Factor V Leiden mutation: the most commonly inherited risk factor for venous thromboembolism

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette M Miles ◽  
Manju Monga
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Inherited Risk

scholarly journals A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study on Activated Protein C Resistance (Factor V Leiden): an Independent, Gender-dependent Risk Factor for Venous Thromboembolism

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahideh Takhviji ◽  
Kazem Zibara ◽  
Asma Maleki ◽  
Ebrahim Azizi ◽  
Sanaz Hommayoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Activated Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Activated Protein C Resistance ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

Abstract Background: Activated protein C resistance (APCR) due to factor V R506Q (Leiden) mutation is a major risk factor in patients with venous thromboembolism. The present study investigated the symptoms patterns and the risk for venous thromboembolism regarding multiple clinical, laboratory, and demographic properties in APCR patients.Material and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted on a total of 288 APCR patients with age interval ranging between 1 to 80 years. In addition, 288 control samples, reported healthy after confirmatory tests, were also randomly selected. Demographic information, clinical manifestations, family and treatment history were recorded, and specific tests applied.Results: APCR was found to be 2.3 times significantly more likely in men (OR: 2.1, p < 0.05) than women. The risk of DVT and PE in APCR patients was 4.5 and 3.2 times more than the normal group, respectively (p < 0.05). However, APCR could not be an independent risk factor for arterial thrombosis and pregnancy complications. Moreover, patients were evaluated for thrombophilia panel tests and showed significantly lower protein C and S than the control group and patients without DVT (p<0.0001).Conclusion: Factor V Leiden mutation and APCR abnormality are noticeable independent risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Screening strategies for factor V Leiden mutation in patients undergoing surgery, oral contraceptive medication, and pregnancy cannot be recommended, but a phenotypic test for activated protein C resistance should be endorsed in patients with venous thromboembolism.

Combined Factor V Leiden (R506Q) and prothrombin G20210A genotyping in young patients presenting with deep venous thrombosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mansilha ◽  
F Araújo ◽  
M Severo ◽  
S M Sampaio ◽  
T Toledo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Young People ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

Objective: To evaluate the association between the Factor V Leiden (FV R506Q) and prothrombin gene (FII G20210A) mutations and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in young people. Methods: Blood samples were drawn from 199 subjects: 100 healthy controls and 99 unselected patients, with an objectively documented first episode of DVT under 40 years old. DNA analysis was performed using the polymerase chain reaction. Results: The mean age in the patient cohort was 27 years (range 16–40) and 68 (68.7%) were women. Patient prevalences were 20.6% and 10.1% for FV R506Q and FII G20210A, respectively. In the control group, carrier frequencies were 2% and 5%, respectively. We found an increased overall relative risk of DVT with statistical significance for FV R506Q carriers (OR: 12.8; 95% CI: 2.9–56.7; P < 0.001), but not for FII G20210A mutation (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 0.7–6.5; P = 0.19). Conclusions: Our results suggest a possible increase in DVT risk for the young G20210A allele carriers, which can be more expressed in the presence of a circumstantial risk factor. There is extremely strong evidence that the Factor V Leiden mutation is an important risk factor in the development of a first episode of DVT in young people.

Neonatal aortic arch thrombosis: analysis of thrombophilic risk factors and prognosis

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivonne Wieland ◽  
Thomas Jack ◽  
Kathrin Seidemann ◽  
Martin Boehne ◽  
Florian Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Rare Event ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

AbstractArterial thrombosis in neonates and children is a rare event and is often associated with external risk factors such as asphyxia or sepsis. We report our experiences with two neonates with spontaneous aortic arch thrombosis mimicking aortic coarctation. Despite single case reports until now, no data exist for the underlying thrombophilic risk factors and prognosis of this rare event. Both patients were carriers of a heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation, which has been reported once before as a risk factor for aortic arch thrombosis. One of our patients was operated upon successfully and is alive. The second patient suffered a large infarction of the right medial cerebral artery and had a thrombotic occlusion of the inferior caval vein. The patient obtained palliative care and died at the age of 6 days. In the literature, we identified 19 patients with neonatal aortic arch thrombosis. Of the 19 patients, 11 (58%) died. Including the two reported patients, the mortality rate of patients with multiple thromboses was 80% (8/10) compared with 18% (2/11) for patients with isolated aortic arch thrombosis; this difference reached statistical significance (p = 0.009). The analysis of thrombophilic disorders revealed that factor V Leiden mutation and protein C deficiency seem to be the most common risk factors for aortic arch thrombosis.Conclusion:Neonatal aortic arch thrombosis is a very rare but life-threatening event, with a high rate of mortality, especially if additional thrombotic complications are present. Factor V Leiden mutation seems to be one important risk factor in the pathogenesis of this fatal disease.

Basal high-sensitivity-C-reactive protein levels in patients with spontaneous venous thromboembolism

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (03) ◽  
pp. 488-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Vormittag ◽  
Thomas Vukovich ◽  
Verena Schönauer ◽  
Stephan Lehr ◽  
Erich Minar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Prothrombin G20210a ◽  
Factor V ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Hs Crp

SummaryThe role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still under discussion because of controversial results in the literature. Conflicting data may have partly been due to bias by exogenous factors altering CRP levels. We investigated CRP concentrations in patients with spontaneous VTE applying a study design that allowed the measurement of basal high sensitivity (hs)-CRP levels. Patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT, n=117) and pulmonary embolism (PE, n=97) were compared to healthy individuals (n=104). Hs-CRP levels (mg/dl) were significantly higher in patients (n=214, median/interquartile range: 0.171/0.082–0.366) than in controls (0.099/0.053–0.245, p=0.001). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for VTE per 1 mg/dl increase of CRP was 2.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–6.8, p=0.03]. This association remained significant after adjustment for factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and factor VIII activity above 230% (OR = 2.9, 95% CI [1.1–7.5]), but became remarkably attenuated and lost its statistical significance after adjustment for BMI alone (OR = 1.7 [0.7–4.0]). CRP was also not independently associated with VTE in subgroups of patients (those with DVT without symptomatic PE, those with PE and patients without established risk factor) in multiple regression analysis. In summary, we observed significantly higher basal hs-CRP levels in patients with spontaneous VTE compared to healthy controls. This association was independent of hereditary and laboratory risk factors for VTE, but lost its significance after adjustment for BMI. Increased basal CRP levels do not appear to represent an independent risk factor for VTE.

scholarly journals Is Hormone Replacement a Risk Factor for Ischemic Stroke in Women With Factor V Leiden Mutation?

1998 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Meschia ◽  
José Biller ◽  
Thomas Witt ◽  
Anne Greist ◽  
Steve N. Rhinehart
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

Is APC Resistance a Risk Factor for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients over 70 Years?

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 587-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karine Lacut ◽  
Grégoire Le Gal ◽  
Patrick Van Dreden ◽  
Luc Bressollette ◽  
Pierre-Yves Scarabin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Dna Analysis ◽  
Activated Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Apc Resistance ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

SummaryActivated protein C (APC) resistance is the most common risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Previous studies mostly analysed patients under 70 years and reported a four-to sevenfold increased risk. This case-control study included consecutive patients referred for a clinical suspicion VTE to our medical unit: 621 patients with a well-documented diagnosis (cases) and 406 patients for which the diagnosis was ruled out and who had no personal history of VTE (controls). APC resistance related to factor V Leiden was defined by either a positive DNA analysis or a positive STA® Staclot APC-R assay. Under 70 years, APC resistance was associated with a threefold increased risk of VTE (odds ratio 3.2, 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0), whereas in patients over 70 years, it appeared to be no longer a strong risk factor (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.7). Age appeared as an effectmeasure modifier with a significant interaction (p = 0.005). Our data suggest that APC resistance is not a risk factor for VTE in elderly.

Factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism: What is the exact risk?

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (07) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Francois Schved ◽  
Jean-Pierre Daures ◽  
Christine Biron-Andreani
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity

SummaryThe magnitude of the association of factor V Leiden mutation with pregnancy-related venous thrombosis remains unclear. Our objective was to undertake a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature to estimate precisely the association of factor V Leiden mutation with the risk of first,or recurrent,pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism. Studies published before October 2005 were identified by Medline®. Using both fixed and random effect models, odds ratios (OR) with accompanying 95% confidential intervals (CI) were calculated for the factor V Leiden mutation and the clinical end-point (Yusuf-Peto adaptation of the Mantel-Haenszel, DerSimonian and Laird method).We identified 13 studies including 7 cohorts and 6 case control studies relating to factor V Leiden and pregnancy-related venous thrombosis.The results from the cohorts showe a pooled OR of 4.46 (95% CI,1.82–10.94;7,879 pooled women), with no evidence of statistical heterogeneity (p=0.36), for the risk of a first venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or the postpartum period associated with the factor V Leiden mutation.Case-control studies revealed a higher risk ( OR 8.6,95% CI, 5.85–12.63; 1,524 pooled women) with significant heterogeneity (p<0.005). Because of insufficient data, an analysis for the risk of recurrence could not be performed. Our findings emphasize the fact that limited data are available on this topic.This meta-analysis provides clinicians with an estimate of the average risk of a first thrombosis occurring during pregnancy in women carrying the factor V Leiden to assist the management of such women.

Factor V Leiden (G1691A) and Prothrombin Gene G20210A Mutations as Potential Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip or Total Knee Replacement Surgery

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (04) ◽  
pp. 580-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Larson ◽  
T. L. Lindahl ◽  
C. Andersson ◽  
L. Frison ◽  
D. Gustafsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

SummaryPatients (n = 1600) from 12 European countries, scheduled for elective orthopaedic hip or knee surgery, were screened for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutations, found in 5.5% and 2.9% of the populations, respectively. All patients underwent prophylactic treatment with one of four doses of melagatran and ximelagatran or dalteparin, starting pre-operatively. Bilateral ascending venography was performed on study day 8-11. The patients were subsequently treated according to local routines and followed for 4-6 weeks postoperatively. The composite endpoint of screened deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) during prophylaxis did not differ significantly between patients with or without these mutations. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) during prophylaxis and follow-up (1.9%) was significantly over-represented among patients with the prothrombin gene G20210A mutation (p = 0.0002). A tendency towards increased risk of VTE was found with the Factor V Leiden mutation (p = 0.09). PE were few, but significantly over-represented in both the Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutated patients (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, since 90% of the patients with these genetic risk factors will not suffer a VTE event, a general pre-operative genotyping is, in our opinion, of questionable value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document