scholarly journals Efficient parallel numerical solver for the elastohydrodynamic Reynolds–Hertz problem

2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (13) ◽  
pp. 1743-1765 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Arenaz ◽  
R. Doallo ◽  
J. Touriño ◽  
C. Vázquez
AIAA Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2458-2461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Cinnella ◽  
Pietro M. Congedo
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Kang ◽  
B. Zheng ◽  
C. X. Lin ◽  
M. A. Ebadian

Abstract The velocity distributions inside a centrifugal separator with outside and inside diameters of 152.4 mm (6″) and 76.2 mm (3″), respectively, have been investigated experimentally and numerically to obtain optimum separation efficiency. Two 12.7 mm (1/2-inch) holes were drilled on the external surface of the separator to measure the velocity distribution in the separator. Two direction velocities (tangential direction along the cylinder surface and axial along the vertical direction) were measured to compare with the numerical simulation results. A 6060P Pitot probe was employed to obtain the velocity distribution. The dust samples (a mixture of steel particle and dust) from the dust collection box were analyzed using a Phillips XL30 Scanning Electron Microscope. FLUENT code is used as the numerical solver for this fully three-dimensional problem. The fluid flow in the separator is assumed to be steady and incompressible turbulent flow. The standard k–ε model was employed in this study. Non-uniform, unstructured grids are chosen to discretize the entire computation domain. Almost 100,000 cells are used to discretize the whole separator. The constant velocity profile is imposed on the inlet plane. The pressure boundary condition is adopted at outlet plane. Comparing the velocity distribution and separation efficiency from the experiment and the numerical modeling shows that the experimental results and the estimated data agree fairly well and with a deviation within ±10%.


2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanyan Cheng ◽  
Guotao Cui ◽  
Jianting Zhu

Abstract Understanding infiltration into soils from rainfall events is important for many practical applications. The idea of time compression approximation (TCA) was proposed to simulate infiltration rate, which only requires the relationship between the potential infiltration rate (PIR) and potential cumulative infiltration (PCI). The TCA-based method can be used in any rainfall–runoff models since the PIR vs. PCI relationship can be developed independent of actual rainfall patterns. The main objective of this study is to establish guidelines on when this method can be adequately applied. The results based on the TCA are compared with those from the field observations and the Richards equation numerical solver for observed rainfall events and randomly generated rainfall patterns with prescribed temporal variabilities and hiatuses. For continuous rainfall with potential ponding, the maximum error of infiltration amount using the TCA-based method is less than 5%. The TCA-based method, in general, underestimates the total infiltration amount from variable rainfall events. Variance in rainfall time series does not significantly affect the errors of using the TCA-based method to determine the actual infiltration rate. The TCA-based method can produce reasonable results in simulating the actual infiltration rate for rainfall events with a short hiatus.


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Claeys ◽  
Ann van Griensven ◽  
Lorenzo Benedetti ◽  
Bernard De Baets ◽  
Peter A. Vanrolleghem

Mathematical models provide insight into numerous biological, physical and chemical systems. They can be used in process design, optimisation, control and decision support, as acknowledged in many different fields of scientific research. Mathematical models do not always yield reliable results and uncertainty should be taken into account. At present, it is possible to identify some factors contributing to uncertainty, and the awareness of the necessity of uncertainty assessment is rising. In the fields of Environmental Modelling and Computational Fluid Dynamics, for instance, terminology related to uncertainty exists and is generally accepted. However, the uncertainty due to the choice of the numerical solver and its settings used to compute the solution of the models did not receive much attention in the past. A motivating example on the existence and effect of numerical uncertainty is provided and clearly shows that we can no longer ignore it. This paper introduces a new terminology to support communication about uncertainty caused by numerical solvers, so that scientists become perceptive to it.


2000 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Dowding ◽  
Bennie F. Blackwell

Parameters in the heat conduction equation are frequently modeled as temperature dependent. Thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity, convection coefficients, emissivity, and volumetric source terms are parameters that may depend on temperature. Many applications, such as parameter estimation, optimal experimental design, optimization, and uncertainty analysis, require sensitivity to the parameters describing temperature-dependent properties. A general procedure to compute the sensitivity of the temperature field to model parameters for nonlinear heat conduction is studied. Parameters are modeled as arbitrary functions of temperature. Sensitivity equations are implemented in an unstructured grid, element-based numerical solver. The objectives of this study are to describe the methodology to derive sensitivity equations for the temperature-dependent parameters and present demonstration calculations. In addition to a verification problem, the design of an experiment to estimate temperature variable thermal properties is discussed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 741-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. Venner

This paper addresses the development of efficient numerical solvers for EHL problems from a rather fundamental point of view. A work-accuracy exchange criterion is derived, that can be interpreted as setting a limit to the price paid in terms of computing time for a solution of a given accuracy. The criterion can serve as a guideline when reviewing or selecting a numerical solver and a discretization. Earlier developed multilevel solvers for the EHL line and circular contact problem are tested against this criterion. This test shows that, to satisfy the criterion a second-order accurate solver is needed for the point contact problem whereas the solver developed earlier used a first-order discretization. This situation arises more often in numerical analysis, i.e., a higher order discretization is desired when a lower order solver already exists. It is explained how in such a case the multigrid methodology provides an easy and straightforward way to obtain the desired higher order of approximation. This higher order is obtained at almost negligible extra work and without loss of stability. The approach was tested out by raising an existing first order multilevel solver for the EHL line contact problem to second order. Subsequently, it was used to obtain a second-order solver for the EHL circular contact problem. Results for both the line and circular contact problem are presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document