Drug development in the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) Clinical Translational Research Center (CTRC) – 2011–2015: The challenge of precision medicine in a very broad playing field

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. S138-S139
Author(s):  
V. Dembla ◽  
D. Ray ◽  
P. Lockett ◽  
C. Fullmer ◽  
H. Subramanian ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 2960-2963 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Naing ◽  
H. Veasey-Rodrigues ◽  
D.S. Hong ◽  
S. Fu ◽  
G.S. Falchook ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
Agata Nowak

Protonoterapia, jako jedna z form leczenia nowotworów gwarantuje dostarczenie wysokiej dawki do zadanej objętości, przy dokładnej ochronie tkanek zdrowych. W związku z tym, iż następuje ciągły rozwój tej metody leczenia, powstaje również coraz więcej placówek oferujących pacjentom leczenie nowotworów przy użyciu protonów. Zastosowanie kliniczne obejmuje coraz większe spektrum  dotyczy leczenia  przede wszystkim takich lokalizacji jak: gałka oczna czy mózg. Protonoterapia jest wyjątkowo dobra metodą leczenia zmian nowotworowych u dzieci, ze względu na maksymalną ochronę tkanek zdrowych. W pracy opisano wybrane ośrodki protonoterapii w Polsce i na Świecie. W naszym kraju obecnie działa jeden ośrodek – Centrum Cyklotronowe w Bronowicach, który zajmuje się przede wszystkim leczeniem zmian zlokalizowanych w gałce ocznej. Rozpoczęto również działania w ramach projektu INPRONKO, który w dużej mierze przyczyni się do znacznego rozwoju protnoterapii w Polsce. W pracy opisano również takie placówki jak Paul Scherrer Institute, gdzie poraz pierwszy zastosowano dynamiczną wiązkę skanującą,  Zjednoczony Instytut Badań w Dubnej, prywatny ośrodek Rinecer Proton Therapy Center, gdzie do leczenia wykorzystuje się trójwymiarową wiązkę protnów. Kolejną opisaną w pracy placówką jest MD Anderson Cancer Center specjalizujący się w leczeniu zmian nowotworowych przy pomocy techniki IMPT. Proton Medical Research Center w Tsukuba to ośrodek, w którym oprócz gałki ocznej naprmieniania się takie lokalizacje jak wątroba, gruczoł krokowy czy przełyk.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A694-A694
Author(s):  
Chantal Saberian ◽  
Faisal Fa’ak ◽  
Jean Tayar ◽  
Maryam Buni ◽  
Sang Kim ◽  
...  

BackgroundManagement of certain immune mediated adverse events (irAEs) can be challenging and may require prolonged/chronic immune suppression with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressant which could compromise and even reverse the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). While the exact immunobiology of irAEs is not fully understood there is enough evidence that IL-6 induced Th-17 that may play critical role in the pathogenesis. Herein, we describe our clinical experience using interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) blockade in management of irAEs in melanoma patients.MethodsWe searched MD Anderson databases to identify cancer patients who had received ICIs between January 2004 and March 2020. Of 11,391 ICI-treated patients, 21 patients with melanoma who received IL-6R blockade after ICI infusion were identified and their medical records were reviewed.ResultsMedian age was 61 years (41–82), 52% were females, 90% received anti-programmed cell death-1 antibodies. Fourteen patients (67%) had de novo onset irAEs (11 had arthritis, and 1 each with polymyalgia rheumatica, oral mucositis, and CNS vasculitis), and 7 patients (33%) had flare of their pre-existing autoimmune diseases (5 had had rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 each with myasthenia gravis and Crohn’s disease). Median time from ICI initiation to irAEs was 91 days (range, 1–496) and to initiation of IL-6R blockade was 6.6 months (range, 0.6–24.3). Median number of IL-6R blockade was 12 (range, 1–35), and 16 patients (76%) were concomitantly receiving corticosteroids of median dose of 10 mg (range, 5–20 mg). Of the 21 patients, irAEs improved in 14 (67%) (95% CI: 46%-87%). Of 13 evaluable patients with arthritis, 11 (85%) achieved remission or minimal disease activity as defined by the clinical disease activity index. Median time from initiation of IL-6R blockade till improvement of irAEs was 2.9 months (range, 1.5–36.9). Nineteen patients tolerated well IL-6R blockade, while two patients stopped treatment due to abdominal pain and sinus tachycardia. The median CRP levels at irAEs was 84 mg/L (0.6–187) and decreased to 1.9 mg/L (0.56–12) at 10 weeks after initiation of IL-6R blockade (P=0.02). Of the 17 evaluable patients, the overall tumor response rate by RECIST-1.1 criteria was similar before and after IL-6R blockade initiation (41% vs. 53%).ConclusionsOur data demonstrated that IL-6R blockade could be an effective therapy for irAEs management without dampening the efficacy of ICIs. Prospective clinical trials with longitudinal blood, tumor, and inflamed tissue biopsies are planned to accurately validate these findings and better study the immunobiology of irAEs.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center intuition’s Ethics Board, approval number PA19-0089


2021 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
Katerina M. Antoniou ◽  
Eliza Tsitoura ◽  
Eirini Vasarmidi ◽  
Emmanouil K. Symvoulakis ◽  
Vassilis Aidinis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1567-1568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Stewart ◽  
Karin Finberg ◽  
Zenta Walther ◽  
Jeffrey L Sklar ◽  
Navid Hafez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A252-A252
Author(s):  
Ala Abudayyeh ◽  
Liye Suo ◽  
Heather Lin ◽  
Omar Mamlouk ◽  
Cassian Yee ◽  
...  

BackgroundInflammatory response in unintended tissues and organs associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors also known as immune related adverse events (irAEs) is a management challenge, and renal irAEs are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. The most common renal toxicity is acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), characterized by infiltration of renal tissue with immune cells, and may be analogous to kidney transplant rejection. Using both clinical variables and tissue findings we evaluated a large cohort of ICI cases to determine predictors of renal response and overall survival.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with ICI (August 2007 to August 2020) at MD Anderson Cancer Center. A total of 38 patients with biopsy confirmed AIN and available tissue were identified. All slides were reviewed by two board certified renal pathologists and the severity of inflammation and chronicity was graded using transplant rejection BANFF criteria. Patients were categorized as renal responders if creatinine improved or returned to baseline after treatment and non-responders if it did not. Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and t-test/ANOVA or the counterparts of the non-parametric approaches (Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis) for continuous variables were used to compare patient‘s characteristics between groups. The distribution of overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was performed to test the difference in survival between groups.ResultsBased on the detailed pathological findings, patients with increased interstitial fibrosis were less likely to have renal response with treatment compared to patients with less fibrosis, (p < 0.05). Inflammation, tubulitis, number of eosinophils and neutrophils had no impact on renal response. Patients with response within 3 months of AKI treatment had a superior OS in comparison to patients who responded late (12-month OS rate: 77% vs 27%, p < 0.05). Notably, patients who received concurrent ICI and achieved renal response within 3 months had the best OS while those who did not receive concurrent ICI nor achieved renal response had worst OS (12-month OS rate: 100% (renal response and concurrent ICI) vs 72% ( renal response with no concurrent ICI), vs 27% ( no renal response and nonconcurrent ICI) (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThis is the first analysis of ICI induced nephritis where a detailed pathological and clinical evaluation was performed to predict renal response. Our findings highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of ICI-AIN while continuing concurrent ICI therapy.Ethics ApprovalThis retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the procedures followed were in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.


Author(s):  
Adriele Prina-Mello ◽  
Luigi Bonacina ◽  
Davide Staedler ◽  
Dania Movia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document