether outcome was influenced by routine follow-up.ResultsBetween January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, 552 women were treated for early stage endometrial carcinoma. The 5-year survival was 81%, and the 5-year progression-free survival was 77%. Of these 552 women, 81 (15%) developed a disease recurrence; the majority (61/81 [75%]) recurred within 3 years. The median survival was 35 months compared with 47 months in patients who did not develop a recurrence. Of the 81 patients, 73 (90%) were symptomatic and only 5 patients were truly asymptomatic at follow-up. The most important and significant prognostic factor was “recurrent disease” with overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.20; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 1.75–2.65) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.52; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 2.09–2.95). “Asymptomatic recurrence” was not an independent predictor of outcome.ConclusionsRoutine follow-up for early endometrial cancer is not beneficial for patients because most were symptomatic at the time of detection. It does not significantly improve the outcome. We propose altering the follow-up time regimen and adopting alternative follow-up strategies for women in South Wales.

Influences of Uterine Adenomyosis on Muscle Invasion and Prognosis of Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1429-1433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyo Taneichi ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujiwara ◽  
Yoshifumi Takahashi ◽  
Yuji Takei ◽  
Shizuo Machida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Histopathological Grade ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Uterine Adenomyosis ◽  
Muscle Invasion

ObjectiveEndometrial cancer often coexists with uterine adenomyosis. However, little is known about the clinical characteristics of these cases. Thus, cases of endometrial cancer occurring with and without uterine adenomyosis were compared, and the influences of uterine adenomyosis on the clinical progress of endometrial cancer were examined.Materials and MethodsOf endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomies in our facility from 2002 to 2011, we included only endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients in our study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, adenomyosis group and nonadenomyosis group, according to the presence/absence of uterine adenomyosis. Patient characteristics, stage, histopathological grade, muscle invasion, recurrence, and mortality were retrospectively compared and examined.ResultsThere were 362 cases of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine body, of which 121 (33.4%) and 241 cases (66.6%) were in the adenomyosis and nonadenomyosis group, respectively. There were no significant differences with respect to the disease stages or ratios of the histopathological grade between the 2 groups. In the adenomyosis group/nonadenomyosis group, 5-year progression-free survival for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I and II was 89.9%/93.7% and that for stages III and IV was 70.6%/62.0%; the 5-year overall survival was 100%/95.9% for FIGO stages I and II, and 88.0%/73.5% for stages III and IV. There were no significant between-group differences for either progression-free survival or overall survival. When limiting the results to only FIGO stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma, despite no grade variance between the 2 groups, a significant difference was observed in the ratios of outer-half muscle invasion between the adenomyosis and nonadenomyosis groups (19.5% [17/87] vs 10.1% [16/158], P < 0.05); however, the prognosis was similar in the 2 groups.ConclusionsUterine adenomyosis is associated with deep myometrial invasion in stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma; however, it did not affect the recurrence or mortality rates.

scholarly journals Mortality and glycemic control among patients with diabetes mellitus and uterine or ovarian cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. FSO670
Author(s):  
Yael N Kusne ◽  
Heidi E Kosiorek ◽  
Matthew R Buras ◽  
Kyle E Coppola ◽  
Patricia M Verona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Aim: To evaluate associations between survival and glycemic control in age-matched patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer, with/without diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients & methods: Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian or endometrial cancer with and without DM were compared. Results: The study included 84 patients with ovarian cancer (28, DM); 96 with endometrial cancer (48 with, 48 without DM). DM patients did not have worse overall or progression-free survival than non-DM patients. Glycemic control was not associated with either cancer. Conclusion: There was no association between DM and survival for patients with uterine or ovarian cancer. In addition, there was no association between uterine and ovarian cancer and glycemic control. Additional studies to confirm these observations in larger populations are required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document