The impact of injury severity and prehospital procedures on scene time in victims of major trauma

1991 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1299-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W Spaite ◽  
David J Tse ◽  
Terence D Valenzuela ◽  
Elizabeth A Criss ◽  
Harvey W Meislin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals 664 The ICON Trauma Study: The Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Major Trauma Workload in the UK

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Adiamah ◽  
A i Thompson ◽  
C Lewis-Lloyd ◽  
E Dickson ◽  
L Blackburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Similar Time ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Anecdotal evidence suggest a direct impact of the SARS-COV-2-pandemic on presentation and severity of major trauma. Method This observational study from a UK Major Trauma Centre matched a cohort of patients admitted during a 10-week period of the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic (09/03/2020 to 18/05/2020) to a historical cohort admitted during a similar time period in 2019 (11/03/2019 to 20/05/2019). Demographic differences, injury method and severity were compared using Fisher’s and Chi-squared tests. Multivariable logistic regression examined the associated factors predicting 30-day mortality. Results Of 642 patients, 405 and 237 were in the 2019 and 2020 cohorts respectively. 1.69%(4/237) of the 2020 cohort tested SARS-CoV-2 positive. There was a 41.5% decrease in trauma admissions in 2020. The 2020 cohort was older (median 46 vs.40 years), more comorbid and frailer (p < 0.0015). There was a significant difference in injury method with a decrease in vehicle related trauma, but an increase in falls. There was a 2-fold increased risk of mortality in the 2020 cohort that in adjusted models, was explained by higher injury severity and frailty. Positive SARS-CoV-2 status was not associated with increased mortality on multivariable analysis. Conclusions Patients admitted during the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic were older, frailer, more co-morbid and had an increased risk of mortality.

scholarly journals The Importance of Sex Differences on Outcome after Major Trauma: Clinical Outcome in Women Versus Men

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1263
Author(s):  
Julian Joestl ◽  
Nikolaus W. Lang ◽  
Anne Kleiner ◽  
Patrick Platzer ◽  
Silke Aldrian
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Hemodynamic Variables ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Icu Treatment

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate epidemiological and clinically relevant sex-related differences in polytraumatized patients at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Methods: 646 adult patients (210 females and 436 males) who were classified as polytraumatized (at the point of admission) and treated at our Level I Trauma Center were reviewed and included in this study. Demographic data as well as mechanism of injury, injury severity, injury pattern, frequency of preclinical intubation, hemodynamic variables on admission, time of mechanical ventilation and of intensive care unit (ICU) treatment, as well as the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multi organ failure (MOF), and mortality were extracted and analyzed. Results: A total of 210 female and 436 male patients formed the basis of this report. Females showed a higher mean age (44.6 vs. 38.3 years; p < 0.0001) than their male counterparts. Women were more likely to be injured as passengers or by suicidal falls whereas men were more likely to suffer trauma as motorcyclists. Following ICU treatment, female patients resided significantly longer at the casualty ward than men (27.1 days vs. 20.4 days, p = 0.013) although there was no significant difference regarding injury severity, hemodynamic variables on admission, and incidence of MOF, ARDS, and mortality. Conclusion: The positive correlation of higher age and longer in-hospital stay in female trauma victims seems to show women at risk for a prolonged in-hospital rehabilitation time. A better understanding of the impact of major trauma in women (but also men) will be an important component of efforts to improve trauma care and long-term outcome.

The Impact of Enhanced Intensive Care on Outcome of Major Trauma Patients in a Regional Hospital in Hong Kong

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-229
Author(s):  
ANL Chan ◽  
ACH Lit
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Regional Hospital ◽  
Blunt Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
The Impact

Objectives To describe an updated epidemiology of major trauma cases presenting to a regional hospital in Hong Kong and to analyse the impact of enhanced intensive care on the outcome of major trauma patients. Methods This was a retrospective comparative study. In late 2004, we amended our trauma care system with enhancement of intensive care in the management of major trauma patients. An 18-month period was chosen before and after the amendment respectively and patients' data and crude mortality rate between the two periods were compared. Stratified analyses based on mechanism of injury, injury severity and physiological parameters were also performed. Finally, a TRISS analysis was included. Results Altogether 163 and 155 patients were included in our study from the two periods respectively. The majority involved blunt injury and one third of them had injury severity score (ISS) greater than 15. Road traffic accidents and fall from height remained as the two leading causes of major trauma. The median length of stay in the intensive care unit increased for one day (p<0.01) in the later period but the median total length of stay in hospital remained the same. The mortality rate decreased from 10.4% to 9.7% (p=0.82). Conclusion With enhanced intensive care, there is an apparent decrease in mortality of major trauma patients but its significance needs to be determined with a larger scale study.

scholarly journals The ICON Trauma Study: the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on major trauma workload in the UK

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred Adiamah ◽  
◽  
Amari Thompson ◽  
Christopher Lewis-Lloyd ◽  
Edward Dickson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Mechanism Of Injury ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has impacted population health and care delivery worldwide. As information emerges regarding the impact of “lockdown measures” and changes to clinical practice worldwide; there is no comparative information emerging from the United Kingdom with regard to major trauma. Methods This observational study from a UK Major Trauma Centre matched a cohort of patients admitted during a 10-week period of the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic (09/03/2020–18/05/2020) to a historical cohort of patients admitted during a similar time period in 2019 (11/03/2019–20/05/2019). Differences in demographics, Clinical Frailty Scale, SARS-CoV-2 status, mechanism of injury and injury severity were compared using Fisher’s exact and Chi-squared tests. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the associated factors that predicted 30-days mortality. Results A total of 642 patients were included, with 405 in the 2019 and 237 in the 2020 cohorts, respectively. 4/237(1.69%) of patients in the 2020 cohort tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. There was a 41.5% decrease in the number of trauma admissions in 2020. This cohort was older (median 46 vs 40 years), had more comorbidities and were frail (p < 0.0015). There was a significant difference in mechanism of injury with a decrease in vehicle related trauma, but an increase in falls. There was a twofold increased risk of mortality in the 2020 cohort which in adjusted multivariable models, was explained by injury severity and frailty. A positive SARS-CoV-2 status was not significantly associated with increased mortality when adjusted for other variables. Conclusion Patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic were older, frailer, more co-morbid and had an associated increased risk of mortality.

1 Simultaneous trauma patients in emergency departments: a difference in mortality?

2018 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 224.1-224
Author(s):  
L Morrow ◽  
T Nutbeam ◽  
O Bouamra
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Patient Category ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThe presentation of multiple simultaneous trauma patients to an Emergency Department is likely to place significant stress and strain on trauma care resources. Currently there is limited literature and no UK or multicentre data available to understand this impact. The aim of this study was to identify patient outcomes when there are simultaneous major trauma patients. We hypothesised that with increasing numbers of simultaneous trauma patients an increase in mortality may be seen.MethodsThe Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database was interrogated from 2010–2015 to identify simultaneous major trauma patients. We defined simultaneous trauma as occurring when there was more than one trauma patient within an Emergency Department at any one time.Patient age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were recorded. A standardised comparison using a stratified Ws statistic was conducted to compare mortality between groups. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital and intensive care (ICU) stay.ResultsOf 2 07 094 patients, 33.7% were eligible simultaneous trauma patients. 55.7% of patients were male, median age was 61 and median ISS was 9. No increase in mortality was seen with increasing patient numbers (table 1).Abstract 1 Table 1 Ws statistic with increasing simultaneous patient numbersIsolated2 patients3 patients4 patients5 patients6+patientsTotal1 37 360 51 466 13 820 3539 671 185 Ws statistic0.05 0.38 0.72 0.53 0.39 2.70 A statistically significant increase in length of ICU stay was observed for the 6+patient category (p=0.047) but no difference was reported in hospital stay.ConclusionThe impact of simultaneous trauma patients on patient outcomes within the UK has not been previously defined. Simultaneous trauma patients do not appear to have an impact on mortality (as measured by Ws statistic).

scholarly journals Nonoperative management of splenic injury in closely monitored patients with reduced consciousness is safe and feasible

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Teuben ◽  
Roy Spijkerman ◽  
Taco Blokhuis ◽  
Roman Pfeifer ◽  
Henrik Teuber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Status ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Splenic Injury ◽  
Nonoperative Management ◽  
Splenic Trauma ◽  
Blunt Splenic Injury ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Gcs Score ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Treatment of blunt splenic injury has changed over the past decades. Nonoperative management (NOM) is the treatment of choice. Adequate patient selection is a prerequisite for successful NOM. Impaired mental status is considered as a relative contra indication for NOM. However, the impact of altered consciousness in well-equipped trauma institutes is unclear. We hypothesized that impaired mental status does not affect outcome in patients with splenic trauma. Methods Our prospectively composed trauma database was used and adult patients with blunt splenic injury were included during a 14-year time period. Treatment guidelines remained unaltered over time. Patients were grouped based on the presence (Group GCS: < 14) or absence (Group GCS: 14–15) of impaired mental status. Outcome was compared. Results A total of 161 patients were included, of whom 82 were selected for NOM. 36% of patients had a GCS-score < 14 (N = 20). The median GCS-score in patients with reduced consciousness was 9 (range 6–12). Groups were comparable except for significantly higher injury severity scores in the impaired mental status group (19 vs. 17, p = 0.007). Length of stay (28 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001) and ICU-stay (8 vs. 0 days, p = 0.005) were longer in patients with decreased GCS-scores. Failure of NOM, total splenectomy rates, complications and mortality did not differ between both study groups. Conclusion This study shows that NOM for blunt splenic trauma is a viable treatment modality in well-equipped institutions, regardless of the patients mental status. However, the presence of neurologic impairment is associated with prolonged ICU-stay and hospitalization. We recommend, in institutions with adequate monitoring facilities, to attempt nonoperative management for blunt splenic injury, in all hemodynamically stable patients without hollow organ injuries, also in the case of reduced consciousness.

scholarly journals Simultaneous Casualty Admissions—Do they Affect Treatment in the Receiving Trauma Center?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Paul Johan Teuben ◽  
Carsten Mand ◽  
Laura Moosdorf ◽  
Kai Sprengel ◽  
Alba Shehu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Simultaneous Treatment ◽  
Diagnostic Pathway ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Background Simultaneous trauma admissions expose medical professionals to increased workload. The impact of simultaneous trauma admissions on hospital allocation, therapy, and outcome is currently unclear. We hypothesized that multiple admission-scenarios impact the diagnostic pathway and outcome. Methods The TraumaRegister DGU® was utilized. Patients admitted between 2002–2015 with an ISS ≥ 9, treated with ATLS®- algorithms were included. Group ´IND´ included individual admissions, two individuals that were admitted within 60 min of each other were selected for group ´MULT´. Patients admitted within 10 min were considered as simultaneous (´SIM´) admissions. We compared patient and trauma characteristics, treatment, and outcomes between both groups. Results 132,382 admissions were included, and 4,462/3.4% MULTiple admissions were found. The SIM-group contained 1,686/1.3% patients. The overall median injury severity score was 17 and a mean age of 48 years was found. MULT patients were more frequently admitted to level-one trauma centers (68%) than individual trauma admissions were (58%, p < 0.001). Mean time to CT-scanning (24 vs. 26/28 min) was longer in MULT / SIM patients compared to individual admissions. No differences in utilization of damage control principles were seen. Moreover, mortality rates did not differ between the groups (13.1% in regular admissions and 11.4%/10,6% in MULT/SIM patients). Conclusion This study demonstrates that simultaneous treatment of injured patients is rare. Individuals treated in parallel with other patients were more often admitted to level-one trauma centers compared with individual patients. Although diagnostics take longer, treatment principles and mortality are equal in individual admissions and simultaneously admitted patients. More studies are required to optimize health care under these conditions.

scholarly journals Validation of the BATT score for prehospital risk stratification of traumatic haemorrhagic death: usefulness for tranexamic acid treatment criteria

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois-Xavier Ageron ◽  
Timothy J. Coats ◽  
Vincent Darioli ◽  
Ian Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Acid Treatment ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Tranexamic acid reduces surgical blood loss and reduces deaths from bleeding in trauma patients. Tranexamic acid must be given urgently, preferably by paramedics at the scene of the injury or in the ambulance. We developed a simple score (Bleeding Audit Triage Trauma score) to predict death from bleeding. Methods We conducted an external validation of the BATT score using data from the UK Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2018. We evaluated the impact of tranexamic acid treatment thresholds in trauma patients. Results We included 104,862 trauma patients with an injury severity score of 9 or above. Tranexamic acid was administered to 9915 (9%) patients. Of these 5185 (52%) received prehospital tranexamic acid. The BATT score had good accuracy (Brier score = 6%) and good discrimination (C-statistic 0.90; 95% CI 0.89–0.91). Calibration in the large showed no substantial difference between predicted and observed death due to bleeding (1.15% versus 1.16%, P = 0.81). Pre-hospital tranexamic acid treatment of trauma patients with a BATT score of 2 or more would avoid 210 bleeding deaths by treating 61,598 patients instead of avoiding 55 deaths by treating 9915 as currently. Conclusion The BATT score identifies trauma patient at risk of significant haemorrhage. A score of 2 or more would be an appropriate threshold for pre-hospital tranexamic acid treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document