scholarly journals P.202 Image-Guidance for Ventricular Drains Insertion: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (s3) ◽  
pp. S78-S78
Author(s):  
M Aljoghaiman ◽  
B Bergen ◽  
R Takroni ◽  
S Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Favourable Effect ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Randomized Design ◽  
Assess Quality ◽  
Quality Evidence

Background: The use of Image-guidance to improve the accuracy during ventricular drain insertion has been attempted. We aim to assess the effect of use of Image-guidance on accuracy, drain failure rate and number of ventricular cannulation attempts. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 2021 looking for studies comparing image-guided versus freehand ventricular drain insertion. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence. Metanalysis was conducted in compliance with PRISMA guidelines using a random-effects model and GRADE tool was used to assess quality of evidence. Results: 17 studies with 3404 patients were included, all of which were of non-randomized design. Pooled data on drain accuracy and drain failure rates showed favourable effect of image-guidance with risk ratio of 1.31 (95% CI of 1.13 – 1.51, low quality evidence) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.48 – 0.83, moderate quality evidence), respectively. Pooled data were equivocal for number of attempts with mean difference score of -0.11 times (95% CI -0.31 – 0.09, very low-quality evidence). Conclusions: Image-guidance likely enhances drain accuracy and reduces drain failure rate. No clear recommendation can be drawn on the benefit of intervention on number of drain insertion attempts.

scholarly journals The need of health policy perspective to protect Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 pandemic. A GRADE rapid review on the N95 respirators effectiveness

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Primiano Iannone ◽  
Greta Castellini ◽  
Daniela Coclite ◽  
Antonello Napoletano ◽  
Alice Fauci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Infection ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Bacterial Colonization ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Surgical Masks ◽  
N95 Respirators ◽  
Quality Evidence

AbstractProtecting Health Care Workers (HCWs) during routine care of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients is of paramount importance to halt the SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2) pandemic. The WHO, ECDC and CDC have issued conflicting guidelines on the use of respiratory filters (N95) by HCWs. We searched PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library from the inception to March 21, 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing N95 respirators versus surgical masks for prevention of COVID-19 or any other respiratory infection among HCWs. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Four RCTs involving 8736 HCWs were included. We did not find any trial specifically on prevention of COVID-19. However, wearing N95 respirators can prevent 73 more (95% CI 46-91) clinical respiratory infections per 1000 HCWs compared to surgical masks (2 RCTs; 2594 patients; low quality of evidence). A protective effect of N95 respirators in laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR= 0.41; 95%CI 0.28-0.61) was also found. A trend in favour of N95 respirators was observed in preventing laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza like illness. We found no direct high quality evidence on whether N95 respirators are better than surgical masks for HCWs protection from SARS-CoV-2. However, low quality evidence suggests that N95 respirators protect HCWs from clinical respiratory infections. This finding should be contemplated to decide the best strategy to support the resilience of healthcare systems facing the potentially catastrophic SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

scholarly journals Lumbar Roll Usage While Sitting Reduces the Forward Head Posture in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 5171
Author(s):  
Yusuke Handa ◽  
Kenya Okada ◽  
Hiroshi Takasaki
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grade System ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Forward Head Posture ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Head Posture ◽  
Head Extension ◽  
The Cochrane Library

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the use of a lumbar roll reduced forward head posture (FHP) while sitting among individuals with or without musculoskeletal disorders. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception to August 2020. The quality of evidence for variables used in the meta-analysis was determined using the GRADE system. Five studies satisfied the criteria for data analysis. All studies included individuals without any spinal symptoms. Data from five studies on neck angle showed a statistically significant (p = 0.02) overall effect (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.77), indicating a lesser neck flexion angle while sitting with a lumbar roll than without it. Data from two studies on head angle showed a statistically significant (p = 0.04) overall effect (SMD = 0.47), indicating a lesser head extension angle while sitting with a lumbar roll than without it. In each meta-analysis, the quality of evidence was very low in the GRADE system. The use of a lumbar roll while sitting reduced FHP among individuals without spinal symptoms.

Abstract P111: Comparative Efficacy Of Bisoprolol Compared To Other Selective Beta-1 Blockers In Patients With Hypertension - A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Uday M Jadhav ◽  
Tiny Nair ◽  
SANDEEP BANSAL ◽  
Saumitra Ray
Keyword(s):  
Lipid Profile ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hdl Cholesterol ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Favourable Effect ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Cholesterol Levels

Introduction: Selective beta-1 blockers (s-BBs) are used in the management of hypertension (HT) in specific subsets. Studies comparing the potency of blood pressure (BP) lowering with different s-BBs are sparse. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of bisoprolol compared to other s-BBs (Atenolol, Betaxolol, Esmolol, Acebutolol, Metoprolol, Nebivolol) in HT patients by examining their effect on BP, heart rate (HR) and metabolic derangements, by examining the evidences reported in observational studies. Methods: Electronic databases like PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program and 12 PV databases were systematically searched from inception to October 2019. Observational studies that compared bisoprolol with other s-BBs in patients with HT were evaluated in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Pooled data were calculated using random-effects model for meta-analysis in terms of mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each outcome. Outcomes of interest were BP, HR and lipid profile. Results: Four observational studies which compared bisoprolol with other s-BBs (nebivolol and atenolol) were included in this meta-analysis. Significant reduction was observed in office diastolic BP [MD: -1.70; 95% CI: -2.68,-0.72; P <0.01] among arterial HT patients treated with bisoprolol for 26 weeks (w) compared to those treated with other s-BBs. HT patients treated with bisoprolol for 26 w showed significant reduction in HR [MD: -2.20; 95% CI: -3.57,-0.65; P <0.01] and office HR [MD: -2.55; 95% CI: -3.57,-1.53; P <0.01] than other s-BBs. HDL cholesterol levels increased significantly in essential HT patients treated with bisoprolol at 26 w [MD: 7.17; 95% CI: 1.90,12.45; P <0.01], 78 w [MD: 11.70; 95% CI: 4.49,18.91; P <0.01] and 104 w [MD: 10.20, 95% CI: 4.49,18.91; P <0.01] compared to other s-BBs. Conclusion: Our results suggests that bisoprolol is superior to other s-BBs in reducing BP and HR. Bisoprolol also had a favourable effect on lipid profile shown by increase in HDL cholesterol. This meta-analysis emphasizes the efficacy of bisoprolol over other s-BBs, which aids clinical decision making in treatment of patients with HT.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of M-Health associated with cardiac rehabilitation on functional capacity and cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A C Campagnolo Goncalves Toledo ◽  
N Soares De Almeida ◽  
A Pierucci ◽  
A Straioto Salomao ◽  
I Ribeiro Lemes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Short Term ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
High Quality Evidence ◽  
Quality Evidence

Abstract Introduction Smartphone applications for health (M-Health) seem to overcome barriers to access Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Programs (CRP), because of their high degree of acceptance and also their potential to influence the frequency of physical exercise in weight loss. Objective To analyze the effectiveness of the combination of M-Health and CRP compared to CRP alone on functional capacity, adherence to CRP, management of cardiovascular risk factors in cardiac patients. Design Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Methods The following databases were used Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, Central, PEDro and SPORTDiscus via EBSCOhost from their inception until July/2020. We included randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of M-Health in combination with CRP compared to CRP alone in adults with heart disease, and the interventions with M-Health consisted of text messages, e-mails, and applications. The primary outcome of this review was functional capacity, measured by VO2peak, or self-reported physical activity (METs.min/week). PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies and the GRADE approach to assess the overall quality of evidence. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random effect model to obtain mean difference (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) and their respectives 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Nineteen RCTs were eligible, the median risk of bias was 7 out of 10 points. The primary endpoint was analyzed by subgroups, time of intervention and kind of type CRP, eigthteen of these studies assessed functional capacity. CRP in combination with a m-health intervention was more effective than CRP alone in improving VO2peak, ml/min/kg, (MD: 0.84, CI: 0.30 to 1.38; I2=0%, high quality evidence, 12 trials, n=1889) at short-term follow-up, but at medium-term follow-up (MD: 0.84, CI: −0.26 to 1.41; I2=0%, high quality evidence, 8 trials, n=927,). Similarly, CRP associated with m-health was superior to CRP alone in increasing self-reported at short-term, METs.min/week, (MD:1.31, CI: −0.24 to 2.37; I2 = not aplicable, very low quality evidence, 1 trial, n=18), and at medium-term follow-up (MD: 0.18, CI: −0.01 to 0.36; I2=56%, moderate quality evidence, 4 trials, n=1107). Conclusion High quality of evidence shows that M-Health improves cardiorespiratory fitness at short-term follow-up. In addition, supervised program showed to be more effective than non-supervised. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Glucocorticoids on acute respiratory distress syndrome: An umbrella review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semagn Mekonnen ◽  
Haile Mariam Mulugeta Kassim ◽  
Bivash Basu ◽  
Solomon Nega
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Background Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome is a very challenging critical illness in ICU with high morbidity and mortality worldwide.The review was intended to provide evidence on the effectiveness of Glucocorticoid treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome Method A comprehensive search strategy was conducted on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Science direct, LILACS, and African Online Journal. Data extraction was carried out with two independent authors with customized checklist. The quality of each systemic review was assessed by two independent authors using AMSTAR tool and the overall quality of evidence was generated with online GRADEpro GDT software for primary and secondary outcomes. Result The umbrella review included nine systemic reviews and meta-analysis and one narrative review with eight thousand four hundred ninety one participants. The methodological quality of the included studies was moderate to high quality. The overall quality of evidence and recommendation varied form high to very low. Conclusion There is high to moderate quality evidence on the initiation of early low dose prolonged glucocorticoid for reduction of mortality for ARDS. However, randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes to address ventilator-free days, the incidence of infection and other glucocorticoid associated adverse events is required as the quality of evidence with these secondary outcomes were low to very low

scholarly journals Technology-assisted rehabilitation following total knee or hip replacement for people with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia Wang ◽  
David J. Hunter ◽  
Giovana Vesentini ◽  
Daniel Pozzobon ◽  
Manuela L. Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Functional Mobility ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Evaluation Approach

Abstract Background To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of technology-assisted rehabilitation following total hip/knee replacement (THR/TKR). Methods Six electronic databases were searched without language or time restrictions for relevant studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro); from inception to November 7th, 2018. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria to select eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of technology-based interventions, compared with usual care or no intervention for people undergoing THR/TKR. Two reviewers independently extracted trial details (e.g. patients’ profile, intervention, outcomes, attrition and adverse events). Study methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Quality of evidence was critically appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Results We identified 21 eligible studies assessing telerehabilitation, game- or web-based therapy. There were 17 studies (N = 2188) in post-TKR rehabilitation and 4 studies (N = 783) in post-THR rehabilitation. Compared to usual care, technology-based intervention was more effective in reducing pain (mean difference (MD): − 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): − 0.48, − 0.02; moderate evidence) and improving function measured with the timed up-and-go test (MD: -7.03; 95% CI: − 11.18, − 2.88) in people undergoing TKR. No between-group differences were observed in rates of hospital readmissions or treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in those studies. Conclusion There is moderate-quality of evidence showed technology-assisted rehabilitation, in particular, telerehabilitation, results in a statistically significant improvement in pain; and low-quality of evidence for the improvement in functional mobility in people undergoing TKR. The effects were however too small to be clinically significant. For THR, there is very limited low-quality evidence shows no significant effects.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of virtual reality technology on functional mobility of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Isabel Corregidor-Sánchez ◽  
Antonio Segura-Fragoso ◽  
Marta Rodríguez-Hernández ◽  
Concepción Jiménez-Rojas ◽  
Begoña Polonio-López ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Older Persons ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Mobility ◽  
Rapid Expansion ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Virtual Reality Technology ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Inverse Variance

Abstract Background The accessibility, versatility and motivation provided by virtual reality technology (VRT) have fostered its rapid expansion as a rehabilitation technique to improve functional mobility. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes using VRT, specific virtual reality technology (VRT-S) and non-specific virtual reality technology (VRT-NS), to improve functional mobility in individuals aged &gt;60 years versus conventional treatment (CT) or no intervention. Methods Nine databases (Cochrane Library, Scopus, PEDro, Medline, CSIC, Web of Science, OT Seeker, NGCH and CINAHL) were searched to identify randomised trials up to December 2019. Results of clinical trials that used VRT-S and VRT-NS in rehabilitation were combined, using a random effects model with inverse variance weighting of the studies. GRADE was used to assess the quality of evidence. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42019131630. Overall, there was moderate quality of evidence for the functional mobility results, which means that the estimate of effect is likely to change. Results Sixteen of the 18 studies selected (n = 568) provided data for the subgroup meta-analysis. VRT-NS was more effective in improving functional mobility than no intervention [standardised mean difference (SMD) = –1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) −1,91 to −0,14). VRT-NS was also more effective than CT in improving resistance in ambulation (SMD = −1.20; 95% CI –1.93 to 0.46). No significant differences were found between VRT-S and CT or no intervention. Programmes in which &gt;18 sessions were applied were more beneficial (SMD = −0.89; 95% CI –1.71 to –0.08; &lt;0.001) than programmes with ≤18 sessions (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI –0.51 to 0.59) versus no intervention. Conclusions Our results suggest that VRT is an effective intervention for improving functional mobility in older persons compared with CT. VRT-NS proved to be more effective than VRT-S. However, these results are still not conclusive due to the low methodological quality of the studies. Thus, new studies and analyses are required.

scholarly journals Interpositional Arthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0012
Author(s):  
James Butler ◽  
Yoshiharu Shimozono ◽  
Arianna L Gianakos ◽  
John G Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Interpositional Arthroplasty ◽  
The Mean

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is a common degenerative joint condition of the foot. In advanced stages of the disease, extensive procedures have been utilized including Keller arthroplasty, interpositional arthroplasty (IPA), arthrodesis, total joint replacement or synthetic cartilage replacement. IPA is a surgical procedure that attempts to maintain joint motion through insertion of a biologic spacer into the joint. However, there is still a paucity of overall clinical data regarding outcomes and complication rates following IPA procedure for the treatment of hallux rigidus.The purpose of the current study was to systematically review the outcomes of IPA in the treatment of hallux rigidus. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes collected and analysed included: AOFAS score, VAS score, SF36 score, range of motion, radiographic parameters, and postoperative complications. The level and quality of evidence were recorded and assessed. Results: Sixteen studies with a total of 433 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The mean AOFAS improved from 56.8±7.3 (range, 43.2-64.3) preoperatively to 84.0±6.7 (range, 71.6-90.0) postoperatively. The preoperative weighted mean total ROM was 37.7±16.2 degrees and the postoperative weighted mean total ROM was 60.3±13.4 degrees. Five studies examined joint space narrowing on plain radiographs. The mean preoperative joint space was 1.2±0.2 mm (range, 1 -1.5) and the mean postoperative joint space was 2.5±0.5 mm (range, 1.9-3). The complication rate was 18.2% with metatarsalgia as the most commonly reported complication. One study was Level III and 15 studies were Level IV. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates improvement in functional and ROM outcomes following IPA. The procedure however has a high complication rate. There is a low level and quality of evidence in the current literature with inconsistent reporting of data. Therefore, further well designed studies must be carried out to determine the efficacy of IPA in the treatment of hallux rigidus.

scholarly journals Overview of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for preoperative care: a systematic review.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agustín Ciapponi ◽  
Tapia-López Elena ◽  
Virgilio Sacha ◽  
Ariel Bardach
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Agree Ii ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Moderate Quality

Abstract Background Our aim was to summarize and compare relevant recommendations from evidence-based CPGs (EB-CPGs). Methods Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Data sources: PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Tripdatabase and additional sources. In July 2017, we searched CPGs that were published in the last 10 years, without language restrictions, in electronic databases, and also searched specific CPG sources, reference lists and consulted experts. Pairs of independent reviewers selected EB-CPGs and rated their methodological quality using the AGREE-II instrument. We summarized recommendations, its supporting evidence and strength of recommendations according to the GRADE methodology. Results We included 16 EB-CPGs out of 2262 references identified. Only nine of them had searches within the last five years and seven used GRADE. The median (percentile 25-75) AGREE-II scores for rigor of development was 49% (35-76%) and the domain ‘applicability’ obtained the worst score: 16% (9-31%). We summarized 31 risk stratification recommendations, 21.6% of which were supported by high/moderate quality of evidence (41% of them were strong recommendations), and 16 therapeutic/preventive recommendations, 59% of which were supported by high/moderate quality of evidence (75.7% strong). We found inconsistency in ratings of evidence level. ‘Guidelines’ applicability’ and ‘monitoring’ were the most deficient domains. Only half of the EB-CPGs were updated in the past five years. Conclusions We present many strong recommendations that are ready to be considered for implementation as well as others to be interrupted, and we reveal opportunities to improve guidelines’ quality.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Longdan Xiegan Decoction on the Treatment of Eczema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Ziteng Hu ◽  
Lidong Gao ◽  
Chengxian Li ◽  
Alberto Cucco ◽  
Shang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Total Effective Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
Quality Evidence

Background. Longdan Xiegan decoction (LDXGD) has been widely used in the treatment of eczema. In recent years, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LDXGD for the treatment of eczema have gradually increased. Most of the results show that LDXGD is effective in treating eczema. However, whether these conclusions are reliable or not requires meta-analysis. Objective. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of LDXGD in the treatment of eczema. Materials and Methods. Seven electronic databases, including PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature on Disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, and Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) were systematically searched from their inception until January 2021. Risk of bias was assessed using criteria from the Cochrane Collaboration and meta-analysis was conducted on the screened literature data using Review Manage (RevMan 5.3). Then, to assess the quality of evidence, the GRADE criteria was adopted. Results. 14 RCTs with 1080 participants were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that compared with western medicine (WM), the cure rate and the total effective rate of LDXGD in treating eczema were higher. Meanwhile, the recurrence rate and the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) after treatment were lower. The adverse reaction was reported in 5 out of 14 studies without significant statistical difference. According to GRADE criteria, the quality of evidence was low for all outcomes except for the cure rate (moderate-quality evidence) and the total effective rate (moderate-quality evidence). Conclusion. The clinical efficacy of LDXGD in the treatment of eczema was more effective compared with the one of conventional WM alone. However, due to the limitation of the quality of the included studies, additional studies are required to further confirm these results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document