Neonatal aortic arch thrombosis: analysis of thrombophilic risk factors and prognosis

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivonne Wieland ◽  
Thomas Jack ◽  
Kathrin Seidemann ◽  
Martin Boehne ◽  
Florian Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Rare Event ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

AbstractArterial thrombosis in neonates and children is a rare event and is often associated with external risk factors such as asphyxia or sepsis. We report our experiences with two neonates with spontaneous aortic arch thrombosis mimicking aortic coarctation. Despite single case reports until now, no data exist for the underlying thrombophilic risk factors and prognosis of this rare event. Both patients were carriers of a heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation, which has been reported once before as a risk factor for aortic arch thrombosis. One of our patients was operated upon successfully and is alive. The second patient suffered a large infarction of the right medial cerebral artery and had a thrombotic occlusion of the inferior caval vein. The patient obtained palliative care and died at the age of 6 days. In the literature, we identified 19 patients with neonatal aortic arch thrombosis. Of the 19 patients, 11 (58%) died. Including the two reported patients, the mortality rate of patients with multiple thromboses was 80% (8/10) compared with 18% (2/11) for patients with isolated aortic arch thrombosis; this difference reached statistical significance (p = 0.009). The analysis of thrombophilic disorders revealed that factor V Leiden mutation and protein C deficiency seem to be the most common risk factors for aortic arch thrombosis.Conclusion:Neonatal aortic arch thrombosis is a very rare but life-threatening event, with a high rate of mortality, especially if additional thrombotic complications are present. Factor V Leiden mutation seems to be one important risk factor in the pathogenesis of this fatal disease.

scholarly journals Factor V-Leiden Mutation: A Common Risk Factor for Venous Thrombosis among Lebanese Patients

Thrombosis ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghid Kreidy
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Duplex Scan ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Thrombophilia Screening ◽  
Fvl Mutation

Aim. Lebanon exhibits one of the highest prevalences of factor V-Leiden (FVL) in the world (14.4%). The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of FVL mutation among Lebanese patients with lower extremity venous thrombosis. Material and Methods. From January 2003 to January 2011, 283 consecutive Lebanese patients, diagnosed with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) by duplex scan, were retrospectively reviewed. FVL mutation was tested among patients with conditions highly suggestive of hypercoagulation states (65 patients). Results. FVL mutation was detected among 56.9% of patients, 68.6% of patients younger than 50 years, and 43.4% of patients older than 50 years (). FVL mutation was commonly reported in young adults, in patients with pregnancy, estrogen drugs, recurrent DVT, and resistance to anticoagulation. Conclusion. The high rate of FVL mutation observed among Lebanese patients with venous thrombosis is related to the high prevalence of this mutation in the Lebanese population. Thrombophilia screening should be tailored to accommodate a population's risk factor. In countries with high prevalence of FVL, this mutation should be screened among patients younger than 50 years and patients with situations highly suggestive of hypercoagulation states.

Combined Factor V Leiden (R506Q) and prothrombin G20210A genotyping in young patients presenting with deep venous thrombosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mansilha ◽  
F Araújo ◽  
M Severo ◽  
S M Sampaio ◽  
T Toledo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Young People ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

Objective: To evaluate the association between the Factor V Leiden (FV R506Q) and prothrombin gene (FII G20210A) mutations and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in young people. Methods: Blood samples were drawn from 199 subjects: 100 healthy controls and 99 unselected patients, with an objectively documented first episode of DVT under 40 years old. DNA analysis was performed using the polymerase chain reaction. Results: The mean age in the patient cohort was 27 years (range 16–40) and 68 (68.7%) were women. Patient prevalences were 20.6% and 10.1% for FV R506Q and FII G20210A, respectively. In the control group, carrier frequencies were 2% and 5%, respectively. We found an increased overall relative risk of DVT with statistical significance for FV R506Q carriers (OR: 12.8; 95% CI: 2.9–56.7; P < 0.001), but not for FII G20210A mutation (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 0.7–6.5; P = 0.19). Conclusions: Our results suggest a possible increase in DVT risk for the young G20210A allele carriers, which can be more expressed in the presence of a circumstantial risk factor. There is extremely strong evidence that the Factor V Leiden mutation is an important risk factor in the development of a first episode of DVT in young people.

Basal high-sensitivity-C-reactive protein levels in patients with spontaneous venous thromboembolism

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (03) ◽  
pp. 488-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Vormittag ◽  
Thomas Vukovich ◽  
Verena Schönauer ◽  
Stephan Lehr ◽  
Erich Minar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Prothrombin G20210a ◽  
Factor V ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Hs Crp

SummaryThe role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still under discussion because of controversial results in the literature. Conflicting data may have partly been due to bias by exogenous factors altering CRP levels. We investigated CRP concentrations in patients with spontaneous VTE applying a study design that allowed the measurement of basal high sensitivity (hs)-CRP levels. Patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT, n=117) and pulmonary embolism (PE, n=97) were compared to healthy individuals (n=104). Hs-CRP levels (mg/dl) were significantly higher in patients (n=214, median/interquartile range: 0.171/0.082–0.366) than in controls (0.099/0.053–0.245, p=0.001). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for VTE per 1 mg/dl increase of CRP was 2.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–6.8, p=0.03]. This association remained significant after adjustment for factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and factor VIII activity above 230% (OR = 2.9, 95% CI [1.1–7.5]), but became remarkably attenuated and lost its statistical significance after adjustment for BMI alone (OR = 1.7 [0.7–4.0]). CRP was also not independently associated with VTE in subgroups of patients (those with DVT without symptomatic PE, those with PE and patients without established risk factor) in multiple regression analysis. In summary, we observed significantly higher basal hs-CRP levels in patients with spontaneous VTE compared to healthy controls. This association was independent of hereditary and laboratory risk factors for VTE, but lost its significance after adjustment for BMI. Increased basal CRP levels do not appear to represent an independent risk factor for VTE.

scholarly journals Is Hormone Replacement a Risk Factor for Ischemic Stroke in Women With Factor V Leiden Mutation?

1998 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Meschia ◽  
José Biller ◽  
Thomas Witt ◽  
Anne Greist ◽  
Steve N. Rhinehart
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

scholarly journals Fusidic Acid: A Neglected Risk Factor for Statin-Associated Myopathy

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117954681881516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefine Rönnqvist ◽  
Pär Hallberg ◽  
Qun-Ying Yue ◽  
Mia Wadelius
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Fusidic Acid ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Swedish Medical ◽  
Statin Dose

Background: Statins are widely used lipid-lowering drugs used for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Statins are known to cause myopathy, an adverse drug reaction with various clinical features rhabdomyolysis. Objective: To describe clinical characteristics of statin-treated individuals who experienced myopathy and identify risk factors of statin-associated myopathy. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on cases of statin-associated myopathy reported to the Swedish Medical Products Agency. Clinical factors were compared between cases and statin-treated controls not diagnosed with myopathy. Statistical methods were univariate and multivariate logistic regression and results were presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). To correct for multiple comparisons, the cutoff for statistical significance was set to P < .0017. Results: In total, 47 cases of statin-associated myopathy were compared with 3871 treated controls. Rhabdomyolysis was diagnosed in 51% of the cases. Markers for cardiovascular disease were more common in cases than controls. Statistical analysis revealed the following independent risk factors for myopathy: high statin dose (OR = 1.54, calculated using the standard deviation 19.82, 95% CI = 1.32-1.80, P < .0001), and concomitant treatment with fusidic acid (OR = 1002, 95% CI = 54.55-18 410, P < .0001), cyclosporine (OR = 34.10, 95% CI = 4.43-262.45, P = .0007), and gemfibrozil (OR = 12.35, 95% CI = 2.38-64.10, P = .0028). Conclusions: The risk of myopathy increases with statin dose and cotreatment with cyclosporine and gemfibrozil. Concomitant fusidic acid has previously only been noted in a few case reports. Considering that use of fusidic acid may become more frequent, it is important to remind of this risk factor for statin-associated myopathy.

THROMBOPHILIC RISK FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH CRANIAL AND SPINAL DURAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAE

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüediger Gerlach ◽  
Martina Boehm-Weigert ◽  
Joachim Berkefeld ◽  
Judith Duis ◽  
Andreas Raabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulae ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Cardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Numerous studies have reported the technical aspects and results of surgical and/or endovascular treatment of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulae (cDAVF) and spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (sDAVF). Only a few of them have addressed the question of thrombophilic conditions, which may be relevant as pathogenetic factors or can increase the risk for venous thromboembolic events. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare thrombophilic risk factors in patients with cDAVF and sDAVF with no history of trauma. METHODS A total of 43 patients (25 with cDAVF and 18 with sDAVF) were included in this study. Blood samples were analyzed for G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene and factor V Leiden mutation. In all patients, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, antithrombin, protein C and S activity, von Willebrand factor antigen, ristocetin cofactor activity, D-dimer, coagulation factor VIII activity, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor were determined. Screening was performed for the occurrence of lupus antiphospholipid and cardiolipin antibodies. RESULTS The prevalence of G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene was significantly higher in patients with cDAVF (n = 6) compared with patients with sDAVF (n = 0; P &lt; 0.05, Fisher's exact test). A factor V Leiden mutation was found in 3 patients with sDAVF and in 1 patient with cDAVF (P = 0.29, Fisher's exact test). No significant difference was found for other parameters, except for fibrinogen, but decreased protein C activity was more frequent in patients with cDAVF compared with patients with sDAVF (4 versus 1). Decreased protein S activity was encountered in 3 patients (2 with sDAVF and 1 with cDAVF). Cardiolipin antibodies were found in 2 patients with cDAVF but in none with sDAVF, whereas only 1 patient with sDAVF had lupus antiphospholipid antibodies. CONCLUSION In both groups of patients with dural arteriovenous fistulae, genetic thrombophilic abnormalities occurred in a higher percentage than in the general population. The differences of the genetic abnormalities may be involved in different pathophysiological mechanism(s) in the development of these distinct neurovascular entities.

Factor V Leiden (G1691A) and Prothrombin Gene G20210A Mutations as Potential Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip or Total Knee Replacement Surgery

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (04) ◽  
pp. 580-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Larson ◽  
T. L. Lindahl ◽  
C. Andersson ◽  
L. Frison ◽  
D. Gustafsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

SummaryPatients (n = 1600) from 12 European countries, scheduled for elective orthopaedic hip or knee surgery, were screened for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutations, found in 5.5% and 2.9% of the populations, respectively. All patients underwent prophylactic treatment with one of four doses of melagatran and ximelagatran or dalteparin, starting pre-operatively. Bilateral ascending venography was performed on study day 8-11. The patients were subsequently treated according to local routines and followed for 4-6 weeks postoperatively. The composite endpoint of screened deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) during prophylaxis did not differ significantly between patients with or without these mutations. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) during prophylaxis and follow-up (1.9%) was significantly over-represented among patients with the prothrombin gene G20210A mutation (p = 0.0002). A tendency towards increased risk of VTE was found with the Factor V Leiden mutation (p = 0.09). PE were few, but significantly over-represented in both the Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutated patients (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, since 90% of the patients with these genetic risk factors will not suffer a VTE event, a general pre-operative genotyping is, in our opinion, of questionable value.

Gene-Gene and Gene-Environment Interactions Determine Risk of Thrombosis in Families With Inherited Antithrombin Deficiency

Blood ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 94 (8) ◽  
pp. 2590-2594 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.H. van Boven ◽  
J.P. Vandenbroucke ◽  
E. Briët ◽  
F.R. Rosendaal
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Genetic Risk ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Genetic Defects ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Antithrombin Deficiency ◽  
Gene Environment ◽  
Genetic And Environmental Factors

To analyze inherited antithrombin deficiency as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in various conditions with regard to the presence or absence of additional genetic or acquired risk factors, we compared 48 antithrombin-deficient individuals with 44 nondeficient individuals of 14 selected families with inherited antithrombin deficiency. The incidence of venous thromboembolism for antithrombin deficient individuals was 20 times higher than among nondeficient individuals (1.1% v 0.05% per year). At the age of 50 years, greater than 50% of antithrombin-deficient individuals had experienced thrombosis compared with 5% of nondeficient individuals. Additional genetic risk factors, Factor V Leiden and PT20210A, were found in more than half of these selected families. The effect of exposure to 2 genetic defects was a 5-fold increased incidence (4.6% per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9% to 11.1%). Acquired risk factors were often present, determining the onset of thrombosis. The incidence among those with exposure to antithrombin deficiency and an acquired risk factor was increased 20-fold (20.3% per year; 95% CI, 12.0% to 34.3%). In conclusion, in these thrombophilia families, the genetic and environmental factors interact to bring about venous thrombosis. Inherited antithrombin deficiency proves to be a prominent risk factor for venous thromboembolism. The increased risks among those with exposure to acquired risk factors should be considered and adequate prophylactic anticoagulant therapy in high-risk situations seems indicated in selected families with inherited antithrombin deficiency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document