scholarly journals P143: A prospective cohort study characterizing 30-day recurrent emergency department visits for hyperglycemia

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S116
Author(s):  
J. Yan ◽  
D. Azzam ◽  
M. Columbus ◽  
K. Van Aarsen
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Local Health

Introduction: Hyperglycemic emergencies, including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS), often recur in patients who have poorly controlled diabetes. Identification of those at risk for recurrent hyperglycemia visits may improve health care delivery and reduce ED utilization for these patients. The objective of this study was to prospectively characterize patients re-presenting to the emergency department (ED) for hyperglycemia within 30 days of an initial ED visit. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of patients ≥18 years presenting to two tertiary care EDs (combined annual census 150,000 visits) with a discharge diagnosis of hyperglycemia, DKA or HHS from Jul 2016-Nov 2018. Trained research personnel collected data from medical records, telephoned patients at 10-14 days after the ED visit for follow-up, and completed an electronic review to determine if patients had a recurrent hyperglycemia visit to any of 11 EDs within our local health integration network within 30 days of the initial visit. Descriptive statistics were used where appropriate to summarize the data. Results: 240 patients were enrolled with a mean (SD) age of 53.9 (18.6) years and 126 (52.5%) were male. 77 (32.1%) patients were admitted from their initial ED visit. Of the 237 patients (98.8%) with 30-day data available, 55 (23.2%) had a recurrent ED visit for hyperglycemia within this time period. 21 (8.9%) were admitted on this subsequent visit, with one admission to intensive care and one death within 30 days. For all patients who had a recurrent 30-day hyperglycemia visit, 22/55 (40.0%) reported having outpatient follow-up with a physician for diabetes management within 10-14 days of their index ED visit. 7/21 (33.3%) patients who were admitted on the subsequent visit had received follow-up within the same 10-14 day period. Conclusion: This prospective study builds on our previous retrospective work and describes patients who present recurrently for hyperglycemia within 30 days of an index ED visit. Further research will attempt to determine if access to prompt follow-up after discharge can reduce recurrent hyperglycemia visits in patients presenting to the ED.

scholarly journals P162: Patient-important outcomes in hyperglycemia after discharge from the emergency department: a prospective cohort study

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S114-S115
Author(s):  
J. W. Yan ◽  
L. Siddiqi ◽  
K. Van Aarsen ◽  
M. Columbus ◽  
K. M. Gushulak
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Healthcare Provider ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Burden Of Disease ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Post Discharge

Introduction: Hyperglycemic emergencies, including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS), carry significant morbidity for individuals even after discharge. The objective of this study was to describe the patient-important outcomes and burden of disease for emergency department (ED) patients with hyperglycemia after discharge from hospital. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients 18 years presenting to two tertiary care EDs (combined annual census 150,000 visits) with a discharge diagnosis of hyperglycemia, DKA or HHS over a 15-month period (Jul 2016-Oct 2017). During the ED visit, consent was obtained for a telephone follow-up call to determine patient-important outcomes. Trained research personnel collected data from medical records and completed a 14 day telephone follow-up using a standardized questionnaire to determine medication changes, missed days of school or work, and repeat admissions or visits to a healthcare provider. Descriptive statistics were used where appropriate to summarize the data. Results: Thus far, 172 patients have been enrolled in our study. Mean (SD) age is 53.9 (19.3) years and 97 (56.4%) are male. 65 (37.8%) patients were admitted from their initial ED visit. Of the 125 patients (72.7%) providing post-discharge outcomes, 75 (60.0%) required an adjustment to their diabetes medications or insulin. 21 (16.8%) patients missed days of school or work for a median (IQR) duration of 3.5 (1.3, 7.0) days. 85 (68.0%) saw another healthcare provider within a 14 day period, 45 (36.0%) saw their family physician, and 34 (27.2%) saw an internist or endocrinologist. 9 (7.2%) were seen again in the ED, 5 of these patients required admission to hospital. There was one death that occurred within the follow-up period. Conclusion: This prospective study builds on our previous retrospective work and demonstrates that visits for hyperglycemia carry a significant burden of disease beyond what may be seen in a single ED encounter. Further research will attempt to identify the factors that may be predictive of adverse outcomes in hyperglycemic patients presenting to the ED.

scholarly journals Physician follow-up and long-term use of evidence-based medication for patients with hypertension who were discharged from an emergency department: a prospective cohort study

CMAJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. E151-E161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare L. Atzema ◽  
Bing Yu ◽  
Michael J. Schull ◽  
Cynthia A. Jackevicius ◽  
Noah M. Ivers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Evidence Based

scholarly journals Adverse events among patients registered in high-acuity areas of the emergency department: a prospective cohort study

CJEM ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (05) ◽  
pp. 421-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Anne Calder ◽  
Alan Forster ◽  
Melanie Nelson ◽  
Jason Leclair ◽  
Jeffrey Perry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
High Acuity

ABSTRACTObjective:To enhance patient safety, it is important to understand the frequency and causes of adverse events (defined as unintended injuries related to health care management). We performed this study to describe the types and risk of adverse events in high-acuity areas of the emergency department (ED).Methods:This prospective cohort study examined the outcomes of consecutive patients who received treatment at 2 tertiary care EDs. For discharged patients, we conducted a structured telephone interview 14 days after their initial visit; for admitted patients, we reviewed the inpatient charts. Three emergency physicians independently adjudicated flagged outcomes (e.g., death, return visits to the ED) to determine whether an adverse event had occurred.Results:We enrolled 503 patients; one-half (n= 254) were female and the median age was 57 (range 18–98) years. The majority of patients (n= 369, 73.3%) were discharged home. The most common presenting complaints were chest pain, generalized weakness and abdominal pain. Of the 107 patients with flagged outcomes, 43 (8.5%, 95% confidence interval 8.1%–8.9%) were considered to have had an adverse event through our peer review process, and over half of these (24, 55.8%) were considered preventable. The most common types of adverse events were as follows: management issues (n= 18, 41.9%), procedural complications (n= 13, 30.2%) and diagnostic issues (n= 10, 23.3%). The clinical consequences of these adverse events ranged from minor (urinary tract infection) to serious (delayed diagnosis of aortic dissection).Conclusion:We detected a higher proportion of preventable adverse events compared with previous inpatient studies and suggest confirmation of these results is warranted among a wider selection of EDs.

scholarly journals Clinical Profile and One Year Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation- A Prospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Satheesan ◽  
Veena Felix ◽  
Alummoottil George Koshy
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Good Control ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and imposes a great burden on health care resources. There is limited data regarding the impact of AF in our population. Aim: To estimate the mortality and Major adverse Cardiovascular events {(MACE)- Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), Stroke, Cardiac death} in AF patients in a tertiary care centre in South India. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study included all patients >18 years with newly diagnosed or previously documented evidence of AF in Electrocardiography (ECG). Transient reversible causes and critically ill patients were excluded. Total of 346 patients were recruited and prospectively, followed-up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months for development of MACE, anticoagulation status, Prothrombin Time (PT), International Normalised Ratio (INR) and major bleeding events. Baseline data including clinical parameters, comorbidities and appropriate investigations such as ECG and Echocardiogram (ECHO) parameters were collected with a structured questionnaire and analysed at one year using appropriate statistical tests. Results: Average age was 60.5 years (SD 11.5 years) and majority (74.6%) were between 50-75 years. Females were more (59.5% vs 40.5%). Most common AF risk factor was Hypertension (44.5%) followed by Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) in 27.2% of AF patients. AF was classified as permanent in 42.2%, persistent in 23.1% and paroxysmal in 34.7%. Valvular AF was present in 26.6% and non-valvular AF in 73.4%. At one year, 17 patients were lost to follow-up. CHA2DS2VASc score of ≥2 was present in 65.1%. During one year follow-up the MACE rate was 26.7% (ischemic stroke in 9.4%, ACS in 2.7% and cardiac mortality in 14.6 %). Mean time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) was 28.12%. TTR >60% (good control) was present in only 9.2%. Conclusion: AF continues to be a significant arrhythmia causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Non-valvular AF was thrice as common as valvular AF. Though 3/4th of the patients were on oral anticoagulants, <10% had their INR under good control which contributed to the higher events. To improve the outcomes in AF patients, treatment of risk factors and optimal anticoagulation plays a crucial role.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document